Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review

Authors: Christopher J. Cadham, Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero, Nancy L. Fleischer, Ritesh Mistry, Jana L. Hirschtick, Rafael Meza, David T. Levy

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), under the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, banned characterizing flavors in cigarettes; however, mentholated tobacco products were exempt. Since 2009, over 20 US jurisdictions and numerous countries around the world have extended this restriction to menthol. Currently, the FDA is reconsidering its position on a nation-wide menthol cigarette ban. However, the effects of such a ban remain unclear. We conducted a scoping review to explore the impact of a menthol cigarette ban on individual behaviors (initiation, cessation, and product switching), sales, and compliance.

Methods

We conducted a search of the international literature using PubMed, EBSCO, and Web of Science (to November 25, 2019). We retrieved articles relevant to the impacts of an implemented or hypothetical menthol ban. We also included studies of flavored tobacco product bans due to their potential relevance in gauging compliance and product substitutability.

Results

The search identified 493 articles, of which 24 were included. Studies examined the effects of implemented menthol bans (n = 6), hypothetical menthol bans (n = 12) and implemented flavor bans that exclude menthol (n = 6). Menthol bans were found to reduce sales and increase smoking cessation with only partial substitution for non-menthol cigarettes. US smokers’ reactions to a hypothetical ban indicate that about 25–64% would attempt to quit smoking and 11–46% would consider switching to other tobacco products, including 15–30% to e-cigarettes. Flavor ban studies indicate reductions in initiation of 6%. Ban compliance was high, but studies indicate that the tobacco industry and retailers have attempted to circumvent their impact via packaging changes and online sales.

Conclusion

Our review finds that extending the US cigarette flavor ban to menthol products would promote smoking cessation and reduce initiation. This evidence supports further action by the FDA towards mentholated tobacco products. However, few studies have been conducted in the vaping era.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Schroth KR, et al. Why an FDA ban on menthol is likely to survive a tobacco industry lawsuit. Public Health Rep. 2019;134(3):300–6.PubMedPubMedCentral Schroth KR, et al. Why an FDA ban on menthol is likely to survive a tobacco industry lawsuit. Public Health Rep. 2019;134(3):300–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Giovino GA, et al. Differential trends in cigarette smoking in the USA: is menthol slowing progress? Tob Control. 2015;24(1):28–37.PubMed Giovino GA, et al. Differential trends in cigarette smoking in the USA: is menthol slowing progress? Tob Control. 2015;24(1):28–37.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Villanti AC, et al. Changes in the prevalence and correlates of menthol cigarette use in the USA, 2004–2014. Tob Control. 2016;25(Suppl 2):ii14–20.PubMed Villanti AC, et al. Changes in the prevalence and correlates of menthol cigarette use in the USA, 2004–2014. Tob Control. 2016;25(Suppl 2):ii14–20.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kuiper NM, et al. Trends in sales of flavored and menthol tobacco products in the United States during 2011-2015. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20(6):698–706.PubMedPubMedCentral Kuiper NM, et al. Trends in sales of flavored and menthol tobacco products in the United States during 2011-2015. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20(6):698–706.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Villanti AC, et al. Menthol cigarettes and the public health standard: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):983.PubMedPubMedCentral Villanti AC, et al. Menthol cigarettes and the public health standard: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):983.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Preliminary scientific evaluation of the possible public health effects of menthol versus nonmenthol cigarettes. Silver Spring: Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration; 2013. Available at: fda.gov/media/86497/download. Accessed 17 Mar 2020. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Preliminary scientific evaluation of the possible public health effects of menthol versus nonmenthol cigarettes. Silver Spring: Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration; 2013. Available at: fda.​gov/​media/​86497/​download. Accessed 17 Mar 2020.
12.
go back to reference Weinstock CP. A menthol cigarette ban may influence smokers to quit. London: Reuter; 2018. Weinstock CP. A menthol cigarette ban may influence smokers to quit. London: Reuter; 2018.
13.
go back to reference Delnevo CD, Hrywna M. Clove cigar sales following the US flavoured cigarette ban. Tob Control. 2015;24(e4):e246–50.PubMed Delnevo CD, Hrywna M. Clove cigar sales following the US flavoured cigarette ban. Tob Control. 2015;24(e4):e246–50.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Borland T, et al. Is blue the new green? Repackaging menthol cigarettes in response to a flavour ban in Ontario, Canada. Tob Control. 2019;28(e1):e7–e12.PubMed Borland T, et al. Is blue the new green? Repackaging menthol cigarettes in response to a flavour ban in Ontario, Canada. Tob Control. 2019;28(e1):e7–e12.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Brown J, et al. Tobacco industry response to menthol cigarette bans in Alberta and Nova Scotia, Canada. Tob Control. 2017;26(e1):e71–4.PubMed Brown J, et al. Tobacco industry response to menthol cigarette bans in Alberta and Nova Scotia, Canada. Tob Control. 2017;26(e1):e71–4.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Chaiton M, et al. Evaluating a real world ban on menthol cigarettes: an interrupted time series analysis of sales. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;22:576–9.PubMedCentral Chaiton M, et al. Evaluating a real world ban on menthol cigarettes: an interrupted time series analysis of sales. Nicotine Tob Res. 2019;22:576–9.PubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Chaiton MO, et al. Ban on menthol-flavoured tobacco products predicts cigarette cessation at 1 year: a population cohort study. Tob Control. 2019;29:341–7.PubMed Chaiton MO, et al. Ban on menthol-flavoured tobacco products predicts cigarette cessation at 1 year: a population cohort study. Tob Control. 2019;29:341–7.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Chaiton MP, et al. Association of Ontario’s ban on menthol cigarettes with smoking behavior 1 month after implementation. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(5):710–1.PubMedPubMedCentral Chaiton MP, et al. Association of Ontario’s ban on menthol cigarettes with smoking behavior 1 month after implementation. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(5):710–1.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Stoklosa M. No surge in illicit cigarettes after implementation of menthol ban in Nova Scotia. Tob Control. 2019;28(6):702–4.PubMed Stoklosa M. No surge in illicit cigarettes after implementation of menthol ban in Nova Scotia. Tob Control. 2019;28(6):702–4.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Reid JL, Hammond D, Tariq U, Burkhalter R, Rynard VL, Douglas O. Tobacco use in Canada: patterns and trends. Waterloo: Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo; 2019. Reid JL, Hammond D, Tariq U, Burkhalter R, Rynard VL, Douglas O. Tobacco use in Canada: patterns and trends. Waterloo: Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo; 2019.
21.
go back to reference Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2014. Washington, DC: US Federal Trade Commission; 2016. Federal Trade Commission. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2014. Washington, DC: US Federal Trade Commission; 2016.
23.
go back to reference Buckell J, Marti J, Sindelar JL. Should flavours be banned in cigarettes and e-cigarettes? Evidence on adult smokers and recent quitters from a discrete choice experiment. Tob Control. 2018;28:168–75. Buckell J, Marti J, Sindelar JL. Should flavours be banned in cigarettes and e-cigarettes? Evidence on adult smokers and recent quitters from a discrete choice experiment. Tob Control. 2018;28:168–75.
24.
go back to reference D'Silva J, Amato MS, Boyle RG. Quitting and switching: menthol Smokers' responses to a menthol ban. Tob Regul Sci. 2015;1(1):54–60. D'Silva J, Amato MS, Boyle RG. Quitting and switching: menthol Smokers' responses to a menthol ban. Tob Regul Sci. 2015;1(1):54–60.
25.
go back to reference Guillory J, et al. Effect of menthol cigarette and other menthol tobacco product bans on tobacco purchases in the RTI iShoppe virtual convenience store. Tob Control. 2019. Online First 05 June 2019. Guillory J, et al. Effect of menthol cigarette and other menthol tobacco product bans on tobacco purchases in the RTI iShoppe virtual convenience store. Tob Control. 2019. Online First 05 June 2019.
26.
go back to reference O’Connor RJ, et al. What would menthol smokers do if menthol in cigarettes were banned? Behavioral intentions and simulated demand. Addiction. 2012;107(7):1330–8.PubMedPubMedCentral O’Connor RJ, et al. What would menthol smokers do if menthol in cigarettes were banned? Behavioral intentions and simulated demand. Addiction. 2012;107(7):1330–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Pacek LR, et al. Young adult dual combusted cigarette and e-cigarette users' anticipated responses to a nicotine reduction policy and menthol ban in combusted cigarettes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;194:40–4. Pacek LR, et al. Young adult dual combusted cigarette and e-cigarette users' anticipated responses to a nicotine reduction policy and menthol ban in combusted cigarettes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;194:40–4.
28.
go back to reference Pearson JL, et al. A ban on menthol cigarettes: impact on public opinion and smokers’ intention to quit. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(11):e107–14.PubMedPubMedCentral Pearson JL, et al. A ban on menthol cigarettes: impact on public opinion and smokers’ intention to quit. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(11):e107–14.PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Rose SW, et al. Longitudinal response to restrictions on menthol cigarettes among young adult US menthol smokers, 2011-2016. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(10):1400–3.PubMed Rose SW, et al. Longitudinal response to restrictions on menthol cigarettes among young adult US menthol smokers, 2011-2016. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(10):1400–3.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Wackowski OA, Manderski MT, Delnevo CD. Young adults’ behavioral intentions surrounding a potential menthol cigarette ban. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(6):876–80.PubMedPubMedCentral Wackowski OA, Manderski MT, Delnevo CD. Young adults’ behavioral intentions surrounding a potential menthol cigarette ban. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(6):876–80.PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Wackowski OA, Delnevo CD, Pearson JL. Switching to E-cigarettes in the event of a menthol cigarette ban. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(10):1286–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Wackowski OA, Delnevo CD, Pearson JL. Switching to E-cigarettes in the event of a menthol cigarette ban. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(10):1286–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Wackowski OA, et al. In their own words: young Adults' menthol cigarette initiation, perceptions, experiences and regulation perspectives. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20(9):1076–84.PubMed Wackowski OA, et al. In their own words: young Adults' menthol cigarette initiation, perceptions, experiences and regulation perspectives. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20(9):1076–84.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Zatonski M, et al. Characterising smokers of menthol and flavoured cigarettes, their attitudes towards tobacco regulation, and the anticipated impact of the tobacco products directive on their smoking and quitting behaviours: the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe surveys. Tob Induc Dis. 2018;16:A4.PubMedPubMedCentral Zatonski M, et al. Characterising smokers of menthol and flavoured cigarettes, their attitudes towards tobacco regulation, and the anticipated impact of the tobacco products directive on their smoking and quitting behaviours: the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe surveys. Tob Induc Dis. 2018;16:A4.PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Chaiton MO, et al. Association of flavoured cigar regulations with wholesale tobacco volumes in Canada: an interrupted time series analysis. Tob Control. 2019;28(4):457–61.PubMed Chaiton MO, et al. Association of flavoured cigar regulations with wholesale tobacco volumes in Canada: an interrupted time series analysis. Tob Control. 2019;28(4):457–61.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Courtemanche CJ, Palmer MK, Pesko MF. Influence of the flavored cigarette ban on adolescent tobacco use. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(5):e139–46.PubMedPubMedCentral Courtemanche CJ, Palmer MK, Pesko MF. Influence of the flavored cigarette ban on adolescent tobacco use. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(5):e139–46.PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Delnevo CD, Giovenco DP, Lo M, Erin J. Changes in the mass-merchandise cigar market since the tobacco control act. Tob Regul Sci. 2017;3(2 Suppl 1):S8–s16.PubMedPubMedCentral Delnevo CD, Giovenco DP, Lo M, Erin J. Changes in the mass-merchandise cigar market since the tobacco control act. Tob Regul Sci. 2017;3(2 Suppl 1):S8–s16.PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Jo CL, Williams RS, Ribisl KM. Tobacco products sold by internet vendors following restrictions on flavors and light descriptors. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(3):344–9.PubMed Jo CL, Williams RS, Ribisl KM. Tobacco products sold by internet vendors following restrictions on flavors and light descriptors. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(3):344–9.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Nguyen HV, Grootendorst P. Intended and unintended effects of restrictions on the sale of cigarillos to youth: evidence from Canada. Tob Control. 2015;24(4):382–8.PubMed Nguyen HV, Grootendorst P. Intended and unintended effects of restrictions on the sale of cigarillos to youth: evidence from Canada. Tob Control. 2015;24(4):382–8.PubMed
39.
40.
go back to reference Levy DT, et al. Modeling the future effects of a menthol ban on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(7):1236–40.PubMedPubMedCentral Levy DT, et al. Modeling the future effects of a menthol ban on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(7):1236–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Levy DT, et al. The relationship of E-cigarette use to cigarette quit attempts and cessation: insights from a large, nationally representative U.S. survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20(8):931–9.PubMed Levy DT, et al. The relationship of E-cigarette use to cigarette quit attempts and cessation: insights from a large, nationally representative U.S. survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20(8):931–9.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Zhu SH, et al. E-cigarette use and associated changes in population smoking cessation: evidence from US current population surveys. BMJ. 2017;358:j3262.PubMedPubMedCentral Zhu SH, et al. E-cigarette use and associated changes in population smoking cessation: evidence from US current population surveys. BMJ. 2017;358:j3262.PubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Levy DT, et al. Examining the relationship of vaping to smoking initiation among US youth and young adults: a reality check. Tob Control. 2019;28(6):629–35.PubMed Levy DT, et al. Examining the relationship of vaping to smoking initiation among US youth and young adults: a reality check. Tob Control. 2019;28(6):629–35.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Huang J, et al. A comprehensive examination of own- and cross-price elasticities of tobacco and nicotine replacement products in the U.S. Prev Med. 2018;117:107–14.PubMedPubMedCentral Huang J, et al. A comprehensive examination of own- and cross-price elasticities of tobacco and nicotine replacement products in the U.S. Prev Med. 2018;117:107–14.PubMedPubMedCentral
45.
go back to reference Pesko MF, et al. E-cigarette price sensitivity among middle- and high-school students: evidence from monitoring the future. Addiction. 2018;113(5):896–906.PubMedPubMedCentral Pesko MF, et al. E-cigarette price sensitivity among middle- and high-school students: evidence from monitoring the future. Addiction. 2018;113(5):896–906.PubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Zheng Y, et al. U.S. Demand for Tobacco Products in a System Framework. Health Econ. 2016;26(8):1067–86.PubMed Zheng Y, et al. U.S. Demand for Tobacco Products in a System Framework. Health Econ. 2016;26(8):1067–86.PubMed
47.
go back to reference Huang J, Tauras J, Chaloupka FJ. The impact of price and tobacco control policies on the demand for electronic nicotine delivery systems. Tob Control. 2014;23(Suppl 3):iii41–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Huang J, Tauras J, Chaloupka FJ. The impact of price and tobacco control policies on the demand for electronic nicotine delivery systems. Tob Control. 2014;23(Suppl 3):iii41–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
48.
go back to reference Cantrell J, et al. Impact of e-cigarette and cigarette prices on youth and young adult e-cigarette and cigarette behaviour: evidence from a national longitudinal cohort. Tob Control. 2019. Online First 05 June 2019. Cantrell J, et al. Impact of e-cigarette and cigarette prices on youth and young adult e-cigarette and cigarette behaviour: evidence from a national longitudinal cohort. Tob Control. 2019. Online First 05 June 2019.
49.
go back to reference Levy DT, et al. A framework for evaluating the public health impact of e-cigarettes and other vaporized nicotine products. Addiction. 2017;112(1):8–17.PubMed Levy DT, et al. A framework for evaluating the public health impact of e-cigarettes and other vaporized nicotine products. Addiction. 2017;112(1):8–17.PubMed
50.
go back to reference Jaccard G, et al. Investigation of menthol content and transfer rates in cigarettes and tobacco heating system 2.2. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019;101:48–52.PubMed Jaccard G, et al. Investigation of menthol content and transfer rates in cigarettes and tobacco heating system 2.2. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019;101:48–52.PubMed
52.
go back to reference Azagba S, et al. Smoking intensity and intent to continue smoking among menthol and non-menthol adolescent smokers in Canada. Cancer Causes Control. 2014;25(9):1093–9.PubMed Azagba S, et al. Smoking intensity and intent to continue smoking among menthol and non-menthol adolescent smokers in Canada. Cancer Causes Control. 2014;25(9):1093–9.PubMed
53.
go back to reference Villanti AC, et al. Flavored tobacco product use in youth and adults: findings from the first wave of the PATH study (2013-2014). Am J Prev Med. 2017;53(2):139–51.PubMedPubMedCentral Villanti AC, et al. Flavored tobacco product use in youth and adults: findings from the first wave of the PATH study (2013-2014). Am J Prev Med. 2017;53(2):139–51.PubMedPubMedCentral
54.
go back to reference Farley SM, Johns M. New York City flavoured tobacco product sales ban evaluation. Tob Control. 2017;26(1):78–84.PubMed Farley SM, Johns M. New York City flavoured tobacco product sales ban evaluation. Tob Control. 2017;26(1):78–84.PubMed
55.
go back to reference Rogers T, et al. Compliance with a sales policy on flavored non-cigarette tobacco products. Tob Regul Sci. 2017;3(2 Suppl 1):S84–s93.PubMedPubMedCentral Rogers T, et al. Compliance with a sales policy on flavored non-cigarette tobacco products. Tob Regul Sci. 2017;3(2 Suppl 1):S84–s93.PubMedPubMedCentral
56.
go back to reference Rogers T, et al. Changes in cigar sales following implementation of a local policy restricting sales of flavoured non-cigarette tobacco products. Tob Control. 2019. Online First 24 July 2019. Rogers T, et al. Changes in cigar sales following implementation of a local policy restricting sales of flavoured non-cigarette tobacco products. Tob Control. 2019. Online First 24 July 2019.
57.
go back to reference Farley SM, et al. Flavour chemicals in a sample of non-cigarette tobacco products without explicit flavour names sold in New York City in 2015. Tob Control. 2018;27(2):170–6.PubMed Farley SM, et al. Flavour chemicals in a sample of non-cigarette tobacco products without explicit flavour names sold in New York City in 2015. Tob Control. 2018;27(2):170–6.PubMed
58.
go back to reference Kephart L, et al. Evaluating tobacco retailer experience and compliance with a flavoured tobacco product restriction in Boston, Massachusetts: impact on product availability, advertisement and consumer demand. Tob Control. 2019;57(6):741–8. Kephart L, et al. Evaluating tobacco retailer experience and compliance with a flavoured tobacco product restriction in Boston, Massachusetts: impact on product availability, advertisement and consumer demand. Tob Control. 2019;57(6):741–8.
59.
go back to reference Kingsley M, et al. Short-term impact of a flavored tobacco restriction: changes in youth tobacco use in a Massachusetts community. Am J Prev Med. 2019;57(6):741–8.PubMed Kingsley M, et al. Short-term impact of a flavored tobacco restriction: changes in youth tobacco use in a Massachusetts community. Am J Prev Med. 2019;57(6):741–8.PubMed
60.
go back to reference Kingsley M, et al. Impact of flavoured tobacco restriction policies on flavoured product availability in Massachusetts. Tob Control. 2020;29(2):175–82.PubMed Kingsley M, et al. Impact of flavoured tobacco restriction policies on flavoured product availability in Massachusetts. Tob Control. 2020;29(2):175–82.PubMed
61.
go back to reference Pearlman DN, et al. Advancing tobacco control through point of Sale policies, Providence, Rhode Island. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019;16:E129.PubMedPubMedCentral Pearlman DN, et al. Advancing tobacco control through point of Sale policies, Providence, Rhode Island. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019;16:E129.PubMedPubMedCentral
62.
go back to reference Brock B, et al. A tale of two cities: exploring the retail impact of flavoured tobacco restrictions in the twin cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota. Tob Control. 2019;28(2):176–80.PubMed Brock B, et al. A tale of two cities: exploring the retail impact of flavoured tobacco restrictions in the twin cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota. Tob Control. 2019;28(2):176–80.PubMed
63.
go back to reference Bolcic-Jankovic D, Biener L. Public opinion about FDA regulation of menthol and nicotine. Tob Control. 2015;24(e4):e241–5.PubMed Bolcic-Jankovic D, Biener L. Public opinion about FDA regulation of menthol and nicotine. Tob Control. 2015;24(e4):e241–5.PubMed
64.
go back to reference Winickoff JP, et al. US attitudes about banning menthol in cigarettes: results from a nationally representative survey. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(7):1234–6.PubMedPubMedCentral Winickoff JP, et al. US attitudes about banning menthol in cigarettes: results from a nationally representative survey. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(7):1234–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review
Authors
Christopher J. Cadham
Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero
Nancy L. Fleischer
Ritesh Mistry
Jana L. Hirschtick
Rafael Meza
David T. Levy
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09055-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Public Health 1/2020 Go to the issue