Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Anesthesiology 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research article

The effect of changing the sequence of cuff inflation and device fixation with the LMA-Supreme® on device position, ventilatory complications, and airway morbidity: a clinical and fiberscopic study

Authors: Ingo Bergmann, Thomas Allen Crozier, Markus Roessler, Hanna Schotola, Ashham Mansur, Benedikt Büttner, José Maria Hinz, Martin Bauer

Published in: BMC Anesthesiology | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The conventional sequence when using supraglottic airway devices is insertion, cuff inflation and fixation. Our hypothesis was that a tighter fit of the cuff and tip could be achieved with a consequently lower incidence of air leak, better separation of gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts and less airway morbidity if the device were first affixed and the cuff then inflated.

Methods

Our clinical review board approved the study (public registry number DRKS00003174). An LMA Supreme® was inserted into 184 patients undergoing lower limb arthroscopy in propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia who were randomly assigned to either the control (inflation then fixation; n = 92) or study group (fixation then inflation; n = 92). The cuff was inflated to 60 cmH2O. The patients’ lungs were ventilated in pressure-controlled mode with 5 cmH2O PEEP, Pmax to give 6 ml kg-1 tidal volume, and respiratory rate adjusted to end-tidal CO2 of 4.8 and 5.6 kPa. Correct cuff and tip position were determined by leak detection, capnometry trace, oropharyngeal leak pressure, suprasternal notch test, and lube-tube test. Bowl and cuff position and the presence of glottic narrowing were assessed by fiberscopic examination. Postoperative dysphagia, hoarseness and sore throat were assessed with a questionnaire. Ventilatory impairment was defined as a tidal volume < 6 ml kg-1 with Pmax at oropharyngeal leak pressure, glottic narrowing was defined as an angle between the vocal cords under 16 degrees.

Results

The incidence of incorrect device position (18% vs. 21%), failed ventilation (10% vs. 9%), leak pressure (24.8 vs. 25.2 cmH2O, p = 0.63), failed lube-tube test (16.3% vs. 17.6%) and glottic narrowing (19.3% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.35) was similar in both groups (control vs. study, resp.). When glottic narrowing occurred, it was more frequently associated with ventilatory impairment in the control group (77% vs. 39%; p = 0.04). Airway morbidity was more common in the control group (33% vs. 19%; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Altering the sequence of cuff inflation and device fixation does not affect device position, oropharyngeal leak pressures or separation of gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts. It reduces the incidence of glottic narrowing with impaired ventilation and also perioperative airway morbidity.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, Kazmaier S, Brauer A, Graf BM, Russo SG: Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the supreme laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology. 2009, 110: 262-265.PubMed Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, Kazmaier S, Brauer A, Graf BM, Russo SG: Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the supreme laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology. 2009, 110: 262-265.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Lee AK, Tey JB, Lim Y, Sia AT: Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009, 37: 815-819.PubMed Lee AK, Tey JB, Lim Y, Sia AT: Comparison of the single-use LMA supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009, 37: 815-819.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Abdi W, Dhonneur G, Amathieu R, Adhoum A, Kamoun W, Slavov V, Barrat C, Combes X: LMA supreme versus facemask ventilation performed by novices: a comparative study in morbidly obese patients showing difficult ventilation predictors. Obes Surg. 2009, 19: 1624-1630. 10.1007/s11695-009-9953-0.CrossRefPubMed Abdi W, Dhonneur G, Amathieu R, Adhoum A, Kamoun W, Slavov V, Barrat C, Combes X: LMA supreme versus facemask ventilation performed by novices: a comparative study in morbidly obese patients showing difficult ventilation predictors. Obes Surg. 2009, 19: 1624-1630. 10.1007/s11695-009-9953-0.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chew EE, Hashim NH, Wang CY: Randomised comparison of the LMA supreme with the I-Gel in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010, 38: 1018-1022.PubMed Chew EE, Hashim NH, Wang CY: Randomised comparison of the LMA supreme with the I-Gel in spontaneously breathing anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010, 38: 1018-1022.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Cook TM, Gatward JJ, Handel J, Hardy R, Thompson C, Srivastava R, Clarke PA: Evaluation of the LMA supreme in 100 non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia. 2009, 64: 555-562. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05824.x.CrossRefPubMed Cook TM, Gatward JJ, Handel J, Hardy R, Thompson C, Srivastava R, Clarke PA: Evaluation of the LMA supreme in 100 non-paralysed patients. Anaesthesia. 2009, 64: 555-562. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05824.x.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, Urwyler N, Luyet C, Vogt A, Greif R, Unibe MM: Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2009, 111: 55-62. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a4c6b9.CrossRefPubMed Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, Urwyler N, Luyet C, Vogt A, Greif R, Unibe MM: Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2009, 111: 55-62. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a4c6b9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Russo SG, Cremer S, Eich C, Jipp M, Cohnen J, Strack M, Quintel M, Mohr A: Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel and LMA-Supreme in anaesthetized human volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2012, 109: 996-1004. 10.1093/bja/aes314.CrossRefPubMed Russo SG, Cremer S, Eich C, Jipp M, Cohnen J, Strack M, Quintel M, Mohr A: Magnetic resonance imaging study of the in vivo position of the extraglottic airway devices i-gel and LMA-Supreme in anaesthetized human volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2012, 109: 996-1004. 10.1093/bja/aes314.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R: Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth. 1999, 82: 286-287. 10.1093/bja/82.2.286.CrossRefPubMed Keller C, Brimacombe JR, Keller K, Morris R: Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth. 1999, 82: 286-287. 10.1093/bja/82.2.286.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Brimacombe J, Keller C: Prime the ProSeal drain tube with lube from a tube!. Can J Anaesth. 2005, 52: 338-339.CrossRefPubMed Brimacombe J, Keller C: Prime the ProSeal drain tube with lube from a tube!. Can J Anaesth. 2005, 52: 338-339.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wahlen BM, Heinrichs W, Latorre F: Gastric insufflation pressure, air leakage and respiratory mechanics in the use of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004, 14: 313-317. 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01213.x.CrossRefPubMed Wahlen BM, Heinrichs W, Latorre F: Gastric insufflation pressure, air leakage and respiratory mechanics in the use of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004, 14: 313-317. 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.01213.x.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Weiler N, Latorre F, Eberle B, Goedecke R, Heinrichs W: Respiratory mechanics, gastric insufflation pressure, and air leakage of the laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg. 1997, 84: 1025-1028.PubMed Weiler N, Latorre F, Eberle B, Goedecke R, Heinrichs W: Respiratory mechanics, gastric insufflation pressure, and air leakage of the laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg. 1997, 84: 1025-1028.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Russo SG, Cremer S, Galli T, Eich C, Brauer A, Crozier TA, Bauer M, Strack M: Randomized comparison of the i-gel, the LMA supreme, and the laryngeal tube suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2012, 12: 18-10.1186/1471-2253-12-18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Russo SG, Cremer S, Galli T, Eich C, Brauer A, Crozier TA, Bauer M, Strack M: Randomized comparison of the i-gel, the LMA supreme, and the laryngeal tube suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2012, 12: 18-10.1186/1471-2253-12-18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Bergmann I, Göhner A, Crozier TA, Hesjedal B, Wiese CH, Popov AF, Bauer M, Hinz JM: Surgical pleth index-guided remifentanil administration reduces remifentanil and propofol consumption and shortens recovery times in outpatient anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2013, 110: 622-628. 10.1093/bja/aes426.CrossRefPubMed Bergmann I, Göhner A, Crozier TA, Hesjedal B, Wiese CH, Popov AF, Bauer M, Hinz JM: Surgical pleth index-guided remifentanil administration reduces remifentanil and propofol consumption and shortens recovery times in outpatient anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2013, 110: 622-628. 10.1093/bja/aes426.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The effect of changing the sequence of cuff inflation and device fixation with the LMA-Supreme® on device position, ventilatory complications, and airway morbidity: a clinical and fiberscopic study
Authors
Ingo Bergmann
Thomas Allen Crozier
Markus Roessler
Hanna Schotola
Ashham Mansur
Benedikt Büttner
José Maria Hinz
Martin Bauer
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2253
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

BMC Anesthesiology 1/2014 Go to the issue