Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 4/2016

01-04-2016 | Clinical Investigation

The Effect of Stent Cell Geometry on Carotid Stenting Outcomes

Authors: Burcu Alparslan, Omer Fatih Nas, Ulku Turpcu Eritmen, Selcen Duran, Guven Ozkaya, Bahattin Hakyemez

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of stent cell geometry on midterm results of carotid artery stenting (CAS).

Materials and Method

One hundred fifty-five patients underwent CAS between February 2010 and December 2012. Ninety-one open- and 84 closed-cell stents were used in this non-randomized, retrospective study. Periprocedural complications were defined as the ones happened during the procedure or within 30 days afterwards. Starting from the 6th month after the procedure, in-stent restenosis was detected with multidetector computed tomography angiography and classified into four groups from focal restenosis to occlusion.

Results

Eleven complications were encountered in the periprocedural period (four on the open- and seven on the closed-cell group). Total complication rate was 6.3 % (11/175). No significant difference was detected in terms of periprocedural complications between two groups (p = 0.643). There was statistically significant difference between stent design groups in regard to radiological findings (p = 0.002). Sixteen of open-cell stents and three of closed-cell stents had focal restenosis. One closed-cell stent had diffuse proliferative restenosis and one open-cell stent had total occlusion.

Conclusion

In-stent restenosis was more common in open-cell stent group, which have larger free cell area than closed-cell stents. Although our radiologic findings promote us to use closed-cell design if ‘possible’, no difference was detected in terms of clinical outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bosiers M, de Donato G, Deloose K, Verbist J, Peeters P, Castriota F, Cremonesi A, Setacci C. Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33:135–41.CrossRefPubMed Bosiers M, de Donato G, Deloose K, Verbist J, Peeters P, Castriota F, Cremonesi A, Setacci C. Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33:135–41.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hernández-Fernández F, Parrilla G, García-Villalba B, Espinosa de Rueda M, Zamarro J, Garrote M, Moreno A. Comparison between proximal versus distal protection devices in 287 cases of carotid revascularization using angioplasty and stenting: periprocedure complications, morbidity, and mortality. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37:639–45.CrossRef Hernández-Fernández F, Parrilla G, García-Villalba B, Espinosa de Rueda M, Zamarro J, Garrote M, Moreno A. Comparison between proximal versus distal protection devices in 287 cases of carotid revascularization using angioplasty and stenting: periprocedure complications, morbidity, and mortality. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37:639–45.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goode SD, Cleveland TJ, Gaines PA. United Kingdom carotid artery stent registry: short- and long-term outcomes. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2013;36:1221–31.CrossRef Goode SD, Cleveland TJ, Gaines PA. United Kingdom carotid artery stent registry: short- and long-term outcomes. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2013;36:1221–31.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Müller-Hülsbeck S, Schäfer PJ, Charalambous N, Schaffner SR, Heller M, Jahnke T. Comparison of carotid stents: an in vitro experiment focusing on stent design. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:168–77.CrossRefPubMed Müller-Hülsbeck S, Schäfer PJ, Charalambous N, Schaffner SR, Heller M, Jahnke T. Comparison of carotid stents: an in vitro experiment focusing on stent design. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:168–77.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Spies C, Doshi R, Spoon J, Snell RJ. Carotid artery stent type influences duplex ultrasonography derived peak systolic velocity: findings of an in-vitromodel. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;70:309–15.CrossRefPubMed Spies C, Doshi R, Spoon J, Snell RJ. Carotid artery stent type influences duplex ultrasonography derived peak systolic velocity: findings of an in-vitromodel. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;70:309–15.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hussain HG, Aparajita R, Khan SZ, Rezayat C, McKinsey JF, Dayal R. Closed-cell stents present with higher velocities on duplex ultrasound compared with open-cell stents after carotid intervention: short- and mid-term results. Ann Vasc Surg. 2011;25:55–63.CrossRefPubMed Hussain HG, Aparajita R, Khan SZ, Rezayat C, McKinsey JF, Dayal R. Closed-cell stents present with higher velocities on duplex ultrasound compared with open-cell stents after carotid intervention: short- and mid-term results. Ann Vasc Surg. 2011;25:55–63.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pierce DS, Rosero EB, Modrall JG, Adams-Huet B, Valentine RJ, Clagett GP, Timaran CH. Open-cell versus closed-cell stent design differences in blood flow velocities after carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:602–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pierce DS, Rosero EB, Modrall JG, Adams-Huet B, Valentine RJ, Clagett GP, Timaran CH. Open-cell versus closed-cell stent design differences in blood flow velocities after carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:602–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Stone GW, Leon MB. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation. 1999;100:1872–8.CrossRefPubMed Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Stone GW, Leon MB. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation. 1999;100:1872–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hart JP, Peeters P, Verbist J, Deloose K, Bosiers M. Do device characteristics impact outcome in carotid artery stenting? J VascSurg. 2006;44:725–30. Hart JP, Peeters P, Verbist J, Deloose K, Bosiers M. Do device characteristics impact outcome in carotid artery stenting? J VascSurg. 2006;44:725–30.
10.
go back to reference Reiff T, Amiri H, Rohde S, Hacke W, Ringleb PA. Statins reduce peri-procedural complications in carotid stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:626–32.CrossRefPubMed Reiff T, Amiri H, Rohde S, Hacke W, Ringleb PA. Statins reduce peri-procedural complications in carotid stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:626–32.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tadros RO, Vouyouka AG, Chung C, Malik RK, Krishnan P, Ellozy SH, Marin ML, Faries PL. The effect of statin use on embolic potential during carotid angioplasty and stenting. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013;27:96–103.CrossRefPubMed Tadros RO, Vouyouka AG, Chung C, Malik RK, Krishnan P, Ellozy SH, Marin ML, Faries PL. The effect of statin use on embolic potential during carotid angioplasty and stenting. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013;27:96–103.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Takayama K, Taki W, Toma N, Nakahara I, Maeda M, Tanemura H, Kuroiwa T, Imai K, Sakamoto M, Nakagawa I, Masuo O, Myouchin K, Wada T, Suzuki H. Effect of pitavastatin on preventing ischemic complications with carotid artery stenting: a multicenter prospective study–EPOCH-CAS study. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37:1436–43.CrossRef Takayama K, Taki W, Toma N, Nakahara I, Maeda M, Tanemura H, Kuroiwa T, Imai K, Sakamoto M, Nakagawa I, Masuo O, Myouchin K, Wada T, Suzuki H. Effect of pitavastatin on preventing ischemic complications with carotid artery stenting: a multicenter prospective study–EPOCH-CAS study. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37:1436–43.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pizzolato R, Hirsch JA, Romero JM. Imaging challenges of carotid artery in-stent restenosis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:32–41.CrossRefPubMed Pizzolato R, Hirsch JA, Romero JM. Imaging challenges of carotid artery in-stent restenosis. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:32–41.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wasser K, Schnaudigel S, Wohlfahrt J, Psychogios MN, Knauth M, Gröschel K. Inflammation and in-stent restenosis: the role of serum markers and stent characteristics in carotid artery stenting. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22683.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wasser K, Schnaudigel S, Wohlfahrt J, Psychogios MN, Knauth M, Gröschel K. Inflammation and in-stent restenosis: the role of serum markers and stent characteristics in carotid artery stenting. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22683.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference de Donato G, Setacci C, Deloose K, Peeters P, Cremonesi A, Bosiers M. Long-term results of carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:1431–40.CrossRefPubMed de Donato G, Setacci C, Deloose K, Peeters P, Cremonesi A, Bosiers M. Long-term results of carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:1431–40.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Maleux G, Marrannes J, Heye S, Daenens K, Verhamme P, Thijs V. Outcome of carotid artery stenting at 2 years follow-up: comparison of nitinol open cell versus stainless steel closed cell stent design. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;50:669–75. Maleux G, Marrannes J, Heye S, Daenens K, Verhamme P, Thijs V. Outcome of carotid artery stenting at 2 years follow-up: comparison of nitinol open cell versus stainless steel closed cell stent design. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;50:669–75.
17.
go back to reference Hart JP, Bosiers M, Deloose K, Uflacker R, Schönholz CJ. Impact of stent design on the outcome of intervention for carotid bifurcation stenosis. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;51:799–806. Hart JP, Bosiers M, Deloose K, Uflacker R, Schönholz CJ. Impact of stent design on the outcome of intervention for carotid bifurcation stenosis. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;51:799–806.
18.
go back to reference Nolz R, Wibmer A, Beitzke D, Gentzsch S, Willfort-Ehringer A, Lammer J, Thurnher M, Schoder M. Carotid artery stenting and follow-up: value of 64-MSCT angiography as complementary imaging method to color-coded duplex sonography. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:89–94.CrossRefPubMed Nolz R, Wibmer A, Beitzke D, Gentzsch S, Willfort-Ehringer A, Lammer J, Thurnher M, Schoder M. Carotid artery stenting and follow-up: value of 64-MSCT angiography as complementary imaging method to color-coded duplex sonography. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:89–94.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lettau M, Kotter E, Bendszus M, Hähnel S. Carotid artery stents on CT angiography: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using 16-, 64- and 320-row CT scanners. J Neuroradiol. 2014;41:259–68.CrossRefPubMed Lettau M, Kotter E, Bendszus M, Hähnel S. Carotid artery stents on CT angiography: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes using 16-, 64- and 320-row CT scanners. J Neuroradiol. 2014;41:259–68.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Effect of Stent Cell Geometry on Carotid Stenting Outcomes
Authors
Burcu Alparslan
Omer Fatih Nas
Ulku Turpcu Eritmen
Selcen Duran
Guven Ozkaya
Bahattin Hakyemez
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1211-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 4/2016 Go to the issue