Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Telemedicine | Research

Placing equity at the heart of eHealth implementation: a qualitative pilot study

Authors: Milena Heinsch, Campbell Tickner, Frances Kay-Lambkin

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a growing urgency to tackle issues of equity and justice in the implementation of eHealth technologies.

Methods

Qualitative interviews were conducted with 19 multidisciplinary health professionals to explore the implementation and uptake of eHealth technologies in practice. The aim of this article was to examine in more detail issues of equity and justice in the implementation and uptake of eHealth technologies in practice. Results were analysed using Braun and Clarke’s six-step reflexive thematic analysis approach.

Results

Nancy Fraser’s concept of social justice is introduced as a novel framework for inquiry into the implementation of digital health services. Health professionals reported that eHealth offered their clients a greater sense of safety, convenience, and flexibility, allowing them to determine the nature and pace of their healthcare, and giving them more control over their treatment and recovery. However, they also expressed concerns about the use of eHealth with clients whose home environment is unsafe. Application of Fraser’s framework revealed that eHealth technologies may not always provide a secure clinical space in which the voices of vulnerable clients can be recognised and heard. It also highlighted critical systemic and cultural barriers that hinder the representation of clients’ voices in the decision to use eHealth technologies and perpetuate inequalities in the distribution of eHealth services.

Conclusions

To facilitate broad participation, eHealth tools need to be adaptable to the needs and circumstances of diverse groups. Future implementation science efforts must also be directed at identifying and addressing the underlying structures that hinder equitable recognition, representation, and distribution in the implementation of eHealth resources.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Braveman P. What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear. Public Health Rep. 2014;129:5–8.CrossRef Braveman P. What are health disparities and health equity? We need to be clear. Public Health Rep. 2014;129:5–8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Brownson RC, Kumanyika SK, Kreuter MW, Haire-Joshu D. Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity. Implement Sci. 2021;16:28.CrossRef Brownson RC, Kumanyika SK, Kreuter MW, Haire-Joshu D. Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity. Implement Sci. 2021;16:28.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Baumann AA, Cabassa LJ. Reframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:190.CrossRef Baumann AA, Cabassa LJ. Reframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:190.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chinman M, Woodward EN, Curran GM, Hausmann LRM. Harnessing implementation science to increase the impact of health equity research. Med Care. 2017;55(9):S16–23.CrossRef Chinman M, Woodward EN, Curran GM, Hausmann LRM. Harnessing implementation science to increase the impact of health equity research. Med Care. 2017;55(9):S16–23.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Eslava-Schmalbach J, Garzón-Orjuela N, Elias V, Reveiz L, Tran N, Langlois EV. Conceptual framework for equity-focused implementation research for health programs (EquIR). Int J Equity Health. 2019;18:80.CrossRef Eslava-Schmalbach J, Garzón-Orjuela N, Elias V, Reveiz L, Tran N, Langlois EV. Conceptual framework for equity-focused implementation research for health programs (EquIR). Int J Equity Health. 2019;18:80.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference McNulty M, Smith JD, Villamar J, Burnett-Zeigler I, Vermeer W, Benbow N, et al. Implementation research methodologies for achieving scientific equity and health equity. Ethn Dis. 2019;29:83–92.CrossRef McNulty M, Smith JD, Villamar J, Burnett-Zeigler I, Vermeer W, Benbow N, et al. Implementation research methodologies for achieving scientific equity and health equity. Ethn Dis. 2019;29:83–92.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sterling MR, Echeverría SE, Commodore-Mensah Y, Breland JY, Nunez-Smith M. Health equity and implementation science in heart, lung, blood, and sleep-related research. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019;12:10.CrossRef Sterling MR, Echeverría SE, Commodore-Mensah Y, Breland JY, Nunez-Smith M. Health equity and implementation science in heart, lung, blood, and sleep-related research. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019;12:10.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Woodward EN, Singh RS, Ndebele-Ngwenya P, Castillo AM, Dickson KS, Kirchner JE. A more practical guide to incorporating health equity domains in implementation determinants frameworks. Implement Sci. 2021;2:61.CrossRef Woodward EN, Singh RS, Ndebele-Ngwenya P, Castillo AM, Dickson KS, Kirchner JE. A more practical guide to incorporating health equity domains in implementation determinants frameworks. Implement Sci. 2021;2:61.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shaw T, McGregor D, Brunner M, Keep M, Janssen A, Barnet S. What is eHealth (6)? Development of a conceptual model for eHealth: qualitative study with key informants. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(10):e324.CrossRef Shaw T, McGregor D, Brunner M, Keep M, Janssen A, Barnet S. What is eHealth (6)? Development of a conceptual model for eHealth: qualitative study with key informants. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(10):e324.CrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Regional action agenda on harnessing e-health for improved health service delivery in the Western Pacific. Manila: WHO; 2018. World Health Organization. Regional action agenda on harnessing e-health for improved health service delivery in the Western Pacific. Manila: WHO; 2018.
12.
go back to reference Bokolo A. Application of telemedicine and eHealth technology for clinical services in response to COVID-19 pandemic. Health Technol. 2021;11:359–66.CrossRef Bokolo A. Application of telemedicine and eHealth technology for clinical services in response to COVID-19 pandemic. Health Technol. 2021;11:359–66.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tebeje TH, Klein J. Applications of e-health to support person-centered heaklth care at the time of COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health. 2021;27(2):150–8.CrossRef Tebeje TH, Klein J. Applications of e-health to support person-centered heaklth care at the time of COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health. 2021;27(2):150–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Zhou X, Snoswell CL, Harding LE, Bambling M, Edirippulige S, Bai X, et al. The role of telehealth in reducing the mental health burden from COVID-19. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(4):377–9.CrossRef Zhou X, Snoswell CL, Harding LE, Bambling M, Edirippulige S, Bai X, et al. The role of telehealth in reducing the mental health burden from COVID-19. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(4):377–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Doarn CR, Pruitt S, Jacobs J, Harris Y, Bott DM, Riley W, et al. Federal efforts to define and advance telehealth – a work in progress. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(5):409–18.CrossRef Doarn CR, Pruitt S, Jacobs J, Harris Y, Bott DM, Riley W, et al. Federal efforts to define and advance telehealth – a work in progress. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(5):409–18.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Crawford A, Serhal E. Digital health equity and COVID-19: the innovation curve cannot reinforce the social gradient of health. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e19361.CrossRef Crawford A, Serhal E. Digital health equity and COVID-19: the innovation curve cannot reinforce the social gradient of health. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e19361.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Honeyman M, Maguire D, Evans H, Davis A. Digital technology and health inequalities: A scoping review. Cardiff: Public Health Wales NHS Trust; 2020. Honeyman M, Maguire D, Evans H, Davis A. Digital technology and health inequalities: A scoping review. Cardiff: Public Health Wales NHS Trust; 2020.
18.
go back to reference Brewer LC, Fortuna KL, Jones C, Walker R, Hayes SN, Patten CA, et al. Back to the future: Achieving health equity through health informatics and digital health. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2020;8(1):e14512.CrossRef Brewer LC, Fortuna KL, Jones C, Walker R, Hayes SN, Patten CA, et al. Back to the future: Achieving health equity through health informatics and digital health. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2020;8(1):e14512.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cheng C, Elsworth GR, Osborne RH. Co-designing eHealth and equity solutions: application of the Ophelia (optimizing health literacy and access) process. Front Public Health. 2020;8:604401.CrossRef Cheng C, Elsworth GR, Osborne RH. Co-designing eHealth and equity solutions: application of the Ophelia (optimizing health literacy and access) process. Front Public Health. 2020;8:604401.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mangin D, Parscandalo J, Khudoyarova O, Agarwal G, Bismah V, Orr S. Multimorbidity, eHealth and implications for equity: A cross-sectional survey of patient perspectives on eHealth. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e023731.CrossRef Mangin D, Parscandalo J, Khudoyarova O, Agarwal G, Bismah V, Orr S. Multimorbidity, eHealth and implications for equity: A cross-sectional survey of patient perspectives on eHealth. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e023731.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wilson J, Heinsch M, Betts D, Booth D, Kay-Lambkin F. Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1556.CrossRef Wilson J, Heinsch M, Betts D, Booth D, Kay-Lambkin F. Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1556.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Heinsch M, Wyllie J, Carlson J, Wells H, Tickner C, Kay-Lambkin F. Theories informing eHealth implementation: Systematic review and typology classification. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(5):e18500.CrossRef Heinsch M, Wyllie J, Carlson J, Wells H, Tickner C, Kay-Lambkin F. Theories informing eHealth implementation: Systematic review and typology classification. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(5):e18500.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fraser N. Fortunes of feminism: from state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. London: Verso; 2013. Fraser N. Fortunes of feminism: from state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. London: Verso; 2013.
24.
go back to reference Fraser N, editor Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition and participation. The Tanner Lectures of Human Values; April 30–May 2, 1996; Stanford University. Fraser N, editor Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition and participation. The Tanner Lectures of Human Values; April 30–May 2, 1996; Stanford University.
25.
go back to reference May CR, Johnson M, Finch T. Implementation, context and complexity. Implement Sci. 2016;11:141.CrossRef May CR, Johnson M, Finch T. Implementation, context and complexity. Implement Sci. 2016;11:141.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRef Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Baker SE, Edwards R. How many qualitative interviews is enough? National Center for research methods; 2012. Baker SE, Edwards R. How many qualitative interviews is enough? National Center for research methods; 2012.
28.
go back to reference Braun VC, V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;13(2):201–2016.CrossRef Braun VC, V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;13(2):201–2016.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Sim J, Sanders B, Waterfield J, Kingstone T. Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori? Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2018;21(5):619–34.CrossRef Sim J, Sanders B, Waterfield J, Kingstone T. Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori? Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2018;21(5):619–34.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11(4):589–97.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11(4):589–97.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2021;18(3):328–52.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2021;18(3):328–52.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Bhaskar R. A realist theory of science. New York: Routledge; 2008. Bhaskar R. A realist theory of science. New York: Routledge; 2008.
35.
go back to reference Fletcher AJ. Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2017;20(2):181–94.CrossRef Fletcher AJ. Applying critical realism in qualitative research: methodology meets method. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2017;20(2):181–94.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Terry G, Hayfield N. Essentials of Thematic Analysis: American Psychological Association; 2021.CrossRef Terry G, Hayfield N. Essentials of Thematic Analysis: American Psychological Association; 2021.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference McDermid J, Peters K, Jackson D, Daly J. Conducting qualitative research in the context of pre-existing peer and collegial relationships. Nurse Res. 2014;21(5):28–33.CrossRef McDermid J, Peters K, Jackson D, Daly J. Conducting qualitative research in the context of pre-existing peer and collegial relationships. Nurse Res. 2014;21(5):28–33.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Placing equity at the heart of eHealth implementation: a qualitative pilot study
Authors
Milena Heinsch
Campbell Tickner
Frances Kay-Lambkin
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Telemedicine
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01640-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2022 Go to the issue