Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Urology Reports 12/2023

26-09-2023

The Boot Camp Model in Urology: Preparing PGY1 Urology Interns for Practice

Authors: Melinda Z. Fu, Raeesa Islam, Joseph DeMarzo, Benjamin Lichtbroun, Alexandra L. Tabakin, Ji Hae Park, Sammy E. Elsamra

Published in: Current Urology Reports | Issue 12/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to highlight literature regarding resident boot camps published across surgical specialties with a focus on urology. Herein, we discuss different boot camp iterations, their results, and the integration of simulation into their curriculum. We review program elements such as curriculum, course length, and efficacy as well as areas for continued investigation.

Recent Findings

The field of urology has grown in both the breadth of knowledge and the complexity of procedures. With urology now being an integrated surgical subspecialty, interns often start on the urology service despite limited experience navigating this unique specialty. The boot camp model is one method by which interns and junior residents participate in consolidated training programs to best prepare them for a patient-facing role and the day-to-day demands of residency. Urology programs, both in the USA and abroad, have begun integrating boot camps into their training programs with positive results.

Summary

Urology boot camps can be a valuable part of training programs for interns to quickly establish medical knowledge, skills, and efficiency. Boot camps should be easily accessible, have sufficient support from institutions, and provide effective training through various methods such as didactics and simulation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zhou AY, et al. Factors associated with burnout and stress in trainee physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2013761.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhou AY, et al. Factors associated with burnout and stress in trainee physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2013761.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Hannan E, et al. Burnout and stress amongst interns in Irish hospitals: contributing factors and potential solutions. Ir J Med Sci. 2018;187(2):301–7.CrossRefPubMed Hannan E, et al. Burnout and stress amongst interns in Irish hospitals: contributing factors and potential solutions. Ir J Med Sci. 2018;187(2):301–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Liu RQ, et al. Impostorism and anxiety contribute to burnout among resident physicians. Med Teach. 2022;44(7):758–64.CrossRefPubMed Liu RQ, et al. Impostorism and anxiety contribute to burnout among resident physicians. Med Teach. 2022;44(7):758–64.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bhama AR, et al. Imposter syndrome in surgical trainees: Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale assessment in general surgery residents. J Am Coll Surg. 2021;233(5):633–8.CrossRefPubMed Bhama AR, et al. Imposter syndrome in surgical trainees: Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale assessment in general surgery residents. J Am Coll Surg. 2021;233(5):633–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Amin-Hanjani S, Haglund MM. Editorial. “Sometimes wrong, never in doubt” or “fake it till you make it”? Neurosurg Focus. 2022;53(2):E10. Amin-Hanjani S, Haglund MM. Editorial. “Sometimes wrong, never in doubt” or “fake it till you make it”? Neurosurg Focus. 2022;53(2):E10.
7.
go back to reference Please H, Biyani CS. How to implement a simulation-based education programme: lessons from the UK Urology Simulation Boot Camp. Indian J Surg. 2022;84(Suppl 1):18–26.CrossRefPubMed Please H, Biyani CS. How to implement a simulation-based education programme: lessons from the UK Urology Simulation Boot Camp. Indian J Surg. 2022;84(Suppl 1):18–26.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sundelin MO, et al. Urology simulation boot camp: a perspective from non-UK delegates. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021;45(1):49–56.CrossRefPubMed Sundelin MO, et al. Urology simulation boot camp: a perspective from non-UK delegates. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021;45(1):49–56.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Yaeger KA, Munich SA, Byrne RW, Germano IM. Trends in United States neurosurgery residency education and training over the last decade (2009–2019). Neurosurg Focus. 2020;48(3):E6.CrossRefPubMed Yaeger KA, Munich SA, Byrne RW, Germano IM. Trends in United States neurosurgery residency education and training over the last decade (2009–2019). Neurosurg Focus. 2020;48(3):E6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Selden NR, et al. Society of Neurological Surgeons boot camp courses: knowledge retention and relevance of hands-on learning after 6 months of postgraduate year 1 training. J Neurosurg. 2013;119(3):796–802.CrossRefPubMed Selden NR, et al. Society of Neurological Surgeons boot camp courses: knowledge retention and relevance of hands-on learning after 6 months of postgraduate year 1 training. J Neurosurg. 2013;119(3):796–802.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dean KM, et al. Otolaryngology boot camps: current landscape and future directions. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(12):2707–12.CrossRefPubMed Dean KM, et al. Otolaryngology boot camps: current landscape and future directions. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(12):2707–12.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nakazato T, et al. A 1-day simulation-based boot camp for incoming general surgery residents improves confidence and technical skills. Surgery. 2019;166(4):572–9.CrossRefPubMed Nakazato T, et al. A 1-day simulation-based boot camp for incoming general surgery residents improves confidence and technical skills. Surgery. 2019;166(4):572–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Theodore S, et al. Boot camp in a box: initial experience with pretraining skills preparation for new interns. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(6):e225–31.CrossRefPubMed Theodore S, et al. Boot camp in a box: initial experience with pretraining skills preparation for new interns. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(6):e225–31.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bamford R, et al. Core trainee boot camp, a method for improving technical and non-technical skills of novice surgical trainees. A before and after study. Int J Surg. 2018;57:60–65. Bamford R, et al. Core trainee boot camp, a method for improving technical and non-technical skills of novice surgical trainees. A before and after study. Int J Surg. 2018;57:60–65.
15.
go back to reference Kenny L, et al. Training cardiothoracic surgeons of the future: The UK experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(6):2526–2538 e2. Kenny L, et al. Training cardiothoracic surgeons of the future: The UK experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(6):2526–2538 e2.
16.
go back to reference Wang W, et al. The impact of surgical boot camp and subsequent repetitive practice on the surgical skills and confidence of residents. World J Surg. 2020;44(11):3607–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang W, et al. The impact of surgical boot camp and subsequent repetitive practice on the surgical skills and confidence of residents. World J Surg. 2020;44(11):3607–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Dversdal RK, et al. A 5-day intensive curriculum for interns utilizing simulation and active-learning techniques: addressing domains important across internal medicine practice. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):916.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dversdal RK, et al. A 5-day intensive curriculum for interns utilizing simulation and active-learning techniques: addressing domains important across internal medicine practice. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):916.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Smith NE, Collins R, Hall J. Surgical pathology “boot camp”: a military experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143(9):1144–8.CrossRefPubMed Smith NE, Collins R, Hall J. Surgical pathology “boot camp”: a military experience. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143(9):1144–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kerrigan D, et al. An anaesthesiology and emergency medicine multidisciplinary simulation-based bootcamp. Ir Med J. 2022;115(4):584.PubMed Kerrigan D, et al. An anaesthesiology and emergency medicine multidisciplinary simulation-based bootcamp. Ir Med J. 2022;115(4):584.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Weis JJ, et al. A proficiency-based surgical boot camp may not provide trainees with a durable foundation in fundamental surgical skills. Am J Surg. 2019;217(2):244–9.CrossRefPubMed Weis JJ, et al. A proficiency-based surgical boot camp may not provide trainees with a durable foundation in fundamental surgical skills. Am J Surg. 2019;217(2):244–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kassam AF, et al. Acquisition and retention of surgical skills taught during intern surgical boot camp. Am J Surg. 2021;221(5):987–92.CrossRefPubMed Kassam AF, et al. Acquisition and retention of surgical skills taught during intern surgical boot camp. Am J Surg. 2021;221(5):987–92.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Singh P, Aggarwal R, Pucher PH, Darzi A. Development, organisation and implementation of a surgical skills “boot camp”: SIMweek. World J Surg. 2015;39(7):1649–60.CrossRefPubMed Singh P, Aggarwal R, Pucher PH, Darzi A. Development, organisation and implementation of a surgical skills “boot camp”: SIMweek. World J Surg. 2015;39(7):1649–60.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference •• Young M, et al. The success and evolution of a urological “boot camp” for newly appointed UK Urology Registrars: incorporating simulation, nontechnical skills and assessment. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(5):1425–32. The United Kingdom’s Urology Simulation Boot Camp (USBC) was established in 2015 as a nation-wide boot camp for all new urology trainees. It implemented a standardized, simulation-based curricula for all new trainees. The UK model is one of the earliest examples of a urology boot camp and provides a model for other programs to follow. This paper provides an overview of the development of this course since its inception in 2015, the curriculum and delivery methods, and the subjective and objective results from cohorts in 2015, 2016, and 2017. Notably, over the first three years, the boot camp resulted in significant improvement in trainee skills and confidence and demonstrates the feasibility for other programs to adopt as well.CrossRefPubMed •• Young M, et al. The success and evolution of a urological “boot camp” for newly appointed UK Urology Registrars: incorporating simulation, nontechnical skills and assessment. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(5):1425–32. The United Kingdom’s Urology Simulation Boot Camp (USBC) was established in 2015 as a nation-wide boot camp for all new urology trainees. It implemented a standardized, simulation-based curricula for all new trainees. The UK model is one of the earliest examples of a urology boot camp and provides a model for other programs to follow. This paper provides an overview of the development of this course since its inception in 2015, the curriculum and delivery methods, and the subjective and objective results from cohorts in 2015, 2016, and 2017. Notably, over the first three years, the boot camp resulted in significant improvement in trainee skills and confidence and demonstrates the feasibility for other programs to adopt as well.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Khavari R, Donalisio da Silva R, Peters CA, Stratton K. Is a "urology intern boot camp"needed? Urol Pract. 2022;9(6):606–612. Khavari R, Donalisio da Silva R, Peters CA, Stratton K. Is a "urology intern boot camp"needed? Urol Pract. 2022;9(6):606–612.
25.
go back to reference • Tabakin AL, et al. The feasibility and efficacy of a multi-institutional urology boot camp for incoming urology residents. Urology. 2021;153:69–74. This was one of the first publications to describe a boot camp specific for urology residents held in the United States. This paper describes the curriculum, participants, and results from a boot camp for junior urology residents from institutions across New Jersey. Immediately after the boot camp, a majority of the 11 participants would have recommended it to peers, felt more confident in their skills, and reported increased preparedness in the multitude of scenarios practiced. Six months later, the majority of participants felt the boot camp made them a better resident.CrossRefPubMed • Tabakin AL, et al. The feasibility and efficacy of a multi-institutional urology boot camp for incoming urology residents. Urology. 2021;153:69–74. This was one of the first publications to describe a boot camp specific for urology residents held in the United States. This paper describes the curriculum, participants, and results from a boot camp for junior urology residents from institutions across New Jersey. Immediately after the boot camp, a majority of the 11 participants would have recommended it to peers, felt more confident in their skills, and reported increased preparedness in the multitude of scenarios practiced. Six months later, the majority of participants felt the boot camp made them a better resident.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference • Stout M, et al. Urology boot camp: a pilot medical student curriculum for common bedside urologic procedures. Urology. 2022;169:35–40. This publication described the results of a boot camp for fourth year medical students completing a urology subinternship, a unique perspective on the boot camp model applied to students prior to residency. The students that participated in the boot camp reported notable gains in both knowledge and confidence and performed better on simulations after the boot camp. This study demonstrated the potential to expand boot camps to medical students with positive results.CrossRefPubMed • Stout M, et al. Urology boot camp: a pilot medical student curriculum for common bedside urologic procedures. Urology. 2022;169:35–40. This publication described the results of a boot camp for fourth year medical students completing a urology subinternship, a unique perspective on the boot camp model applied to students prior to residency. The students that participated in the boot camp reported notable gains in both knowledge and confidence and performed better on simulations after the boot camp. This study demonstrated the potential to expand boot camps to medical students with positive results.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Stout M, et al. Advanced urology boot camp: a simulation-based curriculum to enhance fourth-year medical student procedural competency. Urol Pract. 2023;10(2):196–200.CrossRefPubMed Stout M, et al. Advanced urology boot camp: a simulation-based curriculum to enhance fourth-year medical student procedural competency. Urol Pract. 2023;10(2):196–200.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Wang Y, et al. Development, implementation, and evaluation of a competency-based didactic and simulation-focused boot camp for incoming urology residents: Report of the first three years. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021;15(4):98–105.PubMed Wang Y, et al. Development, implementation, and evaluation of a competency-based didactic and simulation-focused boot camp for incoming urology residents: Report of the first three years. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021;15(4):98–105.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Kailavasan M, et al. A method to evaluate trainee progression during simulation training at the urology simulation boot camp (USBC) course. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(1):215–22.CrossRefPubMed Kailavasan M, et al. A method to evaluate trainee progression during simulation training at the urology simulation boot camp (USBC) course. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(1):215–22.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Somasundram K, et al. Simulation in urology to train non-technical skills in ward rounds. BJU Int. 2018;122(4):705–12.CrossRefPubMed Somasundram K, et al. Simulation in urology to train non-technical skills in ward rounds. BJU Int. 2018;122(4):705–12.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference • Kozan AA, Chan LH, Biyani CS. Current status of simulation training in urology: a non-systematic review. Res Rep Urol. 2020;12:111–28. A non-systematic review that provides a comprehensive and contemporary review of the various simulation models currently used for open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical methods in Urology. This paper discusses the validity of various bench, cadaver, animal, and virtual reality models as well as a discussion about their relative benefits and limitations. While not an all-exhaustive systematic review, this paper provides a valuable review of simulators available for Urologists.PubMedPubMedCentral • Kozan AA, Chan LH, Biyani CS. Current status of simulation training in urology: a non-systematic review. Res Rep Urol. 2020;12:111–28. A non-systematic review that provides a comprehensive and contemporary review of the various simulation models currently used for open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical methods in Urology.  This paper discusses the validity of various bench, cadaver, animal, and virtual reality models as well as a discussion about their relative benefits and limitations. While not an all-exhaustive systematic review, this paper provides a valuable review of simulators available for Urologists.PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):50–63.CrossRefPubMed McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):50–63.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Berridge CT, et al. A training model to teach early management of priapism. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021;45(3):220–4.CrossRefPubMed Berridge CT, et al. A training model to teach early management of priapism. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2021;45(3):220–4.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The Boot Camp Model in Urology: Preparing PGY1 Urology Interns for Practice
Authors
Melinda Z. Fu
Raeesa Islam
Joseph DeMarzo
Benjamin Lichtbroun
Alexandra L. Tabakin
Ji Hae Park
Sammy E. Elsamra
Publication date
26-09-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Urology Reports / Issue 12/2023
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-023-01186-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2023

Current Urology Reports 12/2023 Go to the issue