Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 2/2003

01-10-2003 | Review

The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly

Authors: Robert Gunzburg, Marek Szpalski

Published in: European Spine Journal | Special Issue 2/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Canal stenosis is now the most common indication for lumbar spine surgery in elderly subjects. Degenerative disc disease is by far the most common cause of lumbar spinal stenosis. It is generally accepted that surgery is indicated if a well-conducted conservative management fails. A meta-analysis of the literature showed on average that 64% of surgically treated patients for lumbar spinal stenosis were reported to have good-to-excellent outcomes. In recent years, however, a growing tendency towards less invasive decompressive surgery has emerged. One such procedure, laminarthrectomy, refers to a surgical decompression involving a partial laminectomy of the vertebra above and below the stenotic level combined with a partial arthrectomy at that level. It can be performed through an approach which preserves a maximum of bony and ligamentous structures. Another principle of surgical treatment is interspinous process distraction This device is implanted between the spinous processes, thus reducing extension at the symptomatic level(s), yet allowing flexion and unrestricted axial rotation and lateral flexion. It limits the further narrowing of the canal in upright and extended position. In accordance with the current general tendency towards minimally invasive surgery, such techniques, which preserve much of the anatomy, and the biomechanical function of the lumbar spine may prove highly indicated in the surgical treatment of lumbar stenosis, especially in the elderly.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ et al (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine 25:1424–1436PubMed Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ et al (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine 25:1424–1436PubMed
2.
go back to reference Aryanpur J, Ducker T (1990) Multilevel lumbar laminotomies: an alternative to laminectomy in the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 26:429–432PubMed Aryanpur J, Ducker T (1990) Multilevel lumbar laminotomies: an alternative to laminectomy in the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 26:429–432PubMed
3.
go back to reference Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, Keller RB et al (1996) The Maine lumbar spine study, part III. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21:1787–1795CrossRefPubMed Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, Keller RB et al (1996) The Maine lumbar spine study, part III. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21:1787–1795CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D et al (2000) Surgical and nonsurgical Management of lumbar spine stenosis. Four-year outcomes from the Maine lumbar spine study. Spine 25:556–562PubMed Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D et al (2000) Surgical and nonsurgical Management of lumbar spine stenosis. Four-year outcomes from the Maine lumbar spine study. Spine 25:556–562PubMed
5.
go back to reference Caspar W, Papavero L, Sayler MK et al (1994) Precise and limited decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 131:130–136 Caspar W, Papavero L, Sayler MK et al (1994) Precise and limited decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 131:130–136
6.
go back to reference Ciol MA, Deyo RA, Howell E et al (1996) An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications and re-operations. J Am Geriatr Soc 44:285–290PubMed Ciol MA, Deyo RA, Howell E et al (1996) An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications and re-operations. J Am Geriatr Soc 44:285–290PubMed
7.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Loeser JD et al (1992) Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine: the influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 4:536–543 Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Loeser JD et al (1992) Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine: the influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 4:536–543
8.
go back to reference Epstein NE (1998) Decompression in the surgical management of degenerative spondylolisthesis: advantages of a conservative approach in 290 patients. J Spinal Disord 11:116–122PubMed Epstein NE (1998) Decompression in the surgical management of degenerative spondylolisthesis: advantages of a conservative approach in 290 patients. J Spinal Disord 11:116–122PubMed
9.
go back to reference Fraser RD, Hall DJ (1992) Laminectomy combined with posterolateral stabilisation: a muscle-splitting approach to the lumbosacral spine. Eur Spine J 1:249–253 Fraser RD, Hall DJ (1992) Laminectomy combined with posterolateral stabilisation: a muscle-splitting approach to the lumbosacral spine. Eur Spine J 1:249–253
10.
go back to reference Fredman B, Arinzon Z, Zohar E et al (2002) Observations on the safety and efficacy of surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in geriatric patients. Eur Spine J 11:571–574CrossRefPubMed Fredman B, Arinzon Z, Zohar E et al (2002) Observations on the safety and efficacy of surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in geriatric patients. Eur Spine J 11:571–574CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Greenough CG, Fraser RD (1992) Lumbar spinal canal morphometry from computed tomography scans: reproducibility, results and clinical implications. Eur Spine J 1:32–37 Greenough CG, Fraser RD (1992) Lumbar spinal canal morphometry from computed tomography scans: reproducibility, results and clinical implications. Eur Spine J 1:32–37
12.
go back to reference Greenough CG, Fraser RD (1992) Assessment of outcome in patients with low-back pain. Spine 17:36–41PubMed Greenough CG, Fraser RD (1992) Assessment of outcome in patients with low-back pain. Spine 17:36–41PubMed
13.
go back to reference Gunzburg R, Sandhu A, Fraser RD (1989) The value of computerized tomography in determining lumbar facet orientation. J Spinal Disord 2:170–175PubMed Gunzburg R, Sandhu A, Fraser RD (1989) The value of computerized tomography in determining lumbar facet orientation. J Spinal Disord 2:170–175PubMed
14.
go back to reference Gunzburg R, Szpalski M, Hayez J-P (1996) The surgical approach to the lumbar spine. In: Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Spengler D, Nachemson A (eds) Instrumented fusion of the lumbar spine: state of the art, questions and controversies. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 17–24 Gunzburg R, Szpalski M, Hayez J-P (1996) The surgical approach to the lumbar spine. In: Szpalski M, Gunzburg R, Spengler D, Nachemson A (eds) Instrumented fusion of the lumbar spine: state of the art, questions and controversies. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 17–24
15.
go back to reference Gunzburg R, Keller TS, Szpalski M et al (2003) A prospective study on CT scan outcomes after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Techn 16:261–267:2003 Gunzburg R, Keller TS, Szpalski M et al (2003) A prospective study on CT scan outcomes after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Techn 16:261–267:2003
16.
go back to reference GunzburgR, Keller TS, Szpalski M et al (2003) Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 12:197–204PubMed GunzburgR, Keller TS, Szpalski M et al (2003) Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 12:197–204PubMed
17.
go back to reference Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T (1994) Computed tomography after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 19:1975–1978PubMed Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T (1994) Computed tomography after laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 19:1975–1978PubMed
18.
go back to reference Herno A, Saari T, Suomalainen O et al (1999) The degree of decompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24:1010–1014CrossRefPubMed Herno A, Saari T, Suomalainen O et al (1999) The degree of decompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24:1010–1014CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Herron LD, Mangelsdorf C (1991) Lumbar spinal stenosis: results of surgical treatment. J Spinal Disord 4:26–33PubMed Herron LD, Mangelsdorf C (1991) Lumbar spinal stenosis: results of surgical treatment. J Spinal Disord 4:26–33PubMed
20.
go back to reference Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Larson MG et al (1991) The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:809–816PubMed Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Larson MG et al (1991) The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:809–816PubMed
21.
go back to reference Katz JN, Wright EA, Guadagnoli et al (1994) Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopaedic surgery for degenerative arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 37:687–694PubMed Katz JN, Wright EA, Guadagnoli et al (1994) Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopaedic surgery for degenerative arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 37:687–694PubMed
22.
go back to reference Katz, JN, Lipson SL, Brick GW et al (1995) Clinical correlates of patient satisfaction after laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 20:1155–1160PubMed Katz, JN, Lipson SL, Brick GW et al (1995) Clinical correlates of patient satisfaction after laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 20:1155–1160PubMed
23.
go back to reference Katz JN, Lipson SL, Chang LC et al (1996) Seven to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21:92–98CrossRefPubMed Katz JN, Lipson SL, Chang LC et al (1996) Seven to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 21:92–98CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Lin PM (1982) Internal decompression for multiple levels of lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note. Neurosurgery 11:546–549PubMed Lin PM (1982) Internal decompression for multiple levels of lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note. Neurosurgery 11:546–549PubMed
25.
go back to reference Munting E, Druez V, Tsoukas D (2000) Surgical decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis according to Senegas technique. In: Gunzburg R, Szpalski M (eds) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 207–214 Munting E, Druez V, Tsoukas D (2000) Surgical decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis according to Senegas technique. In: Gunzburg R, Szpalski M (eds) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 207–214
26.
go back to reference Postacchini F (1996) Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:154–164PubMed Postacchini F (1996) Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:154–164PubMed
27.
go back to reference Ragab AA, Fye MA, Bohlman HH (2003) Surgery of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis in 118 patients 70 years of age or older. Spine 28:348–353CrossRefPubMed Ragab AA, Fye MA, Bohlman HH (2003) Surgery of the lumbar spine for spinal stenosis in 118 patients 70 years of age or older. Spine 28:348–353CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Swanson KE, Lindsey DP, Hsu KY et al (2003) The effects of an interspinous implant on vertebral disc pressures. Spine 28:26–32CrossRefPubMed Swanson KE, Lindsey DP, Hsu KY et al (2003) The effects of an interspinous implant on vertebral disc pressures. Spine 28:26–32CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Tsai RY, Yaang R-S, Bray RS (1998) Microscopic laminotomies for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 11:389–394PubMed Tsai RY, Yaang R-S, Bray RS (1998) Microscopic laminotomies for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 11:389–394PubMed
30.
go back to reference Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R (1992) Surgery for lumbar stenosis: attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 17:1–8PubMed Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R (1992) Surgery for lumbar stenosis: attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 17:1–8PubMed
31.
go back to reference Verbiest H (1954) Radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. J Bone Joint Surg Br 26:230–237 Verbiest H (1954) Radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. J Bone Joint Surg Br 26:230–237
32.
go back to reference Weiner BK, Fraser RD, Peterson M (1999) Spinous process osteotomies to facilitate lumbar decompressive surgery. Spine 24:62–66 Weiner BK, Fraser RD, Peterson M (1999) Spinous process osteotomies to facilitate lumbar decompressive surgery. Spine 24:62–66
33.
go back to reference Wong HK, Bose K (1992) Spinal stenosis–Result of surgical treatment. J West Pac Orthop Assoc 29:37–41 Wong HK, Bose K (1992) Spinal stenosis–Result of surgical treatment. J West Pac Orthop Assoc 29:37–41
34.
go back to reference Young S, Veerapen R, O'Laoire SA (1988) Relief of lumbar canal stenosis using multilevel subarticular fenestrations as an alternative to wide laminectomy: preliminary report. Neurosurgery 23:628–633PubMed Young S, Veerapen R, O'Laoire SA (1988) Relief of lumbar canal stenosis using multilevel subarticular fenestrations as an alternative to wide laminectomy: preliminary report. Neurosurgery 23:628–633PubMed
35.
go back to reference Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA et al (2003) A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X-STOP interspinous spacer: 1-year results. Eur Spine J (in press) Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA et al (2003) A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X-STOP interspinous spacer: 1-year results. Eur Spine J (in press)
Metadata
Title
The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly
Authors
Robert Gunzburg
Marek Szpalski
Publication date
01-10-2003
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue Special Issue 2/2003
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0611-2

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2003

European Spine Journal 2/2003 Go to the issue