Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Systems change for the social determinants of health

Authors: Gemma Carey, Brad Crammond

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Inequalities in the distribution of the social determinants of health are now a widely recognised problem, seen as requiring immediate and significant action (CSDH. Closing the Gap in a Generation. Geneva: WHO; 2008; Marmot M. Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review. Strategic Review of Health Inequalitites inEngland Post-2010. London; 2010). Despite recommendations for action on the social determinants of health dating back to the 1980s, inequalities in many countries continue to grow. In this paper we provide an analysis of recommendations from major social determinants of health reports using the concept of ‘system leverage points’. Increasingly, powerful and effective action on the social determinants of health is conceptualised as that which targets government action on the non-health issues which drive health outcomes.

Methods

Recommendations for action from 6 major national reports on the social determinants of health were sourced. Recommendations from each report were coded against two frameworks: Johnston et al’s recently developed Intervention Level Framework (ILF) and Meadow’s seminal ‘12 places to intervene in a system’ (Johnston LM, Matteson CL, Finegood DT. Systems Science and Obesity Policy: A Novel Framework forAnalyzing and Rethinking Population-Level Planning. American journal of public health. 2014;(0):e1-e9; Meadows D. Thinking in Systems. USA: Sustainability Institute; 1999) (N = 166).

Results

Our analysis found several major changes over time to the types of recommendations being made, including a shift towards paradigmatic change and away from individual interventions. Results from Meadow’s framework revealed a number of potentially powerful system intervention points that are currently underutilised in public health thinking regarding action on the social determinants of health.

Conclusion

When viewed through a systems lens, it is evident that the power of an intervention comes not from where it is targeted, but rather how it works to create change within the system. This means that efforts targeted at government policy can have only limited effectiveness if they are aimed at changing relatively weak leverage points. Our analysis raises further (and more nuanced) questions about what effective action on the social determinants of health looks like.
Literature
1.
CSDH. Closing the gap in a generation. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
2.
Marmot M. Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review. Strategic Review of Health Inequalitites in England post-2010. London; 2010.
3.
Johnston LM, Matteson CL, Finegood DT. Systems science and obesity policy: a novel framework for analyzing and rethinking population-level planning. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(7):1270–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Meadows D. Thinking in Systems. USA: Sustainability Institute; 1999.
5.
Black D. Inequalities in Health: The Black Report. London: Penguine; 1982.
6.
OECD. Rising inequality: youth and poor fall further behind. Insights from the OECD Income Distribution Database. Paris: OECD; 2014.
7.
OECD. Divided We Stand: Why inequality keeps rising. Paris: OECD; 2012.
8.
Baum F, Lawless A, Williams C. Health in All Policies from International Ideas to Local Implementation: Policies, Systems and Organizations. In: Clavier C, de Leeuw E, editors. Health Promotion and the Policy Process. London: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 188–217.CrossRef
9.
10.
Mahamoud A, Roche B, Homer J. Modelling the social determinants of health and simulating short-term and long-term intervention impacts for the city of Toronto, Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:247–55.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
Atwood M, Pedler M, Pritchard S, Wilkinson D. Leading Change: A guide to whole of systems working. Bristol: The Polity Press; 2003.CrossRef
13.
14.
Trochim WM, Cabrera DA, Milstein B, Gallagher RS, Leischow SJ. Practical challenges of systems thinking and modeling in public health. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(3):538.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Vandenbroeck I, Goossens J, Clemens M. Foresight tackling obesities: future choices—obesity system atlas. UK: Foresight Study; 2007.
16.
Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Theorising Interventions as Events in Systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2009;43(3–4):267–76.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be? Br Med J. 2004;328(7455):1561.CrossRef
18.
Trickett EJ, Beehler S, Deutsch C, Green LW, Hawe P, McLeroy K, et al. Advancing the science of community-level interventions. J Inform. 2011;101(8):1410–9.
19.
Martin C, Sturmberg J. General pracitce - chaos, complexity and innovation. Med J Australia. 2005;183(2):106–9.PubMed
20.
Jordon M, Lanham HJ, Anderson RA, McDaniel Jr RR. Implications of complex adaptive systems theory for interpreting research about health care organizations. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(1):228–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Best A, Clark P, Leischow S, Trochim W. Greater than the sum of its parts. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2007
22.
Bambra C, Smith KE, Garthwaite K, Joyce KE, Hunter DJ. A labour of Sisyphus? Public policy and health inequalities research from the Black and Acheson Reports to the Marmot Review. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2011;65(5):399–406.CrossRef
23.
Acheson D, Great Britain, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Independent inquiry into inequalities in health: report. London: Stationery Office; 1998.
24.
Marmot M. Review of social determinants and the health divide in the WHO European Region: final report. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2014
25.
Marmot M. Health Inequalities in the EU. London: European Union; 2013.
26.
27.
Bambra C, Gibson M, Sowden A, Wright K, Whitehead M, Petticrew M. Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2010;64(4):284–91.CrossRef
28.
Clavier C, de Leeuw E, editors. Health Promotion and The Policy Process. London: Oxford University Press; 2013.
29.
Carey G, Crammond B, Keast R. Creating change in government to address the social determinants of health: how can efforts be improved? BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1087.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Raphael D. Social determinants of health: present status, unanswered questions, and future directions. Int J Health Serv. 2006;36(4):651–77.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Coburn D. Beyond the income inequality hypothesis: class, neo-liberalism, and health inequalities. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(1):41–56.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Esping-Anderson G. Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. London: Polity Press; 1990.
33.
Navarro V, Shi L. The political context of social inequalities and health. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(3):481–91.CrossRefPubMed
34.
35.
36.
Kisely SR, Pais J, White A, Connor J, Quek L-H, Crilly JL, et al. Effect of the increase in “alcopops” tax on alcohol-related harms in young people: a controlled interrupted time series. Med J Aust. 2011;195(11):690–3.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Doran CM, Digiusto E. Using taxes to curb drinking: A report card on the Australian government’s alcopops tax: Report on the Australian alcopops tax. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011;30(6):677–80.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Agusdinata DB, Dittmar L. Adaptive policy design to reduce carbon emissions: a system-of-systems perspective. IEEE Syst J. 2009;3(4):509–19.CrossRef
39.
Swanson D, Barg S, Tyler S, Venema H, Tomar S, Bhadwal S, et al. Seven tools for creating adaptive policies. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2010;77(6):924–39.CrossRef
40.
Swanson D, Bhadwal S. Creating adaptive policies a guide for policymaking in an uncertain world [Internet]. Los Angeles; [Winnipeg, Man.]; Ottawa: SAGE ; IISD/International Institute for Sustainable Development ; International Development Research Centre; 2009 [cited 2014 Nov 13]. Available from: http://​www.​deslibris.​ca/​ID/​432556
Metadata
Title
Systems change for the social determinants of health
Authors
Gemma Carey
Brad Crammond
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1979-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Public Health 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Does the type of abortion provider influence contraceptive uptake after abortion? An analysis of longitudinal data from 64 health facilities in Ghana

Research article

Daily sleep duration and risk of metabolic syndrome among middle-aged and older Chinese adults: cross-sectional evidence from the Dongfeng–Tongji cohort study

Research article

Are area-based initiatives able to improve area safety in deprived areas? A quasi-experimental evaluation of the Dutch District Approach

Research article

Time to unsafe sexual practice among cross-border female sex workers in Metemma Yohannes, North West Ethiopia

Research article

A home-school-doctor model to break the barriers for uptake of human papillomavirus vaccine

Study protocol

The MOVE study: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial assessing interventions to maximise attendance at physical activity facilities