Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Systematic Reviews
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Protocol

Systematic review protocol of interventions to improve the psychological well-being of general practitioners

Authors: Marylou Murray, Lois Murray, Michael Donnelly

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The challenges and complexities faced by general practitioners are increasing, and there are concerns about their well-being. Consequently, attention has been directed towards developing and evaluating interventions and strategies to improve general practitioner well-being and their capacity to cope with workplace challenges.

Methods/design

This systematic review aims to evaluate research evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve general practitioner well-being. Eligible studies will include programmes developed to improve psychological well-being that have assessed outcomes using validated tools pertaining to well-being and related outcomes. Only programmes that have been evaluated using controlled study designs will be reviewed. An appropriately developed search strategy will be applied to six electronic databases: the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Studies will be screened in two stages by two independent reviewers. A third reviewer will arbitrate when required. Pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria will be assessed during a pilot phase early on in the review process. The Cochrane data extraction form will be adapted and applied to each eligible study by two independent reviewers, and each study will be appraised critically using standardised checklists from the Cochrane Handbook. Methodological quality will be taken into account in the analysis of the data and the synthesis of results. A narrative synthesis will be undertaken if data is unsuited to a meta-analysis.

Discussion

The systematic review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidance. This will be the first systematic review on this topic, and the evidence synthesis will aid decision-making by general practitioners, policy makers and planners regarding ways in which to improve GP well-being. Findings will be disseminated at general practitioner meetings, conferences and in professional and peer-reviewed journals.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42015017899
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Davis K, Stremikis K, Shoan C, Squires D. Mirror, mirror on the wall, 2014 update: how the US healthcare system compares internationally. 2014. 2/26/2015.
2.
Hann M, McDonald J, Checkland K, Coleman A, Gravelle H, Sibbald B, et al. Seventh national general practitioner work-life survey. 2013.
3.
Boorman S. The final report of the independent NHS health and well-being review, (2009). Department of Health. NHS health and well-being review–the government response 2009.
4.
Centre for Workplace Intelligence. In-depth review of the general practitioner workforce. Final report. 2014.
5.
Bourne T, Wynants L, Peters M. The impact of complaints on the welfare, health and clinical practice of 7926 doctors in the UK: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e00687. doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2014-006687.
6.
Huby G, Gerry M, McKinstry B, Porter M, Shaw J, Wrate R. Morale among general practitioners: qualitative study exploring relations between partnership arrangements, personal style, and workload. BMJ. 2002;325(7356):140.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Soler JK, Yaman H, Esteva M. Burnout in European general practice and family medicine. Social Behavior and Personality. 2007;35(8):1149–50.
8.
British Medical Association. BMA quarterly tracker survey. 4th quarter, Dec 2014. 2014.
9.
10.
Francis R. Independent inquiry into care provided by mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust January 2005-March 2009: the Stationery Office; 2010. ISBN 9780102964394, HC 375 2009-10 PDF, 4.96MB, 455 pages.
11.
Archer J, Regan de Bere S, Bryce M, Nunn S, Lynn N, Coombes L, et al. Understanding the rise in fitness to practise complaints from members of the public. 2014.
12.
Rimmer A. Revalidation data shows that patients are satisfied with care they receive from their doctors. BMJ Careers. (2015-01-01) ISSN 17426774.
13.
Brooks SK, Chalder T, Gerada C. Doctors vulnerable to psychological distress and addictions: treatment from the Practitioner Health Programme. Journal of Mental Health. 2011;20(2):157–64.PubMed
14.
Hawton K. Suicide in doctors while under fitness to practise investigation. BMJ. 2015;350:h813.PubMed
15.
Wallace JE, Lemaire JB, Ghali WA. Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator. The Lancet. 2009;374(9702):1714–21.
16.
Seys D, Scott S, Wu A, Van Gerven E, Vleugels A, Euwema M, et al. Supporting involved health care professionals (second victims) following an adverse health event: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):678–87.PubMed
17.
Diener E, Wirtz D, Tov W, Kim-Prieto C, Choi D, Oishi S, et al. New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc Indicators Res. 2010;97(2):143–56.
18.
Huppert FA, So TT. Flourishing across Europe: application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Soc Indic Res. 2013;110(3):837–61.PubMed
19.
Seligman ME. Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York, NY 10020: Simon and Schuster, Inc, Avenue of the Americas; 2012.
20.
Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:63.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Keyes CL. The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. J Health Soc Behav. 2002;43(2):207–22.PubMed
22.
Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57(6):1069.
23.
Ryff CD, Singer B. The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry. 1998;9(1):1–28.
24.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52(1):141–66.PubMed
25.
Putnam RD. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2000.
26.
Helliwell JF, Barrington-Leigh CP, Harris A, Huang H. International evidence on the social context of well-being. 2009.
27.
Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. 1990.
28.
Peterson C, Seligman ME, Vaillant GE. Pessimistic explanatory style is a risk factor for physical illness: a thirty-five-year longitudinal study. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;55(1):23.PubMed
29.
Seligman ME. Authentic happiness: using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment: Simon and Schuster; 2002
30.
World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.
31.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.) Washington, DC: 1-947; 2013.
32.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.PubMed
33.
34.
Goldberg D, Williams P. General health questionnaire (GHQ). Swindon: nferNelson; 2000.
35.
Williams ES, Konrad TR, Linzer M, McMurray J, Pathman DE, Gerrity M, et al. Refining the measurement of physician job satisfaction: results from the Physician Worklife Survey. Med Care. 1999;37:1140–54.PubMed
36.
Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. Maslach burnout inventory. 1986.
37.
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:385–96.PubMed
38.
Derogatis LR, Unger R. Symptom checklist‐90‐revised. Corsini encyclopedia of psychology: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
39.
Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–43.PubMed
40.
Derogatis LR, Spencer P. Brief symptom inventory: BSI. Pearson Upper Saddle River, NJ; 1993.
41.
Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio, TX 78204-2498: The Psychological Corporation, 555 Academic Court; 1996.
42.
Radloff LS. The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1(3):385–401.
43.
Davis MH. Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;44(1):113.
44.
Hojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, Cohen MJ, Gonnella JS, Erdmann JB, et al. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: development and preliminary psychometric data. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2001;61(2):349–65.
45.
Walach H, Buchheld N, Buttenmüller V, Kleinknecht N, Schmidt S. Measuring mindfulness—the Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences. 2006;40(8):1543–55.
46.
Group TW. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(12):1569–85.
Metadata
Title
Systematic review protocol of interventions to improve the psychological well-being of general practitioners
Authors
Marylou Murray
Lois Murray
Michael Donnelly
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0098-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Systematic Reviews 1/2015 Go to the issue

Protocol

Systematic review of universal resilience interventions targeting child and adolescent mental health in the school setting: review protocol

Protocol

Dietary supplements and risk of cause-specific death, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of primary prevention trials

Protocol

Protocol for a systematic review: understanding the motivations and barriers to uptake and use of female-initiated, primary biomedical HIV prevention technologies in sub-Saharan Africa

Protocol

Identifying the content of home-based health behaviour change interventions for frail older people: a systematic review protocol

Protocol

Systematic review of the use of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) in home-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes for patients with cardiovascular disease—protocol

Protocol

The impact of chronic pain on opioid addiction treatment: a systematic review protocol