Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2013

01-02-2013

Technical and perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position

Authors: Ross F. Goldberg, Steven P. Bowers, Michael Parker, John A. Stauffer, Horacio J. Asbun, C. Daniel Smith

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is performed through various approaches, including using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal esophageal dissection. The prone technique allows for gravity-aided retraction of the lung. The aim of this study was to examine perioperative outcomes after prone MIE in relation to patient preoperative comorbidities.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study from our single tertiary-care center is presented. Between January 2007 and August 2010, a total of 42 patients underwent three-field prone MIE. The majority of patients were male (37 vs. 5 female), with an average age of 68 years (range = 37–87). The diagnoses for patients who underwent MIE were 35 adenocarcinoma, four Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia, two achalasia, and one squamous cell carcinoma. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy was administered to 16 (38 %) patients. Preoperative comorbidities were quantified using the Modified Charlson Comorbidity Index; low risk was defined as a score of 0–2 (23 patients), moderate risk 3–4 (14 patients), and high risk 5 or higher (five patients). Postoperative complications were stratified using the Clavien Classification Scale; minor complications were grades 1 and 2 and major complications were grades 3–5.

Results

Median length of hospital stay was 8 days (range = 6–51) and median ICU stay was 2 days (range = 1–26). Average prone surgical time was 108 min (range = 67–198). Thirty-seven of 42 patients (88 %) were extubated on the day of operation. Postoperatively, all five high-risk patients had a complication, three of which were major. Eight of the 14 moderate-risk patients had a complication and three were major, and 17 of the 23 low-risk group had a complication with nine being major. There was a total of 15 major complications. Predominant complications were arrhythmias (15) and pneumonia (five), with four anastomotic leaks and two postoperative 30-day mortalities.

Conclusions

This series supports using prone MIE. Despite a clinical pathway, including immediate extubation postoperatively, there is still a risk of pulmonary complications that appears to correlate with higher preoperative comorbidity scores.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA, Mangum JH, Pappas TN, Harpole DH Jr, D’Amico TA (2004) Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 78:1170–1176 discussion 1170–1176PubMedCrossRef Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA, Mangum JH, Pappas TN, Harpole DH Jr, D’Amico TA (2004) Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 78:1170–1176 discussion 1170–1176PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nguyen NT, Roberts P, Follette DM, Rivers R, Wolfe BM (2003) Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease: lessons learned from 46 consecutive procedures. J Am Coll Surg 197:902–913PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Roberts P, Follette DM, Rivers R, Wolfe BM (2003) Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease: lessons learned from 46 consecutive procedures. J Am Coll Surg 197:902–913PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dapri G, Himpens J, Cadiere GB (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 22:1060–1069PubMedCrossRef Dapri G, Himpens J, Cadiere GB (2008) Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: laparoscopic transhiatal procedure or thoracoscopy in prone position followed by laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 22:1060–1069PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fabian T, McKelvey AA, Kent MS, Federico JA (2007) Prone thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1667–1670PubMedCrossRef Fabian T, McKelvey AA, Kent MS, Federico JA (2007) Prone thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1667–1670PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, Venkatachlam S (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16PubMedCrossRef Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, Venkatachlam S (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Birim O, Maat AP, Kappetein AP, van Meerbeeck JP, Damhuis RA, Bogers AJ (2003) Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in patients with operated primary non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:30–34PubMedCrossRef Birim O, Maat AP, Kappetein AP, van Meerbeeck JP, Damhuis RA, Bogers AJ (2003) Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in patients with operated primary non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 23:30–34PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cuschieri A (1994) Thoracoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 2:21–25PubMed Cuschieri A (1994) Thoracoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 2:21–25PubMed
9.
go back to reference Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, McKelvey AA, Federico JA (2008) Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc 22:2485–2491PubMedCrossRef Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, McKelvey AA, Federico JA (2008) Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc 22:2485–2491PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, Koike K, Miyazaki K (2010) Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2965–2973PubMedCrossRef Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, Koike K, Miyazaki K (2010) Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2965–2973PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bartels H, Stein HJ, Siewert JR (2000) Risk analysis in esophageal surgery. Recent Results Cancer Res 155:89–96PubMedCrossRef Bartels H, Stein HJ, Siewert JR (2000) Risk analysis in esophageal surgery. Recent Results Cancer Res 155:89–96PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Karl RC, Schreiber R, Boulware D, Baker S, Coppola D (2000) Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg 231:635–643PubMedCrossRef Karl RC, Schreiber R, Boulware D, Baker S, Coppola D (2000) Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy. Ann Surg 231:635–643PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kilic A, Schuchert MJ, Pennathur A, Yaeger K, Prasanna V, Luketich JD, Gilbert S (2009) Impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 87:412–415PubMedCrossRef Kilic A, Schuchert MJ, Pennathur A, Yaeger K, Prasanna V, Luketich JD, Gilbert S (2009) Impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 87:412–415PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bollschweiler E, Schroder W, Holscher AH, Siewert JR (2000) Preoperative risk analysis in patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. Br J Surg 87:1106–1110PubMedCrossRef Bollschweiler E, Schroder W, Holscher AH, Siewert JR (2000) Preoperative risk analysis in patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. Br J Surg 87:1106–1110PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ra J, Paulson EC, Kucharczuk J, Armstrong K, Wirtalla C, Rapaport-Kelz R, Kaiser LR, Spitz FR (2008) Postoperative mortality after esophagectomy for cancer: development of a preoperative risk prediction model. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1577–1584PubMedCrossRef Ra J, Paulson EC, Kucharczuk J, Armstrong K, Wirtalla C, Rapaport-Kelz R, Kaiser LR, Spitz FR (2008) Postoperative mortality after esophagectomy for cancer: development of a preoperative risk prediction model. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1577–1584PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sauvanet A, Mariette C, Thomas P, Lozac’h P, Segol P, Tiret E, Delpero JR, Collet D, Leborgne J, Pradere B, Bourgeon A, Triboulet JP (2005) Mortality and morbidity after resection for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: predictive factors. J Am Coll Surg 201:253–262PubMedCrossRef Sauvanet A, Mariette C, Thomas P, Lozac’h P, Segol P, Tiret E, Delpero JR, Collet D, Leborgne J, Pradere B, Bourgeon A, Triboulet JP (2005) Mortality and morbidity after resection for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: predictive factors. J Am Coll Surg 201:253–262PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, Faiz O, Moorthy K, Aylin P (2010) Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England. Ann Surg 252:292–298PubMedCrossRef Lazzarino AI, Nagpal K, Bottle A, Faiz O, Moorthy K, Aylin P (2010) Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: trends of utilization and associated outcomes in England. Ann Surg 252:292–298PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Healy LA, Ryan AM, Gopinath B, Rowley S, Byrne PJ, Reynolds JV (2007) Impact of obesity on outcomes in the management of localized adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134:1284–1291PubMedCrossRef Healy LA, Ryan AM, Gopinath B, Rowley S, Byrne PJ, Reynolds JV (2007) Impact of obesity on outcomes in the management of localized adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 134:1284–1291PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bartels H, Stein HJ, Siewert JR (1998) Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 85:840–844PubMedCrossRef Bartels H, Stein HJ, Siewert JR (1998) Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 85:840–844PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Smith CD (2010) New developments in esophageal surgery. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 20(1):139–145CrossRef Smith CD (2010) New developments in esophageal surgery. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 20(1):139–145CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Technical and perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position
Authors
Ross F. Goldberg
Steven P. Bowers
Michael Parker
John A. Stauffer
Horacio J. Asbun
C. Daniel Smith
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2479-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2013 Go to the issue