Top

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Published in:

01-12-2007 | Orthopaedic Surgery

The effectiveness of the external distal aiming device in intramedullary fixation of tibial shaft fractures

Authors: George C. Babis, Ioannis S. Benetos, Aristides B. Zoubos, Panayotis N. Soucacos

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 10/2007

Abstract

Introduction

Intramedullary nailing has become a popular and effective procedure for the treatment of most fractures of the tibial diaphysis. However, distal interlocking screw placement under fluoroscopic control is responsible for the majority of the radiation exposure and a significant loss of surgical time in the entire nailing procedure. To limit fluoroscopy use, during distal interlocking screw placement, Orthofix^® has developed a distal targeting device which compensates for the inevitable deformation of the nail in the sagittal plane during its insertion. This prospective clinical study evaluates the efficacy of this distal targeting device for distal locking.

Materials and methods

One hundred and fifteen fresh tibial fractures in the same number of patients with a mean age of 37.5 years (17–85 years) were treated with operative stabilization using the Orthofix tibial nailing system.

Results

The mean duration of the operation was 38 min (20–55 min). A mean of four intra-operative plain X-rays (2–6 X-rays) were used in 103 cases to confirm guide wire placement, final nail insertion and accuracy of screws placement. The mean duration of the use of the image intensifier utilized in the remaining 12 fractures was 5 s (3–8 s). The distal targeting device failed in 12 (5.2%) distal locking screws.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that distal locking can be performed easily and successfully with minimal exposure to radiation, once the surgeon develops a reasonable experience with the use of this distal targeting device.

Abdlslam KM, Bonnaire F (2003) Experimental model for a new distal locking aiming device for solid intramedullary tibial nails. Injury 34:363–366PubMedCrossRef

Barry TP (1984) Radiation exposure to an orthopedic surgeon. Clin Orthop Relat Res 182:160–164PubMed

Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Khera V et al (2003) Operative management of lower extremity fractures in patients with head injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:187–198PubMedCrossRef

Blachut PA, O’Brien PJ, Meek RN, Broekhuyse HM (1997) Interlocking intramedullary nailing with and without reaming for the treatment of closed fractures of the tibial shaft A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg 79A(5):640–646

Court-Brown CM, Cristie J, Mc Qeen MM (1990) Closed intramedullary tibial nailing, its use in closed and type I open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 72B:605–611

Drosos GI, Bishay M, Karnezis IA, Alegakis AK (2006) Factors affecting fracture healing after intramedullary nailing of the tibial diaphysis for closed and grade I open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 88B(2):227–231

Gugala Z, Nana A, Lindsey RW (2001) Tibial intramedullary nail distal interlocking screw placement: comparison of the free-hand versus distally based targeting device techniques. Injury 32(S-D):21–25CrossRef

Gustillo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty five open fractures of long bones, retrospective and prospective analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 58A:453–458

Hudson I (1989) Locking nailing: an aid to distal targeting. Injury 20(3):129–130PubMedCrossRef

10.

Karachalios T, Babis G, Tsarouchas J et al (2000) The clinical performance of a small diameter tibial nailing system with a mechanical distal aiming device. Injury 31:451–459PubMedCrossRef

11.

Karladani AH, Granhed H, Edshage B et al (2000) Displaced tibial shaft fractures: a prospective randomized study of closed intramedullary nailing versus cast treatment in 53 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 71(2):160–167PubMedCrossRef

12.

Kelley SS, Bonar S, Hussamy OD, Morrison JA (1995) A simple technique for insertion of distal screws into interlocking nails. J Orthop Trauma 9(3):227–230PubMedCrossRef

13.

Krettek C, Konemann B, Mannes J et al (1996) Analysis of implantation-induced nail deformation and roentgen morphometric studies as the principle for an aiming device for distal interlocking nailing without roentgen image intensification. Unfallchirurg 99(9):671–678PubMedCrossRef

14.

Krettek C, Mannb J, Konemann B et al (1997) The deformation of small diameter solid tibial nails with unreamed intramedullary insertion. J Biomech 30(4):391–394PubMedCrossRef

15.

Krettek C, Konemann B, Miclau T et al (1997) A new technique for the distal locking of solid AO unreamed tibial nails. J Orthop Trauma 11(6):446–451PubMedCrossRef

16.

Krettek C, Mannb J, Miclau T et al (1998) Deformation of femoral nails with intramedullary insertion. J Orthop Res 16(5):572–575PubMedCrossRef

17.

Krettek C, Konemann B, Farouk O et al (1998) Experimental study of distal interlocking of a solid tibial nail: radiation-independent distal aiming device (DAD) versus freehand technique (FHT). J Orthop Trauma 12(6):373–378PubMedCrossRef

18.

Krettek C, Konemann B, Miclau T et al (1998) A new mechanical aiming device for the placement of distal interlocking screws in femoral nails. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117(3):147–152PubMedCrossRef

19.

Krettek C, Konemann B, Miclau T et al (1999) A mechanical distal aiming device for distal locking in femoral nails. Clin Orthop Relat Res 364:267–275PubMedCrossRef

20.

Levin PE, Schoen RW, Browner BD (1987) Radiation exposure to the surgeon during closed interlocking intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg 69A(5):761–766

21.

Madan S, Blakeway C (2002) Radiation exposure to surgeon and patient in intramedullary nailing of the lower limb. Injury 33:723–727PubMedCrossRef

22.

Mehlman CT, DiPasquale TG (1997) Radiation exposure to the orthopaedic surgical team during fluoroscopy: “how far away is far enough?”. J Orthop Trauma 11(6):392–398PubMedCrossRef

23.

Miller ME, Davis ML, MacClean CR et al (1983) Radiation exposure and associated risks to operating-room personnel during use of fluoroscopic guidance for selected orthopaedic surgical procedures. J Bone Joint Surg 65A(1):1–4

24.

Muller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J (1990) The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Springer, Heidelberg

25.

Muller LP, Suffner J, Wenda K et al (1998) Radiation exposure to the hands and the thyroid of the surgeon during intramedullary nailing. Injury 29(6):461–468PubMedCrossRef

26.

Obremskey WT, Medina M (2004) Comparison of intramedullary nailing of distal third tibial shaft fractures: before and after traumatologists. Orthopedics 27:1180–1184PubMed

27.

Pardiwala D, Prabhu V, Dudhniwala G, Katre R (2001) The AO distal locking aiming device: an evaluation of efficacy and learning curve. Injury 32:713–718PubMedCrossRef

28.

Penning D, Oppenheim W, Faccioli G, Rossi S (1997) Intramedullary locked nailing of femur and tibia: insertion of distal locking screws without image intensifier. Injury 28:323–326CrossRef

29.

Riley SA (1989) Radiation exposure from fluoroscopy during orthopedic surgical procedures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:257–260PubMed

30.

Sanders R, Koval KJ, DiPasquale T et al (1993) Exposure of the orthopaedic surgeon to radiation. J Bone Joint Surg 75A(3):326–330

31.

Skjeldal S, Backe S (1987) Interlocking medullary nails-radiation doses in distal targeting. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 106(3):179–181PubMedCrossRef

32.

Sugarman ID, Adam I, Bunker TD (1988) Radiation dosage during AO locking femoral nailing. Injury 19(5):336–338PubMedCrossRef

33.

Watson T (1994) Treatment of unstable fractures of the shaft of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg 76A:1575–1584

34.

Weller S (1993) Internal fixation of fractures by intramedullary nailing Introduction, historical review and present status. Injury 24(S3):1–3CrossRef

35.

Whatling GM, Nokes LDM (2006) Literature review of current techniques for the insertion of distal screws into intramedullary locking nails. Injury 37(2):109–119PubMedCrossRef

36.

Whittle AP, Russel TA, Taylor JC, La Velle DG (1992) Treatment of open fractures of the tibial shaft with the use of interlocking nailing without reaming. J Bone Joint Surg 74A:1162–1171

Title: The effectiveness of the external distal aiming device in intramedullary fixation of tibial shaft fractures
Authors: George C. Babis
Ioannis S. Benetos
Aristides B. Zoubos
Panayotis N. Soucacos
Publication date: 01-12-2007
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 10/2007
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0405-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The effectiveness of the external distal aiming device in intramedullary fixation of tibial shaft fractures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2007

Dislocation of the elbow with fractures of the coronoid process and radial head

How to prevent overlooking cervical spine injuries: pitfalls in spinal diagnostics

Osteoid osteoma with a multicentric nidus: a case report and review of the literature

Trochanteric fractures in the elderly: the influence of primary hip arthroplasty on 1-year mortality

Angular and sliding stable antegrade nailing (Targon PH) for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures

The effect of high and low pressure pulsatile lavage on soft tissue and cortical blood flow: a canine segmental humerus fracture model