Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2016

01-02-2016 | Original Article

The Characterization and Prediction of ISGPF Grade C Fistulas Following Pancreatoduodenectomy

Authors: Matthew T. McMillan, Charles M. Vollmer Jr., Horacio J. Asbun, Chad G. Ball, Claudio Bassi, Joal D. Beane, Adam C. Berger, Mark Bloomston, Mark P. Callery, John D. Christein, Elijah Dixon, Jeffrey A. Drebin, Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo, William E. Fisher, Zhi Ven Fong, Ericka Haverick, Michael G. House, Steven J. Hughes, Tara S. Kent, John W. Kunstman, Giuseppe Malleo, Amy L. McElhany, Ronald R. Salem, Kevin Soares, Michael H. Sprys, Vicente Valero III, Ammara A. Watkins, Christopher L. Wolfgang, Stephen W. Behrman

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) grade C postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) are the greatest contributor to major morbidity and mortality following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD); however, their infrequent occurrence has hindered deeper analysis. This study sought to develop a predictive algorithm, which could facilitate effective management of this challenging complication.

Methods

Data were accrued from 4301 PDs worldwide. Demographics, postoperative management, and microbiological characteristics of grade C POPFs were evaluated. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) preoperative and intraoperative variables were compared between grade C POPFs and a 639-case sample of non-grade C POPFs. Risk factors for grade C POPF formation were identified using regression analysis.

Results

Grade C POPFs developed in 79 patients (1.8 %). Deaths (90 days) occurred in 2.0 % (N = 88) of the overall series, with 35 % (N = 25) occurring in the presence of a grade C POPF. Reoperations occurred 72.2 % of the time. The rates of single- and multi-system organ failure were 28.2 and 39.7 %, respectively. Mortality rates escalated with pulmonary, renal, and neurologic organ failure, but they were unaffected by reoperation(s). The median number of complications incurred was four (IQR: 2–5), and the median duration of hospital stay was 32 (IQR: 21–54) days. Warning signs for impending grade C POPFs most often presented on postoperative day (POD) 6. Adjuvant chemotherapy might have benefited 55.7 % of grade C POPF patients, yet it was delayed in 25.6 % and never delivered in 67.4 % of these patients. Predictive models for grade C POPF occurrence based on preoperative factors alone and preoperative and intraoperative factors yielded areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.73 and 0.84 (both P < 0.000001), respectively.

Conclusion

This global study represents the largest analysis of grade C POPFs following PD. It describes the severe burden that grade C POPFs incur on patients, with high rates of reoperation and infection, while also potentially worsening overall survival by causing death and delay/omission of adjuvant therapy. Additionally, aggressive clinical management for these POPFs did not improve or worsen 90-day mortality. Predictive tools developed through these data may provide value in managing this difficult complication.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McMillan, M.T. and C.M. Vollmer, Jr., Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2014. 399(7): p. 811–24.CrossRefPubMed McMillan, M.T. and C.M. Vollmer, Jr., Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2014. 399(7): p. 811–24.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bassi, C., et al., Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions. Dig Surg, 2004. 21(1): p. 54–9.CrossRefPubMed Bassi, C., et al., Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions. Dig Surg, 2004. 21(1): p. 54–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Denbo, J.W., et al., Toward defining grade C pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome. HPB (Oxford), 2012. 14(9): p. 589–93.CrossRef Denbo, J.W., et al., Toward defining grade C pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome. HPB (Oxford), 2012. 14(9): p. 589–93.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bassi, C., et al., Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery, 2005. 138(1): p. 8–13.CrossRefPubMed Bassi, C., et al., Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery, 2005. 138(1): p. 8–13.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Porembka, M.R., et al., Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg, 2010. 210(3): p. 286–98.CrossRefPubMed Porembka, M.R., et al., Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg, 2010. 210(3): p. 286–98.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Raval, M.V., et al., Improving American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk adjustment: incorporation of a novel procedure risk score. J Am Coll Surg, 2010. 211(6): p. 715–23.CrossRefPubMed Raval, M.V., et al., Improving American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk adjustment: incorporation of a novel procedure risk score. J Am Coll Surg, 2010. 211(6): p. 715–23.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bilimoria, K.Y., et al., Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg, 2013. 217(5): p. 833–42 e1-3.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bilimoria, K.Y., et al., Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg, 2013. 217(5): p. 833–42 e1-3.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Callery, M.P., et al., A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg, 2013. 216(1): 1–14.CrossRefPubMed Callery, M.P., et al., A prospectively validated clinical risk score accurately predicts pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg, 2013. 216(1): 1–14.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference ACS-NSQIP, User Guide for the 2013 ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File (PUF). 2013. ACS-NSQIP, User Guide for the 2013 ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File (PUF). 2013.
11.
go back to reference Fuks, D., et al., Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. Am J Surg, 2009. 197(6): p. 702–9.CrossRefPubMed Fuks, D., et al., Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. Am J Surg, 2009. 197(6): p. 702–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Pratt, W.B., M.P. Callery, and C.M. Vollmer, Jr., Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme. World J Surg, 2008. 32(3): p. 419–28.CrossRefPubMed Pratt, W.B., M.P. Callery, and C.M. Vollmer, Jr., Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme. World J Surg, 2008. 32(3): p. 419–28.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lin, J.W., et al., Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg, 2004. 8(8): p. 951–9.CrossRefPubMed Lin, J.W., et al., Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg, 2004. 8(8): p. 951–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference DeOliveira, M.L., et al., Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg, 2006. 244(6): p. 931–7; discussion 937–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed DeOliveira, M.L., et al., Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg, 2006. 244(6): p. 931–7; discussion 937–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gentilello, L.M., et al., Acute ethanol intoxication increases the risk of infection following penetrating abdominal trauma. J Trauma, 1993. 34(5): p. 669–74; discussion 674–5.CrossRefPubMed Gentilello, L.M., et al., Acute ethanol intoxication increases the risk of infection following penetrating abdominal trauma. J Trauma, 1993. 34(5): p. 669–74; discussion 674–5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Marcus, S.G., H. Cohen, and J.H. Ranson, Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg, 1995. 221(6): p. 635–45; discussion 645–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Marcus, S.G., H. Cohen, and J.H. Ranson, Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg, 1995. 221(6): p. 635–45; discussion 645–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Veillette, G., et al., Implications and management of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience. Arch Surg, 2008. 143(5): p. 476–81.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Veillette, G., et al., Implications and management of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience. Arch Surg, 2008. 143(5): p. 476–81.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kamoda, Y., et al., Usefulness of performing a pancreaticojejunostomy with an internal stent after a pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Today, 2008. 38(6): p. 524–8.CrossRefPubMed Kamoda, Y., et al., Usefulness of performing a pancreaticojejunostomy with an internal stent after a pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Today, 2008. 38(6): p. 524–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mathur, A., et al., Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg, 2007. 246(6): p. 1058–64.CrossRefPubMed Mathur, A., et al., Fatty pancreas: a factor in postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg, 2007. 246(6): p. 1058–64.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Noun, R., et al., The impact of obesity on surgical outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy. JOP, 2008. 9(4): p. 468–76.PubMed Noun, R., et al., The impact of obesity on surgical outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy. JOP, 2008. 9(4): p. 468–76.PubMed
23.
go back to reference de Castro, S.M., et al., Incidence and management of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg, 2005. 92(9): p. 1117–23.CrossRefPubMed de Castro, S.M., et al., Incidence and management of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg, 2005. 92(9): p. 1117–23.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Cameron, J.L. and J. He, Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg, 2015. 220(4): p. 530–6.CrossRefPubMed Cameron, J.L. and J. He, Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg, 2015. 220(4): p. 530–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Van Buren, G., 2nd, et al., A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg, 2014. 259(4): p. 605–12.CrossRefPubMed Van Buren, G., 2nd, et al., A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg, 2014. 259(4): p. 605–12.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference McMillan, M.T., et al., The value of drains as a fistula mitigation strategy for pancreatoduodenectomy: something for everyone? Results of a randomized prospective multi-institutional study. J Gastrointest Surg, 2015. 19(1): p. 21–31.CrossRefPubMed McMillan, M.T., et al., The value of drains as a fistula mitigation strategy for pancreatoduodenectomy: something for everyone? Results of a randomized prospective multi-institutional study. J Gastrointest Surg, 2015. 19(1): p. 21–31.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Pratt, W.B., M.P. Callery, and C.M. Vollmer, Jr., The latent presentation of pancreatic fistulas. Br J Surg, 2009. 96(6): p. 641–9.CrossRefPubMed Pratt, W.B., M.P. Callery, and C.M. Vollmer, Jr., The latent presentation of pancreatic fistulas. Br J Surg, 2009. 96(6): p. 641–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Behrman, S.W., et al., The microbiology of secondary and postoperative pancreatic infections: implications for antimicrobial management. Arch Surg, 2011. 146(5): p. 613–9.CrossRefPubMed Behrman, S.W., et al., The microbiology of secondary and postoperative pancreatic infections: implications for antimicrobial management. Arch Surg, 2011. 146(5): p. 613–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hoos, W.A., et al., Pancreatic cancer clinical trials and accrual in the United States. J Clin Oncol, 2013. 31(27): p. 3432–8.CrossRefPubMed Hoos, W.A., et al., Pancreatic cancer clinical trials and accrual in the United States. J Clin Oncol, 2013. 31(27): p. 3432–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Characterization and Prediction of ISGPF Grade C Fistulas Following Pancreatoduodenectomy
Authors
Matthew T. McMillan
Charles M. Vollmer Jr.
Horacio J. Asbun
Chad G. Ball
Claudio Bassi
Joal D. Beane
Adam C. Berger
Mark Bloomston
Mark P. Callery
John D. Christein
Elijah Dixon
Jeffrey A. Drebin
Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo
William E. Fisher
Zhi Ven Fong
Ericka Haverick
Michael G. House
Steven J. Hughes
Tara S. Kent
John W. Kunstman
Giuseppe Malleo
Amy L. McElhany
Ronald R. Salem
Kevin Soares
Michael H. Sprys
Vicente Valero III
Ammara A. Watkins
Christopher L. Wolfgang
Stephen W. Behrman
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2884-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2/2016 Go to the issue