Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Correspondence

The clinical adoption meta-model: a temporal meta-model describing the clinical adoption of health information systems

Authors: Morgan Price, Francis Lau

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Health information systems (HISs) hold the promise to transform health care; however, their adoption is challenged. We have developed the Clinical Adoption Meta-Model (CAMM) to help describe processes and possible challenges with clinical adoption. The CAMM, developed through an action research study to evaluate a provincial HIS, is a temporal model with four dimensions: availability, use, behaviour changes, and outcome changes. Seven CAMM archetypes are described, illustrating classic trajectories of adoption of HISs over time. Each archetype includes an example from the literature. The CAMM and its archetypes can support HIS implementers, evaluators, learners, and researchers.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Blumenthal D: Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Eng J Med. 2009, 360: 1477-1479. 10.1056/NEJMp0901592.CrossRef
2.
Stead WW, Kelly BJ, Kolodner RM: Achievable steps toward building a national health information infrastructure in the United States. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005, 12: 113-120.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Shekelle P, Morton SC, Keeler EB: Costs and Benefits of Health Information Technology. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 132. (Prepared by the Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center Under Contract No. 290-02-0003.). 2006, Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
4.
Lau F, Kuziemsky C, Price M, Gardner J: A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010, 17: 637-645. 10.1136/jamia.2010.004838.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Lau F, Price M, Boyd J, Partridge C, Bell H, Raworth R: Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012, 12: 10-10.1186/1472-6947-12-10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Donelan K, Rao SR, Ferris TG, Shields A, Rosenbaum S, Blumenthal D: Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2009, 360: 1628-1638. 10.1056/NEJMsa0900592.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Schoen C, Osborn R, Doty MM, Squires D, Peugh J, Applebaum S: A survey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 2009: perspectives on care, costs, and experiences. Health Aff. 2009, 28: w1171-w1183. 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.w1171.CrossRef
8.
Wu S, Chaudhry B, Wang J, Maglione M: Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Int Med. 2006, 144: E12-E22.
9.
Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mahler C: IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006, 6: 3-10.1186/1472-6947-6-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Heeks R: Health information systems: failure, success and improvisation. Int J Med Inform. 2006, 75: 125-137. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.024.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Hall GE, Wallace R, Dossett W: A Developmental Conceptualization of the Adoption Process Within Educational Institutions. 1973, Austin: Texus Univ
12.
DeLone WH: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst. 2003, 19: 9-30.
13.
Lahrmann G, Marx F: Systematization of Maturity Model Extensions. Lecture Notes in Comp Sci. 2010, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 6105: 522-525. 10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_36.
14.
Henderson JC: A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information Systems: Theory and Results. 1986, Boston: M.I.T
15.
Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen K: The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Com Assoc Inform Syst. 2003, 12: 752-780.
16.
Venkatesh V, Davis FD: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000, 46: 186-204. 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.CrossRef
17.
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003, 27: 425-478.
18.
Goodhue DL, Thompson RL: Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 1995, 19: 213-236. 10.2307/249689.CrossRef
19.
Rogers EM: Diffusion of Innovations. 1995, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 5
20.
Rogers EM, Shoemaker FF: Communication of Innovations; a Cross-Cultural Approach. 1971, New York, NY: The Free Press
21.
CMMI Product Team: Capability Maturity Model® Integration (CMMI), Version 1.1--Continuous Representation. 2002, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, 1
22.
Constantinescu R, Iacob IM: Capability maturity model integration. J App Quant Meth. 2007, 2: 31-37.
23.
Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O: Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004, 82: 581-629. 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Armer JM, Harris K, Dusold JM: Application of the concerns-based adoption model to the installation of telemedicine in a Rural Missouri nursing home. J Nurses Staff Devel. 2004, 20: 42-10.1097/00124645-200401000-00008.CrossRef
25.
Holden RJ, Karsh B-T: The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Bio Inform. 2010, 43: 159-172. 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002.CrossRef
26.
Chismar WG, Wiley-Patton S: Does the extended technology acceptance model apply to physicians. Syst Sci. 2003, 8-doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174354
27.
Yusof MM, Stergioulas L, Zugic J: Health information systems adoption: findings from a systematic review. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007, 129: 262-266.PubMed
28.
Lau F, Price M, Keshavjee K: From benefits evaluation to clinical adoption: making sense of health information system success in Canada. Healthc Q. 2011, 14: 39-45.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Pettit L: Understanding EMRAM and how it can be used by policy-makers, hospital CIOs and their IT teams. World Hosp Health Serv. 2013, 49: 7-9.PubMed
30.
Palacio C, Harrison JP, Garets D: Benchmarking electronic medical records initiatives in the US: a conceptual model. J Med Syst. 2009, 34: 273-279.CrossRef
31.
Bakalar R: Diagnostic imaging on demand, information management insights based on Canadian DI/EHR strategies. Comp in Cardio. 2005, 32: 687-689.
32.
VANDEWETERING R, BATENBURG R: A PACS maturity model: a systematic meta-analytic review on maturation and evolvability of PACS in the hospital enterprise. Int J Med Inform. 2009, 78: 127-140. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.010.CrossRef
33.
Wetering R, Batenburg R, Lederman R: Evolutionistic or revolutionary paths? a PACS maturity model for strategic situational planning. Int J CARS. 2010, 5: 401-409. 10.1007/s11548-010-0414-y.CrossRef
34.
Price M, Lau F, Lai J: Measuring EMR adoption: a framework and case study. Elect Healthc. 2011, 10: e25-e30.
35.
Hassenzahl M, Tractinsky N: User experience - a research agenda. Behav Inform Tech. 2006, 25: 91-97. 10.1080/01449290500330331.CrossRef
36.
Kaplan B, Harris-Salamone KD: Health IT success and failure: recommendations from literature and an AMIA workshop. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009, 16: 291-299. 10.1197/jamia.M2997.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Weber-Jahnke J, McCallum G: A Light-Weight Component for Adding Decision Support to Electronic Medical Records. Proc 41st Hawaii Int Conf Syst Sci. 2008, Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 1-10.
38.
Bilykh I, Price M, Jahnke JH, McCallum G: Using the Clinical Document Architecture as open data exchange format for interfacing EMRs with clinical decision support systems. Proc 19th IEEE Int Symp Computer-Based Med Syst, Salt Lake City, Utah. 2006, Los Almitos, CA: IEEE, 855-860.
39.
Price M, Jahnke-Weber JH, McCallum G: Making available clinical decision support in service-oriented architectures. J Inform Tech Healthc. 2008, 6: 42-54.
40.
Eccles M, McColl E, Steen N, Rousseau N, Grimshaw J, Parkin D, Purves I: Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2002, 325: 941-10.1136/bmj.325.7370.941.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Tierney WM, Overhage JM, Murray MD, Harris LE, Zhou X-H, Eckert GJ, Smith FE, Nienaber N, McDonald CJ, Wolinsky FD: Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2003, 18: 967-976. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2003.30635.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
van Doormaal JE, van den Bemt PMLA, Zaal RJ, Egberts ACG, Lenderink BW, Kosterink JGW, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, Mol PGM: The influence that electronic prescribing has on medication errors and preventable adverse drug events: an interrupted time-series study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009, 16: 816-825. 10.1197/jamia.M3099.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Cook PP, Rizzo S, Gooch M, Jordan M, Fang X, Hudson S: Sustained reduction in antimicrobial use and decrease in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile infections following implementation of an electronic medical record at a tertiary-care teaching hospital. J Antimicro Chemo. 2011, 66: 205-209. 10.1093/jac/dkq404.CrossRef
44.
Dorr D, Bonner LM, Cohen AN, Shoai RS, Perrin R, Chaney E, Young AS: Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007, 14: 156-163. 10.1197/jamia.M2255.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Crosson JC, Ohman-Strickland PA, Hahn KA, DiCicco-Bloom B, Shaw E, Orzano AJ, Crabtree BF: Electronic medical records and diabetes quality of care: results from a sample of family medicine practices. Ann Fam Med. 2007, 5: 209-215. 10.1370/afm.696.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Ash JS, Stavri PZ, Kuperman GJ: A consensus statement on considerations for a successful CPOE implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003, 10: 229-10.1197/jamia.M1204.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Ash JS: Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004, 2004 (12): 8-12.CrossRef
48.
Lahrmann G, Marx F, Winter R, Wortmann F: Business intelligence maturity models: an overview. VII Conf Ital Chap AIS. 2010, 1-12.
49.
Greenhalgh T, Russell J: Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? an alternative set of guiding principles. PLoS Med. 2010, 7: e1000360-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000360.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The clinical adoption meta-model: a temporal meta-model describing the clinical adoption of health information systems
Authors
Morgan Price
Francis Lau
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-43

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2014 Go to the issue

Research article

A systematic review of speech recognition technology in health care

Research article

Launching a virtual decision lab: development and field-testing of a web-based patient decision support research platform

Correspondence

A straightforward approach to designing a scoring system for predicting length-of-stay of cardiac surgery patients

Software

Casebook: a virtual patient iPad application for teaching decision-making through the use of electronic health records

Research article

An empirical study to determine factors that motivate and limit the implementation Of ICT in healthcare environments

Research article

Hidden in plain sight: bias towards sick patients when sampling patients with sufficient electronic health record data for research