Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Tumor Biology 9/2014

01-09-2014 | Research Article

The diagnostic value of serum hybrid capture 2 (CH2) HPV DNA in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Duo Yin, Yan Jiang, Ning Wang, Ling Ouyang, Yanming Lu, Yao Zhang, Heng Wei, Shulan Zhang

Published in: Tumor Biology | Issue 9/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of cervical cancer remains a clinical challenge, and a number of studies have used the serum hybrid capture 2 (HC2) human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in the diagnosis of cervical cancer. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to determine the overall accuracy of HC2 HPV DNA in the diagnosis of cervical cancer. A systematic review of studies from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Ovid, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database-disc, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Technology of Chongqing (VIP), and Wan Fang database was conducted, and the data concerning the accuracy of HC2 HPV DNA in the diagnosis of cervical cancer were pooled. The methodological quality of each study was assessed by quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy (QUADAS). Statistical analysis was performed by employing Meta-DiSc (version 1.4) and Stata (version 12.0) software. The overall test performance was summarized using receiver operating characteristic curves. Finally, 12 studies, including 12,492 subjects, met the inclusion criteria and then included in this present meta-analysis. The summary estimates for serum HC2 HPV DNA in the diagnosis of cervical cancer were as follows: sensitivity 0.83 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.81–0.85), specificity 0.71 (95 % CI 0.69–0.72), positive likelihood ratio 3.65 (95 % CI 1.77–7.54), negative likelihood ratio 0.32 (95 % CI 0.21–0.48), and diagnostic odds ratio 10.54 (95 % CI 4.95–22.46), and the area under the curve was 0.8922. Our findings suggest that HC2 HPV DNA may improve the accuracy of cervical cancer diagnosis, while the results of HC2 HPV DNA assays should be interpreted in parallel with conventional test results and other clinical findings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Echelman D, Feldman S. Management of cervical precancers: a global perspective. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am. 2012;26:31–44.CrossRef Echelman D, Feldman S. Management of cervical precancers: a global perspective. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am. 2012;26:31–44.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ferlay J SH, Bray F. GLOBOCAN 2008 v1.2, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 10 [Internet]. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed November 6, 2011. Ferlay J SH, Bray F. GLOBOCAN 2008 v1.2, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 10 [Internet]. Lyon (France): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. Available at: http://​globocan.​iarc.​fr. Accessed November 6, 2011.
3.
go back to reference International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC Handbooks of cancer prevention: cervix cancer screening, chapter2. Lyon, France: IARC; 2005. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC Handbooks of cancer prevention: cervix cancer screening, chapter2. Lyon, France: IARC; 2005.
4.
go back to reference Poljak M, Kocjan BJ. Commercially available assays for multiplex detection of alpha human papillomaviruses. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010;8:1139–62.CrossRefPubMed Poljak M, Kocjan BJ. Commercially available assays for multiplex detection of alpha human papillomaviruses. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010;8:1139–62.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Smidt N, Deeks J, Moore T. Guide to the contents of a Cochrane review and protocol. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. 2011. Smidt N, Deeks J, Moore T. Guide to the contents of a Cochrane review and protocol. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. 2011.
6.
go back to reference Deville WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, Montori VM, de Vet HC, et al. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002;2:9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Deville WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM, Montori VM, de Vet HC, et al. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002;2:9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1129–35.CrossRefPubMed Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1129–35.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lijmer JG, Bossuyt PM, Heisterkamp SH. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. Stat Med. 2002;21:1525–37.CrossRefPubMed Lijmer JG, Bossuyt PM, Heisterkamp SH. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. Stat Med. 2002;21:1525–37.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Walter SD. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data. Stat Med. 2002;21:1237–56.CrossRefPubMed Walter SD. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data. Stat Med. 2002;21:1237–56.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Jones CM, Athanasiou T. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis techniques in the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:16–20.CrossRefPubMed Jones CM, Athanasiou T. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis techniques in the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:16–20.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Coste J, Cochand-Priollet B, de Cremoux P, et al. Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervica1 cancer screening [J]. BMJ. 2003;326(7392):733–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Coste J, Cochand-Priollet B, de Cremoux P, et al. Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervica1 cancer screening [J]. BMJ. 2003;326(7392):733–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Schneider A, Hoyer H, Lotz B, et al. Screening for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer by testing for high-risk HPV, routine cytology or colposcopy. Int J Cancer. 2000;89(6):529–34.CrossRefPubMed Schneider A, Hoyer H, Lotz B, et al. Screening for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer by testing for high-risk HPV, routine cytology or colposcopy. Int J Cancer. 2000;89(6):529–34.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ratnam S, Franco EL, Ferenczy A. Human papillomavirus testing for primary screening of cervical cancer precursors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9(9):945–51.PubMed Ratnam S, Franco EL, Ferenczy A. Human papillomavirus testing for primary screening of cervical cancer precursors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9(9):945–51.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Miranda PSM, Castelo A, Makabe S, et al. Screening for cervical cancer in high-risk populations: DNA pap test or Hybrid Capture II test alone. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2006;25(1):38–41.CrossRef Miranda PSM, Castelo A, Makabe S, et al. Screening for cervical cancer in high-risk populations: DNA pap test or Hybrid Capture II test alone. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2006;25(1):38–41.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gareia F, Barker B, Santos C, et al. Cross-sectional study of patient and physician collected cervical cytology and human papillomavirus. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(2):266–72.CrossRef Gareia F, Barker B, Santos C, et al. Cross-sectional study of patient and physician collected cervical cytology and human papillomavirus. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(2):266–72.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kumar K, Iyer VK, Bhatla N, et al. Comparative evaluation of smear cytology & hybrid capture II for the diagnosis of cervical cancer. Indian J Med Res. 2007;126(1):39–44.PubMed Kumar K, Iyer VK, Bhatla N, et al. Comparative evaluation of smear cytology & hybrid capture II for the diagnosis of cervical cancer. Indian J Med Res. 2007;126(1):39–44.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Qiao YL, Zhang WH, Li AL, et al. Cross-sectional comparative study of cervical cancer screening methods. Acta Acad Med Sin. 2002;24(1):51–3. Qiao YL, Zhang WH, Li AL, et al. Cross-sectional comparative study of cervical cancer screening methods. Acta Acad Med Sin. 2002;24(1):51–3.
19.
go back to reference Huang DY. Cervical smears, colposcopy and HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. J Guangxi Med Univ. 2007;24(5):763–4. Huang DY. Cervical smears, colposcopy and HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. J Guangxi Med Univ. 2007;24(5):763–4.
20.
go back to reference Lu SY, Zhu SY, Chen YY. The application of the detection of high-risk human papillomavirus by the technology flow-through hybridization gene coms chip in cervical cancer filtrate. Mater Child Health Care China. 2007;22(36):5215–6. Lu SY, Zhu SY, Chen YY. The application of the detection of high-risk human papillomavirus by the technology flow-through hybridization gene coms chip in cervical cancer filtrate. Mater Child Health Care China. 2007;22(36):5215–6.
21.
go back to reference Gao N, Yao JP. HPV testing, comparative study of conventional smears and liquid-based producer law in cervical cancer screening. Prog Obstet Gynecol. 2007;16(11):857–9. Gao N, Yao JP. HPV testing, comparative study of conventional smears and liquid-based producer law in cervical cancer screening. Prog Obstet Gynecol. 2007;16(11):857–9.
22.
go back to reference Song LJ, Wei B, Li YY. Comparative study on the screening methods of cervical intraepithelial neoplasm. Lab Med. 2007;22(2):139–41. Song LJ, Wei B, Li YY. Comparative study on the screening methods of cervical intraepithelial neoplasm. Lab Med. 2007;22(2):139–41.
23.
go back to reference Li HY, Zhang W, Zhu SJ, Yang Y, Yi GW. Discussion and research the effective scheme of early cervical cancer screening. Shanxi Med J. 2006;35(7):842–3. Li HY, Zhang W, Zhu SJ, Yang Y, Yi GW. Discussion and research the effective scheme of early cervical cancer screening. Shanxi Med J. 2006;35(7):842–3.
24.
25.
go back to reference Ioannidis JP, Boffetta P, Little J, O’Brien TR, Uitterlinden AG, et al. Assessment of cumulative evidence on genetic associations: interim guidelines. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:120–32.CrossRefPubMed Ioannidis JP, Boffetta P, Little J, O’Brien TR, Uitterlinden AG, et al. Assessment of cumulative evidence on genetic associations: interim guidelines. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:120–32.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Jones CM, Athanasiou T. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis techniques in the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:16–20.CrossRefPubMed Jones CM, Athanasiou T. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis techniques in the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:16–20.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Walter SD. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data. Stat Med. 2002;21:1237–56.CrossRefPubMed Walter SD. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data. Stat Med. 2002;21:1237–56.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The diagnostic value of serum hybrid capture 2 (CH2) HPV DNA in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Duo Yin
Yan Jiang
Ning Wang
Ling Ouyang
Yanming Lu
Yao Zhang
Heng Wei
Shulan Zhang
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Tumor Biology / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 1010-4283
Electronic ISSN: 1423-0380
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2214-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

Tumor Biology 9/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine