Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 4/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

The applicability of using different energy levels in CT imaging for differentiation or identification of dental restorative materials

Authors: Josef M. Kutschy, Garyfalia Ampanozi, Nicole Berger, Thomas D. Ruder, Michael J. Thali, Lars C. Ebert

Published in: Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this study was to investigate whether different computed tomography (CT) energy levels could supply additional information for the differentiation of dental materials for forensic investigations.

Methods

Nine different commonly used restorative dental materials were investigated in this study. A total of 75 human third molars were filled with the restorative dental materials and then scanned using the forensic reference phantom in singlesource mode. The mean Hounsfield unit values and standard deviations (SDs) of each material were calculated at 120, 80 and 140 kVp.

Results

Most of the dental materials could be differentiated at 120 kVp. We found that greater X-ray density of a material resulted in higher SDs and that the material volume could influence the measurements.

Conclusion

Differentiation of dental materials in CT was possible in many cases using single-energy CT scans at 120 kVp. Because of the number of dental restorative materials available and scanner and scan parameter dependence, as well as the CT imaging artifacts, the identification (in contrast to differentiation) was problematic.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kirchhoff S, Fischer F, Lindemaier G, Herzog P, Kirchhoff C, Becker C, et al. Is post-mortem CT of the dentition adequate for correct forensic identification?: Comparison of dental computed tomograpy and visual dental record. Int J Legal Med. 2008;122:471–9.PubMedCrossRef Kirchhoff S, Fischer F, Lindemaier G, Herzog P, Kirchhoff C, Becker C, et al. Is post-mortem CT of the dentition adequate for correct forensic identification?: Comparison of dental computed tomograpy and visual dental record. Int J Legal Med. 2008;122:471–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Thali MJ, Markwalder T, Jackowski C, Sonnenschein M, Dirnhofer R. Dental CT imaging as a screening tool for dental profiling: advantages and limitations. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51:113–9.PubMedCrossRef Thali MJ, Markwalder T, Jackowski C, Sonnenschein M, Dirnhofer R. Dental CT imaging as a screening tool for dental profiling: advantages and limitations. J Forensic Sci. 2006;51:113–9.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dirnhofer R, Jackowski C, Vock P, Potter K, Thali MJ. VIRTOPSY: minimally invasive, imaging-guided virtual autopsy. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc. 2006;26:1305–33. Dirnhofer R, Jackowski C, Vock P, Potter K, Thali MJ. VIRTOPSY: minimally invasive, imaging-guided virtual autopsy. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc. 2006;26:1305–33.
4.
go back to reference Pittayapat P, Jacobs R, De Valck E, Vandermeulen D, Willems G. Forensic odontology in the disaster victim identification process. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2012;30:1–12.PubMed Pittayapat P, Jacobs R, De Valck E, Vandermeulen D, Willems G. Forensic odontology in the disaster victim identification process. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2012;30:1–12.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Baglivo M, Winklhofer S, Hatch GM, Ampanozi G, Thali MJ, Ruder TD. The rise of forensic and post-mortem radiology—analysis of the literature between the year 2000 and 2011. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2013;1:3–9.CrossRef Baglivo M, Winklhofer S, Hatch GM, Ampanozi G, Thali MJ, Ruder TD. The rise of forensic and post-mortem radiology—analysis of the literature between the year 2000 and 2011. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2013;1:3–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Boll DT, Paulson EK, Ho LM, Neville AM, et al. Dual-energy multidetector CT: How does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging. Radiographics. 2010;30:1037–55.PubMedCrossRef Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Boll DT, Paulson EK, Ho LM, Neville AM, et al. Dual-energy multidetector CT: How does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging. Radiographics. 2010;30:1037–55.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ruder TD, Thali Y, Bolliger SA, Somaini-Mathier S, Thali MJ, Hatch GM, et al. Material differentiation in forensic radiology with single-source dual-energy computed tomography. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013;9:163–9.PubMedCrossRef Ruder TD, Thali Y, Bolliger SA, Somaini-Mathier S, Thali MJ, Hatch GM, et al. Material differentiation in forensic radiology with single-source dual-energy computed tomography. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013;9:163–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Jackowski C, Wyss M, Persson A, Classens M, Thali MJ, Lussi A. Ultra-high-resolution dual-source CT for forensic dental visualization-discrimination of ceramic and composite fillings. Int J Legal Med. 2008;122:301–7.PubMedCrossRef Jackowski C, Wyss M, Persson A, Classens M, Thali MJ, Lussi A. Ultra-high-resolution dual-source CT for forensic dental visualization-discrimination of ceramic and composite fillings. Int J Legal Med. 2008;122:301–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ruder TD, Hatch GM, Ebert L, Thali Y, Allmendinger T, Schindera ST, et al. The forensic reference phantom—a new tool for quality assurance of attenuation measurements in forensic radiology. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2013;1:51–5.CrossRef Ruder TD, Hatch GM, Ebert L, Thali Y, Allmendinger T, Schindera ST, et al. The forensic reference phantom—a new tool for quality assurance of attenuation measurements in forensic radiology. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2013;1:51–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ruder TD, Thali Y, Schindera ST, Dalla Torre SA, Zech W-D, Thali MJ, et al. How reliable are Hounsfield-unit measurements in forensic radiology. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;220:219–23.PubMedCrossRef Ruder TD, Thali Y, Schindera ST, Dalla Torre SA, Zech W-D, Thali MJ, et al. How reliable are Hounsfield-unit measurements in forensic radiology. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;220:219–23.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Van Dijken JW, Wing KR, Ruyter IE. An evaluation of the radiopacity of composite restorative materials used in Class I and Class II cavities. Acta Odontol Scand. 1989;47:401–7.PubMedCrossRef Van Dijken JW, Wing KR, Ruyter IE. An evaluation of the radiopacity of composite restorative materials used in Class I and Class II cavities. Acta Odontol Scand. 1989;47:401–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc. 2004;24:1679–91. Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc. 2004;24:1679–91.
Metadata
Title
The applicability of using different energy levels in CT imaging for differentiation or identification of dental restorative materials
Authors
Josef M. Kutschy
Garyfalia Ampanozi
Nicole Berger
Thomas D. Ruder
Michael J. Thali
Lars C. Ebert
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1547-769X
Electronic ISSN: 1556-2891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9595-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 4/2014 Go to the issue