Top

Supportive Care in Cancer

Published in:

01-01-2016 | Original Article

The association between the strength of the working alliance and sharing concerns by advanced cancer patients: a pilot study

Authors: Gil Bar-Sela, Sivan Yochpaz, Rachel Gruber, Doron Lulav-Grinwald, Inbal Mitnik, Dan Koren

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 1/2016

Abstract

Objectives

A strong therapeutic alliance between cancer patients and medical staff is associated with treatment adherence, better health outcomes, and an emotional acceptance of a terminal illness. Given its significant role, the current study investigated the association between the working alliance and sharing concerns by advanced cancer patients.

Methods

Advanced cancer patients completed the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised and a checklist of topics in which they rated their degree of concern about the topics and the degree of sharing them with their physician/nurse.

Results

Fifty-two patients completed the study. The working alliance was found to be strong with respect to treating physicians and nurses. The four topics that concerned patients the most were family coping with their illness (81 %), fear of future suffering (71 %), symptom control (67 %), and the oncological treatment (65 %). Patients with a strong working alliance with their physician shared to a higher extent the personal and main concern regarding their family’s coping, and a significant correlation was found between them (r = 0.53, p < .01). In addition, sharing fears of future suffering was also correlated with a strong working alliance with the physician (r = 0.28, p < .05). A strong working alliance with the nurse was correlated with discussing symptoms control (r = 0.30, p < .05).

Conclusion

These findings provide preliminary support for an association between the strength of the working alliance and the type of concerns that advanced cancer patients choose to discuss with their medical staff and highlight the importance of follow-up studies to further explore this association.

Mead N, Bower P (2000) Patient-centeredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med 51:1087–1110CrossRefPubMed

Fuertes JN, Boylan LS, Fontanella JA (2009) Behavioral indices in medical care outcome: the working alliance, adherence, and related factors. J Gen Intern Med 24(1):80–85PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Osterberg L, Blaschke T (2005) Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med 353:487–497CrossRefPubMed

Trachtenberg F, Dugan E, Hall MA (2005) How patients’ trust relates to their involvement in medical care. J Fam Pract 54(4):344–352PubMed

Beach MC, Keruly J, Moore RD (2006) Is the quality of the patient-provider relationship associated with better adherence and health outcomes for patients with HIV? J Gen Intern Med 21(6):661–665PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Hall MA, Zheng B, Dugan E, Camacho F, Kidd KE, Mishra A, Balkrishnan R (2002) Measuring patients’ trust in their primary care providers. Med Care Res Rev 59(3):293–318CrossRefPubMed

Hillen MA, de Haes HC, Smets E (2011) Cancer patients’ trust in their physician—a review. Psychooncology 20(3):227–241CrossRefPubMed

Mechanic D, Meyer S (2000) Concepts of trust among patients with serious illness. Soc Sci Med 51(5):657–668CrossRefPubMed

Seetharamu N, Iqbal U, Weiner JS (2007) Determinants of trust in the patient-oncologist relationship. Palliat Support Care 5(4):405–409CrossRefPubMed

10.

Shattell M (2004) Nurse–patient interaction: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs 13:714–722CrossRefPubMed

11.

McQueen A (2000) Nurse- patient relationships and partnership in hospital care. J Clin Nurs 9:723–731CrossRef

12.

Halldorsdottir S (2008) The dynamics of the nurse–patient relationship: introduction of a synthesized theory from the patient’s perspective. Scand J Caring Sci 22:643–652CrossRefPubMed

13.

Linn AJ, Weert JMC, Smit EG, Perry K, van Dijk L (2013) 1+1=3? The systematic development of a theoretical and evidence-based tailored multimedia intervention to improve medication adherence. Patient Educ Couns 93:381–388CrossRefPubMed

14.

Linn AJ, van Weert JC, van Dijk L, Horne R, Smit EG (2014) The value of nurses’ tailored communication when discussing medicines: exploring the relationship between satisfaction, beliefs and adherence. J Health Psychol Jul 4

15.

Bordin E (1979) The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy 16:252–260CrossRef

16.

Bordin ES (1994) Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance: new directions. In: Horavath AO, Greenberg LS (eds) The working alliance: theory, research and practice. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 13–37

17.

Horvath AO, Symonds BD (1991) Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Couns Psychol 38:139–149CrossRef

18.

Horvath AO, Luborsky L (1993) The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 61(4):561–573CrossRefPubMed

19.

Van Walsum KL, Lawson DM, Bramson R (2004) Physicians’ intergenerational family relationships and patients’ perceptions of working alliance. Families, Systems, & Health 22(4):457–473CrossRef

20.

Mack JW, Block SD, Nilsson M, Wright A, Trice E, Friedlander R, Paulk E, Prigerson HG (2009) Measuring therapeutic alliance between oncologists and patients with advanced cancer. Cancer 115(14):3302–3311PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

21.

Foley KM, Gelband H (2001) Improving palliative care for cancer. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council, Washington

22.

Luoma ML, Hakamies-Blomqvist L (2004) The meaning of quality of life in patients being treated for advanced breast cancer: a qualitative study. Psychooncology 13:729–739CrossRefPubMed

23.

Adler NE, Page AEK (2008) The psychosocial needs of cancer patients. In: cancer care for the whole patient: meeting psychosocial health needs. National Academies Press, Washington

24.

Lo B, Ruston D, Kates LW, Working Group on Religious and Spiritual Issues at the End of Life et al (2002) Discussing religious and spiritual issues at the end of life: a practical guide for physicians. JAMA 287(6):749–754CrossRefPubMed

25.

Horvath AO, Greenberg LS (1989) Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. J Couns Psychol 36:223–233CrossRef

26.

Tracey TJ, Kokotovic AM (1989) Factor structure of the working alliance inventory. J Consult Clin Psychol 1(3):207–210

27.

Munder T, Wilmers F, Leonhart R, Linster HW, Barth J (2010) Working alliance inventory‐short revised (WAI‐SR): psychometric properties in outpatients and inpatients. Clin Psychol Psychother 17(3):231–239PubMed

28.

Hatcher RL, Gillaspy JL (2006) Development and validation of a revised short version of the working alliance inventory. Psychother Res 16(1):12–25CrossRef

29.

Rotman A (1999) Attachment styles in adulthood and the development of the working alliance. MA thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Israel (in Hebrew)

30.

Pegman S, Beesley H, Holcombe C, Mendick N, Salmon P (2011) Patients’ sense of relationship with breast cancer surgeons: the relative importance of surgeon and patient variability and the influence of patients’ attachment style. Patient Educ Couns 83(1):125–128CrossRefPubMed

31.

Dyson M (1999) Intensive care unit psychosis, the therapeutic nurse-patient relationship and the influence of the intensive care setting: analyses of interrelating factors. J Clin Nurs 8:284–290CrossRefPubMed

32.

Hagerty BM, Patusky KL (2003) Re-conceptualizing patient-nurse relationship. J Nurs Scholarsh 35(2):145–150CrossRefPubMed

33.

McCabe C (2004) Nurse–patient communication: an exploration of patients’ experiences. J Clin Nurs 13:41–49CrossRefPubMed

34.

Higginson IJ, McCarthy M (1993) Validity of the support team assessment schedule: do staffs’ ratings reflect those made by patients or their families? Palliat Med 7:219–228CrossRefPubMed

35.

Liang LP, Dunn SM, Gorman A, Stuart-Harris R (1990) Identifying priorities of psychosocial need in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 62:1000–1003PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

36.

Heaven CM, Maguire P (1997) Disclosure of concerns by hospice patients and their identification by nurses. Palliat Med 11:283–290CrossRefPubMed

37.

Anderson WG, Alexander SC, Rodriguez KL, Jeffreys AS, Olsen MK, Pollak KI, Tulsky JA, Arnold RM (2008) “What concerns me is…” Expression of emotion by advanced cancer patients during outpatient visits. Support Care Cancer 16:803–811PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

38.

Lang F, Floyd MR, Beine KL (2000) Clues to patients’ explanations and concerns about their illnesses: a call for active listening. Arch Fam Med 9(3):222–227CrossRefPubMed

39.

Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, Grambow S, Parker J, Tulsky JA (2001) Preparing for the end of life: preferences of patients, families, physicians, and other care providers. J Pain Symptom Manage 22(3):727–737CrossRefPubMed

40.

Wright AA, Zhang B, Ray A et al (2008) Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA 300(14):1665–1673PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

41.

Sullivan AM, Lakoma MD, Block SD (2003) The status of medical education in end-of-life care. J Gen Int Med 19(9):685–695CrossRef

Title: The association between the strength of the working alliance and sharing concerns by advanced cancer patients: a pilot study
Authors: Gil Bar-Sela
Sivan Yochpaz
Rachel Gruber
Doron Lulav-Grinwald
Inbal Mitnik
Dan Koren
Publication date: 01-01-2016
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2794-6

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras

Prof. Fabrice Barlesi

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Defining cancer-related fatigue for biomarker discovery

Meaning of work and the process of returning after head and neck cancer

Predicting distress among people who care for patients living longer with high-grade malignant glioma

Financial burden of therapy in families with a child with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: report from north India

Relationship between palliative care consultation service and end-of-life outcomes

Occurrence and recall rates of fertility discussions with young breast cancer patients

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer