Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2008

Open Access 01-08-2008 | Technique

The anatomical limits of the posterior vaginal vault toward its use as route for intra-abdominal procedures

Authors: J. J. Harlaar, G. J. Kleinrensink, W. C. J. Hop, M. Stark, A. J. Schneider

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The use of natural openings for abdominal surgery started at the beginning of the 21th century. A trans-Douglas endoscopic device has been designed to perform most of the intra-abdominal operations in women through the pouch of Douglas. The posterior vaginal vault is limited in size and could be damaged by an oversized instrument. This study investigates the optimal dimensions of the instrument by measuring the limiting factor in the passage.

Methods

In ten female embalmed bodies the transversal and sagittal diameter of the fornix posterior vaginalis was measured by two observers. The pouch of Douglas was filled to its maximal capacity with mouldable latex through an open abdomen. By internal vaginal examination the connective tissue borders of the fornix posterior were palpated and the impression in the cast was measured. The mean value of these two diameters was evaluated in this study. The level of agreement between the observers was calculated.

Results

The mean fornix posterior diameter was 2.6 cm (standard deviation, SD 0.5 cm) with a range of 2.0–3.4 cm. The mean difference between the two observers of all measurements was 0.08 cm (not significant). Both observers had an acceptable intraobserver variation. The interobserver agreement was excellent.

Conclusion

Instruments with dimensions within the measured limits can be used safely for intra-abdominal operations via the natural orifice of the vagina.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nichols D (1983) Vaginal surgery. Williams & Wilkins, London Nichols D (1983) Vaginal surgery. Williams & Wilkins, London
2.
go back to reference Baessler K, Schuessler B (2006) Anatomy of the sigmoid colon, rectum, and the rectovaginal pouch in women with enterocele and anterior rectal wall procidentia. Clin Anat 19(2):125–129PubMedCrossRef Baessler K, Schuessler B (2006) Anatomy of the sigmoid colon, rectum, and the rectovaginal pouch in women with enterocele and anterior rectal wall procidentia. Clin Anat 19(2):125–129PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference McGowan L (1966) Incidental appendectomy during vaginal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 95(4):588PubMed McGowan L (1966) Incidental appendectomy during vaginal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 95(4):588PubMed
4.
go back to reference Delvaux G, De Waele B, Willems G (1993) Transvaginal removal of gallbladders with large stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(4):307–309PubMed Delvaux G, De Waele B, Willems G (1993) Transvaginal removal of gallbladders with large stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3(4):307–309PubMed
5.
go back to reference Lane E (1980) Culdoscopy—useful or useless? Int J Gynaecol Obstet 17(4):372–374PubMed Lane E (1980) Culdoscopy—useful or useless? Int J Gynaecol Obstet 17(4):372–374PubMed
6.
go back to reference Brosens I, Campo R, Puttemans P, Gordts S (2003) Transvaginal laparoscopy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 46(1):117–122PubMedCrossRef Brosens I, Campo R, Puttemans P, Gordts S (2003) Transvaginal laparoscopy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 46(1):117–122PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gordts S, Watrelot A, Campo R, Brosens I (2001) Risk and outcome of bowel injury during transvaginal pelvic endoscopy. Fertil Steril 76(6):1238–1241PubMedCrossRef Gordts S, Watrelot A, Campo R, Brosens I (2001) Risk and outcome of bowel injury during transvaginal pelvic endoscopy. Fertil Steril 76(6):1238–1241PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Benhidjeb T, Witzel K, Barlehner E, Stark M (2007) The natural orifice surgery concept. Chirurg 78(6):537–542PubMedCrossRef Benhidjeb T, Witzel K, Barlehner E, Stark M (2007) The natural orifice surgery concept. Chirurg 78(6):537–542PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The anatomical limits of the posterior vaginal vault toward its use as route for intra-abdominal procedures
Authors
J. J. Harlaar
G. J. Kleinrensink
W. C. J. Hop
M. Stark
A. J. Schneider
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9940-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2008 Go to the issue

News and notices

News and Notices