Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 1/2016

01-03-2016 | Original Article

Teflon Implants Versus Titanium Implants in Stapes Surgery

Author: Mohan Bansal

Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Otosclerosis is the most common cause of bilateral gradually progressive conductive hearing loss with normal tympanic membrane and Eustachian tube. Otosclerosis surgical treatment is one of the most gratifying operations in Otorhinolaryngology. It is not only the surgical techniques but also the prosthesis which are evolving in the attempt of providing best hearing results. Teflon piston is the most commonly employed prosthesis in stapes surgery. Titanium pistons are relatively the new development in the evolution of stapes prosthesis. The aim of this review article is to know and compare the surgical technicalities and postoperative outcomes including hearing improvement after the use of Teflon and titanium stapes piston. The adverse reactions occurred during follow-up were taken into consideration. The data in this article are supported by a Medline search. The use of both the prosthesis gave good results in cases of otosclerosis. The placement of titanium soft clip design was found easier than the earlier àWengen design of clip piston.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Topdağ DO, Topdağ M, Aydın O et al (2014) Evaluation of efficacy of otosclerosis surgery on hearing outcomes. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 24(3):137–147CrossRefPubMed Topdağ DO, Topdağ M, Aydın O et al (2014) Evaluation of efficacy of otosclerosis surgery on hearing outcomes. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 24(3):137–147CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Casale M, De Franco A, Salvinelli F et al (2003) Hearing results in stapes surgery using two different prosthesis. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 124(4):255–258PubMed Casale M, De Franco A, Salvinelli F et al (2003) Hearing results in stapes surgery using two different prosthesis. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 124(4):255–258PubMed
3.
go back to reference Causse J, Causse JB (1980) Eighteen year report on stapedectomy. Problems of stapedial fixation. Clin Otolaryngol 5:49–59CrossRefPubMed Causse J, Causse JB (1980) Eighteen year report on stapedectomy. Problems of stapedial fixation. Clin Otolaryngol 5:49–59CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gjuric M (1990) Microdrill versus perforator for stapedotomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 15:411–413CrossRefPubMed Gjuric M (1990) Microdrill versus perforator for stapedotomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 15:411–413CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Tange RA, Grolman W (2008) An analysis of the air–bone gap closure obtained by a crimping and a non-crimping titanium stapes prosthesis in otosclerosis. Auris Nasus Larynx 35(2):181–184CrossRefPubMed Tange RA, Grolman W (2008) An analysis of the air–bone gap closure obtained by a crimping and a non-crimping titanium stapes prosthesis in otosclerosis. Auris Nasus Larynx 35(2):181–184CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cavaliere M, Ricciardiello F, Mesolella M et al (2012) Stapedotomy: functional results with different diameter prostheses. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 74(2):93–96CrossRefPubMed Cavaliere M, Ricciardiello F, Mesolella M et al (2012) Stapedotomy: functional results with different diameter prostheses. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 74(2):93–96CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Teig E, Lindeman H (1999) Stapedotomy piston diameter: Is bigger better? Otolaryngol Nova 9:252–256 Teig E, Lindeman H (1999) Stapedotomy piston diameter: Is bigger better? Otolaryngol Nova 9:252–256
9.
go back to reference Durko M, Pajor A, Jankowski A et al (2008) Does the material of stapes prosthesis influence hearing improvement in stapes surgery–retrospective analysis of 350 cases]. Otolaryngol Pol 62(4):480–482CrossRefPubMed Durko M, Pajor A, Jankowski A et al (2008) Does the material of stapes prosthesis influence hearing improvement in stapes surgery–retrospective analysis of 350 cases]. Otolaryngol Pol 62(4):480–482CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference de Bruijn AJ, Tange RA, Dreschler WA (1999) Comparison of stapes prostheses: a retrospective analysis of individual audiometric results obtained after stapedotomy by implantation of a gold and Teflon piston. Am J Otol 20:573–580PubMed de Bruijn AJ, Tange RA, Dreschler WA (1999) Comparison of stapes prostheses: a retrospective analysis of individual audiometric results obtained after stapedotomy by implantation of a gold and Teflon piston. Am J Otol 20:573–580PubMed
11.
go back to reference Harris JP, Gong S (2007) Comparison of hearing results of nitinol SMART stapes piston prosthesis with conventional piston prostheses: postoperative results of nitinol stapes prosthesis. Otol Neurotol 28(5):692–695PubMed Harris JP, Gong S (2007) Comparison of hearing results of nitinol SMART stapes piston prosthesis with conventional piston prostheses: postoperative results of nitinol stapes prosthesis. Otol Neurotol 28(5):692–695PubMed
12.
go back to reference Mangham CA Jr (2008) Titanium CliP piston versus platinum-ribbon Teflon piston: piston and fenestra size affect air–bone gap. Otol Neurotol 29(1):8–12CrossRefPubMed Mangham CA Jr (2008) Titanium CliP piston versus platinum-ribbon Teflon piston: piston and fenestra size affect air–bone gap. Otol Neurotol 29(1):8–12CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Brar T, Passey JC, Agarwal AK (2012) Comparison of hearing outcome using a Nitinol versus Teflon prosthesis in stapedotomy. Acta Otolaryngol 132(11):1151–1154CrossRefPubMed Brar T, Passey JC, Agarwal AK (2012) Comparison of hearing outcome using a Nitinol versus Teflon prosthesis in stapedotomy. Acta Otolaryngol 132(11):1151–1154CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rajan GP, Diaz J, Blackham R et al (2007) Eliminating the limitations of manual crimping in stapes surgery: mid-term results of 90 patients in the Nitinol stapes piston multicenter trial. Laryngoscope 117(7):1236–1239CrossRefPubMed Rajan GP, Diaz J, Blackham R et al (2007) Eliminating the limitations of manual crimping in stapes surgery: mid-term results of 90 patients in the Nitinol stapes piston multicenter trial. Laryngoscope 117(7):1236–1239CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Reineke U, Ebmeyer J, Plett D et al (2010) Superelastic nitinol stapes prostheses. Laryngorhinootologie 89(5):271–275CrossRefPubMed Reineke U, Ebmeyer J, Plett D et al (2010) Superelastic nitinol stapes prostheses. Laryngorhinootologie 89(5):271–275CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Bast F, Schrom T (2009) First experiences with the new soft-clip piston as an alloplastic prosthesis during stapedotomy. Laryngorhinootologie 88(5):304–308CrossRefPubMed Bast F, Schrom T (2009) First experiences with the new soft-clip piston as an alloplastic prosthesis during stapedotomy. Laryngorhinootologie 88(5):304–308CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Somers T, Marquet T, Goverts P et al (1994) Statistical analysis of otosclerosis surgery performed by Jean Marquet. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103:945–951CrossRefPubMed Somers T, Marquet T, Goverts P et al (1994) Statistical analysis of otosclerosis surgery performed by Jean Marquet. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103:945–951CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Teflon Implants Versus Titanium Implants in Stapes Surgery
Author
Mohan Bansal
Publication date
01-03-2016
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-015-0938-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 1/2016 Go to the issue