Top

Odontology

Published in:

29-11-2022 | Original Article

The effect of external magnetic field on osteogenic and antimicrobial behaviour of surface-functionalized custom titanium chamber with iron nanoparticles. A preliminary research

Authors: Santosh Nelogi, Anand Kumar Patil, Ramesh Chowdhary

Published in: Odontology | Issue 3/2023

Abstract

Purpose

The controlled responsive characteristics of iron nanoparticles (FeNp) in magnetic fields make them an attractive prospect in this field. In the presence of a magnetic field, FeNp can significantly impact cell behaviour, leading to breakthroughs in nanotechnology.

Aim/hypothesis

The aim is to determine the possible applications of iron nano particles (FeNp), and induced magnetic exposure role in osteoconduction and antibacterial activity.

Materials and methods

The custom-grade IV titanium (Ti)hollow chamber is fabricated, surface treated with FeNp. Each titanium chamber contained neodymium, iron, and boron magnet disc, and the effect of FeNp on osteoblast-like cells (MG63) was evaluated in terms of cell attachment and survivability, morphological characteristics, particle absorption, and antibacterial properties. The effects of cellular uptake of FeNp and their responses to subcellular thrust were studied using fluorescent microscopy. MTT was used to determine cell viability, and von Kossa histochemical staining was used to determine matrix mineralization.

Results

In the magnetized Ti chambers group, osteogenic activity and mineralization were considerably greater than in the control groups (p 0.05). With a p value of 0.027, the S. aureus and E. coli were resistant to the antibacterial properties of the FeNp modified titanium custom Ti chamber (MIC: 0.03135 mg/mL and 0.02915 mg/mL, respectively).

Conclusion

The one-of-a-kind, in vitro, conveniently modelled, limited sample study sheds light on the effect of surface-functionalized titanium custom Ti chamber with FeNp on MG63. The use of magnetized FeNp-surfaced implants for long-term strategic bone tissue engineering and bacteriostatic implants.

Tengvall P, Lundström I. Physico-chemical considerations of titanium as a biomaterial. Clin Mater. 1992;9:115–34.CrossRefPubMed

Stanford CM. Surface modifications of dental implants. Aust Dent J. 2008;53:S26–33.CrossRefPubMed

Parekh RB, Shetty O, Tabassum R. Surface modifications of endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Implantol Clin Res. 2012;3:116–21.CrossRef

Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Faggion CM Jr, Duncan WJ. The frequency of peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2013;84:1586–98.PubMed

Tiwari PM. Functionalized gold nanoparticles and their biomedical applications. Nanomaterials. 2011;1:31–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Boisselier E, Astruc D. Gold nanoparticles in nanomedicine: preparations, imaging, diagnostics, therapies and toxicity. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:1759–82.CrossRefPubMed

Zeng XB, Hu H, Xie LQ, Lan F, Jiang W, Wu Y, et al. Magnetic responsive hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds construction for bone defect reparation. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:3365–78.CrossRef

Wang H, Zhao SC, Zhou J, Zhu KP, Cui X, Huang WH, et al. Biocompatibility and osteogenic capacity of borosilicate bioactive glass scaffolds loaded with Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:4377–87.CrossRefPubMed

Dashcam K, Perez RA, Singh RK, Lee EJ, Kim HW. Hybrid magnetic scaffolds of gelatin–siloxane incorporated with magnetite nanoparticles effective for bone tissue engineering. RSC Adv. 2014;4:40841–51.CrossRef

10.

Meng J, Zhang Y, Qi X, Kong H, Wang C, Xu Z, et al. Paramagnetic nanofibrous composite films enhance the osteogenic responses of pre-osteoblast cells. Nanoscale. 2010;2:2565–9.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Burke L, Mortimer CJ, Curtis DJ, Lewis AR, Williams R, Hawkins K, et al. Insitusynthesis of magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticle-nanofibre composites using electrospinning. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;70:512–9.CrossRef

12.

Meng J, Xiao B, Zhang Y, Liu J, Xue H, Lei J, et al. Super-paramagnetic responsive nanofibrous scaffolds under static magnetic field enhance osteogenesis for bone repair in vivo. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Yamamoto Y, Ohsaki Y, Goto T, Nakashima A, Iijima T. Effects of static magnetic fields on bone formation in rat osteoblast cultures. J Dent Res. 2003;82:962–6.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Fini M, Cadossi R, Canè V, Cavani F, Giavaresi G, Krajewski A, et al. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on the osteointegration of hydroxyapatite implants in cancellous bone: a morphologic and microstructural in vivo study. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:756–63.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Yuge L, Okubo A, Miyashita T, Kumagai T, Nikawa T, Takeda S, et al. Physical stress by magnetic force accelerates differentiation of human osteoblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;311:32–8.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Zhang J, Ding C, Ren L, Zhou Y, Shang P. The effects of static magnetic fields on bone. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2014;2014:146–52.CrossRef

17.

Yuan J, Xin F, Jiang W. Underlying signaling pathways and therapeutic applications of pulsed electromagnetic fields in bone repair. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;46:1581–94.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Riley MA, Walmsley AD, Harris IR. Magnets in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:137–42.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Rosen AD. Mechanism of action of moderate-intensity static magnetic fields on biological systems. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2003;39:163–73.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Ba X, Hadjiargyrou M, DiMasi E, Meng Y, Simon M, Tan Z, et al. The role of moderate static magnetic fields on biomineralization of osteoblasts on sulfonated polystyrene films. Biomaterials. 2011;32:7831–8.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Hsu SH, Chang JC. The static magnetic field accelerates the osteogenic differentiation and mineralization of dental pulp cells. Cytotechnology. 2010;62:143–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Richert L, Lavalle P, Payan E, Shu XZ, Prestwich GD, et al. Layer by layer buildup of polysaccharide films: physical chemistry and cellular adhesion aspects. Langmuir. 2004;20:448–58.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Zhang X, Liu X, Pan L, et al. Magnetic fields at extremely low-frequency (50 Hz, 0.8 mT) can induce the uptake of intracellular calcium levels in osteoblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;396(3):662–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.154.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Pounder NM, Harrison AJ. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound for fracture healing: a review of the clinical evidence and the associated biological mechanism of action. Ultrasonics. 2008;48(4):330–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2008.02.005.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Otter MW, Mcleod KJ, Rubin CT. Effects of electromagnetic fields in experimental fracture repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355S(355 Suppl):90–104.CrossRef

26.

Jiang P, Zhang Y, Zhu C, Zhang W, Mao Z, Gao C. Fe3O4/BSA particles induce osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells under static magnetic field. Acta Biomater. 2016;46:141–50.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Marędziak M, Marycz K, Lewandowski D, Siudzińska A, Śmieszek A. Static magnetic field enhances synthesis and secretion of membrane-derived microvesicles (MVs) rich in VEGF and BMP-2 in equine adipose-derived stromal cells (EqASCs)-a new approach in veterinary regenerative medicine. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2015;51(3):230–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-014-9828-0.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Xia Y, Chen H, Zhang F, Wang L, Chen B, Reynolds MA, et al. Injectable calcium phosphate scaffold with iron oxide nanoparticles to enhance osteogenesis via dental pulp stem cells. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46:423–33.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Kim M-O, Jung H, Kim S-C, Park J-K, Seo Y-K. Electromagnetic fields and nanomagnetic particles increase the osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Med. 2015;35(1):153–60. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2014.1978.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Liu YK, Uemura T, Nemoto A, et al. Osteopontin involvement in integrin-mediated cell signaling and regulation of expression of alkaline phosphatase during early differentiation of UMR cells. FEBS Lett. 1997;420(1):112–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-5793(97)01498-145.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Hu H, Jiang W, Lan F, Zeng X, Ma S, Wu Y, et al. Synergic effect of magnetic nanoparticles on the electrospun aligned superparamagnetic nanofibers as a potential tissue engineering scaffold. RSC Adv. 2013;3:879–86.CrossRef

32.

Zhang C, Hu K, Liu X, Reynolds MA, Bao C, Wang P, et al. Novel hiPSC-based tri-culture for pre-vascularization of calcium phosphate scaffold to enhance bone and vessel formation. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;79:296–304.CrossRef

33.

Wang P, Liu X, Zhao L, Weir MD, Sun J, Chen W, et al. Bone tissue engineering via human induced pluripotent, umbilical cord and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rat cranium. Acta Biomater. 2015;18:236–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Fanelli G, Casati A, Garancini P, Torri G. Nerve stimulator and multiple injection technique for upper and lower limb blockade: failure rate, patient acceptance, and neurologic complications. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:847–52.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Yang J, McNamara LE, Gadegaard N, Alakpa EV, Burgess KV, Meek RM, et al. Nanotopographical induction of osteogenesis through adhesion, bone morphogenic protein signalling, and regulation of microRNAs. ACS Nano. 2014;8:9941–53.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Perez RA, Patel KD, Kim HW. Novel magnetic nanocomposite injectables: calcium phosphate cements impregnated with ultrafine magnetic nanoparticles for bone regeneration. RSC Adv. 2015;5:13411–9.CrossRef

37.

Woo KM, Jun JH, Chen VJ, Seo J, Baek JH, Ryoo HM, et al. Nano-fibrous scaffolding promotes osteoblast differentiation and biomineralization. Biomaterials. 2007;28:335–43.CrossRefPubMed

38.

.A. Ranella, M. Barberoglou, S. Bakogianni, C. Fotakis, E. Stratakis, Tuning cell adhesion by controlling the roughness and wettability of 3D micro/nano silicon structures, Acta Biomater. 6 (2010) 2711–2720.

39.

Wang J, Xiang B, Deng JX, Freed DH, Arora RC, Tian GH. Inhibition of viability, proliferation, cytokines secretion, surface antigen expression, and adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells by seven-day exposure to 0.5 T static magnetic fields. Stem Cells Int. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7168175.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Lew WZ, Huang YC, Huang KY, Lin CT, Tsai MT, Huang HM. Static magnetic fields enhance dental pulp stem cell proliferation by activating the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway as its putative mechanism. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;12:19–29.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Marędziak M, Śmieszek A, Tomaszewski KA, Lewandowskie D, Marycz K. The effect of low static magnetic field on osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation potential of human adipose stromal/stem cells. J Magn Magn Mater. 2016;398:235–45.CrossRef

42.

Mahdy SA, Raheed QJ, Kalaichelvan PT. Antimicrobial activity of zero-valent iron nanoparticles. Int J Mod Eng Res. 2012;2(1):578–81.

43.

Mohapatra M, Anand S. Synthesis and application of nano-structured iron oxide/hydroxides—a review. Int J Eng Technol. 2010;2(8):127–46.

44.

Tran N, Mir A, Mallik D, Sinha A, Nayar S, Webster TJ. Bactericidal effect of iron oxide nanoparticles on Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Nanomed. 2010;5(1):277–83.

45.

Lee C, Kim JY, Lee WI, Nelson KL, Yoon J, Sedlak DL. Bactericidal effect of zero-valent iron nanoparticles on Escherichia coli. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(13):4927–33. https://doi.org/10.1021/es800408u.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Chang M, Lin WS, Xiao W, Chen YN. Antibacterial effects of magnetically-controlled Ag/Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles. Materials. 2018;11:659.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Chopra R, Shaikh S, Chatzinoff Y, Munaweera I, Cheng B, Daly SM, et al. Employing high-frequency alternating magnetic fields for the non-invasive treatment of prosthetic joint infections. Sci Rep. 2017;7:7520. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07321-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

McBain SC, Yiu HH, Dobson J. Magnetic nanoparticles for gene and drug delivery. Int J Nanomed. 2008;3:169.

Title: The effect of external magnetic field on osteogenic and antimicrobial behaviour of surface-functionalized custom titanium chamber with iron nanoparticles. A preliminary research
Authors: Santosh Nelogi
Anand Kumar Patil
Ramesh Chowdhary
Publication date: 29-11-2022
Publisher: Springer Nature Singapore
Published in: Odontology / Issue 3/2023
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Electronic ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-022-00769-7

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The effect of external magnetic field on osteogenic and antimicrobial behaviour of surface-functionalized custom titanium chamber with iron nanoparticles. A preliminary research

Abstract

Purpose

Aim/hypothesis

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Aim/hypothesis

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2023

Color stability, surface roughness and flexural strength of additively manufactured and milled interim restorative materials after aging

Masticaticatory muscles characteristics in relation to adiposity and general muscular fitness: a population-based study

In vitro temperature changes in the pulp chamber caused by laser and Quadwave LED-light curing units

The evaluation of prepared microstructure pattern by carbon-dioxide laser on zirconia-based ceramics for dental implant application: an in vitro study

Histone-deacetylase-inhibitory effects of periodontopathic-bacterial metabolites induce human gingival epithelial Ca9-22 cell death

Is adrenomedullin upregulation due to apical periodontitis independent of periodontal disease?