Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pathology & Oncology Research 3/2012

01-07-2012 | Research

The Albumin and Monoclonal Protein Ratio as Prognostic Marker for Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents

Authors: Katalin Kádár, Krisztina Wolf, Judit Tábori, István Karádi, Judit Várkonyi

Published in: Pathology & Oncology Research | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease group regarding prognosis, clinical course, and response to therapeutic interventions. Numerous prognostic factors have been identified however there was no consensus about the best prognostic indicators or the proper staging systems. In a previous study the A/M ratio containing albumin (A) and monoclonal component (M) emerged as reliable predictor of survival duration in patients treated with conventional chemotherapy. In the current retrospective study authors evaluated the prognostic role of this fraction in the era of novel agents. They assessed the A/M ratio prior treatment in 56 newly diagnosed MM patients from the aspect of the survival time. According to the results the A/M being <1 at the diagnosis indicated significantly poorer prognosis both at the 2 years (p = 0,01) and at the 5 years (p = 0,07) survival endpoints. These results proved that A/M ratio remained valuable marker for predicting prognosis in patients treated with proteosome inhibitor and antiangiogenic therapy as well. Authors recommend therefore applying this A/M ratio in further studies for the better pre-treatment stratification.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Bataille R, Durie BG, Grenier J (1983) Serum beta-2 microglobulin and survival duration in multiple myeloma: a simple reliable marker for staging. Br J Haematol 55:439–447PubMedCrossRef Bataille R, Durie BG, Grenier J (1983) Serum beta-2 microglobulin and survival duration in multiple myeloma: a simple reliable marker for staging. Br J Haematol 55:439–447PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bataille R, Boccadoro M, Klein et al (1992) C-reactive protein and beta-2 microglobulin produce a simple and powerful myeloma staging system. Blood 80:733–737PubMed Bataille R, Boccadoro M, Klein et al (1992) C-reactive protein and beta-2 microglobulin produce a simple and powerful myeloma staging system. Blood 80:733–737PubMed
5.
go back to reference Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou V, Bamias A, Gika D et al (2007) Renal failure in multiple myeloma: incidence, correlations, and prognostic significance. Leuk Lymph 48:337–341CrossRef Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou V, Bamias A, Gika D et al (2007) Renal failure in multiple myeloma: incidence, correlations, and prognostic significance. Leuk Lymph 48:337–341CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fonseca R, Barlogie B, Bataille R et al (2004) Genetics and cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: a workshop report. Cancer Res 64:1546–1558PubMedCrossRef Fonseca R, Barlogie B, Bataille R et al (2004) Genetics and cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: a workshop report. Cancer Res 64:1546–1558PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Greipp PR, Witzig TE, Gonchoroff NJ et al (1987) Immunofluorescence labelling indices in myeloma and related monoclonal gammopathies. Mayo Clin Proc 62:969–977PubMed Greipp PR, Witzig TE, Gonchoroff NJ et al (1987) Immunofluorescence labelling indices in myeloma and related monoclonal gammopathies. Mayo Clin Proc 62:969–977PubMed
8.
go back to reference San Miguel JF, Fonseca R, Greipp PR (2004) Prognostic factors and classification for multiple myeloma: contribution to clinical management. In: Malpas JS, Bergsagel DE, Kyle RA, Anderson KC (eds) Myeloma: Biology and management, 3rd edn. Saunders, Elsevier Inc, Oxford, pp 189–199 San Miguel JF, Fonseca R, Greipp PR (2004) Prognostic factors and classification for multiple myeloma: contribution to clinical management. In: Malpas JS, Bergsagel DE, Kyle RA, Anderson KC (eds) Myeloma: Biology and management, 3rd edn. Saunders, Elsevier Inc, Oxford, pp 189–199
9.
go back to reference Witzig TE, Gertz MA, Lust JA et al (1996) Peripheral blood monoclonal plasma cells as a predictor of survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 88:1780–1787PubMed Witzig TE, Gertz MA, Lust JA et al (1996) Peripheral blood monoclonal plasma cells as a predictor of survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 88:1780–1787PubMed
10.
go back to reference Bladé J, Rozman C, Cervantes F et al (1989) A new prognostic system for multiple myeloma based on easily available parameters. Br J Haematol 59:113–118 Bladé J, Rozman C, Cervantes F et al (1989) A new prognostic system for multiple myeloma based on easily available parameters. Br J Haematol 59:113–118
11.
go back to reference Cavo M, Galieni P, Zuffa E et al (1989) Prognostic variables and clinical staging in multiple myeloma. Blood 74:1778–1780 Cavo M, Galieni P, Zuffa E et al (1989) Prognostic variables and clinical staging in multiple myeloma. Blood 74:1778–1780
12.
go back to reference Durie BG, Salmon SE (1975) A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival. Cancer 36:842–854PubMedCrossRef Durie BG, Salmon SE (1975) A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival. Cancer 36:842–854PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Greipp PR, Katzman JA, O’Fallon WM et al (1988) Value of beta-2 microglobulin and plasma cell labelling indices as prognostic factors in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Blood 72:219–223PubMed Greipp PR, Katzman JA, O’Fallon WM et al (1988) Value of beta-2 microglobulin and plasma cell labelling indices as prognostic factors in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Blood 72:219–223PubMed
14.
go back to reference Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG et al (2005) International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 23:3412–3420PubMedCrossRef Greipp PR, San Miguel J, Durie BG et al (2005) International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 23:3412–3420PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jacobson JL, Hussein MA, Barlogie B et al (2003) Southwest Oncology Group. A new staging system for multiple myeloma patients based on the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) experience. Br J Haematol 122:441–450PubMedCrossRef Jacobson JL, Hussein MA, Barlogie B et al (2003) Southwest Oncology Group. A new staging system for multiple myeloma patients based on the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) experience. Br J Haematol 122:441–450PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kumar SK, Mihael JR, Buadi FK et al (2009) Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc 84(12):1095–1110PubMedCrossRef Kumar SK, Mihael JR, Buadi FK et al (2009) Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines. Mayo Clin Proc 84(12):1095–1110PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Medical Research Working Party on Leukemia in Adults (1980) Prognostic features on the third MRC myelomatosis trial. Br J Cancer 42:831–840CrossRef Medical Research Working Party on Leukemia in Adults (1980) Prognostic features on the third MRC myelomatosis trial. Br J Cancer 42:831–840CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Merlini G, Waldesnström JG, Jayakar SD (1980) A new improved clinical staging system for multiple myeloma based on analysis of 123 treated patients. Blood 55:1011–1019PubMed Merlini G, Waldesnström JG, Jayakar SD (1980) A new improved clinical staging system for multiple myeloma based on analysis of 123 treated patients. Blood 55:1011–1019PubMed
19.
go back to reference San Miguel JF, Garcia Sanz R, Gonzalez M et al (1995) A new staging system for multiple myeloma based on the number of S-phase plasma cells. Blood 85:448–455PubMed San Miguel JF, Garcia Sanz R, Gonzalez M et al (1995) A new staging system for multiple myeloma based on the number of S-phase plasma cells. Blood 85:448–455PubMed
20.
go back to reference Várkonyi J, Bajzik E, Fazakas A et al (2009) Short or long survival in multiple myeloma. A simple method for determine the prognosis. Pathol Oncol Res 15:383–387PubMedCrossRef Várkonyi J, Bajzik E, Fazakas A et al (2009) Short or long survival in multiple myeloma. A simple method for determine the prognosis. Pathol Oncol Res 15:383–387PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481 Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481
Metadata
Title
The Albumin and Monoclonal Protein Ratio as Prognostic Marker for Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agents
Authors
Katalin Kádár
Krisztina Wolf
Judit Tábori
István Karádi
Judit Várkonyi
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Pathology & Oncology Research / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1219-4956
Electronic ISSN: 1532-2807
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-012-9506-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Pathology & Oncology Research 3/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine