Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Protocol

Technology for fostering intergenerational connectivity: scoping review protocol

Authors: Jennifer Boger, Kathryn Mercer

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The simultaneous increase in geographically dispersed families and general decrease in engagement in local communities is resulting in fewer opportunities for youth and older adults interact in meaningful ways. Technology is becoming increasingly pervasive and flexible and providing new opportunities to foster intergenerational connection that can be implemented and evaluated across a multitude of populations and contexts. What research has been done in this area is spread across disciplines and what aspects of technologies could make them more effective is not well understood.

Method

The scoping review will be completed in five stages: (1) identifying the research question, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) selecting studies, (4) charting the data, and (5) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. Comprehensive descriptive data from each study will be presented along with an analysis of similarities and differences in research from different disciplines.

Discussion

This scoping review focuses on a search of the literature to gain an understanding of what technologies have been used specifically for fostering intergenerational connectivity and to establish what future directions for research could be. To the authors’ knowledge, it is the first scoping review of its kind.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Springate I, Atkinson M, Martin K. Intergenerational practice: a review of the literature. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research; 2008. Springate I, Atkinson M, Martin K. Intergenerational practice: a review of the literature. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research; 2008.
2.
go back to reference Au A, Ng E, Garner B, Lai S, Chan K. Proactive aging and intergenerational mentoring program to promote the well-being of older adults: pilot studies. Clin Gerontol. 2015;38:203–10.CrossRef Au A, Ng E, Garner B, Lai S, Chan K. Proactive aging and intergenerational mentoring program to promote the well-being of older adults: pilot studies. Clin Gerontol. 2015;38:203–10.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Marcia SM, Alicia RP, Parpura-Gill A, Cohen-Mansfield J. Direct observations of children at risk for academic failure: benefits of an intergenerational visiting program. Educ Gerontol. 2004;30:663–75.CrossRef Marcia SM, Alicia RP, Parpura-Gill A, Cohen-Mansfield J. Direct observations of children at risk for academic failure: benefits of an intergenerational visiting program. Educ Gerontol. 2004;30:663–75.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kemp CL. Dimensions of grandparent-adult grandchild relationships: from family ties to intergenerational friendships. Can J Aging. 2005;24:161–77.CrossRefPubMed Kemp CL. Dimensions of grandparent-adult grandchild relationships: from family ties to intergenerational friendships. Can J Aging. 2005;24:161–77.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Madianou M. Ambient co-presence: transnational family practices in polymedia environments. Global Networks. 2017;16:183–201.CrossRef Madianou M. Ambient co-presence: transnational family practices in polymedia environments. Global Networks. 2017;16:183–201.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bengtson VL. The Burgess Award Lecture: beyond the nuclear family: the increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. J Marriage Fam. 2001;63:1–16.CrossRef Bengtson VL. The Burgess Award Lecture: beyond the nuclear family: the increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. J Marriage Fam. 2001;63:1–16.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zentgraf KM, Chinchilla NS. Transnational family separation: a framework for analysis. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2012;38(2):345–66. Zentgraf KM, Chinchilla NS. Transnational family separation: a framework for analysis. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2012;38(2):345–66.
8.
go back to reference Skrbiš Z. Transnational families: Theorising migration, emotions and belonging. J Intercult Stud. 2008;29(3):231–46. Skrbiš Z. Transnational families: Theorising migration, emotions and belonging. J Intercult Stud. 2008;29(3):231–46.
9.
go back to reference Schans D. Transnational family ties of immigrants in the Netherlands. Ethn Racial Stud. 2009;32(7):1164–82. Schans D. Transnational family ties of immigrants in the Netherlands. Ethn Racial Stud. 2009;32(7):1164–82.
10.
go back to reference Leinaweaver JB. Outsourcing care: how Peruvian migrants meet transnational family obligations. Lat Am Perspect. 2010;37:67–87.CrossRefPubMed Leinaweaver JB. Outsourcing care: how Peruvian migrants meet transnational family obligations. Lat Am Perspect. 2010;37:67–87.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hagestad GO. The aging society as a context for family life. Daedalus. 1986;115:119–39. Hagestad GO. The aging society as a context for family life. Daedalus. 1986;115:119–39.
12.
go back to reference He W, Goodkind D, Kowal P. An aging world: 2015. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau; 2016. He W, Goodkind D, Kowal P. An aging world: 2015. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau; 2016.
13.
go back to reference Harley D, Fitzpatrick G. YouTube and intergenerational communication: the case of Geriatric1927. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2009;8:5–20.CrossRef Harley D, Fitzpatrick G. YouTube and intergenerational communication: the case of Geriatric1927. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2009;8:5–20.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Harley DA, Kurniawan SH, Fitzpatrick G, Vetere F. Age matters: bridging the generation gap through technology-mediated interaction. In: CHI '09 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. Boston: ACM; 2009. p. 4799–802. Harley DA, Kurniawan SH, Fitzpatrick G, Vetere F. Age matters: bridging the generation gap through technology-mediated interaction. In: CHI '09 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. Boston: ACM; 2009. p. 4799–802.
15.
go back to reference Anderson M, Perrin A. Tech adoption climbs among older adults. Washington: Pew Research Centre; 2017. Anderson M, Perrin A. Tech adoption climbs among older adults. Washington: Pew Research Centre; 2017.
16.
go back to reference Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.CrossRef Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zhang F, Kaufman D. A review of intergenerational play for facilitating interactions and learning. Gerontechnology. 2016;14:127–38.CrossRef Zhang F, Kaufman D. A review of intergenerational play for facilitating interactions and learning. Gerontechnology. 2016;14:127–38.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Costa L, Veloso A. Being (grand) players: review of digital games and their potential to enhance intergenerational interactions. J Intergenerational Relationships. 2016;14:43–59.CrossRef Costa L, Veloso A. Being (grand) players: review of digital games and their potential to enhance intergenerational interactions. J Intergenerational Relationships. 2016;14:43–59.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sánchez M, Kaplan MS, Bradley L. Using technology to connect generations: some considerations of form and function. Comunicar. 2015;23:95–103.CrossRef Sánchez M, Kaplan MS, Bradley L. Using technology to connect generations: some considerations of form and function. Comunicar. 2015;23:95–103.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Campos W, Martinez A, Sanchez W, Estrada H, Castro-Sánchez NA, Mujica D. A systematic review of proposals for the social integration of elderly people using ambient intelligence and social networking sites. Cogn Comput. 2016;8:529–42.CrossRef Campos W, Martinez A, Sanchez W, Estrada H, Castro-Sánchez NA, Mujica D. A systematic review of proposals for the social integration of elderly people using ambient intelligence and social networking sites. Cogn Comput. 2016;8:529–42.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pluye P, Robert E, Cargo M, Bartlett G, O’Cathain A, Griffiths F, Boardman F, Gagnon MP, Rousseau MC. Proposal: a mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. Montreal: Department of Family Medicine, McGill University; 2011. Pluye P, Robert E, Cargo M, Bartlett G, O’Cathain A, Griffiths F, Boardman F, Gagnon MP, Rousseau MC. Proposal: a mixed methods appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews. Montreal: Department of Family Medicine, McGill University; 2011.
23.
go back to reference National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies (updated 03 October, 2017). Hamilton: McMaster University; 2008. National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies (updated 03 October, 2017). Hamilton: McMaster University; 2008.
24.
go back to reference Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP qualitative checklist (v 13.03.17). 2017. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP qualitative checklist (v 13.03.17). 2017.
Metadata
Title
Technology for fostering intergenerational connectivity: scoping review protocol
Authors
Jennifer Boger
Kathryn Mercer
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0652-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Systematic Reviews 1/2017 Go to the issue