Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2007

01-11-2007 | Original Article

The associations between living conditions, demography, and the ‘impact of cancer’ scale in tumor-free cancer survivors: a NOCWO study

Authors: Sævar B. Gudbergsson, Sophie D. Fosså, Patricia A. Ganz, Brad J. Zebrack, Alv A. Dahl

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 11/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Goals of work

The “impact of cancer” scale (IOC) is a new questionnaire that explores attitudes in the physical, psychological, social, and spiritual/existential domains in cancer survivors. This study explores the associations between demography, living conditions (LCs), and the IOC dimensions in disease-free Norwegian survivors who have been treated for breast, prostate, or testicular cancer.

Materials and methods

A questionnaire covering demography, LCs, and the IOC was mailed to 852 cancer survivors; 459 (54%) participated. A living condition index (LCI) was calculated based on self-reported education, employment, annual income, health, housing expenditures, and social participation.

Main results

Survivors with a low LCI level viewed their situation significantly worse on four of five negative IOC dimensions than those with high LCI level. No significant LCI-related differences were observed for the mean scores of positive IOC dimensions. Significant associations were observed between gender, health status, employment, and five to six IOC dimensions. LCs were more often associated with the negative IOC dimensions than the positive ones.

Conclusions

The significant associations between LCs and dimensions of the IOC in tumor-free cancer survivors show that LCs should be considered when health care professionals assist cancer survivors in dealing with the impact the cancer experience had on their lives.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adams JM, White M (2004) Biological ageing: a fundamental, biological link between socioeconomic status and health. Eur J Public Health 14:331–334PubMedCrossRef Adams JM, White M (2004) Biological ageing: a fundamental, biological link between socioeconomic status and health. Eur J Public Health 14:331–334PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Arozullah AM, Calhoun EA, Wolf M, Finley DK, Fitzner KA, Heckinger EA, Gorby NS, Schumock GT, Bennett CL (2004) The financial burden of cancer: estimates from a study of insured women with breast cancer. J Support Oncol 3:271–278 Arozullah AM, Calhoun EA, Wolf M, Finley DK, Fitzner KA, Heckinger EA, Gorby NS, Schumock GT, Bennett CL (2004) The financial burden of cancer: estimates from a study of insured women with breast cancer. J Support Oncol 3:271–278
3.
go back to reference Atkinson T, Cantillon B, Marlier E, Nolan B (2002) Social indicators. The EU and social inclusion. Oxford University Press, Oxford Atkinson T, Cantillon B, Marlier E, Nolan B (2002) Social indicators. The EU and social inclusion. Oxford University Press, Oxford
4.
go back to reference Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Tangen Haug T, Neckelmann D (2002) The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 52:69–77PubMedCrossRef Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Tangen Haug T, Neckelmann D (2002) The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 52:69–77PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bouchardy C, Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G (2006) Social class is an important prognostic factor of breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer 5:1145–1151CrossRef Bouchardy C, Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G (2006) Social class is an important prognostic factor of breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer 5:1145–1151CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bradley CJ, Bednarek HL, Neumark D (2002a) Breast cancer and women’s labour supply. Health Serv Res 37:1309–1328PubMedCrossRef Bradley CJ, Bednarek HL, Neumark D (2002a) Breast cancer and women’s labour supply. Health Serv Res 37:1309–1328PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bradley CJ, Bednarek HL, Neumark D (2002b) Breast cancer survival, work, and earnings. J Health Econ 21:757–779PubMedCrossRef Bradley CJ, Bednarek HL, Neumark D (2002b) Breast cancer survival, work, and earnings. J Health Econ 21:757–779PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bradley CJ, Neumark D, Bednarek HL, Schenk M (2005) Short-term effect of breast cancer on labor market attachment: results from a longitudinal study. J Health Econ 24:137–160PubMedCrossRef Bradley CJ, Neumark D, Bednarek HL, Schenk M (2005) Short-term effect of breast cancer on labor market attachment: results from a longitudinal study. J Health Econ 24:137–160PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chirikos TN, Russel-Jacobs A, Cantor AB (2005) Indirect economic effect of long-term breast cancer survival. Cancer Pract 10:248–255CrossRef Chirikos TN, Russel-Jacobs A, Cantor AB (2005) Indirect economic effect of long-term breast cancer survival. Cancer Pract 10:248–255CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Clark EJ, Stovall EL (1996) Advocacy: the cornerstone of cancer survivorship. Cancer Pract 4:239–244PubMed Clark EJ, Stovall EL (1996) Advocacy: the cornerstone of cancer survivorship. Cancer Pract 4:239–244PubMed
11.
go back to reference Fayers P, Hays R (eds) (2005) Assessing quality of life in clinical trials: methods and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford Fayers P, Hays R (eds) (2005) Assessing quality of life in clinical trials: methods and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
12.
go back to reference Gandek B, Ware JE Jr, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bjorner J, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Fukuhara S, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Sullivan M (1998) Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA project. J Clin Epidemiol 11:1149–1158CrossRef Gandek B, Ware JE Jr, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, Apolone G, Bjorner J, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Fukuhara S, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Sullivan M (1998) Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA project. J Clin Epidemiol 11:1149–1158CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gudbergsson SB, Fosså SD, Borgeraas E, Dahl AA (2006) A comparative study of living conditions in cancer patients who have returned to work after curative treatment. Support Care Cancer 14:1020–1029PubMedCrossRef Gudbergsson SB, Fosså SD, Borgeraas E, Dahl AA (2006) A comparative study of living conditions in cancer patients who have returned to work after curative treatment. Support Care Cancer 14:1020–1029PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kaffashian F, Godward S, Davies T, Solomon L, McCann J, Duffy SW (2003) Socioeconomic effects on breast cancer survival: proportion attributable to stage and morphology. Br J Cancer 89:1693–1696PubMedCrossRef Kaffashian F, Godward S, Davies T, Solomon L, McCann J, Duffy SW (2003) Socioeconomic effects on breast cancer survival: proportion attributable to stage and morphology. Br J Cancer 89:1693–1696PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kravdal O (2000) Social inequalities in cancer survival. Popul Stud 54:1–18CrossRef Kravdal O (2000) Social inequalities in cancer survival. Popul Stud 54:1–18CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Krokstad S, Westin S (2002) Health inequalities by socioeconomics status among men in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, Norway. Scand J Public Health 30:113–124PubMedCrossRef Krokstad S, Westin S (2002) Health inequalities by socioeconomics status among men in the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, Norway. Scand J Public Health 30:113–124PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lauzier S, Maunsell E, De Koninck M, Drolet M, Hèbert-Croteau N, Robert J (2005) Conceptualization and sources of costs from breast cancer: findings from patient and caregiver focus groups. Psychooncology 14:351–360PubMedCrossRef Lauzier S, Maunsell E, De Koninck M, Drolet M, Hèbert-Croteau N, Robert J (2005) Conceptualization and sources of costs from breast cancer: findings from patient and caregiver focus groups. Psychooncology 14:351–360PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder C (eds) (2005) Outcomes assessment in cancer: measures, methods, and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder C (eds) (2005) Outcomes assessment in cancer: measures, methods, and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
19.
go back to reference Main DS, Nowels CT, Cavender TA, Etschmaier M, Steiner JF (2005) A qualitative study of work and work return in cancer survivors. Psychooncology 14:992–1004PubMedCrossRef Main DS, Nowels CT, Cavender TA, Etschmaier M, Steiner JF (2005) A qualitative study of work and work return in cancer survivors. Psychooncology 14:992–1004PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Marmot M (2002) The influence of income on health: views of an epidemiologist. Health Aff 21:31–46CrossRef Marmot M (2002) The influence of income on health: views of an epidemiologist. Health Aff 21:31–46CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Michelson H, Bolund C, Brandberg Y (2001) Multiple chronic health problems are negatively associated with health related quality of life (HRQoL) irrespective of age. Qual Life Res 9:1093–1104CrossRef Michelson H, Bolund C, Brandberg Y (2001) Multiple chronic health problems are negatively associated with health related quality of life (HRQoL) irrespective of age. Qual Life Res 9:1093–1104CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pollack LA, Greer GE, Rowland JH, Miller A, Doneski D, Coughlin SS, Stovall E, Ulman D (2005) Cancer survivorship: a new challenge in comprehensive cancer control. Cancer Causes Control 16(Suppl 1):51–59PubMedCrossRef Pollack LA, Greer GE, Rowland JH, Miller A, Doneski D, Coughlin SS, Stovall E, Ulman D (2005) Cancer survivorship: a new challenge in comprehensive cancer control. Cancer Causes Control 16(Suppl 1):51–59PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Short PF, Mallonee EL (2006) Income disparities in the quality of life of cancer survivors. Med Care 44:16–23PubMedCrossRef Short PF, Mallonee EL (2006) Income disparities in the quality of life of cancer survivors. Med Care 44:16–23PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Subhajit DR, Philip J, Javle P (2005) Trends in prostate cancer incidence and survival in various socioeconomic classes: a population-based study. Int J Urol 12:644–653CrossRef Subhajit DR, Philip J, Javle P (2005) Trends in prostate cancer incidence and survival in various socioeconomic classes: a population-based study. Int J Urol 12:644–653CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Steiner JF, Cavender TA, Main DS, Bradley CJ (2004) Assessing the impact of cancer on work outcomes. What are the research needs? Cancer 8:1703–1711CrossRef Steiner JF, Cavender TA, Main DS, Bradley CJ (2004) Assessing the impact of cancer on work outcomes. What are the research needs? Cancer 8:1703–1711CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Verbeek J, Spelten E, Kammeijer M, Spangers M (2003) Return to work of cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study into quality of rehabilitation by occupational physicians. Occup Environ Med 60:352–357PubMedCrossRef Verbeek J, Spelten E, Kammeijer M, Spangers M (2003) Return to work of cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study into quality of rehabilitation by occupational physicians. Occup Environ Med 60:352–357PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 13:220–233CrossRef Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 13:220–233CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Zebrack BJ, Ganz PA, Bernaards CA, Petersen L, Abraham L (2006) Assessing the impact of cancer: development of a new instrument for long-term survivors. Psychooncology 15:407–421PubMedCrossRef Zebrack BJ, Ganz PA, Bernaards CA, Petersen L, Abraham L (2006) Assessing the impact of cancer: development of a new instrument for long-term survivors. Psychooncology 15:407–421PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The associations between living conditions, demography, and the ‘impact of cancer’ scale in tumor-free cancer survivors: a NOCWO study
Authors
Sævar B. Gudbergsson
Sophie D. Fosså
Patricia A. Ganz
Brad J. Zebrack
Alv A. Dahl
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0251-x

Other articles of this Issue 11/2007

Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2007 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine