Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 3/2023

Open Access 20-08-2021 | KNEE

The compartmental approach to revision of partial knee arthroplasty results in nearer-normal gait and improved patient reported outcomes compared to total knee arthroplasty

Authors: Amy J. Garner, Oliver W. Dandridge, Richard J. van Arkel, Justin P. Cobb

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 3/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated the gait and patient reported outcome measures of subjects converted from a partial knee arthroplasty to combined partial knee arthroplasty, using a compartmental approach. Healthy subjects and primary total knee arthroplasty patients were used as control groups.

Methods

Twenty-three patients converted from partial to combined partial knee arthroplasty were measured on the instrumented treadmill at top walking speeds, using standard gait metrics. Data were compared to healthy controls (n = 22) and primary posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty subjects (n = 23) where surgery were performed for one or two-compartment osteoarthritis. Groups were matched for age, sex and body mass index. At the time of gait analysis, combined partial knee arthroplasty subjects were median 17 months post-revision surgery (range 4–81 months) while the total knee arthroplasty group was median 16 months post-surgery (range 6–150 months). Oxford Knee Scores and EuroQol-5D 5L scores were recorded at the time of treadmill assessment, and results analysed by question and domain.

Results

Subjects revised from partial to combined partial knee arthroplasty walked 16% faster than total knee arthroplasty (mean top walking speed 6.4 ± 0.8 km/h, vs. 5.5 ± 0.7 km/h p = 0.003), demonstrating nearer-normal weight-acceptance rate (p < 0.001), maximum weight-acceptance force (p < 0.006), mid-stance force (p < 0.03), contact time (p < 0.02), double support time (p < 0.009), step length (p = 0.003) and stride length (p = 0.051) compared to primary total knee arthroplasty. Combined partial knee arthroplasty subjects had a median Oxford Knee Score of 43 (interquartile range 39–47) vs. 38 (interquartile range 32–41, p < 0.02) and reported a median EQ-5D 0.94 (interquartile range 0.87–1.0) vs. 0.84 (interquartile range 0.80–0.89, p = 0.006).

Conclusion

This study finds that a compartmental approach to native compartment degeneration following partial knee arthroplasty results in nearer-normal gait and improved patient satisfaction compared to total knee arthroplasty.

Level of evidence

III.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference (2019) 16th Annual report 2019. National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (2019) 16th Annual report 2019. National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man
2.
go back to reference Al-Dadah O, Hawes G, Chapman-Sheath PJ, Tice JW, Barrett DS (2020) Unicompartmental vs. segmental bicompartmental vs. total knee replacement: comparison of clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Relat Res 32:47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Al-Dadah O, Hawes G, Chapman-Sheath PJ, Tice JW, Barrett DS (2020) Unicompartmental vs. segmental bicompartmental vs. total knee replacement: comparison of clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Relat Res 32:47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Banger MS, Johnston WD, Razii N, Doonan J, Rowe PJ, Jones BG et al (2020) Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Bone Jt J 102-b:1511–1518CrossRef Banger MS, Johnston WD, Razii N, Doonan J, Rowe PJ, Jones BG et al (2020) Robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty maintains natural knee joint anatomy compared with total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Bone Jt J 102-b:1511–1518CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Beard DJ, Harris K, Dawson J, Doll H, Murray DW, Carr AJ et al (2015) Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 68:73–79CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beard DJ, Harris K, Dawson J, Doll H, Murray DW, Carr AJ et al (2015) Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 68:73–79CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Biazzo A, Silvestrini F, Manzotti A, Confalonieri N (2019) Bicompartmental (uni plus patellofemoral) versus total knee arthroplasty: a match-paired study. Musculoskelet Surg 103:63–68CrossRefPubMed Biazzo A, Silvestrini F, Manzotti A, Confalonieri N (2019) Bicompartmental (uni plus patellofemoral) versus total knee arthroplasty: a match-paired study. Musculoskelet Surg 103:63–68CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Burger JA, Kleeblad LJ, Laas N, Pearle AD (2020) Mid-term survivorship and patient-reported outcomes of robotic-arm assisted partial knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 102-b:108–116CrossRef Burger JA, Kleeblad LJ, Laas N, Pearle AD (2020) Mid-term survivorship and patient-reported outcomes of robotic-arm assisted partial knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 102-b:108–116CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Crawford DA, Berend KR, Lombardi AV (2018) Management of the failed medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 26:e426–e433CrossRefPubMed Crawford DA, Berend KR, Lombardi AV (2018) Management of the failed medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 26:e426–e433CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Garner A, Dandridge O, Amis AA, Cobb JP, van Arkel RJ (2021) The extensor efficiency of unicompartmental, bicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt Res 10:1–9CrossRef Garner A, Dandridge O, Amis AA, Cobb JP, van Arkel RJ (2021) The extensor efficiency of unicompartmental, bicompartmental, and total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt Res 10:1–9CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Garner A, van Arkel RJ, Cobb J (2019) Classification of combined partial knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 101-B:922–928CrossRef Garner A, van Arkel RJ, Cobb J (2019) Classification of combined partial knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 101-B:922–928CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ, Murray DW (2010) A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Jt Surg Br 92:1628–1631CrossRef Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ, Murray DW (2010) A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Jt Surg Br 92:1628–1631CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gromov K, Petersen PB, Jørgensen CC, Troelsen A, Kehlet H (2020) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty undertaken using a fast-track protocol. Bone Jt J 102-b:1167–1175CrossRef Gromov K, Petersen PB, Jørgensen CC, Troelsen A, Kehlet H (2020) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty undertaken using a fast-track protocol. Bone Jt J 102-b:1167–1175CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Masri BA (2019) Compartmental arthroplasty: time for a clear nomenclature. Bone Jt J 101-b:889–890CrossRef Haddad FS, Masri BA (2019) Compartmental arthroplasty: time for a clear nomenclature. Bone Jt J 101-b:889–890CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Cartier P (2010) UKA in combination with PFR at average 12-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:1227–1230CrossRefPubMed Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Cartier P (2010) UKA in combination with PFR at average 12-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:1227–1230CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
go back to reference Jenkins C, Jackson W, Bottomley N, Price A, Murray D, Barker K (2019) Introduction of an innovative day surgery pathway for unicompartmental knee replacement: no need for early knee flexion. Physiotherapy 105:46–52CrossRefPubMed Jenkins C, Jackson W, Bottomley N, Price A, Murray D, Barker K (2019) Introduction of an innovative day surgery pathway for unicompartmental knee replacement: no need for early knee flexion. Physiotherapy 105:46–52CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Jonas SC, Jermin P, Howells N, Porteous A, Murray J, Robinson J (2019) Outcome of revision UKR to TKR when compared to a matched group of TKR of same total arthroplasty lifespan. Knee 26:400–404CrossRefPubMed Jonas SC, Jermin P, Howells N, Porteous A, Murray J, Robinson J (2019) Outcome of revision UKR to TKR when compared to a matched group of TKR of same total arthroplasty lifespan. Knee 26:400–404CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Jones G, Kotti M, Wiik A, Collins R, Brevadt M, Strachan R et al (2016) Gait comparison of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasties with healthy controls. Bone Jt J 98-B:16–21CrossRef Jones G, Kotti M, Wiik A, Collins R, Brevadt M, Strachan R et al (2016) Gait comparison of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasties with healthy controls. Bone Jt J 98-B:16–21CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Joseph MN, Carmont MR, Tailor H, Stephen JM, Amis AA (2020) Total knee arthroplasty reduces knee extension torque in-vitro and patellofemoral arthroplasty does not. J Biomech 104:109739CrossRefPubMed Joseph MN, Carmont MR, Tailor H, Stephen JM, Amis AA (2020) Total knee arthroplasty reduces knee extension torque in-vitro and patellofemoral arthroplasty does not. J Biomech 104:109739CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Khan Z, Nawaz SZ, Kahane S, Esler C, Chatterji U (2013) Conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: the challenges and need for augments. Acta Orthop Belg 79:699–705PubMed Khan Z, Nawaz SZ, Kahane S, Esler C, Chatterji U (2013) Conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: the challenges and need for augments. Acta Orthop Belg 79:699–705PubMed
27.
go back to reference Lewis PL, Graves SE, Cuthbert A, Parker D, Myers P (2019) What is the risk of repeat revision when patellofemoral replacement is revised to TKA? An analysis of 482 cases from a large national arthroplasty registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 477:1402–1410CrossRefPubMed Lewis PL, Graves SE, Cuthbert A, Parker D, Myers P (2019) What is the risk of repeat revision when patellofemoral replacement is revised to TKA? An analysis of 482 cases from a large national arthroplasty registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 477:1402–1410CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Liddle A, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray D (2015) Optimal usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 41,986 cases from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Jt J 97-b:1506–1511CrossRef Liddle A, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray D (2015) Optimal usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 41,986 cases from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Bone Jt J 97-b:1506–1511CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lim JBT, Pang HN, Tay KJD, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ (2019) Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty are as good as a primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee 26:847–852CrossRefPubMed Lim JBT, Pang HN, Tay KJD, Chia SL, Lo NN, Yeo SJ (2019) Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction following revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty are as good as a primary total knee arthroplasty. Knee 26:847–852CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Lundberg HJ, Rojas IL, Foucher KC, Wimmer MA (2016) Comparison of antagonist muscle activity during walking between total knee replacement and control subjects using unnormalized electromyography. J Arthroplast 31:1331–1339CrossRef Lundberg HJ, Rojas IL, Foucher KC, Wimmer MA (2016) Comparison of antagonist muscle activity during walking between total knee replacement and control subjects using unnormalized electromyography. J Arthroplast 31:1331–1339CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Murray DW, Parkinson RW (2018) Usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 100-b:432–435CrossRef Murray DW, Parkinson RW (2018) Usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 100-b:432–435CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2011) Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93:198–204CrossRef Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2011) Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93:198–204CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Pandit H, Mancuso F, Jenkins C, Jackson WFM, Price AJ, Dodd CAF et al (2017) Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of arthritis progression after medial unicompartmental replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:669–674CrossRefPubMed Pandit H, Mancuso F, Jenkins C, Jackson WFM, Price AJ, Dodd CAF et al (2017) Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement for the treatment of arthritis progression after medial unicompartmental replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:669–674CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN (2010) Survival of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 5 to 23 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:64–72CrossRefPubMed Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN (2010) Survival of bicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 5 to 23 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:64–72CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Price AJ, Svard U (2011) A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:174–179CrossRefPubMed Price AJ, Svard U (2011) A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:174–179CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Scott CEH, Powell-Bowns MFR, MacDonald DJ, Simpson PM, Wade FA (2018) Revision of unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty: does the unicompartmental implant (metal-backed vs all-polyethylene) impact the total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplast 33:2203–2209CrossRef Scott CEH, Powell-Bowns MFR, MacDonald DJ, Simpson PM, Wade FA (2018) Revision of unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty: does the unicompartmental implant (metal-backed vs all-polyethylene) impact the total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplast 33:2203–2209CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Wiik AV, Manning V, Strachan RK, Amis AA, Cobb JP (2013) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty enables near normal gait at higher speeds, unlike total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 28:176–178CrossRef Wiik AV, Manning V, Strachan RK, Amis AA, Cobb JP (2013) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty enables near normal gait at higher speeds, unlike total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 28:176–178CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Zuo W, Ma J, Guo W, Zhang Q, Wang W, Liu Z (2018) Comparison of the clinical outcomes of revision of failed UKAs to TKAs with primary TKAs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltim) 97:e13408CrossRef Zuo W, Ma J, Guo W, Zhang Q, Wang W, Liu Z (2018) Comparison of the clinical outcomes of revision of failed UKAs to TKAs with primary TKAs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltim) 97:e13408CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The compartmental approach to revision of partial knee arthroplasty results in nearer-normal gait and improved patient reported outcomes compared to total knee arthroplasty
Authors
Amy J. Garner
Oliver W. Dandridge
Richard J. van Arkel
Justin P. Cobb
Publication date
20-08-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06691-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2023

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 3/2023 Go to the issue