Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Authors: Alison Watson, Lisa Charlesworth, Ruth Jacob, Denise Kendrick, Philippa Logan, Fiona Marshall, Alan Montgomery, Tracey Sach, Wei Tan, Maria Walker, Justin Waring, Diane Whitham, Opinder Sahota

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Older people represent a significant proportion of patients admitted to hospital. Their care compared to younger patients is more challenging, length of stay is longer, risk of hospital-acquired problems higher and the risk of being re-admitted within 28 days greater. This study aims to compare a Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) service with Traditional Hospital Based rehabilitation (THB-Rehab) provided to the older person. The CIRACT service differs from the THB-rehab service in that they are able to provide more intensive hospital rehabilitation, visiting patients daily, and are able to continue with the patient’s rehabilitation following discharge allowing a seamless, integrated discharge working alongside community providers. A pilot comparing the two services showed that the CIRACT service demonstrated reduced length of stay and reduced re-admission rates when analysed over a four-month period.

Methods/Design

This trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the CIRACT service, conducted as a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with an integral qualitative mechanism and action study designed to provide the explanatory and theoretical components on how the CIRACT service compares to current practice. The RCT element consists of 240 patients over 70 years of age, being randomised to either the THB therapy group or the CIRACT service following an unplanned hospital admission. The primary outcome will be hospital length of stay from admission to discharge from the general medical elderly care ward. Additional outcome measures including the Barthel Index, Charlson Co-morbidity Scale, EuroQoL-5D and the modified Client Service Receipt Inventory will be assessed at the time of recruitment and repeated at 91 days post-discharge. The qualitative mechanism and action study will involve a systematic programme of organisational profiling, observations of work processes, interviews with key informants and care providers and tracking of participants. In addition, a within-trial economic evaluation will be undertaken comparing the CIRACT and THB-rehab services to determine cost-effectiveness.

Discussion

The outcome of the study will inform clinical decision-making, with respect to allocation of resources linked to hospital discharge planning and re-admissions, in a resource intensive and growing group of patients.

Trial registration

Registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISCRCTN94393315) on 25 April 2013 (version 3.1, 11 September 2014).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
3.
Sager MA, Franke T, Inouye SK, Landefeld CS, Morgan TM, Rudberg MA, et al. Functional outcomes of acute medical illness and hospitalization in older persons. Arch Int Med. 1996;156(6):645–52.CrossRef
4.
5.
Coleman EA, Parry C, Chalmers S, Min SJ. The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Int Med. 2006;166(17):1822–8.CrossRef
6.
Levine C. Rough crossings: family caregivers' odysseys through the health care system. New York: United Hospital Fund of New York; 1998.
7.
Vom Eigen KA, Walker JD, Edgman-Levitan S, Cleary PD, Delbanco TL. Carepartner experiences with hospital care. Med Care. 1999;37(1):33–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Weaver FM, Perloff L, Waters T. Patients' and caregivers' transition from hospital to home: needs and recommendations. Home Health Care Serv. 1998;17(3):27–48.CrossRef
9.
Beers MH, Sliwkowski J, Brooks J. Compliance with medication orders among the elderly after hospital discharge. Hosp Formul. 1999;27(7):720–4.
10.
Coleman EAJ, Smith JD, Raha D, Min SJ. Posthospital medication discrepancies: prevalence and contributing factors. Arch Int Med. 2005;165(16):1842–7.CrossRef
11.
Cornish PL, Knowles SR, Marchesano R, Tam V, Shadowitz Z, Juurlink DN, et al. Unintended medication discrepancies at the time of hospital admission. Arch Int Med. 2005;165(4):424–9.CrossRef
12.
Moore CJ, Wisnivesky J, Williams S, McGinn T. Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(8):646–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Van Walraven C, Seth R, Austin PC, Laupacis A. Effect of discharge summary availability during postdischarge visits on hospital readmission. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(3):186–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Dudas V, Bookwalter T, Kerr KM, Pantilat SZ. The impact of follow-up telephone calls to patients after hopsitalisation. Am J Med. 2001;111(9B):26S–30.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Boockvar K, Fishman E, Kyriacou CK, Monias A, Gavi S, Cortes T. Adverse events due to discontinuations in drug use and dose changes in patients transferred between acute and long-term care facilities. Arch Int Med. 2004;164(5):545–50.CrossRef
16.
17.
18.
Bachmann S, Finger C, Huss A, Egger M, Stuck AE, Clough-Gorr KM. Inpatient rehabilitation specifically designed for geriatric patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c1718.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Nancarrow S, Moran A, Freeman J, Enderby P, Dixon S, Parker S, et al. Looking inside the black box of community rehabilitation and intermediate care teams in the United Kingdom: an audit of service and staffing. Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(5):323–33.PubMed
20.
Grimmer KA, Moss JR, Gill TK. Discharge planning quality from the carer perspective. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(9):1005–13.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Melin AL, Hakansson S, Bygren LO. The cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation in the home: a study of Swedish elderly. Am J Public Health. 1993;83(3):356–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Parry C, Coleman EA, Smith JD, Frank J, Kramer AM. The care transitions intervention: a patient-centered approach to ensuring effective transfers between sites of geriatric care. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2003;22(3):1–17.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Shepperd S, Parkes J, McClaren J, Phillips C. Discharge planning from hospital to home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;1, CD000313.PubMed
24.
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.PubMed
25.
Group EQ. EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.CrossRef
26.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Beecham J, Knapp M. Chapter 12: Costing Psychiatric Interventions. Discussion Paper 1536. In: Thornicroft G, editor. Measuring Mental Health Needs. 2nd ed. London: Gaskell; 1999. p. 200–24.
28.
29.
Berghmans RLP, Ter Meulen RHJ. Ethical issues in research with dementia patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1995;10:64751.CrossRef
30.
Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M, Hawkins C. The non-spread of innovations: the mediating role of professionals. Acad Manag J. 2005;48(1):117–34.CrossRef
31.
Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
33.
Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications; 2003.
34.
Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1993. p. 173–94.
35.
Drummond M, Schulpher M, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart G. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
36.
37.
Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher MJ. Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ. 2005;14(5):487–96.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Fenwick E, Byford S. A guide to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Br J Psychiatry. 2005;187:106–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Suh DC, Choi IS, Plauschinat C, Kwon J, Baron M. Impact of comorbid conditions and race/ethnicity on glycaemic control among the US population with type 2 diabetes, 1988-1994 to 1999-2004. J Diabetes Complications. 2010;24(6):382–91.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Walker M, Sahota O, Logan P, Clinical effectiveness. Age and Ageing. 2013;42 Suppl 2: ii5–16.
Metadata
Title
The Community In-Reach and Care Transition (CIRACT) clinical and cost-effectiveness study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Authors
Alison Watson
Lisa Charlesworth
Ruth Jacob
Denise Kendrick
Philippa Logan
Fiona Marshall
Alan Montgomery
Tracey Sach
Wei Tan
Maria Walker
Justin Waring
Diane Whitham
Opinder Sahota
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0551-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Trials 1/2015 Go to the issue

Study protocol

The Karnataka Anemia Project 2 — design and evaluation of a community-based parental intervention to improve childhood anemia cure rates: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

A novel comparative effectiveness study of Tai Chi versus aerobic exercise for fibromyalgia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

Effect of a high-dose target-controlled naloxone infusion on pain and hyperalgesia in patients following groin hernia repair: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Commentary

Making smart investment decisions in clinical research

Methodology

Lessons learned from recruiting socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers into a pilot randomized controlled trial to explore the role of Exercise Assisted Reduction then Stop (EARS) smoking

Study protocol

Effect of a patient-centered drug review on polypharmacy in primary care patients: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial