Top

Published in:

01-11-2007 | Original Article

Test–Retest Reliability of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2)

Authors: Edward M. Vega, K. Daniel O’Leary

Published in: Journal of Family Violence | Issue 8/2007

Abstract

The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) are widely used to measure intimate partner aggression. Various aspects of the CTS2 and its subscales have been examined, e.g. factor structure, internal consistency, and validity, but little or no evidence exists regarding the stability of the self-report of aggression on the CTS2 This study examines the stability of reports of aggression against a partner on the CTS2 among 82 men court-mandated to a batterer intervention program. At both testing times men reported on aggression occurring in the year prior to beginning treatment. Using variety scores, stability of report was strong for psychological aggression (r = 0.69), physical assault (r = 0.76), injury (r = 0.70), and negotiation (r = 0.60), but weaker for sexual coercion (r = 0.30). Implications for the use of the CTS2 in court-mandated populations are discussed.

Details regarding the lack of change from the initial to the second assessment can be obtained from the authors.

Archer, J. (1999). Assessment of the reliability of the conflict tactics scales: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1263–1289.CrossRef

Arias, I., & Beach, S. R. H. (1987). Validity of self-reports of marital violence. Journal of Family Violence, 2, 139–149.CrossRef

Birchler, G. R., & Fals-Stewart, W. (1994). The Response to Conflict Scale: Psychometric properties. Assessment, 1(4), 335–344.

Browning, J., & Dutton, D. (1986). Assessment of wife assault with the Conflict Tactics Scale: Using couple data to quantify the differential reporting effect. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 375–379.CrossRef

Byrne, C. A., Resnick, H. S., Kilpatrick, D. G., Best, C. L., & Saunders, B. E. (1999). The socioeconomic impact of interpersonal violence on women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 362–366.PubMedCrossRef

Cascardi, M., Langhinrichsen, J., & Vivian, D. (1992). Marital aggression, impact, injury, and health correlates for husbands and wives. Archives of Internal Medicine, 152, 1178–1184.PubMedCrossRef

Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Elliott, D. S., & Huizinga, D. (1989). Improving self-reported measures of delinquency. In M. W. Klein (Ed.), Cross-national Research in Self-reported Crime and Delinquency (pp. 155–186). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Gelles, R. J. (1979). The myth of battered husbands and new facts about family violence. Ms., 66, 71, October.

Hirschi, T., Hindelang, M. J., & Weis, J. G. (1980). The status of self-report measures. In M. W. Klein & K. S. Teilmann (Eds.), Handbook of Criminal Justice Evaluation (pp. 473–488). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Jones, N. T., Ji, P., Beck, M., & Beck, N. (2002). The reliability and validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2) in a female incarcerated population. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 441–457.CrossRef

Jouriles, E. N., & O’Leary, K. D. (1985). Interspousal reliability of reports of marital violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 419–421.PubMedCrossRef

Lucente, S. W., Fals-Stewart, W., Richards, H. J., & Goscha, J. (2001). Factor structure and reliability of the revised Conflict Tactics Scales for incarcerated female substance abusers. Journal of Family Violence, 16, 437–450.CrossRef

Mills, J. F., Kroner, D. G., & Forth, A. E. (1998). Novaco Anger Scale: reliability and validity within an adult criminal sample. Assessment, 5, 237–248.PubMedCrossRef

Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Krueger, R. F., Magdol, L., Margolin, G., Silva, P. A., et al. (1997). Do partners agree about abuse in their relationship? A psychometric evaluation in interpartner agreement. Psychological Assessment, 9, 47–56.CrossRef

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

O’Leary, K. D., & Arias, I. (1988a). Assessing agreement of reports of spouse abuse. In G. T. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, et al. (Eds.), Family Abuse and its Consequences: New Directions in Research (pp. 218–227). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

O’Leary, K. D., & Arias, I. (1988b). Prevalence, correlates and development of spouse abuse. In R. D. Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds), Social Learning and Systems Approaches to Marriage and the Family (pp. 104–127). New York: Brunner/Mazel.

O’Leary, K. D., & Williams, M. C. (2006). Agreement about acts of aggression in marriage. Family Psychology, 20, 656–662.CrossRef

Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education Groups for Men who Batter: The Duluth Model. New York: Springer.

Riggs, D. S., Murphy, C. M., & O’Leary, K. D. (1989). Intentional falsification in reports of interpartner aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 220–232.CrossRef

Schafer, J. (1996). Measuring spousal violence with the Conflict Tactics Scale: Notes on reliability and validity issues. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11(4), 572–585.CrossRef

Schafer, J., Caetano, R., & Clark, C. C. (1998). Rates of intimate partner violence in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1702–1704.PubMedCrossRef

Sedlak, A. J., Bowen, G. L., Hotaling, G. T. & Sugarman, D. B. (1985). Domestic violence risk factors and consequences: Current state of knowledge, Paper presented at the 93rd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.

Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–86.CrossRef

Straus, M. A. (1990). The conflict tactics scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families (pp. 49–73). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Straus, M. A. (1993). Identifying offenders in criminal justice research on domestic assault. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 587–600.CrossRef

Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (Eds.) (1990). Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.CrossRef

Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the national violence against women survey. In National Institute of Justice Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Research in Brief, November 1998.

Title: Test–Retest Reliability of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2)
Authors: Edward M. Vega
K. Daniel O’Leary
Publication date: 01-11-2007
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Family Violence / Issue 8/2007
Print ISSN: 0885-7482
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2851
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9118-7

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Test–Retest Reliability of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2)

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 8/2007

Alcoholism Level Differences between Vietnamese Batterers and Non-Batterers

The Co-occurrence of Child and Intimate Partner Maltreatment in the Family: Characteristics of the Violent Perpetrators

External Barriers to Help Seeking for Older Women Who Experience Intimate Partner Violence

The Prevalence of Domestic Violence Among Pregnant Women Who Were Attended in Iran University of Medical Science Hospitals

Mothering and Domestic Violence: A Longitudinal Analysis

Intimate Partner Violence and Psychological Health in a Sample of Asian and Caucasian Women: The Roles of Social Support and Coping