Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pediatrics 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

The Early Development Instrument: an evaluation of its five domains using Rasch analysis

Authors: Margaret Curtin, John Browne, Anthony Staines, Ivan J. Perry

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Early childhood development is a multifaceted construct encompassing physical, social, emotional and intellectual competencies. The Early Development Instrument (EDI) is a population-level measure of five domains of early childhood development on which extensive psychometric testing has been conducted using traditional methods. This study builds on previous psychometric analysis by providing the first large-scale Rasch analysis of the EDI. The aim of the study was to perform a definitive analysis of the psychometric properties of the EDI domains within the Rasch paradigm.

Methods

Data from a large EDI study conducted in a major Irish urban centre were used for the analysis. The unidimensional Rasch model was used to examine whether the EDI scales met the measurement requirement of invariance, allowing responses to be summated across items. Differential item functioning for gender was also analysed.

Results

Data were available for 1344 children. All scales apart from the Physical Health and Well-Being scale reliably discriminated between children of different levels of ability. However, all the scales also had some misfitting items and problems with measuring higher levels of ability.
Differential item functioning for gender was particularly evident in the emotional maturity scale with almost one-third of items (9 out of 30) on this scale biased in favour of girls.

Conclusion

The study points to a number of areas where the EDI could be improved.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Maggi S, Irwin LJ, Siddiqi A, Hertzman C. The social determinants of early child development: an overview. J Paediatr Child Health. 2010;46:627–35.CrossRefPubMed Maggi S, Irwin LJ, Siddiqi A, Hertzman C. The social determinants of early child development: an overview. J Paediatr Child Health. 2010;46:627–35.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Russ S, Garro N, Halfon N. Meeting children’s basic health needs: from patchwork to tapestry. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010;32:1149–64.CrossRef Russ S, Garro N, Halfon N. Meeting children’s basic health needs: from patchwork to tapestry. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2010;32:1149–64.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hertzman C, Boyce T. How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health. In: Annual review of public health, vol 31. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews; 2010. p. 329–47. Hertzman C, Boyce T. How experience gets under the skin to create gradients in developmental health. In: Annual review of public health, vol 31. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews; 2010. p. 329–47.
5.
go back to reference Avan BI, Kirkwood B. Review of the theoretical frameworks for the study of child development within public health and epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64:388–93.CrossRefPubMed Avan BI, Kirkwood B. Review of the theoretical frameworks for the study of child development within public health and epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010;64:388–93.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Guhn M, Janus M, Hertzman C. The Early Development Instrument: translating school readiness assessment into community actions and policy planning. Early Education and Development. 2007;18:369–74.CrossRef Guhn M, Janus M, Hertzman C. The Early Development Instrument: translating school readiness assessment into community actions and policy planning. Early Education and Development. 2007;18:369–74.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Janus M, Brinkman S, Duku E, Hertzman C, Santos R, Sayers M, et al. The early development instrument: a population-based measure for communities. Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University; 2007 Janus M, Brinkman S, Duku E, Hertzman C, Santos R, Sayers M, et al. The early development instrument: a population-based measure for communities. Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University; 2007
9.
go back to reference Janus M, Offord DR. Development and psychometric properties of the Early Development Instrument (EDI): a measure of children’s school readiness. Can J Behav Sci. 2007;39:1–22.CrossRef Janus M, Offord DR. Development and psychometric properties of the Early Development Instrument (EDI): a measure of children’s school readiness. Can J Behav Sci. 2007;39:1–22.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brinkman S, Sayers M, Goldfeld S, Kline J. Population monitoring of language and cognitive development in Australia: the Australian Early Development Index. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;11:419–30.CrossRef Brinkman S, Sayers M, Goldfeld S, Kline J. Population monitoring of language and cognitive development in Australia: the Australian Early Development Index. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009;11:419–30.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Curtin M, Madden J, Staines A, Perry IJ. Determinants of vulnerability in early childhood development in Ireland: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002387.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Curtin M, Madden J, Staines A, Perry IJ. Determinants of vulnerability in early childhood development in Ireland: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002387.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Brinkman SA, Gialamas A, Rahman A, Mittinty MN, Gregory TA, Silburn S, et al. Jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001075.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brinkman SA, Gialamas A, Rahman A, Mittinty MN, Gregory TA, Silburn S, et al. Jurisdictional, socioeconomic and gender inequalities in child health and development: analysis of a national census of 5-year-olds in Australia. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001075.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Brinkman S, Silburn S, Lawrence D, Goldfeld S, Sayers M, Oberklaid F. Investigating the validity of the Australian Early Development Index. Early Education and Development. 2007;18:427–51.CrossRef Brinkman S, Silburn S, Lawrence D, Goldfeld S, Sayers M, Oberklaid F. Investigating the validity of the Australian Early Development Index. Early Education and Development. 2007;18:427–51.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Janus M, Brinkman S, Duku E. Validity and psychometric properties of the Early Development Instrument in Canada, Australia, United States, and Jamaica. Soc Indic Res. 2011;103:283–97.CrossRef Janus M, Brinkman S, Duku E. Validity and psychometric properties of the Early Development Instrument in Canada, Australia, United States, and Jamaica. Soc Indic Res. 2011;103:283–97.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Forer B, Zumbo B. Validation of multilevel constructs: validation methods and empirical findings for the EDI. Soc Indic Res. 2011;103:231–65.CrossRef Forer B, Zumbo B. Validation of multilevel constructs: validation methods and empirical findings for the EDI. Soc Indic Res. 2011;103:231–65.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference D’Angiulli A, Warburton W, Dahinten S, Hertzman C. Population-level associations between preschool vulnerability and grade-four basic skills. PLoS One. 2009;4, e7692.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral D’Angiulli A, Warburton W, Dahinten S, Hertzman C. Population-level associations between preschool vulnerability and grade-four basic skills. PLoS One. 2009;4, e7692.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Muhajarine N, Puchala C, Janus M. Does the EDI equivalently measure facets of school readiness for Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal children? Soc Indic Res. 2011;103:299–314.CrossRef Muhajarine N, Puchala C, Janus M. Does the EDI equivalently measure facets of school readiness for Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal children? Soc Indic Res. 2011;103:299–314.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hymel S, LeMare L, McKee W. The Early Development Instrument: an examination of convergent and discriminant validity. Soc Indic Res. 2011;103:267–82.CrossRef Hymel S, LeMare L, McKee W. The Early Development Instrument: an examination of convergent and discriminant validity. Soc Indic Res. 2011;103:267–82.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Andrich D, Styles I. Final report on the psychometric analysis of the Early Development Instrument (EDI) using the Rasch model: a technical paper commissioned for the development of the Australian Early Development Instrument (AEDI). 2004. Andrich D, Styles I. Final report on the psychometric analysis of the Early Development Instrument (EDI) using the Rasch model: a technical paper commissioned for the development of the Australian Early Development Instrument (AEDI). 2004.
20.
go back to reference Hagquist C, Hellström L: The psychometric properties of the Early Development Instrument: a Rasch analysis based on Swedish pilot data. Social Indicators Research 2013;117:1–17. Hagquist C, Hellström L: The psychometric properties of the Early Development Instrument: a Rasch analysis based on Swedish pilot data. Social Indicators Research 2013;117:1–17.
21.
go back to reference Wright BD, Tennant A. Sample size again. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1996;9:468. Wright BD, Tennant A. Sample size again. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1996;9:468.
22.
go back to reference Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46:1–18.CrossRefPubMed Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46:1–18.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Mills RJ, Young CA, Pallant JF, Tennant A. Rasch analysis of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:1049–51.CrossRefPubMed Mills RJ, Young CA, Pallant JF, Tennant A. Rasch analysis of the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:1049–51.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Andrich D. An elaboration of Guttman scaling with Rasch models for measurement. Sociol Methodol. 1985;33. Andrich D. An elaboration of Guttman scaling with Rasch models for measurement. Sociol Methodol. 1985;33.
25.
go back to reference Hobart JC, Cano SJ: Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(12) Hobart JC, Cano SJ: Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(12)
26.
go back to reference Andrich D, Sheridan B. Rasch RUMM2030: unidimensional models for measurement. Perth: RUMM Laboratory; 2010. Andrich D, Sheridan B. Rasch RUMM2030: unidimensional models for measurement. Perth: RUMM Laboratory; 2010.
27.
go back to reference Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Zajicek JP, Thompson AJ. Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:1094–105.CrossRefPubMed Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Zajicek JP, Thompson AJ. Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:1094–105.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Else-Quest NM, Hyde JS, Goldsmith HH, Van Hulle CA. Gender differences in temperament: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2006;132:33–72.CrossRefPubMed Else-Quest NM, Hyde JS, Goldsmith HH, Van Hulle CA. Gender differences in temperament: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2006;132:33–72.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Early Development Instrument: an evaluation of its five domains using Rasch analysis
Authors
Margaret Curtin
John Browne
Anthony Staines
Ivan J. Perry
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0543-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Pediatrics 1/2016 Go to the issue