Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

The BeHealthyR Study: a randomized trial of a multicomponent intervention to reduce stress, smoking and improve financial health of low-income residents in Rotterdam

Authors: Sara S. Shagiwal, Astrid Schop-Etman, Iris Bergwerff, Wil Vrencken, Semiha Denktaş

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Compared to higher socioeconomic status (SES) groups, those in lower SES groups are financially strained, experience higher rates of smoking-related morbidity, are in poorer health and have reduced life expectancy. This is especially true for the city of Rotterdam, where a large inequality in health is observed between low and high SES groups. The BeHealthyR study (Dutch: Grip en Gezondheid) is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) which will evaluate the impact of a theory-based multicomponent behavior intervention aiming to reduce stress, smoking, and improve financial health by means of a group-based stress management program combining cognitive and behavioral techniques, and nudges in low-SES residents living in Rotterdam.

Methods

The BeHealthyR study is a three-arm RCT. Between February 2018 and July 2019, low-SES participants who perceive stress, smoke, are financially strained and reside in Rotterdam (one of the four largest cities in The Netherlands) are recruited. Subsequently, participants are randomly assigned to either a stress management condition (SM), stress management with a buddy condition (SM-B) or a control condition (CC). Participants in the SM and SM-B conditions will attend four weekly group sessions (1.5 h/session) and a follow-up session eight weeks later. The SM condition includes psychoeducation and exercises, and cognitive and behavioral intervention techniques. Demographic data and objective measures will be collected at baseline (T0), four weeks post-baseline (T1), and twelve weeks post-baseline (T2). Primary outcome measures are to reduce stress, smoking and improve financial health. We hypothesize that low-SES participants in the intervention conditions, compared with those in the control condition, will experience less stress, smoke less and have improved financial health.

Discussion

This study is a group-based intervention which aims to investigate the effects of a theory-based behavioral change intervention employing several components on reducing stress, smoking, and improving financial health in low-SES residents living in Rotterdam. If effective, the findings from the present study will serve to inform future directions of research and clinical practice with regard to behavioral change interventions for low-SES groups.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.​gov (ID: NCT03553979). Registered on January 1 2018.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Stronks K, van de Mheen HD, Looman CW, Mackenbach JP. Cultural, material, and psychosocial correlates of the socioeconomic gradient in smoking behavior among adults. Prev Med. 1997;26(5 Pt 1):754–66.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Tsourtos G, O'Dwyer L. Stress, stress management, smoking prevalence and quit rates in a disadvantaged area: has anything changed? Health Promot J Austr. 2008;19(1):40–4.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
9.
Baum A, Garofalo JP, Yali AM. Socioeconomic status and chronic stress. Does stress account for SES effects on health? Ann NY Acad Sci. 1999;896:131–44.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Lantz PM, House JS, Mero RP, Williams DR. Stress, life events, and socioeconomic disparities in health: results from the Americans' Changing Lives Study. J Health Soc Behav. 2005;46(3):274–88.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
Benson FE, Kuipers MA, Nierkens V, Bruggink JW, Stronks K, Kunst AE. Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking in The Netherlands before and during the Global Financial Crisis: a repeated cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:469–015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Boland VC, Mattick RP, McRobbie H, Siahpush M, Courtney RJ. "I'm not strong enough; I'm not good enough. I can't do this, I'm failing"- A qualitative study of low-socioeconomic status smokers' experiences with accessing cessation support and the role for alternative technology-based support. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):196–017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Siahpush M, McNeill A, Borland R, Fong GT. Socioeconomic variations in nicotine dependence, self-efficacy, and intention to quit across four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control. 2006;15(3):71–5.
16.
Jarvis MJ WJ. Social patterning of individual health behaviours: the case of cigarette smoking. In: Marmot MWR, editor. Social Determinants of Health. 2nd edition ed. Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 224–37.
17.
18.
19.
Michie S, Jochelson K, Markham WA, Bridle C. Low-income groups and behavior change interventions: a review of intervention content, effectiveness and theoretical frameworks. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009;63(8):610–22.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Williams SL, Michie S, Dale J, Stallard N, French DP. The effects of a brief intervention to promote walking on Theory of Planned Behavior constructs: a cluster randomized controlled trial in general practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2015;98(5):651–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
van der Waerden JE, Hoefnagels C, Hosman CM, Souren PM, Jansen MW. A randomized controlled trial of combined exercise and psycho-education for low-SES women: short- and long-term outcomes in the reduction of stress and depressive symptoms. Soc Sci Med. 2013;91:84–93.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Lazarus RS, Cohen J. Environmental stress. In: Altman IWJ, editor. Human Behavior and Environment. Boston: Springer; 1977. pp 89–127.CrossRef
23.
Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer; 1984. p. 141.
24.
Cohen F. Coping. In: Matarazzo JD, Weiss SM, editors. Behavioral health: a handbook of health enhancement and disease prevention. New York: Wiley; 1984.
25.
26.
Hobbis IC, Sutton S. Are techniques used in cognitive behavior therapy applicable to behaviour change interventions based on the theory of planned behavior? J Health Psychol. 2005;10(1):7–18.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Jokić-Begić N. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Neuroscience: Towards Closer Integration. Psychological Topics 19. 2010;2:235–54.
28.
Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses. Cognit Ther Res. 2012;36(5):427–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Knapp P, Beck AT. Cognitive therapy: foundations, conceptual models, applications and research. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2008;30(2):54–64.CrossRef
30.
31.
Clark DA. Cognitive Restructuring. In: Hofmann SG, Dozois D, editors. The Wiley handbook of cognitive behavioral therapy. First ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013.
32.
Luthans FYC. Human, Social, and Now Positive Psychological Capital Management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organ Dyn. 2004;33(2):143–60.CrossRef
33.
Karwoski L GG. On the Integration of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression and Positive Psychology. J Cogn Psychother. 2006;20(2):159–70.CrossRef
34.
Alex Linley P, Joseph S, Harrington S, Wood AM. Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future. J Posit Psychol. 2006;1(1):3–16.CrossRef
35.
Rashid T. Positive psychotherapy: A strength-based approach. J Posit Psychol. 2015;10(1):25–40.CrossRef
36.
Page KM, Vella-Brodrick D. The working for wellness program: RCT of an employee well-being intervention. J Happiness Stud. 2013;14(3):1007–31.CrossRef
37.
Bolier L, Haverman M, Westerhof GJ, Riper H, Smit F, Bohlmeijer E. Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health 2013;13:119–2458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Sin NL, Lyubomirsky S. Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: a practice-friendly meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65(5):467–87.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Sherman DK, Cohen GL. The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In: Zanna MP, editor. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. San Diego: Academic Press; 2006. p. 183–242.
40.
Armitage CJ, Harris PR, Hepton G, Napper L. Self-affirmation increases acceptance of health-risk information among UK adult smokers with low socioeconomic status. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008;22(1):88–95.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Locke EA, Latham GP. A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1990.
42.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: WH Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.; 1997.
43.
Macleod AK, Conway C. Well-being and the anticipation of future positive experiences: The role of income, social networks, and planning ability. Cogn Emot. 2005;19(3):357–74.CrossRefPubMed
44.
MacLeod AK, Coates E, Hetherton J. Increasing well-being through teaching goal-setting and planning skills: Results of a brief intervention. J Happiness Stud. 2008;9(2):185–96.CrossRef
45.
46.
Lakey B, Cohen S. Social support theory and measurement. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 29–52.
47.
Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):310–57.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Hogan BE, Linden W, Najarian B. Social support interventions: do they work? Clin Psychol Rev. 2002;22(3):383–442.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Ford P, Clifford A, Gussy K, Gartner C. A systematic review of peer-support programs for smoking cessation in disadvantaged groups. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(11):5507–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2008.
51.
Leonard TC. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Constit Polit Econ. 2008;19(4):356–60.CrossRef
52.
Haff N, Patel MS, Lim R, Zhu J, Troxel AB, Asch DA. The role of behavioral economic incentive design and demographic characteristics in financial incentive-based approaches to changing health behaviors: a meta-analysis. Am J Health Promot. 2015;29(5):314–23.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Spijkerman M, Ruiter M, Conijn B, Kramer J, Boon B, Poel A. Zijn klachtgerichte Mini-interventies voor slapen, stress en piekeren een aanwinst voor depressiepreventie? Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen, 2014;92:109–16.CrossRef
54.
Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. Brit Med J. 2013;346:e7586.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Lovibond SH, Lovibond, PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety & Stress Scales (DASS). New South Wales: Psychology Foundation Monograph; 1995.
56.
Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005;44(2):227–39.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, Swinson RP. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychol Assess. 1998;10(2):176–81.CrossRef
58.
59.
Vink JM, Willemsen G, Beem AL, Boomsma DI. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence in a Dutch sample of daily smokers and ex-smokers. Addict Behav. 2005;30(3):575–9.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Littel M FI. Psychometric properties of the brief Questionnaire on Smoking Urges (QSU-Brief) in a Dutch smoker population. Neth J Psychol. 2011;66(2):44–6.
61.
Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Berle D, Starcevic V, Moses K, Hannan A, Milicevic D, Sammut P. Preliminary validation of an ultra-brief version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Clin Psychol Psychother 2011;18(4):339–46.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Tobin DL HK. The Hierarchical Factor Structure of the Coping Strategies Inventory. Cogn Ther Res. 1989;13(4):343–61.CrossRef
64.
Addison CC, Campbell-Jenkins BW, Sarpong DF, Kibler J, Singh M, Dubbert P, et al. Psychometric evaluation of a Coping Strategies Inventory Short-Form (CSI-SF) in the Jackson Heart Study cohort. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2007;4(4):289–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
65.
Speyer E, Morgenstern H, Hayashino Y, Kerr PG, Rayner H, Robinson BM, et al. Reliability and validity of the coping strategy inventory-short form applied to hemodialysis patients in 13 countries: Results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). J Psychosom Res. 2016;91:12–9.CrossRefPubMed
66.
67.
Connor-Smith JK, Compas BE, Wadsworth ME, Thomsen AH, Saltzman H. Responses to stress in adolescence: measurement of coping and involuntary stress responses. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68(6):976–92.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Wadsworth ME RT. Parent and Adolescent Responses to Poverty-Related Stress: Tests of Mediated and Moderated Coping Models. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2005;14(2):283–98.CrossRef
69.
70.
Hald J, Overgaard J, Grau C. Evaluation of objective measures of smoking status--a prospective clinical study in a group of head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2003;42(2):154–9.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Jarvis MJ, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Feyerabend C, Vesey C, Saloojee Y. Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers. Am J Public Health. 1987;77(11):1435–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
72.
Bryant J, Bonevski B, Paul C, Lecathelinais C. Assessing smoking status in disadvantaged populations: is computer administered self-report an accurate and acceptable measure? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:153–2288.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
73.
Rajendra AU, Joseph PK, Kannathal N, Lim CM, Suri JS. Heart rate variability: a review. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44(12):1031–51.CrossRef
74.
Clays E, De Bacquer D, Crasset V, Kittel F, de Smet P, Kornitzer M, et al. The perception of work stressors is related to reduced parasympathetic activity. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011;84(2):185–91.CrossRefPubMed
75.
Bonomi AG, Goldenberg S, Papini G, et al. 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). In: Predicting Energy Expenditure from Photo-Plethysmography Measurements of Heart Rate under Beta Blocker Therapy: Data Driven Personalization Strategies Based on Mixed Models. IEEE; 2015:7642–6. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1109/​EMBC.​2015.​7320162.CrossRef
76.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
78.
Metadata
Title
The BeHealthyR Study: a randomized trial of a multicomponent intervention to reduce stress, smoking and improve financial health of low-income residents in Rotterdam
Authors
Sara S. Shagiwal
Astrid Schop-Etman
Iris Bergwerff
Wil Vrencken
Semiha Denktaş
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5728-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Public Health 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

Epidemiology and factors associated with amoebic liver abscess in northern Sri Lanka

Study protocol

Effects of a culturally specific tobacco cessation intervention among African American Quitline enrollees: a randomized controlled trial

Research article

Parental perceptions of children’s exposure to tobacco smoke: development and validation of a new measure

Research article

Self-reported oral and general health in relation to socioeconomic position

Research article

How timely closure can reduce outbreak duration: gastroenteritis in care homes in North West England, 2012–2016

Correction

Correction to: Identifying common barriers and facilitators to linkage and retention in chronic disease care in western Kenya