Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 1/2007

01-03-2007

The Effect of Gaussian Noise on the Threshold, Dynamic Range, and Loudness of Analogue Cochlear Implant Stimuli

Authors: Robert P. Morse, Peter F. Morse, Terry B. Nunn, Karen A. M. Archer, Patrick Boyle

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

The deliberate addition of Gaussian noise to cochlear implant signals has previously been proposed to enhance the time coding of signals by the cochlear nerve. Potentially, the addition of an inaudible level of noise could also have secondary benefits: it could lower the threshold to the information-bearing signal, and by desynchronization of nerve discharges, it could increase the level at which the information-bearing signal becomes uncomfortable. Both these effects would lead to an increased dynamic range, which might be expected to enhance speech comprehension and make the choice of cochlear implant compression parameters less critical (as with a wider dynamic range, small changes in the parameters would have less effect on loudness). The hypothesized secondary effects were investigated with eight users of the Clarion cochlear implant; the stimulation was analogue and monopolar. For presentations in noise, noise at 95% of the threshold level was applied simultaneously and independently to all the electrodes. The noise was found in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) experiments to decrease the threshold to sinusoidal stimuli (100 Hz, 1 kHz, 5 kHz) by about 2.0 dB and increase the dynamic range by 0.7 dB. Furthermore, in 2AFC loudness balance experiments, noise was found to decrease the loudness of moderate to intense stimuli. This suggests that loudness is partially coded by the degree of phase-locking of cochlear nerve fibers. The overall gain in dynamic range was modest, and more complex noise strategies, for example, using inhibition between the noise sources, may be required to get a clinically useful benefit.
Literature
go back to reference Benham SE, Zeng F-G. Noise improves suprathreshold discrimination in cochlear implant listeners. Hear. Res. 186:91–93, 2003.CrossRef Benham SE, Zeng F-G. Noise improves suprathreshold discrimination in cochlear implant listeners. Hear. Res. 186:91–93, 2003.CrossRef
go back to reference Boothroyd A, Erickson A, Medwetsky L. The hearing aid input: a phonemic approach to assessing the spectral distribution of speech. Ear Hear. 15:432–442, 1994.PubMedCrossRef Boothroyd A, Erickson A, Medwetsky L. The hearing aid input: a phonemic approach to assessing the spectral distribution of speech. Ear Hear. 15:432–442, 1994.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bornstein SP, Musiek FE. Loudness discomfort level and reliability as a function of instructional set. Scand. Audiol. 22:125–131, 1993.PubMed Bornstein SP, Musiek FE. Loudness discomfort level and reliability as a function of instructional set. Scand. Audiol. 22:125–131, 1993.PubMed
go back to reference Box GEP, Muller MA. A note on the generation of random normal deviates. Ann. Math. Stat. 29:610, 1958. Box GEP, Muller MA. A note on the generation of random normal deviates. Ann. Math. Stat. 29:610, 1958.
go back to reference Carlyon RP, Moore BCJ. Intensity discrimination: a severe departure from Weber’s Law. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76:1369–1376, 1984.PubMedCrossRef Carlyon RP, Moore BCJ. Intensity discrimination: a severe departure from Weber’s Law. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76:1369–1376, 1984.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Chatterjee M, Oba SI. Noise improves modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners at moderate carrier levels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118:993–1002, 2005.PubMedCrossRef Chatterjee M, Oba SI. Noise improves modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners at moderate carrier levels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118:993–1002, 2005.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Chatterjee M, Robert ME. Noise enhances modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant listeners: stochastic resonance in a prosthetic sensory system? JARO 2:159–171, 2001.PubMed Chatterjee M, Robert ME. Noise enhances modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant listeners: stochastic resonance in a prosthetic sensory system? JARO 2:159–171, 2001.PubMed
go back to reference Cox RM, Matesich JS, Moore JN. Distributions of short-term rms levels in conversational speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84:1100–1104, 1988.PubMedCrossRef Cox RM, Matesich JS, Moore JN. Distributions of short-term rms levels in conversational speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84:1100–1104, 1988.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dynes SBC, Delgutte B. Phase-locking of auditory nerve discharges to sinusoidal electric stimulation of the cochlea. Hear. Res. 58:79–90, 1992.PubMedCrossRef Dynes SBC, Delgutte B. Phase-locking of auditory nerve discharges to sinusoidal electric stimulation of the cochlea. Hear. Res. 58:79–90, 1992.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Eddington DK, Dobelle WH, Brackmann DE, Mladejovsky MG, Parkin JL. Auditory prosthesis research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 87:5–39, 1978. Eddington DK, Dobelle WH, Brackmann DE, Mladejovsky MG, Parkin JL. Auditory prosthesis research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 87:5–39, 1978.
go back to reference Gammaitoni L, HÄnggi P, Marchesoni F. Stochastic resonance. Rev. Mod. Phys. 70:223–287, 1998.CrossRef Gammaitoni L, HÄnggi P, Marchesoni F. Stochastic resonance. Rev. Mod. Phys. 70:223–287, 1998.CrossRef
go back to reference Gockel H, Moore BCJ, Patterson RD, Meddis R. Louder sounds can produce less forward masking: effects of component phase in complex tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:978–990, 2003.PubMedCrossRef Gockel H, Moore BCJ, Patterson RD, Meddis R. Louder sounds can produce less forward masking: effects of component phase in complex tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:978–990, 2003.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hartmann R, Klinke R. Response patterns of nerve fibres to patterned electrical stimulation. In: Miller JJ and Spelman FA (eds) Cochlear implants: models of the electrically stimulated ear. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 135–160, 1990. Hartmann R, Klinke R. Response patterns of nerve fibres to patterned electrical stimulation. In: Miller JJ and Spelman FA (eds) Cochlear implants: models of the electrically stimulated ear. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 135–160, 1990.
go back to reference Hartmann R, Topp G, Klinke R. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibres with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear. Res. 13:47–62, 1984.PubMedCrossRef Hartmann R, Topp G, Klinke R. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibres with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear. Res. 13:47–62, 1984.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, Burian K, Fischer RE. Four years experience with cochlear prostheses. Med. Prog. Technol. 8:107–119, 1981.PubMed Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, Burian K, Fischer RE. Four years experience with cochlear prostheses. Med. Prog. Technol. 8:107–119, 1981.PubMed
go back to reference Hong RS, Rubinstein JT. High-rate conditioning pulse trains in cochlear implants: dynamic range measures with sinusoidal stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:3327–3342, 2003.PubMedCrossRef Hong RS, Rubinstein JT. High-rate conditioning pulse trains in cochlear implants: dynamic range measures with sinusoidal stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:3327–3342, 2003.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hong RS, Rubinstein JT, Horn D. Dynamic range enhancement for cochlear implants. Otol. Neurotol. 24:590–595, 2003.PubMedCrossRef Hong RS, Rubinstein JT, Horn D. Dynamic range enhancement for cochlear implants. Otol. Neurotol. 24:590–595, 2003.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Johnson DH, Kiang NYS. Analysis of discharges recorded simultaneously from pairs of auditory nerve fibres. Biophys J. 16:719–734, 1976.PubMedCrossRef Johnson DH, Kiang NYS. Analysis of discharges recorded simultaneously from pairs of auditory nerve fibres. Biophys J. 16:719–734, 1976.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kessler DK. The Clarion multistrategy cochlear implant. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 108:8–16, 1999. Kessler DK. The Clarion multistrategy cochlear implant. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 108:8–16, 1999.
go back to reference Kiang NYS. Discharge patterns of single fibres in the cat’s auditory cortex. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1965. Kiang NYS. Discharge patterns of single fibres in the cat’s auditory cortex. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1965.
go back to reference Litvak L, Delgutte B, Eddington D. Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:2066–2078, 2003.PubMedCrossRef Litvak L, Delgutte B, Eddington D. Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:2066–2078, 2003.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Loizou PC. Mimicking the human ear. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 15:101–130, 1998.CrossRef Loizou PC. Mimicking the human ear. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 15:101–130, 1998.CrossRef
go back to reference Loizou PC. Signal-processing techniques for cochlear implants—a review of progress in deriving electrical stimuli from the speech signal. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 18:34–46, 1999.PubMedCrossRef Loizou PC. Signal-processing techniques for cochlear implants—a review of progress in deriving electrical stimuli from the speech signal. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 18:34–46, 1999.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Loizou PC, Dorman M, Fitzke J. The effect of reduced dynamic range on speech understanding: implications for patients with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 21:25–31, 2000.PubMedCrossRef Loizou PC, Dorman M, Fitzke J. The effect of reduced dynamic range on speech understanding: implications for patients with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 21:25–31, 2000.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference McDonnell MD, Stocks NG, Pearce CEM, Abbott D. Optimal information transmission in nonlinear arrays through suprathreshold stochastic resonance. Phys. Lett. A. 352:183–189, 2006.CrossRef McDonnell MD, Stocks NG, Pearce CEM, Abbott D. Optimal information transmission in nonlinear arrays through suprathreshold stochastic resonance. Phys. Lett. A. 352:183–189, 2006.CrossRef
go back to reference Michelson RP. Electrical stimulation of the human cochlea. Arch. Otol. 93:317–323, 1971. Michelson RP. Electrical stimulation of the human cochlea. Arch. Otol. 93:317–323, 1971.
go back to reference Moore BCJ, Peters RW. Detection of increments and decrements in sinusoids as a function of frequency, increment, and decrement duration and pedestal duration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:2954–2965, 1997.PubMedCrossRef Moore BCJ, Peters RW. Detection of increments and decrements in sinusoids as a function of frequency, increment, and decrement duration and pedestal duration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:2954–2965, 1997.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Baer T. A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 45:224–240, 1997. Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Baer T. A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 45:224–240, 1997.
go back to reference Morse RP, Evans EF. Enhancement of vowel coding for cochlear implants by addition of noise. Nat. Med. 2:928–932, 1996.PubMedCrossRef Morse RP, Evans EF. Enhancement of vowel coding for cochlear implants by addition of noise. Nat. Med. 2:928–932, 1996.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Morse RP, Evans EF. Additive noise can enhance temporal coding in a computational model of analogue cochlear implant stimulation. Hear. Res. 133:107–119, 1999.PubMedCrossRef Morse RP, Evans EF. Additive noise can enhance temporal coding in a computational model of analogue cochlear implant stimulation. Hear. Res. 133:107–119, 1999.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Morse RP, Meyer GF. The practical use of noise to improve speech coding by analogue cochlear implants. Chaos Soliton Fract. 11:1885–1894, 2000.CrossRef Morse RP, Meyer GF. The practical use of noise to improve speech coding by analogue cochlear implants. Chaos Soliton Fract. 11:1885–1894, 2000.CrossRef
go back to reference Morse RP, Meyer GF, Evans EF, Archer K, Nunn T, Boyle P. The response of the cochlear nerve in the deafened ear to electrical stimulation: the potential benefits of noise. 3rd International Symposium on Electronic Implants in Otology and Conventional Hearing Aids, Birmingham, UK, 2000. Morse RP, Meyer GF, Evans EF, Archer K, Nunn T, Boyle P. The response of the cochlear nerve in the deafened ear to electrical stimulation: the potential benefits of noise. 3rd International Symposium on Electronic Implants in Otology and Conventional Hearing Aids, Birmingham, UK, 2000.
go back to reference Pfingst BE. Comparisons of psychophysical and neurophysiological studies of cochlear implants. Hear. Res. 34:243–252, 1988.PubMedCrossRef Pfingst BE. Comparisons of psychophysical and neurophysiological studies of cochlear implants. Hear. Res. 34:243–252, 1988.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rubinstein JT, Wilson BS, Finley CC, Abbas P. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibres with electrical stimulation. Hear. Res. 127:108–118, 1999.PubMedCrossRef Rubinstein JT, Wilson BS, Finley CC, Abbas P. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibres with electrical stimulation. Hear. Res. 127:108–118, 1999.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Runge-Samuelson CL, Firszt JB, Gaggl W, Wackym PA. Effects of high-rate pulse trains on intensity discrimination. ARO Midwinter Meeting, Daytona, USA, 2004. Runge-Samuelson CL, Firszt JB, Gaggl W, Wackym PA. Effects of high-rate pulse trains on intensity discrimination. ARO Midwinter Meeting, Daytona, USA, 2004.
go back to reference Shannon RV. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear. Res. 11:157–189, 1983.PubMedCrossRef Shannon RV. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear. Res. 11:157–189, 1983.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shepherd RK, Javel E. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological response with cochlear status. Hear. Res. 108:112–144, 1997.PubMedCrossRef Shepherd RK, Javel E. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological response with cochlear status. Hear. Res. 108:112–144, 1997.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stevens SS. Calculation of the loudness of complex noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 28:807–832, 1956.CrossRef Stevens SS. Calculation of the loudness of complex noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 28:807–832, 1956.CrossRef
go back to reference Stocks NG. Suprathreshold stochastic resonance in multilevel threshold systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84:2310–2313, 2000.PubMedCrossRef Stocks NG. Suprathreshold stochastic resonance in multilevel threshold systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84:2310–2313, 2000.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stocks NG. Information transmission in parallel arrays of threshold elements: suprathreshold stochastic resonance. Phys. Rev. E. 63:1–11, 2001.CrossRef Stocks NG. Information transmission in parallel arrays of threshold elements: suprathreshold stochastic resonance. Phys. Rev. E. 63:1–11, 2001.CrossRef
go back to reference Stocks NG, Stein ND, Short H, McClintock PVE, Mannella R, Luchinsky DG, Dykman MI. Noise induced linearization and delinearization. In: Millonas M (ed) Fluctuations and Order: the New Synthesis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1996. Stocks NG, Stein ND, Short H, McClintock PVE, Mannella R, Luchinsky DG, Dykman MI. Noise induced linearization and delinearization. In: Millonas M (ed) Fluctuations and Order: the New Synthesis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1996.
go back to reference Stocks NG, Allingham D, Morse RP. The application of suprathreshold stochastic resonance to cochlear implant coding. Fluct. Noise Lett. 2:L169–L181, 2002.CrossRef Stocks NG, Allingham D, Morse RP. The application of suprathreshold stochastic resonance to cochlear implant coding. Fluct. Noise Lett. 2:L169–L181, 2002.CrossRef
go back to reference Summerfield Q. Speech processing alternatives for electrical auditory stimulation. In: Schindler RA and Merzenich MM (eds) Cochlear Implants. Raven Press, New York, pp. 195–222, 1985. Summerfield Q. Speech processing alternatives for electrical auditory stimulation. In: Schindler RA and Merzenich MM (eds) Cochlear Implants. Raven Press, New York, pp. 195–222, 1985.
go back to reference Taylor MM, Creelman CD. PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 41:782–787, 1967.CrossRef Taylor MM, Creelman CD. PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 41:782–787, 1967.CrossRef
go back to reference Wiesenfeld K, Moss F. Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDS. Nature. 373:33–36, 1995.PubMedCrossRef Wiesenfeld K, Moss F. Stochastic resonance and the benefits of noise: from ice ages to crayfish and SQUIDS. Nature. 373:33–36, 1995.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Winer BJ. Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw Hill, New York, 1971. Winer BJ. Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw Hill, New York, 1971.
go back to reference Wright HN. Auditory adaptation in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31:1004–1012, 1959.CrossRef Wright HN. Auditory adaptation in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31:1004–1012, 1959.CrossRef
go back to reference Wygonski JJ, Lee J, Faltys M, Shannon RV. Configurable speech strategy implementation using the Clarion Research Interface. Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Asilomar, USA, 1999. Wygonski JJ, Lee J, Faltys M, Shannon RV. Configurable speech strategy implementation using the Clarion Research Interface. Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Asilomar, USA, 1999.
go back to reference Zeng F-G, Galvin J. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear. 20:60–74, 1999.PubMedCrossRef Zeng F-G, Galvin J. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear. 20:60–74, 1999.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zeng F-G, Grant G, Niparko J, Galvin J, Shannon R, Opie J, Segel P. Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111:377–386, 2002.PubMedCrossRef Zeng F-G, Grant G, Niparko J, Galvin J, Shannon R, Opie J, Segel P. Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111:377–386, 2002.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zwicker E, Flottorp G, Stevens SS. Critical bandwidth in loudness summation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29:548–557, 1957.CrossRef Zwicker E, Flottorp G, Stevens SS. Critical bandwidth in loudness summation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29:548–557, 1957.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Effect of Gaussian Noise on the Threshold, Dynamic Range, and Loudness of Analogue Cochlear Implant Stimuli
Authors
Robert P. Morse
Peter F. Morse
Terry B. Nunn
Karen A. M. Archer
Patrick Boyle
Publication date
01-03-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 1/2007
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-006-0064-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 1/2007 Go to the issue