Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Lasers in Medical Science
Published in: Lasers in Medical Science 5/2011

01-09-2011 | Original Article

The effect of different surface treatments on roughnessand bond strength in low fusing ceramics

Authors: Haluk Baris Kara, A. Nilgun Ozturk, Filiz Aykent, Ozlem Koc, Bora Ozturk

Published in: Lasers in Medical Science | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments (air abrasion, acid etching, and laser irradiation) on the surface roughness and bond strength of a low fusing ceramic. Thirty-six discs of low fusing ceramic (Finesse, Ceramco) were prepared (10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specimens were divided into three groups (n = 12), and the following treatments were performed: Air abrasion with alumina particles (50 μm), acid etching with 5% HF and Nd:YAG laser irradiation (distance: 1 mm, 100 mJ, 20 Hz, 2 W, and 141.54 J/cm2). Following determination of surface roughness (Ra) by profilometry, specimens were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The luting cement (Clearfil Esthetic Cement) was bonded to the ceramic specimens using Teflon tubes. After 24 h of water storage, shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD tests (α = .05). Two-way ANOVA indicated that surface roughness was significantly affected by surface treatments (p < .001). Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value (p < .05) than the other groups. Shear bond strength was significantly affected by surface treatments (p < .001). Tukey HSD indicated that the air abrasion group had a significantly higher mean value (p < .05) than the other groups. No significant difference was found between the acid-etching and laser-irradiation groups (p > .05). The SEM image of the laser irradiation surface appeared to be relatively smooth as compared to the images of other the groups. Air abrasion of low-fusing porcelain surfaces was effective in improving the bond strength as compared to the acid-etching and laser-irradiation methods.
Literature
1.
2.
Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS (2006) Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent 95:430–436PubMedCrossRef
3.
Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva DL, Rivera FG, Santana-Penin UA (2000) Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG laser treated enamel and dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 84:280–288PubMedCrossRef
4.
Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, Correr L, Chan DCN (2003) Effect of etching and air borne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 89:479–488PubMedCrossRef
5.
Blatz MB (2004) Cementation of zirconium-oxide ceramic restorations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 16:14PubMed
6.
De Oyague RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio E, Ferrari M, Osorio R (2009) Influence of surface treatments and resin cement selection on bonding to densely-sintered zirconium–oxide ceramic. Dent Mater 25:172–179PubMedCrossRef
7.
Kumbuloglu O, Lasssila LVJ, User A, Vallitu PK (2006) Bonding of resin composite luting cements to zirconium oxide by two air-particle abrasion methods. Oper Dent 31:248–255PubMedCrossRef
8.
Akgungo RG, Sen D, Aydin M (2008) Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material. J Prosthet Dent 99:388–399CrossRef
9.
Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Torres TJ, Avera SP (1991) Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 4:17–23PubMed
10.
Aida M, Hayakawa T, Mizukawa K (1995) Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surfaces conditions. J Prosthet Dent 73:464–470PubMedCrossRef
11.
Piascik JR, Swift EJ, Thompson JY, Grego S, Stoner BR (2009) Surface modification for enhanced silanation of zirconia ceramics. Dent Mater. Epub ahead of print
12.
Wang H, Aboushelib MN, Feilzer AJ (2008) Strength influencing variables on CAD/CAM zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater 24:633–638PubMedCrossRef
13.
Wood DJ, Bubb NL, Millar BJ, Dunne SM (1997) Preliminary investigation of a novel retentive system for hydrofluoric acid etching resistant dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 78:275–280PubMedCrossRef
14.
Arcoria CJ, Lippas MG, Vitasek BA (1993) Enamel surface roughness analysis after laser ablation and acid-etching. J Oral Rehabil 20:213–224PubMedCrossRef
15.
Corpas-Pastor L, Villalba Moreno J, de Dios Lopez-Gonzalez Garrido J, Pedraza Muriel V, Moore K, Elias A (1997) Comparing the tensile strength of brackets adhered to laser-etched enamel vs. acid-etched enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 128:732–737PubMed
16.
Atrill DC, Farrar SR, King TA, Dickinson MR, Davies RM, Blinkhorn AS (2000) Er:YAG (λ = 2.94 μm) laser etching of dental enamel as an alternative to acid etching. Lasers Med Sci 15:154–161CrossRef
17.
Usumez A, Aykent F (2003) Bond strengths of porcelain laminate veneers to tooth surfaces prepared with acid and Er, Cr:YSGG laser etching. J Prosthet Dent 90:24–30PubMedCrossRef
18.
Ersu B, Yuzugullu B, Yazici AR, Canay S (2009) Surface roughness and bond strengths of glass-infiltrated alumina-ceramics prepared using various surface treatments. J Dent 37(11):848–856PubMedCrossRef
19.
Osorio E, Toledano M, Silveira BL, Osorio R (2009) Effect of different surface treatments on In-Ceram Alumina roughness. An AFM study. J Dent
20.
DellaBona A, Anusavice KJ, Shen C (2000) Microtensile strength of composite bonded to hot-pressed ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2:305–313
21.
Li R, Ren Y, Han J (2000) Effects of pulsed Nd:YAG laser irradiation on shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 18:377–379PubMed
22.
Ariyaratnam MT, Wilson MA, MackieI C, Blinkhorn AS (1997) A comparison of surface roughness and composite/enamel bond strength of human enamel following the application of the Nd:YAG laser and etching with phosphoric acid. Dent Mater 13:51–55PubMedCrossRef
23.
Von Fraunhofer JA, Allen DJ, Orbell GM (1993) Laser etching of enamel for direct bonding. Angle Orthod 63:73–76
24.
Walsh LJ, Abood D, Brockhurst PJ (1994) Bonding of resin composite to carbon dioxide laser-modified human enamel. Dent Mater 10:162–166PubMedCrossRef
25.
Akova T, Yoldas O, Toroglu MS, Uysal H (2005) Porcelain surface treatment by laser for bracket-porcelain bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128:630–637PubMedCrossRef
26.
Della Bona A, van Noort R (1995) Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 74:1591–1596PubMedCrossRef
27.
28.
Wolf DM, Powers JM, O’Keefe KL (1992) Bond strength of composite to porcelain treated with new porcelain repair agents. Dent Mater 8:158–161PubMedCrossRef
29.
Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M (1998) Effect of different etching periods on the bond strength of a composite resin to a machinable porcelain. J Dent 26:53–58PubMedCrossRef
30.
Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M (1998) Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 23:250–257PubMed
31.
Szep S, Gerhardt T, Gockel HW, Ruppel M, Metzeltin D, Heidemann D (2000) In vitro dentinal surface reaction of 9.5% buffered hydro fluoric acid in repair of ceramic restorations: a scanning electron microscopic investigation. J Prosthet Dent 83:668–674PubMedCrossRef
32.
Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M (1998) Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent 79:508–513PubMedCrossRef
33.
Schmage P, Nergiz I, Herrmann W, Ozcan M (2003) Influence of various surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123:540–546PubMedCrossRef
34.
Akyıl MS, Yılmaz A, Karaalioğlu OF, Duymuş ZY (2009) Shear bond strength of repair composite resin to an acid-etched and a laser-irradiated feldspathic ceramic surface. Photomed Laser Surg. Epub ahead of print
35.
Calamia JR (1985) Etched porcelain veneers: the current state of the art. Quintessence Int 16:5–12PubMed
36.
Kern M, Thompson VP (1994) Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology, and changes in the surface composition. J Prosthet Dent 71:453–461PubMedCrossRef
37.
Al Edris A, al Jabr A, Cooley RL, Barghi N (1990) SEM evaluation of etch patterns by three etchants on three porcelains. J Prosthet Dent 64:734–739PubMedCrossRef
38.
Lacy AM, La Luz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M (1988) Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 60:288–291PubMedCrossRef
39.
De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikitaa K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting materials to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 20:963–971PubMedCrossRef
40.
Ozcan M, Vallittu PK (2003) Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 19:725–731PubMedCrossRef
41.
Semmelmann JO, Kulp PR (1968) Silane bonding porcelain teeth to acrylic. J Am Dent Assoc 76:69–73
42.
Hummel M, Kern M (2004) Durability of the resin bond strength to the alumina ceramic Procera. Dent Mater 20:498–508PubMedCrossRef
43.
Won-suck O, Shen C (2003) Effect of surface topography on the bond strength of a composite to three different types of ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 90:241–246CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The effect of different surface treatments on roughnessand bond strength in low fusing ceramics
Authors
Haluk Baris Kara
A. Nilgun Ozturk
Filiz Aykent
Ozlem Koc
Bora Ozturk
Publication date
01-09-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Lasers in Medical Science / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0268-8921
Electronic ISSN: 1435-604X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0806-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Lasers in Medical Science 5/2011 Go to the issue

Original Article

A photothermal model of selective photothermolysis with dynamically changing vaporization temperature

Original Article

Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser-assisted hair removal in Fitzpatrick skin types IV–VI

Original Article

Low-level laser irradiation treatment reduces CCL2 expression in rat rheumatoid synovia via a chemokine signaling pathway

Original Article

Diode-pumped solid-state laser for bonding orthodontic brackets: effect of light intensity and light-curing time

Original Article

The 1,318-nm diode laser supported partial nephrectomy in laparoscopic and open surgery: preliminary results of a prospective feasibility study

Original Article

Effects of heating by steam autoclaving and Er:YAG laser etching on dentin components