Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

The Berlin Inventory of Gambling behavior – Screening (BIG-S): Validation using a clinical sample

Authors: Martin Wejbera, Kai W. Müller, Jan Becker, Manfred E. Beutel

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Published diagnostic questionnaires for gambling disorder in German are either based on DSM-III criteria or focus on aspects other than life time prevalence. This study was designed to assess the usability of the DSM-IV criteria based Berlin Inventory of Gambling Behavior Screening tool in a clinical sample and adapt it to DSM-5 criteria.

Methods

In a sample of 432 patients presenting for behavioral addiction assessment at the University Medical Center Mainz, we checked the screening tool’s results against clinical diagnosis and compared a subsample of n=300 clinically diagnosed gambling disorder patients with a comparison group of n=132.

Results

The BIG-S produced a sensitivity of 99.7% and a specificity of 96.2%. The instrument’s unidimensionality and the diagnostic improvements of DSM-5 criteria were verified by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis as well as receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Conclusions

The BIG-S is a reliable and valid screening tool for gambling disorder and demonstrated its concise and comprehensible operationalization of current DSM-5 criteria in a clinical setting.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical Manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1980. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical Manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1980.
2.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical Manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical Manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
3.
go back to reference Stinchfield R. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of a measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:180–2.CrossRefPubMed Stinchfield R. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of a measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:180–2.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Strong DR, Kahler CW. Evaluation of the continuum of gambling problems using the DSM-IV. Addiction. 2007;102(5):713–21.CrossRefPubMed Strong DR, Kahler CW. Evaluation of the continuum of gambling problems using the DSM-IV. Addiction. 2007;102(5):713–21.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Denis C, Fatseas M, Auriacombe M. Analyses related to the development of DSM-5 criteria for substance use related disorders: 3. An assessment of pathological gambling criteria. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;122:22–7.CrossRefPubMed Denis C, Fatseas M, Auriacombe M. Analyses related to the development of DSM-5 criteria for substance use related disorders: 3. An assessment of pathological gambling criteria. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;122:22–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical Manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.CrossRef American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical Manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Reilly C, Smith N. The evolving definition of pathological gambling in the DSM-5. National Center for Responsible Gaming White Paper. 2013:1–6. Reilly C, Smith N. The evolving definition of pathological gambling in the DSM-5. National Center for Responsible Gaming White Paper. 2013:1–6.
8.
go back to reference Lesieur HR, Blume S. The South Oaks gambling screen (the SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144:1184–8.CrossRefPubMed Lesieur HR, Blume S. The South Oaks gambling screen (the SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144:1184–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Müller-Spahn F, Margraf J. Wenn Spielen pathologisch wird. Basel: Karger; 2003. Germanica. Müller-Spahn F, Margraf J. Wenn Spielen pathologisch wird. Basel: Karger; 2003. Germanica.
10.
go back to reference Petry J. Psychotherapie der Glücksspielsucht. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union; 1996. Germanica. Petry J. Psychotherapie der Glücksspielsucht. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union; 1996. Germanica.
11.
go back to reference Premper V, Sobottka B, Fischer T. Der Schweriner Fragebogen zum Glücksspielen. Praxis Klinische Verhaltensmedizin und Rehabilitation. 2007;78:244-9. Germanica. Premper V, Sobottka B, Fischer T. Der Schweriner Fragebogen zum Glücksspielen. Praxis Klinische Verhaltensmedizin und Rehabilitation. 2007;78:244-9. Germanica.
12.
go back to reference Johnson EE, Hamer R, Nora RM, Tan B, Eistenstein N, Engelhart C. The lie/bet questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers. Psychol Rep. 1997;80:83–8.CrossRefPubMed Johnson EE, Hamer R, Nora RM, Tan B, Eistenstein N, Engelhart C. The lie/bet questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers. Psychol Rep. 1997;80:83–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Johnson EE, Hamer R, Nora RM. The lie/bet questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers: a follow-up study. Psychol Rep. 1988;83:1219–24.CrossRef Johnson EE, Hamer R, Nora RM. The lie/bet questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers: a follow-up study. Psychol Rep. 1988;83:1219–24.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Strong DR, Lesieur HR, Breen RB, Stinchfield R, Lejuez CW. Using a Rasch model to examine the utility of the South Oaks gambling screen across clinical and community samples. Addict Behav. 2004;29:465–81.CrossRefPubMed Strong DR, Lesieur HR, Breen RB, Stinchfield R, Lejuez CW. Using a Rasch model to examine the utility of the South Oaks gambling screen across clinical and community samples. Addict Behav. 2004;29:465–81.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lesieur HR, Blume S. Revising the South Oaks gambling screen in different settings. J Gambl Stud. 1993;9(3):213–23.CrossRef Lesieur HR, Blume S. Revising the South Oaks gambling screen in different settings. J Gambl Stud. 1993;9(3):213–23.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dickerson MG, Baron E, Hong SM, Cottrell D. Estimating the extent and degree of gambling related problems in the Australian population: a National Survey. J Gambl Stud. 1996;12(2):161–78.CrossRefPubMed Dickerson MG, Baron E, Hong SM, Cottrell D. Estimating the extent and degree of gambling related problems in the Australian population: a National Survey. J Gambl Stud. 1996;12(2):161–78.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Volberg RA. Prevalence studies of problem gambling in the United States. J Gambl Stud. 1996;12(2):111–28.CrossRefPubMed Volberg RA. Prevalence studies of problem gambling in the United States. J Gambl Stud. 1996;12(2):111–28.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Stinchfield R. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks gambling screen (SOGS). Addict Behav. 2002;27:1–19.CrossRefPubMed Stinchfield R. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks gambling screen (SOGS). Addict Behav. 2002;27:1–19.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Echeburúa E, Baez C, Fernandez-Montalvo J, Paez D. Cuestionario de juego patológico de South Oaks (SOGS): Validación española. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta. 1994;20:769-91. Spanish. Echeburúa E, Baez C, Fernandez-Montalvo J, Paez D. Cuestionario de juego patológico de South Oaks (SOGS): Validación española. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta. 1994;20:769-91. Spanish.
20.
21.
go back to reference Tang CS, Wu AMS, Tang JYC, Yan ECW. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the South Oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese. J Gambl Stud. 2010;26(1):145–58.CrossRefPubMed Tang CS, Wu AMS, Tang JYC, Yan ECW. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the South Oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese. J Gambl Stud. 2010;26(1):145–58.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Grüsser SM, Wölfling K, Düffert S, Mörsen CP, Flor H. Psychometrische Kennwerte und erste Ergebnisse zur Validität des Fragebogens zur Differenzierten Drogenanamnese (FDDA). Psychother Psych Med. 2004;54(11):405-12. Germanica. Grüsser SM, Wölfling K, Düffert S, Mörsen CP, Flor H. Psychometrische Kennwerte und erste Ergebnisse zur Validität des Fragebogens zur Differenzierten Drogenanamnese (FDDA). Psychother Psych Med. 2004;54(11):405-12. Germanica.
24.
go back to reference Meyer C, Rumpf HJ, Kreuzer A, de Brito S, Glorius S, Jeske C, et al. Pathologisches Glücksspielen und Epidemiologie (PAGE): Entstehung, Komorbidität, Remission und Behandlung. Endbericht an das Hessische Ministerium des Innern und für Sport. University of Greifswald, Lübeck; 2011. Germanica. Meyer C, Rumpf HJ, Kreuzer A, de Brito S, Glorius S, Jeske C, et al. Pathologisches Glücksspielen und Epidemiologie (PAGE): Entstehung, Komorbidität, Remission und Behandlung. Endbericht an das Hessische Ministerium des Innern und für Sport. University of Greifswald, Lübeck; 2011. Germanica.
Metadata
Title
The Berlin Inventory of Gambling behavior – Screening (BIG-S): Validation using a clinical sample
Authors
Martin Wejbera
Kai W. Müller
Jan Becker
Manfred E. Beutel
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1349-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Psychiatry 1/2017 Go to the issue