Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2012

01-08-2012

The burden of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed with the patient under conscious sedation

Authors: S. M. Jeurnink, E. W. Steyerberg, E. J. Kuipers, P. D. Siersema

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an invasive procedure that proves burdensome to patients. Nevertheless, very little data are available on patient tolerance of this procedure that may improve practice guidelines and could aid in decreasing the burden of ERCP. This study therefore investigated the burden of ERCP performed with the patient under conscious sedation.

Methods

Consecutive patients receiving ERCP under conscious sedation between November 2007 and December 2008 at the University Medical Center Utrecht and Erasmus MC Rotterdam (The Netherlands) were asked to participate in this study. The patients completed questionnaires on demographics, medical history, burden of ERCP (mental health, discomfort, and pain), symptoms and the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), including the EQ-VAS (lower EQ-5D scores and higher EQ-VAS scores represent a better quality of life). The paired t-test, the Kruskal–Wallis test, Pearson correlation, and logistic regression were used to evaluate the results.

Results

The questionnaire was returned by 149 (54%) of 276 eligible patients, 139 of whom completed the entire questionnaire (54% males; mean age, 60 ± 14 years). Throat ache (p < 0.001) was the only symptom higher than baseline value 1 day after the ERCP. On day 1, about one-tenth of the patients experienced moderate to severe mental health problems, which were associated with a higher EQ-5D score before ERCP (p = 0.01). Slightly fewer than half of the patients experienced pain and discomfort during and immediately after ERCP. More discomfort was experienced by patients who underwent therapeutic ERCP (p < 0.05) and those with a higher EQ-5D score (p < 0.001) or lower VAS (p < 0.01). Pain was associated with younger age (p < 0.01), higher EQ-5D score (p < 0.001), and lower VAS (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

One-third to one-half of patients experience pain and discomfort during and immediately after ERCP when it is performed with conscious sedation for the patient. Other sedation strategies, such as the use of general anesthesia or propofol, may well reduce the burden of ERCP, particularly for patients with a higher EQ-5D score, younger age, or therapeutic ERCP treatment. However, randomized trials are warranted.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393PubMedCrossRef Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37:383–393PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sherman S, Ruffolo TA, Hawes RH, Lehman GA (1991) Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: a prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts. Gastroenterology 101:1068–1075PubMed Sherman S, Ruffolo TA, Hawes RH, Lehman GA (1991) Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: a prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts. Gastroenterology 101:1068–1075PubMed
4.
go back to reference Mehta SN, Pavone E, Barkun JS, Bouchard S, Barkun AN (1998) Predictors of post-ERCP complications in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy 30:457–463PubMedCrossRef Mehta SN, Pavone E, Barkun JS, Bouchard S, Barkun AN (1998) Predictors of post-ERCP complications in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy 30:457–463PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Barthet M, Lesavre N, Desjeux A, Gasmi M, Berthezene P, Berdah S, Viviand X, Grimaud JC (2002) Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: results from a single tertiary referral center. Endoscopy 34:991–997PubMedCrossRef Barthet M, Lesavre N, Desjeux A, Gasmi M, Berthezene P, Berdah S, Viviand X, Grimaud JC (2002) Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: results from a single tertiary referral center. Endoscopy 34:991–997PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J (2004) Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 60:721–731PubMedCrossRef Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J (2004) Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 60:721–731PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kruijshaar ME, Kerkhof M, Siersema PD, Steyerberg EW, Homs MY, Essink-Bot ML (2006) The burden of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy 38:873–878PubMedCrossRef Kruijshaar ME, Kerkhof M, Siersema PD, Steyerberg EW, Homs MY, Essink-Bot ML (2006) The burden of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy 38:873–878PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Masci E, Rossi M, Minoli G, Mangiavillano B, Bianchi G, Colombo E, Comin U, Fesce E, Perego M, Ravelli P, Lella F, Buffoli F et al (2009) Patient satisfaction after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliary stones: a prospective multicenter study in Lombardy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:1510–1515PubMedCrossRef Masci E, Rossi M, Minoli G, Mangiavillano B, Bianchi G, Colombo E, Comin U, Fesce E, Perego M, Ravelli P, Lella F, Buffoli F et al (2009) Patient satisfaction after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliary stones: a prospective multicenter study in Lombardy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 24:1510–1515PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Menon K, Barkun AN, Romagnuolo J, Friedman G, Mehta SN, Reinhold C, Bret PM (2001) Patient satisfaction after MRCP and ERCP. Am J Gastroenterol 96:2646–2650PubMedCrossRef Menon K, Barkun AN, Romagnuolo J, Friedman G, Mehta SN, Reinhold C, Bret PM (2001) Patient satisfaction after MRCP and ERCP. Am J Gastroenterol 96:2646–2650PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Colton JB, Curran CC (2009) Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 70:457–467PubMedCrossRef Colton JB, Curran CC (2009) Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 70:457–467PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Johanson JF, Cooper G, Eisen GM, Freeman M, Goldstein JL, Jensen DM, Sahai A, Schmitt CM, Schoenfeld P (2002) Quality assessment of ERCP: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 56:165–169PubMedCrossRef Johanson JF, Cooper G, Eisen GM, Freeman M, Goldstein JL, Jensen DM, Sahai A, Schmitt CM, Schoenfeld P (2002) Quality assessment of ERCP: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 56:165–169PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Essink-Bot ML, Rijnsburger AJ, van DS, de Koning HJ, Seynaeve C (2006) Women’s acceptance of MRI in breast cancer surveillance because of a familial or genetic predisposition. Breast 15:673–676PubMedCrossRef Essink-Bot ML, Rijnsburger AJ, van DS, de Koning HJ, Seynaeve C (2006) Women’s acceptance of MRI in breast cancer surveillance because of a familial or genetic predisposition. Breast 15:673–676PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Essink-Bot ML, de Koning HJ, Nijs HG, Kirkels WJ, van der Maas PJ, Schroder FH (1998) Short-term effects of population-based screening for prostate cancer on health-related quality of life. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:925–931PubMedCrossRef Essink-Bot ML, de Koning HJ, Nijs HG, Kirkels WJ, van der Maas PJ, Schroder FH (1998) Short-term effects of population-based screening for prostate cancer on health-related quality of life. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:925–931PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jung HS, Park DK, Kim MJ, Yu SK, Kwon KA, Ku YS, Kim YK, Kim JH (2009) A comparison of patient acceptance and preferences between CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Korean J Intern Med 24:43–47PubMedCrossRef Jung HS, Park DK, Kim MJ, Yu SK, Kwon KA, Ku YS, Kim YK, Kim JH (2009) A comparison of patient acceptance and preferences between CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. Korean J Intern Med 24:43–47PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Essink-Bot ML, Kruijshaar ME, Bac DJ, Wisman PJ, ter Borg F, Steyerberg EW, Siersema PD (2007) Different perceptions of the burden of upper GI endoscopy: an empirical study in three patient groups Qual Life Res 16(8):1309–1318 Essink-Bot ML, Kruijshaar ME, Bac DJ, Wisman PJ, ter Borg F, Steyerberg EW, Siersema PD (2007) Different perceptions of the burden of upper GI endoscopy: an empirical study in three patient groups Qual Life Res 16(8):1309–1318
17.
go back to reference Ren J, Xie P, Lang IM, Bardan E, Sui Z, Shaker R (2000) Deterioration of the pharyngo-UES contractile reflex in the elderly. Laryngoscope 110:1563–1566PubMedCrossRef Ren J, Xie P, Lang IM, Bardan E, Sui Z, Shaker R (2000) Deterioration of the pharyngo-UES contractile reflex in the elderly. Laryngoscope 110:1563–1566PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kongkam P, Rerknimitr R, Punyathavorn S, Sitthi-Amorn C, Ponauthai Y, Prempracha N, Kullavanijaya P (2008) Propofol infusion versus intermittent meperidine and midazolam injection for conscious sedation in ERCP. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 17:291–297PubMed Kongkam P, Rerknimitr R, Punyathavorn S, Sitthi-Amorn C, Ponauthai Y, Prempracha N, Kullavanijaya P (2008) Propofol infusion versus intermittent meperidine and midazolam injection for conscious sedation in ERCP. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 17:291–297PubMed
19.
go back to reference Barriga J, Sachdev MS, Royall L, Brown G, Tombazzi CR (2008) Sedation for upper endoscopy: comparison of midazolam versus fentanyl plus midazolam. South Med J 101:362–366PubMedCrossRef Barriga J, Sachdev MS, Royall L, Brown G, Tombazzi CR (2008) Sedation for upper endoscopy: comparison of midazolam versus fentanyl plus midazolam. South Med J 101:362–366PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yi SY, Shin JE (2005) Midazolam for patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective, single-blind, and randomized study to determine the appropriate amount and time of initiation of endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20:1873–1879PubMedCrossRef Yi SY, Shin JE (2005) Midazolam for patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective, single-blind, and randomized study to determine the appropriate amount and time of initiation of endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20:1873–1879PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Campo R, Brullet E, Montserrat A, Calvet X, Donoso L, Bordas JM (2000) Efficacy of low and standard midazolam doses for gastroscopy: a randomized, double-blind study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:187–190PubMedCrossRef Campo R, Brullet E, Montserrat A, Calvet X, Donoso L, Bordas JM (2000) Efficacy of low and standard midazolam doses for gastroscopy: a randomized, double-blind study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:187–190PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The burden of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed with the patient under conscious sedation
Authors
S. M. Jeurnink
E. W. Steyerberg
E. J. Kuipers
P. D. Siersema
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2162-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2012 Go to the issue