Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Telemedicine | Research

Barriers and facilitators to health technology adoption by older adults with chronic diseases: an integrative systematic review

Authors: Alessia Bertolazzi, Valeria Quaglia, Ramona Bongelli

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In recent years, healthcare systems have progressively adopted several technologies enhancing access to healthcare for older adults and support the delivery of efficient and effective care for this specific population. These technologies include both assistive technologies designed to maintain or improve the independence, social participation and functionality of older people at home, as well as health information technology developed to manage long-term conditions. Examples of such technologies include telehealth, wearable devices and mobile health. However, despite the great promise that health technology holds for promoting independent living among older people, its actual implementation remains challenging.

Methods

This study aimed to conduct an integrative systematic review of the research evidence on the factors that facilitate or hinder the adoption of different types of technology by older individuals with chronic diseases. For this purpose, four electronic databases (PsycArticles, Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed) were queried to search for indexed published studies. The methodological quality of the selected papers has been assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

Results

Twenty-nine articles were selected, including 6.213 adults aged 60 or older. The studies have been synthesised considering the types of technological interventions and chronic diseases, as well as the main barriers and facilitators in technology acceptance. The results revealed that the majority of the selected articles focused on comorbid conditions and the utilisation of telemedicine tools. With regard to hindering and facilitating factors, five main domains were identified: demographic and socioeconomic, health-related, dispositional, technology-related and social factors.

Conclusion

The study results have practical implications not only for technology developers but also for all the social actors involved in the design and implementation of healthcare technologies, including formal and informal caregivers and policy stakeholders. These actors could use this work to enhance their understanding of the utilisation of technology by the ageing population. This review emphasises the factors that facilitate technology adoption and identifies barriers that impede it, with the ultimate goal of promoting health and independent living.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Wang H, Naghavi M, Allen C. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1459–544.CrossRef
3.
4.
5.
Bähler C, Huber CA, Brüngger B. Reich O. Multimorbidity, health care utilization and costs in an elderly community-dwelling population: a claims data based observational study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:1–12.CrossRef
6.
Volders E, Bolman CA, de Groot RH, Lechner L. The effect of active plus, a computer-tailored physical activity intervention, on cognitive functioning of elderly people with chronic illness (es)–study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1–10.CrossRef
7.
Fitzpatrick AL, Powe NR, Cooper LS, Ives DG, Robbins JA. Barriers to health care access among the elderly and who perceives them. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(10):1788–94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Maresova P, Javanmardi E, Barakovic S, Barakovic Husic J, Tomsone S, Krejcar O, et al. Consequences of chronic diseases and other limitations associated with old age. A scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1431.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Doetsch J, Pilot E, Santana P, Krafft T. Potential barriers in healthcare access of the elderly population influenced by the economic crisis and the troika agreement: a qualitative case study in Lisbon, Portugal. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):184.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
10.
11.
World Health Organization. Classification of digital health interventions v1. 0: A shared language to describe the uses of digital technology for health. Geneva. 2018.
12.
World Health Organization. Global strategy on digital health 2020–2025. Geneva. 2021.
13.
Lupton D. Digital Sociology. London: Routledge; 2015.
14.
Bouma H. Gerontechnology: emerging technologies and their impact on aging in society stud. Health Technol Inf. 1998;48:93–104.
15.
16.
17.
Søraa RA, Fosch-Villaronga E, Quintas J, Dias J, Tøndel G, Serrano A. Mitigating isolation and loneliness in remote areas through social robot emotional care. In: Ray PK, Nakashima N, Ahmed A, Ro S, Soshino Y, editors. Mobile technologies for delivering healthcare in remote, rural, or developing regions. London: Institution of Engineering and Technology; 2020. pp. 255–68.
18.
Elbaz S, Cinalioglu K, Sekhon K, Gruber J, Rigas C, Bodenstein K, et al. A systematic review of telemedicine for older adults with dementia during COVID-19: an alternative to in-person health services? Front Neurol. 2021;12:761965.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Goldberg EM, Lin MP, Burke LG, Jiménez FN, Davoodi NM, Merchant RC. Perspectives on Telehealth for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic using the quadruple aim: interviews with 48 physicians. BMC Geriatric. 2022;22:188.CrossRef
20.
Facchinetti G, Petrucci G, Albanesi B, De Marinis MG, Piredda M. Can smart home technologies help older adults manage their chronic condition? A systematic literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):1205.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Wang D, Liu S, Wu J, Lin Q. Purchase and use of home healthcare devices for the elderly: a pilot study in Shanghai, China. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–10.
22.
Choi NG, Dinitto DM. The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(5):e93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Nelson LA, Mulvaney SA, Gebretsadik T, Ho YX, Johnson KB, Osborn CY. Disparities in the use of a mHealth medication adherence promotion intervention for low-income adults with type 2 diabetes. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2016;23(1):12–8.CrossRef
24.
Showell C, Cummings E, Turner P. The invisibility of disadvantage: why do we not notice? 2017. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;235:388–392.
25.
Chen K, Chan AH. Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics. 2014;57(5):635–52.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Astell AJ, McGrath C, Dove E. That’s for old so and so’s!’: does identity influence older adults’ technology adoption decisions? Ageing Soc. 2020;40(7):1550–76.CrossRef
27.
Lansley P. The promise and challenge of providing assistive technology to older people. Age Ageing. 2001;30(6):439–40.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Yusif S, Soar J, Hafeez-Baig A. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: a systematic review. Int J Med Inf. 2016;94:112–6.CrossRef
29.
Claes V, Devriendt E, Tournoy J, Milisen K. Attitudes and perceptions of adults of 60 years and older towards in-home monitoring of the activities of daily living with contactless sensors: an explorative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(1):134–48.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Londei ST, Rousseau J, Ducharme F, St-Arnaud A, Meunier J, Saint-Arnaud J, et al. An intelligent videomonitoring system for fall detection at home: perceptions of elderly people. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(8):383–90.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Merkel S, Kucharski A. Participatory design in gerontechnology: a systematic literature review. Gerontologist. 2019;59(1):e16–e25.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Mort M, Roberts C, Callén B. Ageing with telecare: care or coercion in austerity? Sociol Health Illn. 2013;35(6):799–812.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Gibson G, Dickinson C, Brittain K, Robinson L. Personalisation, customisation and bricolage: how people with dementia and their families make assistive technology work for them. Ageing Soc. 2019;39(11):2502–19.CrossRef
34.
Pols J, Willems D. Innovation and evaluation: taming and unleashing telecare technology. Sociol Health Illn. 2011;33(3):484–98.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Procter R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93(1):86–94.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Fox NJ, Ward KJ, O’Rourke AJ. The ‘expert patient’: empowerment or medical dominance? The case of weight loss, pharmaceutical drugs and the internet. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(6):1299–309.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Lupton D. The diverse domains of quantified selves: self-tracking modes and dataveillance. Econ Soc. 2016;45(1):101–22.MathSciNetCrossRef
38.
Petrakaki D, Hilberg E, Waring J. Between empowerment and self-discipline: governing patients’ conduct through technological self-care. Soc Sci Med. 2018;213:146–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
Dean DMM. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. London: Sage; 1999.
40.
Crawshaw P. Governing at a distance: social marketing and the (bio) politics of responsibility. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(1):200–7.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Introna LD. Algorithms, Governance, and governmentality. Sci Technol Hum Values. 2016;41(1):17–49.CrossRef
42.
Waring J, Latif A, Boyd M, Barber N, Elliott R. Pastoral power in the community pharmacy: a foucauldian analysis of services to promote patient adherence to new medicine use. Soc Sci Med. 2016;148:123–30.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Ong BN, Rogers A, Kennedy A, Bower P, Sanders T, Morden A, et al. Behaviour change and social blinkers? The role of sociology in trials of self-management behaviour in chronic conditions. Sociol Health Illn. 2014;36(2):226–38.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Øversveen E. Stratified users and technologies of empowerment: theorising social inequalities in the use and perception of diabetes self-management technologies. Sociol Health Illn. 2020;42(4):862–76.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Kallinikos J, Tempini N. Patient data as medical facts: social media practices as a foundation for medical knowledge creation. Inf Syst Res. 2014;25(4):817–33.CrossRef
46.
Till C. Exercise as labour: quantified self and the transformation of exercise into labour. Societies. 2014;4(3):446–62.CrossRef
47.
Wilson J, Heinsch M, Betts D, Booth D, Kay-Lambkin F. Barriers and facilitators to the use of e-health by older adults: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:1–12.CrossRef
48.
Bunn F, Dickinson A, Barnett-Page E, Mcinnes E, Horton K. A systematic review of older people’s perceptions of facilitators and barriers to participation in falls-prevention interventions. Ageing Soc. 2008;28(4):449–72.CrossRef
49.
Changizi M, Kaveh MH. Effectiveness of the mHealth technology in improvement of healthy behaviors in an elderly population-a systematic review. Mhealth. 2017;3:51.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
Chalfont G, Mateus C, Varey S, Milligan C. Self-efficacy of older people using technology to self-manage COPD, hypertension, heart failure, or dementia at home: an overview of systematic reviews. Gerontologist. 2021;61(6):e318–34.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Niazkhani Z, Toni E, Cheshmekaboodi M, Georgiou A, Pirnejad H. Barriers to patient, provider, and caregiver adoption and use of electronic personal health records in chronic care: a systematic review. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2020;20(1):153.CrossRef
52.
Khosravi P, Ghapanchi AH. Investigating the effectiveness of technologies applied to assist seniors: a systematic literature review. Int J Med Inf. 2016;85(1):17–26.CrossRef
53.
Leonardsen AL, Hardeland C, Helgesen AK, Grøndahl VA. Patient experiences with technology enabled care across healthcare settings- a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):779.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
54.
Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546–53.PubMedCrossRef
55.
56.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, Dagenais P, et al. The mixed methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ Inf. 2018;34(4):285–91.
58.
59.
Banbury A, Parkinson L, Nancarrow S, Dart J, Gray L, Buckley J. Multi-site videoconferencing for home-based education of older people with chronic conditions: the Telehealth literacy project. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20(7):353–9.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Herkert C, Graat-Verboom L, Gilsing-Fernhout J, Schols M, Kemps HMC. Home-based exercise program for patients with combined advanced chronic cardiac and pulmonary diseases: exploratory study. JMIR Form Res. 2021;5(11):e28634.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
61.
Zulfiqar AA, Vaudelle O, Hajjam M, Geny B, Talha S, Letourneau D, et al. Results of the GER-e-TEC experiment involving the use of an automated platform to detect the exacerbation of geriatric syndromes. J Clin Med. 2020;9(12):3836.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
62.
Zulfiqar AA, Massimbo D, Hajjam M, Gény B, Talha S, Hajjam J, et al. Glycemic disorder risk remote monitoring program in the COVID-19 very elderly patients. Front Physiol. 2021;12:749731.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
Gellis ZD, Kenaley B, McGinty J, Bardelli E, Davitt J, Ten Have T. Outcomes of a telehealth intervention for homebound older adults with heart or chronic respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial. Gerontologist. 2012;52(4):541–52.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Smaerup M, Laessoe U, Grönvall E, Henriksen JJ, Damsgaard EM. The use of computer-assisted home exercises to preserve physical function after a vestibular rehabilitation program: a randomized controlled study. Rehabil Res Pract. 2016;2016:7026317.PubMedPubMedCentral
65.
Middlemass JB, Vos J, Siriwardena AN. Perceptions on use of home telemonitoring in patients with long term conditions - concordance with the Health Information Technology Acceptance Model: a qualitative collective case study. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2017;17(1):89.CrossRef
66.
Doyle J, Murphy E, Gavin S, Pascale A, Deparis S, Tommasi P, et al. A digital platform to support self-management of multiple chronic conditions (ProACT): findings in relation to engagement during a one-year proof-of-concept trial. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(12):e22672.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
67.
Nancarrow S, Banbury A, Buckley J. Evaluation of a national broadband network-enabled telehealth trial for older people with chronic disease. Aust Health Rev. 2016;40(6):641–8.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Mitseva A, Peterson CB, Karamberi C, Oikonomou LC, Ballis AV, Giannakakos C, et al. Gerontechnology: providing a helping hand when caring for cognitively impaired older adults. Intermediate results from a controlled study on the satisfaction and acceptance of informal caregivers. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2012;2012:401705.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
69.
Johnson DO, Cuijpers RH, Juola JF, Torta E, Simonov M, Frisiello A, et al. Socially assistive robots: a comprehensive approach to extending independent living. Int J Soc Robot. 2014;6(2):195–211.CrossRef
70.
Christiansen L, Sanmartin Berglund J, Anderberg P, Cellek S, Zhang J, Lemmens E, et al. Associations between mobile health technology use and self-rated quality of life: a cross-sectional study on older adults with cognitive impairment. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021;7:23337214211018924.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
Jiang Y, Sun P, Chen Z, Guo J, Wang S, Liu F, et al. Patients’ and healthcare providers’ perceptions and experiences of telehealth use and online health information use in chronic disease management for older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
72.
Robinson SA, Wan ES, Shimada SL, Richardson CR, Moy ML. Age and attitudes towards an internet-mediated, pedometer-based physical activity intervention for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: secondary analysis. JMIR Aging. 2020;3(2):e19527.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
73.
Ancker JS, Witteman HO, Hafeez B, Provencher T, Van de Graaf M, Wei E. You get reminded you’re a sick person: personal data tracking and patients with multiple chronic conditions. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(8):e202.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
74.
Cajita MI, Hodgson NA, Lam KW, Yoo S, Han HR. Facilitators of and barriers to mHealth adoption in older adults with heart failure. Comput Inf Nurs. 2018;36(8):376.
75.
Simmich J, Mandrusiak A, Russell T, Smith S, Hartley N. Perspectives of older adults with chronic disease on the use of wearable technology and video games for physical activity. Digit Health. 2021;7:20552076211019900.PubMedPubMedCentral
76.
Søraa RA, Nyvoll P, Tøndel G, Fosch-Villaronga E, Serrano JA. The social dimension of domesticating technology: interactions between older adults, caregivers, and robots in the home. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021;167:120678.CrossRef
77.
AlMahadin G, Lotfi A, Zysk E, Siena FL, Carthy MM, Breedon P. Parkinson’s disease: current assessment methods and wearable devices for evaluation of movement disorder motor symptoms. A patient and healthcare professional perspective. BMC Neurol. 2020;20(1):419.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
78.
Metting E, Schrage AJ, Kocks JW, Sanderman R, van der Molen T. Assessing the needs and perspectives of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on patient web portals: focus group study. JMIR Form Res. 2018;2(2):e22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
79.
Portz JD, Bayliss EA, Bull S, Boxer RS, Bekelman DB, Gleason K, et al. Using the technology acceptance model to explore user experience, intent to use, and use behavior of a patient portal among older adults with multiple chronic conditions: descriptive qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(4):e11604.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
80.
Jo HS, Hwang YS. Psychological factors that affect the acceptance and need for ICT services for older adults with chronic diseases. Gerontechnology. 2021;20(2):1–11.CrossRef
81.
Duroseau N, Abramson T, Pergament K, Chan V, Govindavari JP, Ciraco C, et al. Acceptance of technology-based tools in a sample of Parkinson’s patients. Chronic Illn. 2017;13(1):3–13.PubMedCrossRef
82.
Ha J, Park HK. Factors affecting the acceptability of technology in health care among older Korean adults with multiple chronic conditions: a cross-sectional study adopting the Senior Technology Acceptance Model. Clin Interv Aging. 2020;15:1873–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
83.
Price-Haywood EG, Harden-Barrios J, Ulep R, Luo Q. eHealth literacy: patient engagement in identifying strategies to encourage use of patient portals among older adults. Popul Health Manag. 2017;20(6):486–94.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Reading Turchioe M, Grossman LV, Baik D, Lee C, Maurer MS, Goyal P, et al. Older adults can successfully monitor symptoms using an inclusively designed mobile application. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(6):1313–8.PubMedCrossRef
85.
86.
Rodríguez-Fernández JM, Danies E, Hoertel N, Galanter W, Saner H, Franco OH. Telemedicine readiness across medical conditions in a US national representative sample of older adults. J Appl Gerontol. 2022;41(4):982–92.PubMedCrossRef
87.
88.
Zaman SB, Khan RK, Evans RG, Thrift AG, Maddison R, Islam SMS. Exploring barriers to and enablers of the adoption of information and Communication Technology for the care of older adults with chronic diseases: scoping review. JMIR Aging. 2022;5(1):e25251.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
89.
Fozard J, Wahl H. Age and cohort effects in gerontechnology: a reconsideration. Gerontechnology. 2012;11(1):10–21.CrossRef
90.
91.
Attig C, Franke T. Abandonment of personal quantification: a review and empirical study investigating reasons for wearable activity tracking attrition. Comput Hum Behav. 2020;102:223–37.CrossRef
92.
Lupton D. Critical perspectives on digital health technologies. Sociol Compass. 2014;8(12):1344–59.CrossRef
93.
Rapp A, Tirassa M. Know thyself: a theory of the self for personal informatics. Hum Comput Interact. 2017;32(5–6):335–80.CrossRef
94.
Senbekov M, Saliev T, Bukeyeva Z, Almabayeva A, Zhanaliyeva M, Aitenova N, Toishibekov Y, Fakhradiyev I. The recent progress and applications of digital technologies in healthcare: a review. Int J Telemed Appl. 2020;2020:8830200.PubMedPubMedCentral
95.
Metadata
Title
Barriers and facilitators to health technology adoption by older adults with chronic diseases: an integrative systematic review
Authors
Alessia Bertolazzi
Valeria Quaglia
Ramona Bongelli
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Telemedicine
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18036-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue

Research

Characteristics of children readmitted with severe pneumonia in Kenyan hospitals

Research

The role of social support in antiretroviral therapy uptake and retention among pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV in the Greater Accra region of Ghana

Research

Spatial spillover effect of environmental factors on the tuberculosis occurrence among the elderly: a surveillance analysis for nearly a dozen years in eastern China

Research

Can federal policy help overcome systemically reinforced racial inequities in social determinants of health? An observational study of Georgia and neighboring U.S. states

Research

Cost and economic evidence for asset-based approaches to health improvement and their evaluation methods: a systematic review

Research

Critical analyses of Latina mortality: disentangling the heterogeneity of ethnic origin, place, nativity, race, and socioeconomic status