Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12/2017

01-12-2017 | How I do it

Technical Details and Results of a Modified End-to-Side Technique of Pancreatojejunostomy: a Personal Series of 100 Patients

Authors: Luca Morelli, Gregorio Di Franco, Simone Guadagni, Matteo Palmeri, Niccolò Furbetta, Desirée Gianardi, Marco Del Chiaro, Giulio Di Candio, Franco Mosca

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The treatment of pancreatic stump is a critical step of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) because leaks from this anastomosis incur major morbidity and mortality. We describe the technical details of a modified end-to-side pancreatojejunostomy (mPJ), and report on the outcome of the first 100 patients.

Methods

From October 2008 to June 2017, 424 pancreatic resections were performed, of which 203 were PD. The mPJ was introduced in November 2010 and used in 100 consecutive patients, by a single surgeon. Data were retrieved from a prospectively collected Institutional database, and used for the present retrospective evaluation. Post-operative pancreatic fistulas (POPF) were stratified with the Fistula Risk Score (FRS), based on the 2005-International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula classification (ISGPFc) and on the subsequent 2016-revised version (ISGPSc).

Results

ISGPFc POPF occurred in 17/100 (17%): grade A in 10/100 (10%), grade B in 6/100 (6%) and grade C in 1/100 (1%). On the ISGPSc, POPF rate averaged 7%: grade B in 6/100 (6%) and grade C in 1/100 (1%). POPF rate associated with high FRS was 18.8%/6.3% (ISGPFc/ISGPSc). With low and intermediate FRS, POPFs were 5.3%/0% (ISGPFc/ISGPSc) and 21.3%/9.8% (ISGPFc/ISGPSc) respectively. Re-operation rate was 3%. In-hospital mortality rate was 2% and specific mortality rate for POPF was 1%.

Conclusions

The mPJ technique is associated with a POPF rate which was less than expected, especially for "difficult" pancreas with high FRS (soft gland texture and small duct). A larger prospective series is needed in addition to comparative studies with other techniques for robust assessment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yoshioka R, Yasunaga H, Hasegawa K, Horiguchi H, Fushimi K, Aoki T, Sakamoto Y, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N. Impact of hospital volume on hospital mortality, length of stay and total costs after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2014; 101:523–529.CrossRefPubMed Yoshioka R, Yasunaga H, Hasegawa K, Horiguchi H, Fushimi K, Aoki T, Sakamoto Y, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N. Impact of hospital volume on hospital mortality, length of stay and total costs after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2014; 101:523–529.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kimura W, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Hirai I, Kenjo A, Kitagawa Y, Shimada M, Baba H, Tomita N, Nakagoe T. A pancreaticoduodenectomy risk model derived from 8575 cases from a national single-race population (Japanese) using a web-based data entry system: the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2014; 259(4):773–780.CrossRefPubMed Kimura W, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Hirai I, Kenjo A, Kitagawa Y, Shimada M, Baba H, Tomita N, Nakagoe T. A pancreaticoduodenectomy risk model derived from 8575 cases from a national single-race population (Japanese) using a web-based data entry system: the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2014; 259(4):773–780.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Zhang X, Dong X, Liu P, Yan Y, Wei Y, Zechner D, Gong P, Vollmar B. Binding versus Conventional Pancreaticojejunostomy in Preventing Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Surg 2017; 34(4):265–280.CrossRefPubMed Zhang X, Dong X, Liu P, Yan Y, Wei Y, Zechner D, Gong P, Vollmar B. Binding versus Conventional Pancreaticojejunostomy in Preventing Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Surg 2017; 34(4):265–280.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138(1):8–13.CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138(1):8–13.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fisula: 11 Years After. Surgery 2017; 161(3):584–591.CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fisula: 11 Years After. Surgery 2017; 161(3):584–591.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Chen Y, Ke N, Tan C, Zhang H, Wang X, Mai G, Liu X. Continuous versus interrupted suture techniques of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Res 2005; 93(2):590–7. Chen Y, Ke N, Tan C, Zhang H, Wang X, Mai G, Liu X. Continuous versus interrupted suture techniques of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Res 2005; 93(2):590–7.
7.
go back to reference El Nakeeb A, El Hemaly M, Askr W, Abd Ellatif M, Hamed H, Elghawalby A, Attia M, Abdallah T, Abd ElWahab M. Comparative study between duct to mucosa and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective randomized study. Int J Surg 2015; 16:1–6.CrossRefPubMed El Nakeeb A, El Hemaly M, Askr W, Abd Ellatif M, Hamed H, Elghawalby A, Attia M, Abdallah T, Abd ElWahab M. Comparative study between duct to mucosa and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective randomized study. Int J Surg 2015; 16:1–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Schoellhammer HF, Fong Y, Gagandeep S. Techniques for prevention of pancreatic leak after pancreatectomy. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2014; 3(5):276–87.PubMedPubMedCentral Schoellhammer HF, Fong Y, Gagandeep S. Techniques for prevention of pancreatic leak after pancreatectomy. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2014; 3(5):276–87.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Hua J, He Z, Qian D, Meng H, Zhou B, Song Z. Duct-to-Mucosa Versus Invagination Pancreaticojejunostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19(10):1900–9.CrossRefPubMed Hua J, He Z, Qian D, Meng H, Zhou B, Song Z. Duct-to-Mucosa Versus Invagination Pancreaticojejunostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19(10):1900–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Wang SE, Chen SC, Shyr BU, Shyr YM. Comparison of Modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2016; 18(3):229–35.CrossRef Wang SE, Chen SC, Shyr BU, Shyr YM. Comparison of Modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2016; 18(3):229–35.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ji W, Shao Z, Zheng K, Wang J, Song B, Ma H, Tang L, Shi L, Wang Y, Li X, Song B, Zhang Y, Jin G. Pancreaticojejunostomy with double-layer continuous suturing is associated with a lower risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study. Int J Surg 2015; 13:84–9.CrossRefPubMed Ji W, Shao Z, Zheng K, Wang J, Song B, Ma H, Tang L, Shi L, Wang Y, Li X, Song B, Zhang Y, Jin G. Pancreaticojejunostomy with double-layer continuous suturing is associated with a lower risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study. Int J Surg 2015; 13:84–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shrikhande SV, Sivasanker M, Vollmer CM, Friess H, Besselink MG, Fingerhut A, Yeo CJ, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Dervenis C, Halloran C, Gouma DJ, Radenkovic D, Asbun HJ, Neoptolemos JP, Izbicki JR, Lillemoe KD, Conlon KC, Fernandez-Cruz L, Montorsi M, Bockhorn M, Adham M, Charnley R, Carter R, Hackert T, Hartwig W, Miao Y, Sarr M, Bassi C, Büchler MW; International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: A position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2016; 161(5):1221–1234.CrossRefPubMed Shrikhande SV, Sivasanker M, Vollmer CM, Friess H, Besselink MG, Fingerhut A, Yeo CJ, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Dervenis C, Halloran C, Gouma DJ, Radenkovic D, Asbun HJ, Neoptolemos JP, Izbicki JR, Lillemoe KD, Conlon KC, Fernandez-Cruz L, Montorsi M, Bockhorn M, Adham M, Charnley R, Carter R, Hackert T, Hartwig W, Miao Y, Sarr M, Bassi C, Büchler MW; International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: A position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2016; 161(5):1221–1234.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fujii T, Sugimoto H, Yamada S, Kanda M, Suenaga M, Takami H, Hattori M, Inokawa Y, Nomoto S, Fujiwara M, Kodera Y. Modified Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy: technical improvement in matched historical control study. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18(6):1108–15.CrossRefPubMed Fujii T, Sugimoto H, Yamada S, Kanda M, Suenaga M, Takami H, Hattori M, Inokawa Y, Nomoto S, Fujiwara M, Kodera Y. Modified Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy: technical improvement in matched historical control study. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18(6):1108–15.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kleespies A, Rentsch M, Seeliger H, Albertsmeier M, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ. Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 2009; 96(7):741–50.CrossRefPubMed Kleespies A, Rentsch M, Seeliger H, Albertsmeier M, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ. Blumgart anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy minimizes severe complications after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 2009; 96(7):741–50.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Miller BC, Christein JD, Behrman SW, Drebin JA, Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr. A multi-institutional external validation of the fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18(1):172–79.CrossRefPubMed Miller BC, Christein JD, Behrman SW, Drebin JA, Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr. A multi-institutional external validation of the fistula risk score for pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18(1):172–79.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mark P Callery, Wande B Pratt, Tara S Kent, Elliot L Chaikof, Charles M Vollmer Jr. A Prospectively Validated Clinical Risk Score Accurately Predicts Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216(1):1–14.CrossRefPubMed Mark P Callery, Wande B Pratt, Tara S Kent, Elliot L Chaikof, Charles M Vollmer Jr. A Prospectively Validated Clinical Risk Score Accurately Predicts Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216(1):1–14.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–213.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–213.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F, Seeliger H, Jauch K-W, Bruns CJ. The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2008; 393(4):459–471.CrossRefPubMed Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F, Seeliger H, Jauch K-W, Bruns CJ. The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 2008; 393(4):459–471.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Grobmyer SR, Kooby D, Blumgart LH, Hochwald SN. Novel pancreaticojejunostomy with a low rate of anastomotic failure-related complications. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210(1):54–9.CrossRefPubMed Grobmyer SR, Kooby D, Blumgart LH, Hochwald SN. Novel pancreaticojejunostomy with a low rate of anastomotic failure-related complications. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210(1):54–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference McMillan MT, Soi S, Asbun HJ, Ball CG, Bassi C, Beane JD, Behrman SW, Berger AC, Bloomston M, Callery MP, Christein JD, Dixon E, Drebin JA, Castillo CF, Fisher WE, Fong ZV, House, MG, Hughes SJ, Kent TS, Kunstman JW, Malleo G, Miller BC, Salem RR, Soares K, Valero V, Wolfgang CL, Vollmer CM Jr. Risk-adjusted out- comes of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: a model for performance evaluation. Ann Surg 2016; 264:344–52.CrossRefPubMed McMillan MT, Soi S, Asbun HJ, Ball CG, Bassi C, Beane JD, Behrman SW, Berger AC, Bloomston M, Callery MP, Christein JD, Dixon E, Drebin JA, Castillo CF, Fisher WE, Fong ZV, House, MG, Hughes SJ, Kent TS, Kunstman JW, Malleo G, Miller BC, Salem RR, Soares K, Valero V, Wolfgang CL, Vollmer CM Jr. Risk-adjusted out- comes of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: a model for performance evaluation. Ann Surg 2016; 264:344–52.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Mukherjee R, Huang W, Hu WM, Li A, Ke NW, Liu XB. Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stent placement during Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2012; 99(8):1050–61.CrossRefPubMed Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Mukherjee R, Huang W, Hu WM, Li A, Ke NW, Liu XB. Systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes after intraoperative pancreatic duct stent placement during Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2012; 99(8):1050–61.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Peng S, Mou Y, Cai X, Peng C. Binding Pancreaticojejunostomy is a new technique to minimize leakage. Am J Surg 2002; 183(3):283–5.CrossRefPubMed Peng S, Mou Y, Cai X, Peng C. Binding Pancreaticojejunostomy is a new technique to minimize leakage. Am J Surg 2002; 183(3):283–5.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Chen Y, Tan C, Zhang H, Mai G, Ke N Liu X. Novel entirely continuous running suture of two-layer pancreaticojejunostomy using only one polypropylene monofilament suture. J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 216(2):e17–21.CrossRefPubMed Chen Y, Tan C, Zhang H, Mai G, Ke N Liu X. Novel entirely continuous running suture of two-layer pancreaticojejunostomy using only one polypropylene monofilament suture. J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 216(2):e17–21.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Dhom J, Bloes DA, Peschel A, Hofmann UK. Bacterial adhesion to suture material in a contaminated wound model: Comparison of monofilament, braided, and barbed sutures. J Orthop Res 2017 35(4):925–933.CrossRefPubMed Dhom J, Bloes DA, Peschel A, Hofmann UK. Bacterial adhesion to suture material in a contaminated wound model: Comparison of monofilament, braided, and barbed sutures. J Orthop Res 2017 35(4):925–933.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Technical Details and Results of a Modified End-to-Side Technique of Pancreatojejunostomy: a Personal Series of 100 Patients
Authors
Luca Morelli
Gregorio Di Franco
Simone Guadagni
Matteo Palmeri
Niccolò Furbetta
Desirée Gianardi
Marco Del Chiaro
Giulio Di Candio
Franco Mosca
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3587-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12/2017 Go to the issue