Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 4/2005

01-04-2005 | Correspondence

The Authors’ Reply

Authors: Bregt S. Kappelhoff, Alwin D. R. Huitema, Jos H. Beijnen

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 4/2005

Login to get access

Excerpt

We appreciate the interest that Drs Leith, Hinzmann and Mayers took in our recent paper Practical Guidelines to Interpret Plasma Concentrations of Antiretroviral Drugs.[1] The purpose of this review was to provide a practical guide for therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretroviral drugs based on currently available literature data. For nevirapine a target trough level (Ctrough) of >3.4 mg/L has been reported.[2] In some cases, however, when patients are treated with nevirapine at its registered dose of 200mg twice daily, the Ctrough remains below 3.4 mg/L. This may be the result of multiple causes (e.g. adherence, comedication, clinical condition, treatment history). The interpretation of a patient’s drug level in such a case must be performed on an individual basis. When, however, all potential interfering causes have been ruled out and the patient does not exhibit signs of adverse effects we feel that the treating physician could consider a daily dose of 600mg with frequent safety monitoring. This consideration is based on the study results of González de Requenza et al.[3] They increased the daily dose of nevirapine from 400 to 600mg in 25 patients experiencing a first virological failure (>50 HIV RNA copies/mL). The patients were at least 3 months on a nevirapine containing triple combination. They concluded that this dose increase led to a significant rise in nevirapine plasma levels and was well tolerated. A greater virologic response was also noticed among the patients with higher nevirapine plasma concentrations.[3] Clearly this concerns results from a small study and more data should become available before this becomes ‘evidence-based medicine’. Dr Leith et al., thus, rightly point out that only for the daily nevirapine dose of 400mg a huge safety and efficacy database exists and evidently not for the 600mg dose. Hopefully further studies will be designed to find out whether the suggested dose increase is a safe and effective approach for patients with low nevirapine Ctrough levels. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kappelhoff BS, Crommentuyn KML, de Maat MMR, et al. Practical guidelines to interpret plasma concentrations of antiretroviral drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 2004; 43(13): 845–53PubMedCrossRef Kappelhoff BS, Crommentuyn KML, de Maat MMR, et al. Practical guidelines to interpret plasma concentrations of antiretroviral drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 2004; 43(13): 845–53PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Veldkamp AI, Weverling GJ, Lange JMA, et al. High exposure to nevirapine in plasma is associated with an improved virological response in HIV-1 infected individuals. AIDS 2001; 15: 1089–95PubMedCrossRef Veldkamp AI, Weverling GJ, Lange JMA, et al. High exposure to nevirapine in plasma is associated with an improved virological response in HIV-1 infected individuals. AIDS 2001; 15: 1089–95PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gonz’alez de Requenza D, Nuñez M, Gallego O, et al. Does an increase in nevirapine plasma levels cause complete virologic suppression in patients experiencing early virologic failure? HIV Clin Trials 2002; 3: 463–7CrossRef Gonz’alez de Requenza D, Nuñez M, Gallego O, et al. Does an increase in nevirapine plasma levels cause complete virologic suppression in patients experiencing early virologic failure? HIV Clin Trials 2002; 3: 463–7CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Authors’ Reply
Authors
Bregt S. Kappelhoff
Alwin D. R. Huitema
Jos H. Beijnen
Publication date
01-04-2005
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 4/2005
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200544040-00009

Other articles of this Issue 4/2005

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 4/2005 Go to the issue