Published in:
01-01-2014 | Orthopaedic Surgery
Ten-year follow-up on Dutch orthopaedic blood management (DATA III survey)
Authors:
M. C. Struijk-Mulder, W. G. Horstmann, C. C. Verheyen, H. B. Ettema
Published in:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
|
Issue 1/2014
Login to get access
Abstract
Introduction
Hip and knee arthroplasties are frequently complicated by the need for allogeneic blood transfusions. This survey was conducted to assess the current use of perioperative blood-saving measures and to compare it with prior results.
Materials and methods
All departments of orthopaedic surgery at Dutch hospitals were sent a follow-up survey on perioperative blood-saving measures, and data were compared to the results of two surveys conducted 5 and 10 years earlier.
Results
The response rate was 94 out of 108 departments (87 %). Most departments used erythropoietin prior to hip and knee replacements at the expense of preoperative autologous blood donation. The use of intraoperative autologous retransfusion in revision hip (56 vs. 54 %) as well as revision knee arthroplasty (26 vs. 24 %), was virtually unchanged. Postoperative autologous retransfusion is still used by the majority of departments after both primary arthroplasty and revision of hip (58/53 %) and knee (65/61 %).
Conclusions
Currently, just as in 2007, the majority of Dutch orthopaedic departments uses erythropoietin, normothermia and postoperative autologous retransfusion with hip and knee arthroplasty. Intraoperative retransfusion is used mainly with hip revision arthroplasty. Other effective blood management modalities such as tranexamic acid have not been widely implemented.