Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
HSS Journal ®
Published in: HSS Journal ® 2/2020

01-07-2020 | Current Concepts in Spinal Fusion/Commentary

Technologies to Enhance Spinal Fusion: Bench to Bedside

Authors: Allison C. Greene, MPH, Wellington K. Hsu, MD

Published in: HSS Journal ® | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

The success of biomedical innovation and the development of novel therapeutics depend on the strategic integration of scientific research and clinical medicine. This process, traditionally referred to as translational medicine or “bench-to-bedside” research, allows scientists to provide clinicians with treatment strategies designed with specific biological targets in mind. Equally critical to effective research is the reverse translational pathway, whereby clinical observation of disease progression and patient outcomes informs future scientific investigation [24]. This bidirectional flow of information allows for the continued refinement of drug and product development. …
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Bae HW, Zhao L, Kanim LE, Wong P, Delamarter RB, Dawson EG. Intervariability and intravariability of bone morphogenetic proteins in commercially available demineralized bone matrix products. Spine. 2006;31(12):1299–1306.CrossRef
2.
Boden SD, Schimandle JH, Hutton WC. An experimental lumbar intertransverse process spinal fusion model. Radiographic, histologic, and biomechanical healing characteristics. Spine. 1995;20(4):412–420.CrossRef
3.
Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Weiner BK. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J. 2011;11(6):471–491.CrossRef
4.
Chang KY, McClendon M, Driscoll JA, et al. Friday, September 28, 2018 4:05–5:05 PM abstracts: basic science of spinal fusion: 235. Peptide amphiphile nanoscaffolds potentiates the delivery of rh-BMP2 in a rabbit spine fusion model. Spine J. 2018;18(8):S116–S117.CrossRef
5.
Deyo RA, Ching A, Matsen L, et al. Use of bone morphogenetic proteins in spinal fusion surgery for older adults with lumbar stenosis: trends, complications, repeat surgery, and charges. Spine. 2012;37(3):222–230.CrossRef
6.
Duda GN, Grainger DW, Frisk ML, et al. Changing the mindset in life sciences toward translation: a consensus. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(264):264cm212.CrossRef
7.
Edelman ER, LaMarco K. William Heberden and reverse translation. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(287):287fs220.CrossRef
8.
El Bialy I, Jiskoot W, Reza Nejadnik M. Formulation, delivery and stability of bone morphogenetic proteins for effective bone regeneration. Pharm Res. 2017;34(6):1152–1170.CrossRef
9.
Fu R, Selph S, McDonagh M, et al. Effectiveness and harms of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in spine fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(12):890–902.CrossRef
10.
Geiger M, Li RH, Friess W. Collagen sponges for bone regeneration with rhBMP-2. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003;55(12):1613–1629.CrossRef
11.
Hartgerink JD, Beniash E, Stupp SI. Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Science. 2001;294(5547):1684–1688.CrossRef
12.
Hobin JA, Deschamps AM, Bockman R, et al. Engaging basic scientists in translational research: identifying opportunities, overcoming obstacles. J Transl Med. 2012;10:72.CrossRef
13.
Hsu WK, Nickoli MS, Wang JC, et al. Improving the clinical evidence of bone graft substitute technology in lumbar spine surgery. Global Spine J. 2012;2(4):239–248.CrossRef
14.
Hsu EL, Ghodasra JH, Ashtekar A, et al. A comparative evaluation of factors influencing osteoinductivity among scaffolds designed for bone regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19(15–16):1764–1772.CrossRef
15.
James AW, LaChaud G, Shen J, et al. A review of the clinical side effects of bone morphogenetic protein-2. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2016;22(4):284–297.CrossRef
16.
Kissling S, Seidenstuecker M, Pilz IH, Suedkamp NP, Mayr HO, Bernstein A. Sustained release of rhBMP-2 from microporous tricalciumphosphate using hydrogels as a carrier. BMC Biotechnol. 2016;16(1):44.CrossRef
17.
Kurpinski K, Johnson T, Kumar S, Desai T, Li S. Mastering translational medicine: interdisciplinary education for a new generation. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(218):218fs212.CrossRef
18.
Lee SS, Hsu EL, Mendoza M, et al. Gel scaffolds of BMP-2-binding peptide amphiphile nanofibers for spinal arthrodesis. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;4(1):131–141.CrossRef
19.
Lee SS, Fyrner T, Chen F, et al. Sulfated glycopeptide nanostructures for multipotent protein activation. Nat Nanotechnol. 2017;12(8):821–829.CrossRef
20.
Li RH, Wozney JM. Delivering on the promise of bone morphogenetic proteins. Trends Biotechnol. 2001;19(7):255–265.CrossRef
21.
Li H, Johnson NR, Usas A, et al. Sustained release of bone morphogenetic protein 2 via coacervate improves the osteogenic potential of muscle-derived stem cells. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2013;2(9):667–677.CrossRef
22.
Lian TY, Lim KK. The legacy of William Heberden the Elder (1710–1801). Rheumatology. 2004;43(5):664–665.CrossRef
23.
Liu W-C, Robu IS, Patel R, Leu MC, Velez M, Gabriel Chu T-M. The effects of 3D bioactive glass scaffolds and BMP-2 on bone formation in rat femoral critical size defects and adjacent bones. Biomed Mater. 2014;9(4):045013.CrossRef
24.
Lobo M, Ibanez B. Take a deep (nitric oxide) breath and follow the reverse translational research pathway. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(29):2726–2729.CrossRef
25.
Mapara M, Thomas BS, Bhat KM. Rabbit as an animal model for experimental research. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012;9(1):111–118.CrossRef
26.
Mata A, Geng Y, Henrikson KJ, et al. Bone regeneration mediated by biomimetic mineralization of a nanofiber matrix. Biomaterials.. 2010;31(23):6004–6012.CrossRef
27.
Schroeder GD, Hsu WK, Kepler CK, et al. Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine. 2016;41(5):445–449.CrossRef
28.
Simmonds MC, Brown JVE, Heirs MK, et al. Safety and effectiveness of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for spinal fusion: a meta-analysis of individual-participant data. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(12):877–889.CrossRef
29.
Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. 1965. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002(395):4–10.
30.
Wancket LM. Animal models for evaluation of bone implants and devices: comparative bone structure and common model uses. Vet Pathol. 2015;52(5):842–850.CrossRef
31.
Xie G, Sun J, Zhong G, Liu C, Wei J. Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as a controlled-release carrier of BMP-2: absorption and release kinetics in vitro. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(6):1875–1880.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Technologies to Enhance Spinal Fusion: Bench to Bedside
Authors
Allison C. Greene, MPH
Wellington K. Hsu, MD
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
HSS Journal ® / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1556-3316
Electronic ISSN: 1556-3324
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-019-09733-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

HSS Journal ® 2/2020 Go to the issue

Current Concepts in Spinal Fusion/Commentary

The Importance of Surface Technology in Spinal Fusion

Current Concepts in Spinal Fusion/Review Article

Advances in Spinal Fusion Strategies in Adult Deformity Surgery

CURRENT CONCEPTS IN SPINAL FUSION / REVIEW ARTICLE

Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: What Is the Evidence of Indirect Neural Decompression? A Systematic Review of the Literature

Current Concepts in Spinal Fusion/Surgical Technique

Awake Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note

Current Concepts in Spinal Fusion/Editorial

The Advances in the Science and Clinical Practice of Spinal Fusion Are Real

Current Concepts in Spinal Fusion/Review Article

New Strategies in Enhancing Spinal Fusion