Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Swiss family physicians’ perceptions and attitudes towards knowledge translation practices

Authors: Theresa Bengough, Emilie Bovet, Camille Bécherraz, Susanne Schlegel, Bernard Burnand, Vincent Pidoux

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several studies have been performed to understand the way family physicians apply knowledge from medical research in practice. However, very little is known concerning family physicians in Switzerland. In an environment in which information constantly accumulates, it is crucial to identify the major sources of scientific information that are used by family physicians to keep their medical knowledge up to date and barriers to use these sources. Our main objective was to examine medical knowledge translation (KT) practices of Swiss family physicians.

Methods

The population consisted of French- and German-speaking private practice physicians specialised in family medicine. We conducted four interviews and three focus groups (n = 25). The interview guides of the semi-structured interviews and focus groups focused on (a) ways and means used by physicians to keep updated with information relevant to clinical practice; (b) how they consider their role in translating knowledge into practice; (c) potential barriers to KT; (d) solutions proposed by physicians for effective KT.

Results

Family physicians find themselves rather ambivalent about the translation of knowledge based on scientific literature, but generally express much interest in KT. They often feel overwhelmed by “information floods” and perceive clinical practice guidelines and other supports to be of limited usefulness for their practice. They often combine various formal and informal information sources to keep their knowledge up to date. Swiss family physicians report considering themselves as artisans, caring for patients with complex needs.

Conclusion

Improved performance of KT initiatives in family medicine should be tailored to actual needs and based on high quality evidence-based sources.
Footnotes
1
Knowledge translation defined as “a dynamic and iterative process that includes the synthesis, dissemination, exchange and ethically sound application of knowledge to improve health, provide more effective health services and products, and strengthen the health care system” http://​www.​cihr-irsc.​gc.​ca/​e/​29418.​html#2 by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
 
2
Census data revisited.(n.d.) Retrieved November 29, 2013, from Swiss Medical Association website, http://​www.​doctorfmh.​ch/​index_​fr.​cfm
 
3
Iramuteq produces overlapping figures if co-occurrence of key words is similar in several contexts
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Hannes K, Leys M, Vermeire E, Aertgeerts F. B, Buntinx F. & Depoorter A.- M: Implementing evidence-based medicine in general practice: a focus group based study. BioMed Central Family Practice. 2005; 6 (37); doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-37. Hannes K, Leys M, Vermeire E, Aertgeerts F. B, Buntinx F. & Depoorter A.- M: Implementing evidence-based medicine in general practice: a focus group based study. BioMed Central Family Practice. 2005; 6 (37); doi: 10.​1186/​1471-2296-6-37.
3.
go back to reference Zwolsman S, Te Pas E, Hooft L, Wieringa-de Waard M, van Dijk N. Barriers to GPs’ use of evidence-based medicine: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(600):511–21. doi:10.3399/bjgp12X652382.CrossRef Zwolsman S, Te Pas E, Hooft L, Wieringa-de Waard M, van Dijk N. Barriers to GPs’ use of evidence-based medicine: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(600):511–21. doi:10.​3399/​bjgp12X652382.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dawes M, & Samspon U: Knowledge management in clinical practice: a systematic review of information seeking behavior in physicians. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2003; 71. 9–15; doi: 10.1016/S1386-5056(03)00023-6. Dawes M, & Samspon U: Knowledge management in clinical practice: a systematic review of information seeking behavior in physicians. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2003; 71. 915; doi: 10.​1016/​S1386-5056(03)00023-6.
6.
go back to reference Lugtenberg M, Zegers-van Schaick J. M, Westert G. P, & Burgers J. S. Why don’t physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners. Implementation Science. 2009; 4, (54); doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-54. Lugtenberg M, Zegers-van Schaick J. M, Westert G. P, & Burgers J. S. Why don’t physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners. Implementation Science. 2009; 4, (54); doi:10.​1186/​1748-5908-4-54.
7.
go back to reference Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, Chambliss ML, Vinson DC, Stevermer JJ, et al. Obstacles to answering doctors’ question about patient care with evidence: qualitative study. Br Med J. 2002;324:1–7.CrossRef Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Ebell MH, Chambliss ML, Vinson DC, Stevermer JJ, et al. Obstacles to answering doctors’ question about patient care with evidence: qualitative study. Br Med J. 2002;324:1–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mc G, Elizabeth A, Steven MA, John A, Joan K, Jennifer H, et al. The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–45. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa022615.CrossRef Mc G, Elizabeth A, Steven MA, John A, Joan K, Jennifer H, et al. The Quality of Health Care Delivered to Adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–45. doi:10.​1056/​NEJMsa022615.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, et al. Why don’t Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines? A Framework for Improvement. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1458–65.CrossRefPubMed Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, et al. Why don’t Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines? A Framework for Improvement. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1458–65.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining Knowledge Translation. Can Med Assoc J. 2009;181(3–4):165–68.CrossRef Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining Knowledge Translation. Can Med Assoc J. 2009;181(3–4):165–68.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bovier PA, Seboa P, Abetel G, Georgec F, Staldera H. Adherence to recommended standards of diabetes care by Swiss primary care physicians. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;137:173–81.PubMed Bovier PA, Seboa P, Abetel G, Georgec F, Staldera H. Adherence to recommended standards of diabetes care by Swiss primary care physicians. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;137:173–81.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Bochud M, Cornuz J, Vader J-P, Kamm W, Burnand B. Are internists in an non-prescriptive setting favourable to guidelines? A survey in a Department of Internal Medicine in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2002;132:201–6.PubMed Bochud M, Cornuz J, Vader J-P, Kamm W, Burnand B. Are internists in an non-prescriptive setting favourable to guidelines? A survey in a Department of Internal Medicine in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2002;132:201–6.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Finch H, Lewis J. Focus Group Research in Qualitative Research in Practice. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. A Guide for Social Science Students. London: Sage Publications; 2003. p. 170–98. Finch H, Lewis J. Focus Group Research in Qualitative Research in Practice. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. A Guide for Social Science Students. London: Sage Publications; 2003. p. 170–98.
16.
go back to reference Mc Cosker H, Barnard A, & Gerber R. Undertaking Sensitive Research: Issues and Strategies for Meeting the Safety Needs of All Participants. Forum Qualitative Research. 2001;2(1), Art 22 Mc Cosker H, Barnard A, & Gerber R. Undertaking Sensitive Research: Issues and Strategies for Meeting the Safety Needs of All Participants. Forum Qualitative Research. 2001;2(1), Art 22
17.
go back to reference Cammer A, Morgan D, Stewart N, McGilton K, Rycroft-Malone J, Dopson S, et al. The Hidden Complexity of Long-Term-Care: How Context Mediates Knowledge Translation and Use of Best Practices. Gerontologist. 2014;54(6):1013–23.CrossRefPubMed Cammer A, Morgan D, Stewart N, McGilton K, Rycroft-Malone J, Dopson S, et al. The Hidden Complexity of Long-Term-Care: How Context Mediates Knowledge Translation and Use of Best Practices. Gerontologist. 2014;54(6):1013–23.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Estabrooks C, Rutakumwa W, O’Leary KA, Profetto M, Milner M, Levers MJ, et al. Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:460.CrossRefPubMed Estabrooks C, Rutakumwa W, O’Leary KA, Profetto M, Milner M, Levers MJ, et al. Sources of Practice Knowledge Among Nurses. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:460.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Britten N. Qualitative interviews in medical research. Br Med J. 1995;311:251–3.CrossRef Britten N. Qualitative interviews in medical research. Br Med J. 1995;311:251–3.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet. 2001;358(9280):483–8.CrossRef Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet. 2001;358(9280):483–8.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Berg BL. Qualitative Reserach methods for the social sciences. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2001. Berg BL. Qualitative Reserach methods for the social sciences. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
24.
go back to reference Glaser BG. Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1967. Glaser BG. Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press; 1967.
25.
go back to reference Mayring P. Qualitative Content Analysis. Basic Principles and Techniques. 7th ed. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag; 2000. Mayring P. Qualitative Content Analysis. Basic Principles and Techniques. 7th ed. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag; 2000.
26.
go back to reference Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 2008. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 2008.
27.
go back to reference Smith C. Content analysis and narrative analysis. In: Reis H, Judd C, editors. Eds. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge; 2000. Smith C. Content analysis and narrative analysis. In: Reis H, Judd C, editors. Eds. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge; 2000.
28.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006;3(2):77–101 Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006;3(2):77–101
29.
go back to reference Gilgun JF. Grounded theory and other inductive research methods. In: Thyer B, editor. Handbook of social work research methods. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage; 2001. p. 345–64. Gilgun JF. Grounded theory and other inductive research methods. In: Thyer B, editor. Handbook of social work research methods. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage; 2001. p. 345–64.
31.
go back to reference Bawden D, Robinson L. The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. J Inf Sci. 2009;35(2):180–91.CrossRef Bawden D, Robinson L. The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. J Inf Sci. 2009;35(2):180–91.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Straus SE, Sackett DL. Reply to Ebell’s article. Putting Computer-Based Evidence in the Hands of Clinicians. JAMA. 1999;281(13):1171. doi:10.1001/pubs. Straus SE, Sackett DL. Reply to Ebell’s article. Putting Computer-Based Evidence in the Hands of Clinicians. JAMA. 1999;281(13):1171. doi:10.1001/pubs.
34.
35.
go back to reference Haug JD. Physicians’ preferences for information sources: a meta-analytic study. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997;85(3):223–32.PubMedPubMedCentral Haug JD. Physicians’ preferences for information sources: a meta-analytic study. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997;85(3):223–32.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Swiss family physicians’ perceptions and attitudes towards knowledge translation practices
Authors
Theresa Bengough
Emilie Bovet
Camille Bécherraz
Susanne Schlegel
Bernard Burnand
Vincent Pidoux
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0392-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Primary Care 1/2015 Go to the issue