Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2011

Open Access 01-02-2011

The effect of distractions in the operating room during endourological procedures

Authors: Marjolein C. Persoon, Hans J. H. P. Broos, J. Alfred Witjes, Ad. J. M. Hendrikx, Albert J. J. M. Scherpbier

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Professionals working in the operating room (OR) are subject to various distractions that can be detrimental to their task performance and the quality of their work. This study aimed to quantify the frequency, nature, and effect on performance of (potentially) distracting events occurring during endourological procedures and additionally explored urologists’ and residents’ perspectives on experienced ill effects due to distracting factors.

Methods

First, observational data were collected prospectively during endourological procedures in one OR of a teaching hospital. A seven-point ordinal scale was used to measure the level of observed interference with the main task of the surgical team. Second, semistructured interviews were conducted with eight urologists and seven urology residents in two hospitals to obtain their perspectives on the impact of distracting factors.

Results

Seventy-eight procedures were observed. A median of 20 distracting events occurred per procedure, which corresponds to an overall rate of one distracting event every 1.8 min. Equipment problems and procedure-related and medically irrelevant communication were the most frequently observed causes of interruptions and identified as the most distracting factors in the interviews. Occurrence of distracting factors in difficult situations requiring high levels of concentration was perceived by all interviewees as disturbing and negatively impacting performance. The majority of interviewees (13/15) thought distracting factors impacted more strongly on residents’ compared to urologists’ performance due to their different levels of experience.

Conclusion

Distracting events occur frequently in the OR. Equipment problems and communication, the latter both procedure-related and medically irrelevant, have the largest impact on the sterile team and regularly interrupt procedures. Distracting stimuli can influence performance negatively and should therefore be minimized. Further research is required to determine the direct effect of distraction on patient safety.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kohls-Gatzoulis JA, Regehr G, Hutchison C (2004) Teaching cognitive skills improves learning in surgical skills courses: a blinded, prospective, randomized study. Can J Surg 47:277–283PubMed Kohls-Gatzoulis JA, Regehr G, Hutchison C (2004) Teaching cognitive skills improves learning in surgical skills courses: a blinded, prospective, randomized study. Can J Surg 47:277–283PubMed
3.
go back to reference Forster S, Lavie N (2008) Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors: the role of load. J Exp Psychol Appl 14:73–83CrossRefPubMed Forster S, Lavie N (2008) Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors: the role of load. J Exp Psychol Appl 14:73–83CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference McEvoy SP, Stevenson MR, McCartt AT, Woodward M, Haworth C, Palamara P (2005) Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study. BMJ 331:428CrossRefPubMed McEvoy SP, Stevenson MR, McCartt AT, Woodward M, Haworth C, Palamara P (2005) Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study. BMJ 331:428CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference McEvoy SP, Stevenson MR, Woodward M (2007) The contribution of passengers versus mobile phone use to motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance by the driver. Accid Anal Prev 39:1170–1176CrossRefPubMed McEvoy SP, Stevenson MR, Woodward M (2007) The contribution of passengers versus mobile phone use to motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance by the driver. Accid Anal Prev 39:1170–1176CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Healey AN, Primus CP, Koutantji M (2007) Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery. Qual Saf Health Care 16:135–139CrossRefPubMed Healey AN, Primus CP, Koutantji M (2007) Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery. Qual Saf Health Care 16:135–139CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Primus CP, Healey AN, Undre S (2007) Distraction in the urology operating theatre. BJU Int 99:493–494CrossRefPubMed Primus CP, Healey AN, Undre S (2007) Distraction in the urology operating theatre. BJU Int 99:493–494CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ullmann Y, Fodor L, Schwarzberg I, Carmi N, Ullmann A, Ramon Y (2008) The sounds of music in the operating room. Injury 39:592–597CrossRefPubMed Ullmann Y, Fodor L, Schwarzberg I, Carmi N, Ullmann A, Ramon Y (2008) The sounds of music in the operating room. Injury 39:592–597CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hsu KE, Man FY, Gizicki RA, Feldman LS, Fried GM (2008) Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distraction on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons. Surg Endosc 22:196–201CrossRefPubMed Hsu KE, Man FY, Gizicki RA, Feldman LS, Fried GM (2008) Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distraction on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons. Surg Endosc 22:196–201CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pluyter JR, Buzink SN, Rutkowski AF, Jakimowicz JJ (2010) Do absorption and realistic distraction influence performance of component task surgical procedure? Surg Endosc 24(4):902–907CrossRefPubMed Pluyter JR, Buzink SN, Rutkowski AF, Jakimowicz JJ (2010) Do absorption and realistic distraction influence performance of component task surgical procedure? Surg Endosc 24(4):902–907CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mays N, Pope C (1995) Qualitative research: observational methods in health care settings. BMJ 15:182–184 Mays N, Pope C (1995) Qualitative research: observational methods in health care settings. BMJ 15:182–184
12.
go back to reference Mudford OC, Taylor SA, Martin NT (2009) Continuous recording and interobserver agreement algorithms reported in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (1995–2005). J Appl Behav Anal 42:165–169CrossRefPubMed Mudford OC, Taylor SA, Martin NT (2009) Continuous recording and interobserver agreement algorithms reported in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (1995–2005). J Appl Behav Anal 42:165–169CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Britten N (1995) Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ 22:251–253 Britten N (1995) Qualitative interviews in medical research. BMJ 22:251–253
14.
go back to reference Liu EH, Tan S (2000) Patients’ perception of sound levels in the surgical suite. J Clin Anesth 12:298–302CrossRefPubMed Liu EH, Tan S (2000) Patients’ perception of sound levels in the surgical suite. J Clin Anesth 12:298–302CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Schneider AJ, Biebuyck JF (1990) Music in the operating-room. Lancet 9:1407CrossRef Schneider AJ, Biebuyck JF (1990) Music in the operating-room. Lancet 9:1407CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Moorthy K, Munz Y, Undre S, Darzi A (2004) Objective evaluation of the effect of noise on the performance of a complex laparoscopic task. Surgery 136:25–30 Moorthy K, Munz Y, Undre S, Darzi A (2004) Objective evaluation of the effect of noise on the performance of a complex laparoscopic task. Surgery 136:25–30
17.
go back to reference Levy J, Pashler H (2001) Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:862–869CrossRefPubMed Levy J, Pashler H (2001) Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:862–869CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Meyer DE, Kieras DE (1997) A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychol Rev 104:3–65CrossRefPubMed Meyer DE, Kieras DE (1997) A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychol Rev 104:3–65CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Horberry T, Anderson J, Regan MA, Triggs TJ, Brown J (2006) Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. Accid Anal Prev 38:185–191CrossRefPubMed Horberry T, Anderson J, Regan MA, Triggs TJ, Brown J (2006) Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. Accid Anal Prev 38:185–191CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The effect of distractions in the operating room during endourological procedures
Authors
Marjolein C. Persoon
Hans J. H. P. Broos
J. Alfred Witjes
Ad. J. M. Hendrikx
Albert J. J. M. Scherpbier
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1186-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2011 Go to the issue