Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neural Transmission 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Translational Neurosciences - Original Article

Temporary deafferentation evoked by cutaneous anesthesia: behavioral and electrophysiological findings in healthy subjects

Authors: Aida Sehle, Imke Büsching, Eva Vogt, Joachim Liepert

Published in: Journal of Neural Transmission | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Motor function and motor excitability can be modulated by changes of somatosensory input. Here, we performed a randomized single-blind trial to investigate behavioral and neurophysiological changes during temporary deafferentation of left upper arm and forearm in 31 right-handed healthy adults. Lidocaine cream was used to anesthetize the skin from wrist to shoulder, sparing the hand. As control condition, on a different day, a neutral cream was applied to the same skin area. The sequence (first Lidocaine, then placebo or vice versa) was randomized. Behavioral measures included the Grating Orientation Task, the Von Frey hair testing and the Nine-hole-peg-test. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to investigate short-interval intracortical inhibition, stimulus response curves, motor evoked potential amplitudes during pre-innervation and the cortical silent period (CSP). Recordings were obtained from left first dorsal interosseous muscle and from left flexor carpi radialis muscle. During deafferentation, the threshold of touch measured at the forearm was significantly worse. Other behavioral treatment-related changes were not found. The CSP showed a significant interaction between treatment and time in first dorsal interosseous muscle. CSP duration was longer during Lidocaine application and shorter during placebo exposure. We conclude that, in healthy subjects, temporary cutaneous deafferentation of upper and lower arm may have minor effects on motor inhibition, but not on sensory or motor function for the adjacent non-anesthetized hand.
Literature
go back to reference Abo M, Kakuda W, Momosaki R et al (2014) Randomized, multicenter, comparative study of NEURO versus CIMT in poststroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis: the NEURO-VERIFY Study. Int J Stroke 9:607–612. doi:10.1111/ijs.12100 CrossRefPubMed Abo M, Kakuda W, Momosaki R et al (2014) Randomized, multicenter, comparative study of NEURO versus CIMT in poststroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis: the NEURO-VERIFY Study. Int J Stroke 9:607–612. doi:10.​1111/​ijs.​12100 CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kellor M, Frost J, Silberberg N, Iversen I, Cummings R (1971) Hand strength and dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 25:77–83PubMed Kellor M, Frost J, Silberberg N, Iversen I, Cummings R (1971) Hand strength and dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 25:77–83PubMed
go back to reference Meyer S, Karttunen AH, Thijs V, Feys H, Verheyden G (2014) How do somatosensory deficits in the arm and hand relate to upper limb impairment, activity, and participation problems after stroke? A systematic review. Phys Ther 94:1220–1231. doi:10.2522/ptj.20130271 CrossRefPubMed Meyer S, Karttunen AH, Thijs V, Feys H, Verheyden G (2014) How do somatosensory deficits in the arm and hand relate to upper limb impairment, activity, and participation problems after stroke? A systematic review. Phys Ther 94:1220–1231. doi:10.​2522/​ptj.​20130271 CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Murphy BA, Haavik Taylor H, Wilson SA, Knight JA, Mathers KM, Schug S (2003) Changes in median nerve somatosensory transmission and motor output following transient deafferentation of the radial nerve in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1477–1488. doi:10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00131-7 CrossRefPubMed Murphy BA, Haavik Taylor H, Wilson SA, Knight JA, Mathers KM, Schug S (2003) Changes in median nerve somatosensory transmission and motor output following transient deafferentation of the radial nerve in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1477–1488. doi:10.​1016/​S1388-2457(03)00131-7 CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nair DG, Renga V, Lindenberg R, Zhu L, Schlaug G (2011) Optimizing recovery potential through simultaneous occupational therapy and non-invasive brain-stimulation using tDCS. Restor Neurol Neurosci 29:411–420. doi:10.3233/RNN-2011-0612 PubMedPubMedCentral Nair DG, Renga V, Lindenberg R, Zhu L, Schlaug G (2011) Optimizing recovery potential through simultaneous occupational therapy and non-invasive brain-stimulation using tDCS. Restor Neurol Neurosci 29:411–420. doi:10.​3233/​RNN-2011-0612 PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Pavlides C, Miyashita E, Asanuma H (1993) Projection from the sensory to the motor cortex is important in learning motor skills in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 70:733–741PubMed Pavlides C, Miyashita E, Asanuma H (1993) Projection from the sensory to the motor cortex is important in learning motor skills in the monkey. J Neurophysiol 70:733–741PubMed
go back to reference Rolke R, Magerl W, Campbell KA, Schalber C, Caspari S, Birklein F, Treede RD (2006) Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials. Eur J Pain 10:77–88CrossRefPubMed Rolke R, Magerl W, Campbell KA, Schalber C, Caspari S, Birklein F, Treede RD (2006) Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials. Eur J Pain 10:77–88CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R et al (2015) Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol 126:1071–1107. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001 CrossRefPubMed Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R et al (2015) Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol 126:1071–1107. doi:10.​1016/​j.​clinph.​2015.​02.​001 CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sens E, Knorr C, Preul C, Meissner W, Witte OW, Miltner WH, Weiss T (2013) Differences in somatosensory and motor improvement during temporary functional deafferentation in stroke patients and healthy subjects. Behav Brain Res 252:110–116. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.048 CrossRefPubMed Sens E, Knorr C, Preul C, Meissner W, Witte OW, Miltner WH, Weiss T (2013) Differences in somatosensory and motor improvement during temporary functional deafferentation in stroke patients and healthy subjects. Behav Brain Res 252:110–116. doi:10.​1016/​j.​bbr.​2013.​05.​048 CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ziemann U, Corwell B, Cohen LG (1998a) Modulation of plasticity in human motor cortex after forearm ischemic nerve block. J Neurosci 18:1115–1123PubMed Ziemann U, Corwell B, Cohen LG (1998a) Modulation of plasticity in human motor cortex after forearm ischemic nerve block. J Neurosci 18:1115–1123PubMed
go back to reference Ziemann U, Hallett M, Cohen LG (1998b) Mechanisms of deafferentation-induced plasticity in human motor cortex. J Neurosci 18:7000–7007PubMed Ziemann U, Hallett M, Cohen LG (1998b) Mechanisms of deafferentation-induced plasticity in human motor cortex. J Neurosci 18:7000–7007PubMed
Metadata
Title
Temporary deafferentation evoked by cutaneous anesthesia: behavioral and electrophysiological findings in healthy subjects
Authors
Aida Sehle
Imke Büsching
Eva Vogt
Joachim Liepert
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Journal of Neural Transmission / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0300-9564
Electronic ISSN: 1435-1463
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-016-1537-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Journal of Neural Transmission 5/2016 Go to the issue

Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article

Reconstituting botulinum toxin drugs: shaking, stirring or what?