Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2011

01-10-2011 | Otology

The effect of cochlear implantation and post-operative rehabilitation on acoustic voice analysis in post-lingual hearing impaired adults

Authors: Sabah M. Hassan, Khalid H. Malki, Tamer A. Mesallam, Mohamad Farahat, Manal Bukhari, Thomas Murry

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 10/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Post-lingual deaf adults can develop some vocal abnormalities similar to those developed in pre-lingual deaf individuals. The aim of this work was to study the effect of cochlear implantation followed by post-operative rehabilitation on voice acoustics in post-lingual hearing impaired adults with different durations of hearing loss. The study included 35 post-lingual hearing impaired adults who underwent cochlear implantation. Patients were divided into two groups according to the duration of their hearing loss. Each group was further divided into two subgroups according to whether they received auditory rehabilitation or not. Using the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) parameters, comparisons were made between each subgroup of patients and the normal MDVP Saudi database, and between subgroups of patients. Most of the patients in the two groups reported significant improvement in their MDVP results post-implantation. Further, significantly deviant MDVP parameters were reported in the group of patients with longer duration of hearing loss. Patients who received rehabilitation significantly improved more than those who did not. In conclusion, it appears that cochlear implantation improves the auditory control of voice production in post-lingual deaf adults. Also, it is obvious that cochlear implantation at an early stage of hearing loss gives better results on voice control, especially if augmented with auditory rehabilitation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Leder SB, Spitzer JB (1990) A perceptual evaluation of the speech of adventitiously deaf adult males. Ear Hear 11:169–175PubMedCrossRef Leder SB, Spitzer JB (1990) A perceptual evaluation of the speech of adventitiously deaf adult males. Ear Hear 11:169–175PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ball V, Ison KT (1984) Speech production with electrocochlear stimulation. Br J Audiol 18:251–258 Ball V, Ison KT (1984) Speech production with electrocochlear stimulation. Br J Audiol 18:251–258
3.
go back to reference Evans MK, Deliyski DD (2007) Acoustic voice analysis of prelingually deaf adults before and after cochlear implantation. J Voice 21:669–682PubMedCrossRef Evans MK, Deliyski DD (2007) Acoustic voice analysis of prelingually deaf adults before and after cochlear implantation. J Voice 21:669–682PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lane H, Webster JW (1991) Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults. J Acoust Soc Am 89:859–866PubMedCrossRef Lane H, Webster JW (1991) Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults. J Acoust Soc Am 89:859–866PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Leder SB, Spitzer JB, Kirchner JC et al (1987) Speaking rate of adventitiously deaf male cochlear implant candidates. J Acoust Soc Am 82:843–846PubMedCrossRef Leder SB, Spitzer JB, Kirchner JC et al (1987) Speaking rate of adventitiously deaf male cochlear implant candidates. J Acoust Soc Am 82:843–846PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Leder SB, Spitzer JB, Kirchner JC (1987) Immediate effects of cochlear implantation on voice quality. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 244:93–95PubMedCrossRef Leder SB, Spitzer JB, Kirchner JC (1987) Immediate effects of cochlear implantation on voice quality. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 244:93–95PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Economou A, Tartter VC, Chute PM et al (1992) Speech changes following reimplantation from a single-channel to a multichannel cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 92:1310–1323PubMedCrossRef Economou A, Tartter VC, Chute PM et al (1992) Speech changes following reimplantation from a single-channel to a multichannel cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 92:1310–1323PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kirk KI, Edgerton BJ (1983) The effects of cochlear implant use on voice parameters. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 16:281–292PubMed Kirk KI, Edgerton BJ (1983) The effects of cochlear implant use on voice parameters. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 16:281–292PubMed
9.
go back to reference Langereis MC, Bosman AJ, van Olphen AF et al (1998) Effect of cochlear implantation on voice fundamental frequency in post-lingually deafened adults. Audiology 37:219–230PubMedCrossRef Langereis MC, Bosman AJ, van Olphen AF et al (1998) Effect of cochlear implantation on voice fundamental frequency in post-lingually deafened adults. Audiology 37:219–230PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Szyfter W, Pruszewicz A, Woznica B et al (1996) The acoustic analysis of voice in patients with multi-channel cochlear implant. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 117:225–227 Szyfter W, Pruszewicz A, Woznica B et al (1996) The acoustic analysis of voice in patients with multi-channel cochlear implant. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 117:225–227
11.
go back to reference Perkell J, Lane H, Svirsky M et al (1992) Speech of cochlear implant patients: a longitudinal study of vowel production. J Acoust Soc Am 91:2961–2978PubMedCrossRef Perkell J, Lane H, Svirsky M et al (1992) Speech of cochlear implant patients: a longitudinal study of vowel production. J Acoust Soc Am 91:2961–2978PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lane H, Perkell J, Wozniak J et al (1998) The effect of changes in hearing status on speech sound level and speech breathing: a study conducted with cochlear implant users and NF-2 patients. J Acoust Soc Am 104:3059–3069PubMedCrossRef Lane H, Perkell J, Wozniak J et al (1998) The effect of changes in hearing status on speech sound level and speech breathing: a study conducted with cochlear implant users and NF-2 patients. J Acoust Soc Am 104:3059–3069PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kishon-Rabin L, Taitelbaum R, Tobin Y et al (1999) The effect of partially restored hearing on speech production of postlingually deafened adults with multichannel cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 106:2843–2857PubMedCrossRef Kishon-Rabin L, Taitelbaum R, Tobin Y et al (1999) The effect of partially restored hearing on speech production of postlingually deafened adults with multichannel cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 106:2843–2857PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Malki KH, Al-Habib SF, Hagr AA et al (2009) Acoustic analysis of normal Saudi adult voices. Saudi Med J 30:1081–1086PubMed Malki KH, Al-Habib SF, Hagr AA et al (2009) Acoustic analysis of normal Saudi adult voices. Saudi Med J 30:1081–1086PubMed
15.
go back to reference Angelocci AA, Kopp GA, Holbrook A (1964) The vowel formants of deaf and normal-hearing eleven- to fourteen-year-old boys. J Speech Hear Disord 29:156–160PubMed Angelocci AA, Kopp GA, Holbrook A (1964) The vowel formants of deaf and normal-hearing eleven- to fourteen-year-old boys. J Speech Hear Disord 29:156–160PubMed
16.
go back to reference Higgins MB, McCleary EA, Carney AE et al (2003) Longitudinal changes in children’s speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 24:48–70PubMedCrossRef Higgins MB, McCleary EA, Carney AE et al (2003) Longitudinal changes in children’s speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 24:48–70PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nickerson R (1975) Characteristics of the speech of deaf pesons. Volta Rev 342–362 Nickerson R (1975) Characteristics of the speech of deaf pesons. Volta Rev 342–362
18.
go back to reference Abberton E, Fourcin A (1975) Visual feedback and acquisition of intonation. Academic Press, New York Abberton E, Fourcin A (1975) Visual feedback and acquisition of intonation. Academic Press, New York
19.
go back to reference Hood R, Dixon R (1969) Physical characteristics of speech rhythm of deaf and normal hearing speakers. J Commun Dis 2:20–28CrossRef Hood R, Dixon R (1969) Physical characteristics of speech rhythm of deaf and normal hearing speakers. J Commun Dis 2:20–28CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Leder SB, Spitzer JB, Kirchner JC (1987) Speaking fundamental frequency of postlingually profoundly deaf adult men. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 96:322–324PubMed Leder SB, Spitzer JB, Kirchner JC (1987) Speaking fundamental frequency of postlingually profoundly deaf adult men. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 96:322–324PubMed
21.
go back to reference Read T (1989) Improvement in speech production following use of the UCH/RNID cochlear implant. J Laryngol Otol 18:45–49 Read T (1989) Improvement in speech production following use of the UCH/RNID cochlear implant. J Laryngol Otol 18:45–49
22.
go back to reference Leder SB, Spitzer JB, Milner P et al (1987) Voice intensity of prospective cochlear implant candidates and normal hearing adult males. Laryngoscope 97:224–227PubMedCrossRef Leder SB, Spitzer JB, Milner P et al (1987) Voice intensity of prospective cochlear implant candidates and normal hearing adult males. Laryngoscope 97:224–227PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Smoorenburg G, Huiskamp T, Langeries M et al (1994) Effects of cochlear implantation on voice quality and speech production. Manz, Wien, pp 374–379 Smoorenburg G, Huiskamp T, Langeries M et al (1994) Effects of cochlear implantation on voice quality and speech production. Manz, Wien, pp 374–379
Metadata
Title
The effect of cochlear implantation and post-operative rehabilitation on acoustic voice analysis in post-lingual hearing impaired adults
Authors
Sabah M. Hassan
Khalid H. Malki
Tamer A. Mesallam
Mohamad Farahat
Manal Bukhari
Thomas Murry
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1501-6

Other articles of this Issue 10/2011

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2011 Go to the issue

Editorial

Editorial