Top

Published in:

01-12-2009

The Benefits of Booster Interventions: Evidence from a Family-Focused Prevention Program

Authors: Patrick H. Tolan, Deborah Gorman-Smith, David Henry, Michael Schoeny

Published in: Prevention Science | Issue 4/2009

Abstract

Booster effects have been reported in few prevention and treatment studies. However, as noted by Eyberg et al. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 544–554 (1998), there has been no adequate random-assignment test of booster effects to address the basic question of whether boosters increase effects over initial intervention. The present study addresses this question by randomly assigning 196 families to a booster intervention (SAFEChildren II) and comparing effects 1 year after that intervention with families who had been assigned to the initial intervention only (SAFEChildren I). Both interventions were based in a developmental-ecological framework emphasizing family management of child-rearing and related challenges within an inner-city social ecology. The booster led to a relative improvement in child aggression and concentration in school for the overall sample, with additional benefit for high-risk groups in academic achievement, behavior, and family organization. The study also suggests need for more careful study of processes related to booster effects in prevention, including comparison of competing models.

August, G.J., Realmuto, G.R., Hektner, J.M., & Bloomquist, M.L. (2001). An integrated components preventive intervention for aggressive elementary school children: The “Early Risers” program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 614–626. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.69.4.614.CrossRefPubMed

Botvin, G.J. (2000). Preventing drug abuse in schools: Social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 887–897. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00119-2.CrossRefPubMed

Botvin, G.J., Baker, C., Filazzola, A.D., & Botvin, E.N. (1990). A cognitive behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: One year follow-up. Addictive Behaviors, 15, 47–63. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(90)90006-J.CrossRefPubMed

Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

CTB/McGraw-Hill. (1985). California Achievement Test. Monterey: CTB/McGraw-Hill.

Dishion, T.J., & Kavanagh, K. (2000). A multilevel approach to family-centered prevention in schools: Process and outcome. Addictive Behaviors. Special Issue: Addictions 2000. Prevention of Substance Abuse Problems: Directions for the Next Millennium, 25, 899–911.

Djikstra, M., Mesters, I., DeVries, H., van Breukelen, G., & Parcel, G.S. (1999). Effectiveness of a social influence approach and boosters to smoking prevention. Health Education Research: Theory & Practice, 14, 791–802.

Eyberg, S.M., Edwards, D., Boggs, S.R., & Foote, R. (1998). Maintaining the treatment effects of parent training: The role of booster sessions and other maintenance strategies. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 544–554.CrossRef

Forgatch, M.S., & DeGarmo, D.S. (1999). Parenting through change: An effective parenting training program for single mothers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 711–724. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.67.5.711.CrossRefPubMed

Gibbons, H., Elkin, W., Kraemer, G., et al. (1993). Some conceptual and statistical issues in analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 739–750.PubMed

Gorman-Smith, D., Tolan, P.H., Zelli, A., & Huesmann, L.R. (1996). The relation of family functioning to violence among inner-city minority youth. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 115–129. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.10.2.115.CrossRef

Hawkins, J.D., Catalano, R.F., Kosterman, R., Abbott, R., & Hill, K. (1999). Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 153, 226–234.

Hieronymous, N.A., Hoover, H.D., & Linquist, E.F. (1986). Iowa Tests of Basic Skills. Chicago: Riverside Publishing Company.

Kellam, S.G., & Rebok, G.W. (1992). Building developmental and etiological theory through epidemiologically based preventive intervention trials. In J. McCord & R. E. Tremblay (Eds.), Preventing antisocial behavior: Interventions from birth through adolescence (pp. 162–195). New York: Guilford.

Kellam, S.G., Brown, C.H., Rubin, B.R., & Ensminger, M.E. (1983). Paths leading to teenage psychiatric symptoms and substance use: Developmental epidemiological studies in Woodlawn. In S. B. Guze, F. J. Earls, & J. E. Barrett (Eds.), Childhood psychopathology and development (pp. 17–47). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lochman, J.E. (1992). Cognitive behavioral intervention with aggressive boys: Three-year follow-up and preventive effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 426–432. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.60.3.426.CrossRefPubMed

McDonald, M.R., & Budd, K.S. (1983). “Booster shots” following didactic parent training: Effects of follow-up using graphic feedback and instructions. Behavior Modification, 7, 211–223. doi:10.1177/01454455830072006.CrossRefPubMed

Metropolitan Area Child Study Research Group. (2002). A cognitive-ecological approach to preventing aggression in urban settings: Initial outcomes for high-risk children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 179–194. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.70.1.179.CrossRef

Metropolitan Area Child Study Research Group. (2007). Changing the way children “think” about aggression: Social-cognitive effects of a preventive intervention for early elementary school urban children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 160–167.CrossRef

Olds, D., Henderson Jr, C.R., Cole, R., Eckenrode, J., Kitzman, H., Luckey, D. et al. (1998). Long-term effects of nurse home visitation on children’s criminal and antisocial behavior: 15-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1238–1244. doi:10.1001/jama.280.14.1238.CrossRefPubMed

Patterson, G.R. (1974). Retraining of aggressive boys by their parents: Review of recent literature and follow-up evaluation. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 19, 142–158.PubMed

Reid, J.B., Patterson, G.R., & Snyder, J. (2002). Antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A developmental analysis and model for intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Reynolds, C.R., & Kamphaus, R.W. (1998). BASC: Behavioral Assessment System for Children - Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

Salvia, J., & Yesseldyke, J.E. (1991). Assessment. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.

Shadish, W.R., Hu, X., Glaser, R.R., Kownacki, R., & Wong, S. (1998). A method for exploring the effects of attrition in randomized experiments with dichotomous outcomes. Psychological Methods, 3, 3–22. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.1.3.CrossRef

Stoolmiller, M., Eddy, J.M., & Reid, J.B. (2000). Detecting and describing preventive intervention effects in a universal school-based randomized trial targeting delinquent and violent behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 296–306. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.2.296.CrossRefPubMed

Tolan, P., & Gorman-Smith, D. (2002). What violence prevention research can tell us about developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 713–729. doi:10.1017/S0954579402004042.CrossRefPubMed

Tolan, P.H., Gorman-Smith, D., Huessman, L.R., & Zelli, A. (1997). Assessing family processes to explain risk for antisocial behavior and depression among urban youth. Psychological Assessment, 9, 212–223. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.9.3.212.CrossRef

Tolan, P., Gorman-Smith, D., & Henry, D. (2004). Supporting families in a high-risk setting: Proximal effects of the SAFEChildren preventive intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 855–869. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.72.5.855.CrossRefPubMed

Tolan, P., Szapocznik, J., & Sombrano, S. (Eds.) (2006). Preventing youth substance abuse: Science-based programs for children and adolescents. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Whisman, M.A. (1990). The efficacy of booster maintenance sessions in behavior therapy: Review and methodological critique. Clinical Psychology Review, 10, 155–170. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(90)90055-F.CrossRef

Wolf, F.M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Sage University Paper on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–059.

Title: The Benefits of Booster Interventions: Evidence from a Family-Focused Prevention Program
Authors: Patrick H. Tolan
Deborah Gorman-Smith
David Henry
Michael Schoeny
Publication date: 01-12-2009
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Prevention Science / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-009-0139-8

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

The Benefits of Booster Interventions: Evidence from a Family-Focused Prevention Program

Abstract

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Latent Class Analysis of Lifestyle Characteristics and Health Risk Behaviors among College Youth

Confirmed Recall and Perceived Effectiveness of Tobacco Countermarketing Media in Rural Youth

Socio-Demographic Variability in Adolescent Substance Use: Mediation by Parents and Peers

Analysis and Influence of Demographic and Risk Factors on Difficult Child Behaviors

Socio-Demographic Variability in Adolescent Substance Use: Mediation by Parents and Peers

The Attitudes of Females in Drug Court Toward Additional Safeguards in HIV Prevention Research