Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

The association between health-related quality of life and problem gambling severity: a cross-sectional analysis of the Health Survey for England

Authors: Esther Moore, Robert Pryce, Hazel Squires, Elizabeth Goyder

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Problem gambling can lead to health-related harms, such as poor mental health and suicide. In the UK there is interest in introducing guidance around effective and cost-effective interventions to prevent harm from gambling. There are no estimates of the health state utilities associated with problem gambling severity from the general population in the UK. These are required to determine the cost-effectiveness of interventions. This study aims to use an indirect elicitation method to estimate health state utilities, using the EQ-5D, for various levels of problem gambling and gambling-related harm.

Methods

We used the Health Survey for England to estimate EQ-5D-derived health state utilities associated with the different categories of the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI), PGSI score and a 7-item PGSI-derived harms variable. Propensity score matching was used to create a matched dataset with respect to risk factors for problem gambling and regression models were used to estimate the EQ-5D-derived utility score and the EQ-5D domain score whilst controlling for key comorbidities. Further exploratory analysis was performed to look at the relationship between problem gambling and the individual domains of the EQ-5D.

Results

We did not find any significant attributable decrements to health state utility for any of the PGSI variables (categories, score and 7-item PGSI derived harms variable) when key comorbidities were controlled for. However, we did find a significant association between the 7-item PGSI derived harms variable and having a higher score (worse health) in the anxiety/depression domain of the EQ-5D, when comorbidities were controlled for.

Conclusions

This study found no significant association between problem gambling severity and HRQoL measured by the EQ-5D when controlling for comorbidities. There might be several reasons for this including that this might reflect the true relationship between problem gambling and HRQoL, the sample size in this study was insufficient to detect a significant association, the PGSI is insufficient for measuring gambling harm, or the EQ-5D is not sensitive enough to detect the changes in HRQoL caused by gambling. Further research into each of these possibilities is needed to understand more about the relationship between problem gambling severity and HRQoL.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Johnstone P, Regan M. Gambling harm is everybody’s business: a public health approach and call to action. Public Health. 2020;1(184):63–6.CrossRef
2.
Health TLP. Gambling: a neglected public health issue. Lancet Public Health. 2021;6(1):e1.CrossRef
3.
Office For Health Improvement and Disparities. The economic cost of gambling-related harm in England: evidence update 2023. 2023.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Arnold D, Girling A, Stevens A, Lilford R. Comparison of direct and indirect methods of estimating health state utilities for resource allocation: review and empirical analysis. BMJ. 2009;22(339):b2688.CrossRef
11.
Brazier J, Roberts J, Tsuchiya A, Busschbach J. A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ. 2004;13(9):873–84.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Browne M, Bellringer M, Greer N, Kolandai-Matchett K, Rawat V, Langham E, Rockloff M, et al. Measuring the burden of gambling harm in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2017.
13.
Rawat V, Browne M, Bellringer M, Greer N, Kolandai-Matchett K, Rockloff M, et al. A tale of two countries: comparing disability weights for gambling problems in New Zealand and Australia. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(9):2361–71.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Moayeri F. A reference set of Health State Utility Values for gambling problem behaviour, a survey of the Australian general population: implications for future healthcare evaluations. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020;20(1):115–24.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Wynne HJ. Introducing the Canadian problem gambling index. 2002.
17.
18.
19.
Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. 2011;20(10):1727–36.CrossRef
20.
Devlin NJ, Shah KK, Feng Y, Mulhern B, van Hout B. Valuing health-related quality of life: an EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ. 2018;27(1):7–22.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Langham E, Thorne H, Browne M, Donaldson P, Rose J, Rockloff M. Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms. BMC Public Health. 2015;16(1):80.CrossRef
22.
Bonfils NA, Aubin HJ, Benyamina A, Limosin F, Luquiens A. Quality of life instruments used in problem gambling studies: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;1(104):58–72.CrossRef
23.
Subramaniam M, Abdin E, Vaingankar JA, Wong KE, Chong SA. Comorbid physical and mental illnesses among pathological gamblers: results from a population based study in Singapore. Psychiatry Res. 2015;227(2):198–205.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Lahti T, Halme JT, Pankakoski M, Sinclair D, Alho H. Treatment of pathological gambling with naltrexone pharmacotherapy and brief intervention: a pilot study. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2010;43(3):35–44.PubMed
25.
Browne M, Rawat V, Newall P, Begg S, Rockloff M, Hing N. A framework for indirect elicitation of the public health impact of gambling problems. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1717.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
27.
Raisamo SU, Mäkelä P, Salonen AH, Lintonen TP. The extent and distribution of gambling harm in Finland as assessed by the Problem Gambling Severity Index. Eur J Public Health. 2015;25(4):716–22.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Young MM, Hodgins DC, Currie SR, Brunelle N, Dufour M, Flores-Pajot MC, et al. Not too much, not too often, and not too many: the results of the first large-scale, international project to develop lower-risk gambling guidelines. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11469-022-00896-w. Cited 2022 Aug 22.
29.
30.
31.
Browne M, Goodwin BC, Rockloff MJ. Validation of the Short Gambling Harm Screen (SGHS): a tool for assessment of harms from gambling. J Gambl Stud. 2018;34(2):499–512.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Tulloch C, Hing N, Browne M, Rockloff M. How gambling problems relate to health and wellbeing in Australian households: evidence from the household income and labour dynamics of Australia survey. Addict Behav. 2023;1(137):107538.CrossRef
33.
Brazier J, Peasgood T, Mukuria C, Marten O, Kreimeier S, Luo N, et al. The EQ-HWB: overview of the development of a measure of health and wellbeing and key results. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2022;25(4):482–91.CrossRef
34.
35.
J E, J N, W H, R B. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1993;29(2):321–6.
36.
Frisch MB, Cornell J, Villanueva M, Retzlaff PJ. Clinical validation of the Quality of Life Inventory. A measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment. Psychol Assess. 1992;4(1):92–101.
37.
Cummins RA, Eckersley R, Pallant J, Van Vugt J, Misajon R. Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Soc Indic Res. 2003;64(2):159–90.
38.
Swanton TB, Gainsbury SM. Debt stress partly explains the relationship between problem gambling and comorbid mental health problems. Soc Sci Med. 2020;1(265):113476.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The association between health-related quality of life and problem gambling severity: a cross-sectional analysis of the Health Survey for England
Authors
Esther Moore
Robert Pryce
Hazel Squires
Elizabeth Goyder
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17816-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue

Research

Healthy together Victoria and childhood obesity study: effects of a large scale, community-based cluster randomised trial of a systems thinking approach for the prevention of childhood obesity among secondary school students 2014–2016

Research

Objectively measured the impact of ambient air pollution on physical activity for older adults

Research

Physical activity and odds of coronary heart disease among Lebanese women

Research

Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D mediates the association between heavy metal exposure and cardiovascular disease

Research

Efficacy of mobile-based educational intervention using Instructional Systems Design in promoting preventive behaviors for sexually transmitted infections among Iranian women: a randomized controlled trial

Research

The impact of residential environment on older people’s capabilities to live independently: a survey in Beijing