Top

Clinical Oral Investigations

Published in:

01-03-2015 | Original Article

Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic

Authors: Bogna Stawarczyk, Andreas Krawczuk, Nicoleta Ilie

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 2/2015

Abstract

Objectives

This study was conducted in order to assess the pretreatment method (air abrasion, both wet and dry, and Al₂O₃ grinder), the conditioning method (comprised of different adhesive systems), the repair resin composite (low and high modulus of elasticity), the contamination of CoJet air-abraded surfaces with water, and the effect phosphoric acid on the macrotensile bond strength (TBS) to aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic (RNC).

Materials and methods

Aged RNC substrates (LAVA Ultimate, 3M ESPE; N = 900; 10,000 cycles, 5 °C/55 °C) were air-abraded (CoJet 3M ESPE) with and without water contamination or treated with an Al₂O₃ grinder (Cimara, Voco). Immediately after pretreatment, half of the specimens were additionally cleaned with phosphoric acid, while the rest were only rinsed with water. Four intermediate agents (Futurabond U/VOCO, Scotchbond Universal/3M ESPE, One Coat Bond/Coltène Whaledent, visio.link/bredent) were selected for conditioning the surface, while no conditioned specimens acted as control groups. Specimens were thereafter repaired using two direct resin composites (Arabesk Top and GrandioSo, VOCO), stored for 24 h at 37 °C in H₂O, and thermally aged for 10,000 cycles (5 °C/55 °C; n = 15/subgroup). TBS and failure types were determined and evaluated with four- and one-way ANOVA and χ ² test (p < 0.05).

Results

The highest influence on TBS was exerted by the conditioning method (partial eta-squared (η _P ²) = 0.273, p < 0.05), followed by the resin composite repair (η _P ² = 0.07, p < 0.05) and the surface pretreatment method (η _P ² = 0.032, p < 0.05), while an acid contamination after surface pretreatment was insignificant (p = 0.154).

Conclusions

Air abrasion produced superior TBS compared to grinding of the surface with Al₂O₃ prior to repair. The tested universal adhesives proved to be effective intermediate agents for repairing aged CAD/CAM RNC, while visio.link and Scotchbond Universal performed slightly better than Futurabond U.

Clinical relevance

Phosphoric acid or water contamination of the air-abraded surface does not affect the repair bond strength.

Edelhoff D, Beuer F, Schweiger J, Brix O, Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF (2012) CAD/CAM-generated high-density polymer restorations for the pretreatment of complex cases: a case report. Quintessence Int 43:457–467PubMed

Alt V, Hannig M, Wöstmann B, Balkenhol M (2011) Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dent Mater 27:339–347CrossRefPubMed

Balkenhol M, Mautner MC, Ferger P, Wöstmann B (2008) Mechanical properties of provisional crown and bridge materials: chemical-curing versus dual curing systems. J Dent 36:15–20CrossRefPubMed

Göncü Basaran E, Ayna E, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV (2011) Load-bearing of handmade and computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing-fabricated tree-unit fixed dental prostheses of particulate filler composite. Acta Odontol Scand 69:144–150CrossRefPubMed

Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Trottmann A, Özcan M, Fischer J, Hämmerle CH (2012) Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses. Effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Investig 16:1669–1677CrossRefPubMed

Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Özcan M, Hämmerle CH (2012) Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: effect of storage media, duration and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J 31:377–383CrossRefPubMed

Stawarczyk B, Özcan M, Roos M, Schmutz F, Trottmann A, Hämmerle CHF (2013) Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists. J Prosthet Dent 109:325–332CrossRefPubMed

Schweiger J, Neumeier P, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D (2013) Macro-retentive replaceable veneers on crowns and fixed dental prostheses: a new approach in implant-prosthodontics. Quintessence Int 44:341–349PubMed

Lin CL, Chang YH, Liu PR (2008) Multi-factorial analysis of a cusp-replacing adhesive premolar restoration: a finite element study. J Dent 36:194–203CrossRefPubMed

10.

Krämer N, Kunzelmann KH, Taschner M, Mehl A, Garcia-Godoy F, Frankenberger R (2006) Antagonist enamel wears more than ceramic inlays. J Dent Res 85:1097–1100CrossRefPubMed

11.

Giordano R (2006) Materials for chairside CAD/CAM-produced restorations. J Am Dent Ass 137:14S–21SCrossRefPubMed

12.

Attia A, Abdelaziz KM, Freitag S, Kern M (2006) Fracture load of composite resin and feldspatic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns. J Prosthet Dent 95:117–123CrossRefPubMed

13.

Magne P, Knezevic A (2009) Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int 40:125–133PubMed

14.

Stawarczyk B, Basler T, Ender A, Roos M, Özcan M, Hämmerle C (2012) Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD/CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 107:94–101CrossRefPubMed

15.

Bähr N, Keul C, Edelhoff D, Eichberger M, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B (2013) Effect of different adhesives combined with two resin composite cements on shear bond strength to polymeric CAD/CAM materials. Dent Mater J 32:492–501CrossRefPubMed

16.

Keul C, Martin A, Wimmer T, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B (2013) Tensile bond strength of PMMA- and composite-based CAD/CAM materials to luting cements after different conditioning methods. Int J Adhes Adhes 46:122–127CrossRef

17.

Stawarczyk B, Trottmann A, Hämmerle CH, Özcan M (2013) Adhesion of veneering resins to polymethylmethacrylate-based CAD/CAM polymers after various surface conditioning methods. Acta Odontol Scand 71:1142–1148CrossRefPubMed

18.

Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N (2013) Repair of restorations—criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater 29:28–50CrossRefPubMed

19.

Rocca GT, Bonnafous F, Rizcalla N, Krejci I (2010) A technique to improve the esthetic aspect of CAD/CAM composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1004:273–275CrossRef

20.

Ilie N and Oberthur MT (2013) Effect of sonic-activated resin composites on the repair of aged substrates: an in vitro investigation. Clin Oral Investig. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-1136-7

21.

Marshall SJ, Bayne SC, Baier R, Tomsia AP, Marshall GW (2010) A review of adhesion science. Dent Mater 26:e11–e16CrossRefPubMed

22.

Naves LZ, Soares CJ, Moraes RR, Goncalves LS, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L (2010) Surface/interface morphology and bond strength to glass ceramic etched for different periods. Oper Dent 35:420–427CrossRefPubMed

23.

Pereira SG, Fulgencio R, Nunes TG, Toledano M, Osorio R, Carvalho RM (2010) Effect of curing protocol on the polymerization of dual-cured resin cements. Dent Mater 26:710–718CrossRefPubMed

24.

Amaral M, Belli R, Cesar PF, Valandro LF, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U (2014) The potential of novel primers and universal adhesives to bond to zirconia. J Dent 42:90–98CrossRefPubMed

25.

De Munck J, Arita A, Shirai K, Van Landuyt KL, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Microrotary fatigue resistance of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to dentin. J Adhes Dent 9:373–379PubMed

26.

Torstenson B, Brannstrom M (1988) Contraction gap under luting restorations: effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress. Oper Dent 13:24–31PubMed

27.

Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen (2004) In vitro shear bond strength of cementing agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 92:265–273CrossRefPubMed

28.

Palmer DS, Barco MT, Billy EJ (1992) Temperature extremes produced orally by hot and cold liquids. J Prosthet Dent 67:325–327CrossRefPubMed

29.

Longman CM, Pearson CJ (1984) Variation in temperature of the oral cavity during the imbibition of hot and cold fluids [special issue]. J Dent Res 63, 283

30.

Boehm RF (1972) Thermal environment of teeth during open mouth respiration. J Dent Res 51:75–78CrossRefPubMed

31.

Kelly JR, Benetti P, Rungruanganunt P, Bona AD (2012) The slippery slope: critical perspectives on in vitro research methodologies. Dent Mater 28:41–51CrossRefPubMed

Title: Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic
Authors: Bogna Stawarczyk
Andreas Krawczuk
Nicoleta Ilie
Publication date: 01-03-2015
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1269-3

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Detection of herpesviruses and human papillomavirus in acute apical abscesses by real-time PCR

Clinical results of implant placement in resorbed ridges using simultaneous guided bone regeneration: a multicenter case series

Effect of different curing protocols on the mechanical properties of low-viscosity bulk-fill composites

Surface scratch assessment of titanium implant abutments and cementum following instrumentation with metal curettes

Effects of short-term xylitol gum chewing on the oral microbiome

Isolation and characterization of SSEA-4-positive subpopulation of human deciduous dental pulp cells