Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Trials
Published in: Trials 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Testing the effectiveness of a mentoring intervention to improve social participation of adolescents with visual impairments: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Eline C. M. Heppe, Sabina Kef, Carlo Schuengel

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Social participation is challenging for people with visual impairments. As a result, on average, social networks are smaller, romantic relationships formed later, educational achievements lower, and career prospects limited. Adolescents on their way towards achieving these goals may benefit from the knowledge and experience of adults who have overcome similar difficulties. Therefore, a mentoring intervention, called Mentor Support, will be set up and studied in which adolescents with visual impairments are matched with successfully social participating adults with and without visual impairments. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Mentor Support. Secondary aims are to distinguish the importance of the disability-specific experience of mentors, predictors of success, and mediating factors.

Methods/design

The effect of Mentor Support will be tested in a randomized clinical trial, using pre-test one week before starting, post-test after 12 months, and follow-up after 18 months. Participants will be referred to one of the experimental groups or the control group, and this randomization will be stratified according to country region. Three groups are included in the trial: 40 participants will receive Mentor Support by mentors with a visual impairment in combination with care-as-usual, 40 participants will receive Mentor Support by mentors without visual impairments in combination with care-as-usual, and 40 participants will receive care-as-usual only. Mentor Support consists of 12 face-to-face meetings of the mentee with a mentor with an overall time period of one year. On a weekly basis, dyads have contact via email, the Internet, or telephone. The primary outcome measure is improved social participation within three domains (work/school, leisure activities, and social relationships). Mediator variables are psychosocial functioning and self-determination. Predictors such as demographics and personality are also investigated in order to distinguish the pathways to successful social participation. Intention-to-treat and completer analyses will be conducted.

Discussion

The primary outcomes of this trial regard increased social participation. The study may yield insights to further improve effects of support programs to adolescents with visual impairments.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register NTR4768 (registered 4 September 2014).
Literature
1.
McConachie H, Colver A, Forsyth R, Jarvis S, Parkinson K. Participation of disabled children: how should it be characterised and measured? Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(18):1157–64.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Kef S, Hox JJ, Habekothé H. Social networks of visually impaired and blind adolescents. Structure and effect on well-being. Soc Netw. 2000;22(1):73–91.CrossRef
3.
Kef S, Dekovic M. The role of parental and peer support in adolescents well-being: a comparison of adolescents with and without a visual impairment. J Adolesc. 2004;27(4):453–66.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Kef S. The personal networks and social supports of blind and visually impaired adolescents. J Vis Impair Blind. 1997;91(3):236–44.
5.
Kef S. Outlook on relations: personal networks and psychosocial characteristics of visually impaired adolescents. 1999.
6.
Kef S. Psychosocial adjustment and the meaning of social support for visually impaired adolescents. J Vis Impairment Blind. 2002;96(01):22–37.
7.
Goertz YH, van Lierop A, Houkes I, Nijhuis FJ. Factors related to the employment of visually impaired persons: a systematic literature review. J Vis Impair Blind. 2010;104(7):404–18.
8.
Mojon-Azzi SM, Sousa-Poza A, Mojon DS. Impact of low vision on employment. Ophthalmologica. 2009;224(6):381–8.CrossRef
9.
Gold D, Shaw A, Wolffe K. The social lives of Canadian youths with visual impairments. J Vis Impair Blind. 2010;104(7):431–43.
10.
Shaw A, Gold D, Wolffe K. Employment-related experiences of youths who are visually impaired: how are these youths faring? J Vis Impair Blind. 2007;101(1):7–21.
11.
Mawjee F, Grieshop JI. Testing the waters: facilitating parents’ participation in their children’s education. School Community J. 2001;12(1):117–32.
12.
Law M, King G, Rosenbaum P, Kertoy M, King S, Young N. The participation of children with physical disabilities. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health; 2000.
13.
14.
Kef S, Bos H. Is love blind? Sexual behavior and psychological adjustment of adolescents with blindness. Sexuality Disabil. 2006;24(2):89–100.CrossRef
15.
McDonnall MC. Factors predicting post-high school employment for young adults with visual impairments. Rehabil Counseling Bull. 2010.
16.
McDonnall MC. The employment and postsecondary educational status of transition-age youths with visual impairments. J Vis Impair Blind. 2010;104(5):298.
17.
Vygotsky LS. Thought and language-revised edition. 1986.
18.
Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inquiry. 2000;11(4):227–68.CrossRef
19.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Organization WH. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Children & Youth Version: ICF-CY. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007
21.
Eby LT, Allen TD, Evans SC, Ng T, DuBois DL. Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals. J Vocat Behav. 2008;72(2):254–67.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
22.
Ragins BR, Cotton JL. Mentor functions and outcomes: a comparison of men and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. J Appl Psychol. 1999;84(4):529.CrossRefPubMed
23.
DuBois DL, Holloway BE, Valentine JC, Cooper H. Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: a meta-analytic review. Am J Community Psychol. 2002;30(2):157–97.CrossRefPubMed
24.
DuBois DL, Portillo N, Rhodes JE, Silverthorn N, Valentine JC. How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2011;12(2):57–91.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Mathews TL, Fawcett SB, Sheldon JB. Effects of a peer engagement program on socially withdrawn children with a history of maltreatment. Child Fam Behav Ther. 2009;31(4):270–91.CrossRef
26.
Allen TD, Eby LT, Poteet ML, Lentz E, Lima L. Career benefits associated with mentoring for proteges: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(1):127.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Grossman JB, Rhodes JE. The test of time: predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring relationships. Am J Community Psychol. 2002;30(2):199–219.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Bell EC. Mentoring transition-age youth with blindness. J Special Educ. 2012;46(3):170–9.CrossRef
29.
Ragins BR, Scandura TA. Burden or blessing? Expected costs and benefits of being a mentor. J Organ Behav. 1999;20(4):493–509.CrossRef
30.
Looijestijn P. Het Visueel Profiel: een onderzoek naar visuele perceptie visuele activiteiten, participatie probleemgedrag en opvoedingskenmerken bij kinderen en jongeren met oculaire slechtziendheid. Stichting Kinderstudies. 2004.
31.
Dékovic M. Vragenlijst Depressie bij Adolescenten (VDA). Intern Rapport: Universiteit Utrecht; 1996.
32.
Kendel D, Davies M. Epidemiology of depressive mood in adolescents. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39:1205.CrossRef
33.
O’Keeffe GS, Clarke-Pearson K. The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics. 2011;127(4):800–4.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Neiger BL, Thackeray R, Van Wagenen SA, Hanson CL, West JH, Barnes MD, et al. Use of social media in health promotion purposes, key performance indicators, and evaluation metrics. Health Promot Pract. 2012;13(2):159–64.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Frison E, Eggermont S. Exploring the relationships between different types of Facebook use, perceived online social support, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2015;1-19
36.
Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52(1):30–41.CrossRef
37.
Frison E, Eggermont S. The impact of daily stress on adolescents’ depressed mood: the role of social support seeking through Facebook. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;44:315–25.CrossRef
38.
Kemp SP, Whittaker JK, Tracy EM. Person-environment practice: the social ecology of interpersonal helping. New York: Transaction Publishers; 1997.
39.
Papadopoulos K, Papakonstantinou D, Montgomery A, Solomou A. Social support and depression of adults with visual impairments. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(7):1734–41.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Tracy EM, Whittaker JK. The Social Network Map: Assessing social support in clinical practice. Families in Society. 1990;71(8):461–470.
41.
Meeus W. Ouders en leeftijdgenoten in het persoonlijke netwerk van jongeren. Pedagogisch Tijdschrift. 1990;15(1):25–37.
42.
Connolly J, Craig W, Goldberg A, Pepler D. Mixed‐gender groups, dating, and romantic relationships in early adolescence. J Res Adolesc. 2004;14(2):185–207.CrossRef
43.
Collins WA. More than myth: the developmental significance of romantic relationships during adolescence. J Res Adolesc. 2003;13(1):1–24.CrossRef
44.
Cantrill H. The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 1965.
45.
Harter S. Manual for the self-perception profile for children. Denver: University of Denver; 1985.
46.
Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1965.
47.
Van der Linden F, Dijkman T, Roeders P. Metingen van kenmerken van het persoonssysteem en sociale systeem [Measurements of features of the person system and the social system]. Nijmegen: Hoogveld Instituut; 1983.
48.
De Jong Gierveld J, Van Tilburg T. Manual of the Loneliness Scale. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; 1999.
49.
Dodds AG, Flannigan H, Ng L. The Nottingham Adjustment Scale: a validation study. Int J Rehabil Res. 1993;16(3):177–84.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Dodds AG, Bailey P, Pearson A, Yates L. Psychological factors in acquired visual impairment: the development of a scale of adjustment. J Vis Impair Blind. 1991;85:306–10.
51.
Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Spinhoven P. Manual for the use of the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. Leiderdorp: DATEC; 2002.
52.
Garnefski N, Kraaij V. Relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: a comparative study of five specific samples. Pers Indiv Differ. 2006;40(8):1659–69.CrossRef
53.
Garnefski N, Legerstee J, Kraaij V, van den Kommer T, Teerds J. Cognitive coping strategies and symptoms of depression and anxiety: a comparison between adolescents and adults. J Adolesc. 2002;25(6):603–11.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Chen B, Vansteenkiste M, Beyers W, Boone L, Deci EL, Van der Kaap-Deeder J, et al. Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motiv Emotion. 2014;39(2):216–236.CrossRef
55.
Goldberg LR. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychol Assess. 1992;4(1):26.CrossRef
56.
Branje SJ, Van Lieshout CF, Gerris JR. Big Five personality development in adolescence and adulthood. Eur J Pers. 2007;21(1):45–62.CrossRef
57.
Weiner ADSW. The social support networks of blind and visually impaired young adults. Michigan: U.M.I.; 1991.
58.
Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus: statistical analysis with latent variables. User’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 2010
Metadata
Title
Testing the effectiveness of a mentoring intervention to improve social participation of adolescents with visual impairments: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Eline C. M. Heppe
Sabina Kef
Carlo Schuengel
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-1028-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Trials 1/2015 Go to the issue

Methodology

The implausibility of ‘usual care’ in an open system: sedation and weaning practices in Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) in the United Kingdom (UK)

Study protocol

The effectiveness of Tai Chi for patients with Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

Effectiveness and feasibility of a software tool to help patients communicate with doctors about problems they face with their medication regimen (EMPATHy): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

Efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture with different acupoints for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Study protocol

The FOCUS, AFFINITY and EFFECTS trials studying the effect(s) of fluoxetine in patients with a recent stroke: a study protocol for three multicentre randomised controlled trials

Study protocol

Cardiac rehabilitation versus standard care after aortic aneurysm repair (Aneurysm CaRe): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial