Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drug Safety 10/2011

01-10-2011 | Original Research Article

The Case-Population Study Design

An Analysis of its Application in Pharmacovigilance

Authors: Hélène Théophile, Joan-Ramon Laporte, Nicholas Moore, Karin-Latry Martin, Bernard Bégaud

Published in: Drug Safety | Issue 10/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: The case-population approach or population-based case-cohort approach is derived from the case-control design and consists of comparing past exposure to a given risk factor in subjects presenting a given disease or symptom (cases) with the exposure rate to this factor in the whole cohort or in the source population of cases. In the same way as the case-control approach, the case-population approach measures the disproportionality of exposure between cases of a given disease and their source population expressed in the form of an odds ratio approximating the ratio of the risks in exposed and notexposed populations (relative risk).
Objective: The aim of this study was to (i) present the case-population principle design in a way understandable for non-statisticians; (ii) propose the easiest way of using it for pharmacovigilance purposes (mainly alerting and hypothesis testing); (iii) propose simple formulae for computing an odds ratio and its confidence interval; (iv) apply the approach to several practical and published examples; and (v) discuss its pros and cons in the context of real life.
Methods: The approach used is derived from that comparing two rates expressed as person-time denominators. It allows easy computation of an odds ratio and its confidence interval under several hypotheses. Results obtained with the case-population approach were compared with those of case-control studies published in the literature.
Results: Relevance and limits of the proposed approach are illustrated by examples taken from published pharmacoepidemiological studies. The odds ratio (OR) reported in a European case-control study on centrally acting appetite suppressants and primary pulmonary hypertension was 23.1 (95% CI 6.9, 77.7) versus 31 (95% CI 16.2, 59.2) using the case-population approach. In the European case-control studies SCAR (Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions) and EuroSCAR on the risk of toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with the use of medicines, the OR for cotrimoxazole was 160 and 102, respectively, versus 44.4 using the case-population approach. Similarly, these two case-control studies found ORs of 12 and 72 for carbamazepine versus 24.4 using the case-population approach, 8.7 and 16 for phenobarbital versus 21.9, 12 for piroxicam (analysed in the SCAR study only) versus 14.5, and 5.5 and 18 for allopurinol versus 3.4 using the case-population approach.
Conclusions: Being based on the estimate derived from sales statistics of the total exposure time in the source population of cases, the method can be used even when there is no information about the actual number of exposed subjects in this population. Although the case-population approach suffers from limitations stemming from its main advantage, i.e. impossibility to control possible confounders and to quantify the strength of associations due to the absence of an ad hoc control group, it is particularly useful to use in routine practice, mainly for purposes of signal generation and hypothesis testing in drug surveillance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Prentice RL. A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika 1986; 73(1): 1–11CrossRef Prentice RL. A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials. Biometrika 1986; 73(1): 1–11CrossRef
2.
go back to reference van der Klauw MM, Stricker BH, Herings RM, et al. A population based case-cohort study of drug-induced anaphylaxis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1993; 35(4): 400–8PubMedCrossRef van der Klauw MM, Stricker BH, Herings RM, et al. A population based case-cohort study of drug-induced anaphylaxis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1993; 35(4): 400–8PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Capella D, Laporte JR, Vidal X, et al. European network for the case-population surveillance of rare diseases (Euronet): a prospective feasibility study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 53(5): 299–302PubMedCrossRef Capella D, Laporte JR, Vidal X, et al. European network for the case-population surveillance of rare diseases (Euronet): a prospective feasibility study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 53(5): 299–302PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Capella D, Pedros C, Vidal X, et al. Case-population studies in pharmacoepidemiology. Drug Saf 2002; 25(1): 7–19PubMedCrossRef Capella D, Pedros C, Vidal X, et al. Case-population studies in pharmacoepidemiology. Drug Saf 2002; 25(1): 7–19PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott-Raven, 1998 Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott-Raven, 1998
6.
go back to reference Etwel FA, Rieder MJ, Bend JR, et al. A surveillance method for the early identification of idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions. Drug Saf 2008; 31(2): 169–80PubMedCrossRef Etwel FA, Rieder MJ, Bend JR, et al. A surveillance method for the early identification of idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions. Drug Saf 2008; 31(2): 169–80PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ibanez L, Ballarin E, Vidal X, et al. Agranulocytosis associated with calcium dobesilate clinical course and risk estimation with the case-control and the case-population approaches. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 56(9-10): 763–7PubMedCrossRef Ibanez L, Ballarin E, Vidal X, et al. Agranulocytosis associated with calcium dobesilate clinical course and risk estimation with the case-control and the case-population approaches. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 56(9-10): 763–7PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Laporte JR, Capella D, Juan J. Agranulocytosis induced by cinepazide. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 38(4): 387–8PubMedCrossRef Laporte JR, Capella D, Juan J. Agranulocytosis induced by cinepazide. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1990; 38(4): 387–8PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Laporte JR, Ibanez L, Ballarin E, et al. Fatal aplastic anaemia associated with nifedipine. Lancet 1998; 352(9128): 619–20PubMedCrossRef Laporte JR, Ibanez L, Ballarin E, et al. Fatal aplastic anaemia associated with nifedipine. Lancet 1998; 352(9128): 619–20PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stricker BH, de Groot RR, Wilson JH. Glafenine-associated anaphylaxis as a cause of hospital admission in the Netherlands. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1991; 40(4): 367–71PubMedCrossRef Stricker BH, de Groot RR, Wilson JH. Glafenine-associated anaphylaxis as a cause of hospital admission in the Netherlands. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1991; 40(4): 367–71PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference van der Klauw MM, Goudsmit R, Halie MR, et al. A population-based case-cohort study of drug-associated agranulocytosis. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159(4): 369–74PubMedCrossRef van der Klauw MM, Goudsmit R, Halie MR, et al. A population-based case-cohort study of drug-associated agranulocytosis. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159(4): 369–74PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Daly LE, Bourke GJ, McGilvray J. Authors interpretation and use of medical statistics. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991: 200–2 Daly LE, Bourke GJ, McGilvray J. Authors interpretation and use of medical statistics. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1991: 200–2
13.
go back to reference Miettinen OS. Simple interval-estimation of risk ratio. Am J Epidemiol 1974; 100: 515–6 Miettinen OS. Simple interval-estimation of risk ratio. Am J Epidemiol 1974; 100: 515–6
14.
go back to reference Abenhaim L, Moride Y, Brenot F, et al. Appetitesuppressant drugs and the risk of primary pulmonary hypertension. International Primary Pulmonary Hypertension Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996; 335(9): 609–16PubMedCrossRef Abenhaim L, Moride Y, Brenot F, et al. Appetitesuppressant drugs and the risk of primary pulmonary hypertension. International Primary Pulmonary Hypertension Study Group. N Engl J Med 1996; 335(9): 609–16PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Roujeau JC, Kelly JP, Naldi L, et al. Medication use and the risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis. N Engl J Med 1995; 333(24): 1600–7PubMedCrossRef Roujeau JC, Kelly JP, Naldi L, et al. Medication use and the risk of Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis. N Engl J Med 1995; 333(24): 1600–7PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mockenhaupt M, Viboud C, Dunant A, et al. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: assessment of medication risks with emphasis on recently marketed drugs. The EuroSCAR-study. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 128(1): 35–44PubMedCrossRef Mockenhaupt M, Viboud C, Dunant A, et al. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: assessment of medication risks with emphasis on recently marketed drugs. The EuroSCAR-study. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 128(1): 35–44PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Roujeau JC, Guillaume JC, Fabre JP, et al. Toxic epidermal necrolysis (Lyell syndrome): incidence and drug etiology in France, 1981–1985. Arch Dermatol 1990; 126(1): 37–42PubMedCrossRef Roujeau JC, Guillaume JC, Fabre JP, et al. Toxic epidermal necrolysis (Lyell syndrome): incidence and drug etiology in France, 1981–1985. Arch Dermatol 1990; 126(1): 37–42PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Roujeau JC. Clinical aspects of skin reactions to NSAIDs. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 1987; 65: 131–4PubMedCrossRef Roujeau JC. Clinical aspects of skin reactions to NSAIDs. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 1987; 65: 131–4PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Roujeau JC, Stern RS. Severe adverse cutaneous reactions to drugs. N Engl J Med 1994; 331(19): 1272–85PubMedCrossRef Roujeau JC, Stern RS. Severe adverse cutaneous reactions to drugs. N Engl J Med 1994; 331(19): 1272–85PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Stern RS, Bigby M. An expanded profile of cutaneous reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: reports to a specialty-based system for spontaneous reporting of adverse reactions to drugs. JAMA 1984; 252(11): 1433–7PubMedCrossRef Stern RS, Bigby M. An expanded profile of cutaneous reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: reports to a specialty-based system for spontaneous reporting of adverse reactions to drugs. JAMA 1984; 252(11): 1433–7PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wolkenstein PE, Roujeau JC, Revuz J. Drug-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis. Clin Dermatol 1998; 16(3): 399–408PubMedCrossRef Wolkenstein PE, Roujeau JC, Revuz J. Drug-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis. Clin Dermatol 1998; 16(3): 399–408PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Claessens N, Delbeke L, Lambert J, et al. Toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with treatment for preterm labor. Dermatology 1998; 196(4): 461–2PubMedCrossRef Claessens N, Delbeke L, Lambert J, et al. Toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with treatment for preterm labor. Dermatology 1998; 196(4): 461–2PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lear JT, English JS. Toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with indomethacin therapy. Postgrad Med J 1996; 72(845): 186–7PubMedCrossRef Lear JT, English JS. Toxic epidermal necrolysis associated with indomethacin therapy. Postgrad Med J 1996; 72(845): 186–7PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference O’Sullivan M, Hanly JG, Molloy M. A case of toxic epidermal necrolysis secondary to indomethacin. Br J Rheumatol 1983; 22(1): 47–9PubMedCrossRef O’Sullivan M, Hanly JG, Molloy M. A case of toxic epidermal necrolysis secondary to indomethacin. Br J Rheumatol 1983; 22(1): 47–9PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Beral V, Chilvers C, Fraser P. On the estimation of relative risk from vital statistical data. J Epidemiol Community Health 1979; 33(2): 159–62PubMedCrossRef Beral V, Chilvers C, Fraser P. On the estimation of relative risk from vital statistical data. J Epidemiol Community Health 1979; 33(2): 159–62PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mittleman MA. Estimation of exposure prevalence in a population at risk using data from cases and an external estimate of the relative risk. Epidemiology 1995; 6(5): 551–3PubMedCrossRef Mittleman MA. Estimation of exposure prevalence in a population at risk using data from cases and an external estimate of the relative risk. Epidemiology 1995; 6(5): 551–3PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Suissa S, Edwardes MD, Boivin JF. External comparisons from nested case-control designs. Epidemiology 1998; 9(1): 72–8PubMedCrossRef Suissa S, Edwardes MD, Boivin JF. External comparisons from nested case-control designs. Epidemiology 1998; 9(1): 72–8PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wacholder S, Boivin JF. External comparisons with the casecohort design. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 126(6): 1198–209PubMed Wacholder S, Boivin JF. External comparisons with the casecohort design. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 126(6): 1198–209PubMed
30.
go back to reference Martin-Latry K, Begaud B. Pharmacoepidemiological research using French reimbursement databases: yes we can! Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010; 19(3): 256–65PubMedCrossRef Martin-Latry K, Begaud B. Pharmacoepidemiological research using French reimbursement databases: yes we can! Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010; 19(3): 256–65PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Pelat C, Boelle PY, Turbelin C, et al. A method for selecting and monitoring medication sales for surveillance of gastroenteritis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010; 19(10): 1009–18PubMedCrossRef Pelat C, Boelle PY, Turbelin C, et al. A method for selecting and monitoring medication sales for surveillance of gastroenteritis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010; 19(10): 1009–18PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Vergu E, Grais RF, Sarter H, et al. Medication sales and syndromic surveillance, France. Emerg Infect Dis 2006; 12(3): 416–21PubMedCrossRef Vergu E, Grais RF, Sarter H, et al. Medication sales and syndromic surveillance, France. Emerg Infect Dis 2006; 12(3): 416–21PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Case-Population Study Design
An Analysis of its Application in Pharmacovigilance
Authors
Hélène Théophile
Joan-Ramon Laporte
Nicholas Moore
Karin-Latry Martin
Bernard Bégaud
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drug Safety / Issue 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0114-5916
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1942
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11592140-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 10/2011

Drug Safety 10/2011 Go to the issue