Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research

Swiss chocolate and free beverages to increase the motivation for scientific work amongst residents: a prospective interventional study in a non-academic teaching hospital in Switzerland

Authors: Annika Rühle, Florian Oehme, Björn-Christian Link, Jürg Metzger, Henning Fischer, Michael Stickel, Dimitri E. Delagrammaticas, Reto Babst, Frank J. P. Beeres

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The success of a clinical trial depends on its recruitment of eligible patients; therefore, the recruitment period requires special attention. We hypothesized that with a new approach focused on continuous information and gratification, resident motivation to participate in scientific work will increase and recruitment rates will improve.

Methods

Our new recruitment approach was applied to the recruitment phase of two prospective randomized trials (registered at the German Clinical Trials Register). Randomization of these trials was performed first using blinded envelopes; later a soft drink machine was used as the delivery tool of randomization as a lighthearted motivation to join scientific work and to reward the resident with free soft drinks for each recruitment. Residents were informed about the trial via a lecture and by mail. To increase interest everyone received Swiss chocolate. With a multiple choice survey we investigated the success of our actions at 6 and 12 months. Recruitment rates of the trials were evaluated and associated with the motivational approaches.

Results

Our residents rated their awareness of the trials with median 9 (IQR 7;9) during the first and 8 (IQR 5;9) during the second survey and their interest in scientific work with median 7 (IQR 4;8) and 6 (IQR 5;8). The percentage of residents feeling highly motivated improved from 58% to 70%. The recruitment rates stayed stably high over time with 73% and 72% in trial 1 and 90% and 85% in trial 2; 24% of residents stated their motivation could be increased by gratifications.

Conclusions

After implementation of our new recruitment approach we found positively motivated residents and high recruitment rates in the corresponding trials. We propose this procedure may help to ensure the successful initiation of clinical trials. Larger studies testing this approach are warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Newington L, Metcalfe A. Factors influencing recruitment to research: qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of research teams. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:10.CrossRef Newington L, Metcalfe A. Factors influencing recruitment to research: qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of research teams. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:10.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Treweek S, Lockhart P, Pitkethly M, et al. Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002360.CrossRef Treweek S, Lockhart P, Pitkethly M, et al. Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002360.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bower P, Brueton V, Gamble C, et al. Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities. Trials. 2014;15:399.CrossRef Bower P, Brueton V, Gamble C, et al. Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities. Trials. 2014;15:399.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ziebland S, Featherstone K, Snowdon C, Barker K, Frost H, Fairbank J. Does it matter if clinicians recruiting for a trial don't understand what the trial is really about? Qualitative study of surgeons’ experiences of participation in a pragmatic multi-centre RCT. Trials. 2007;8:4.CrossRef Ziebland S, Featherstone K, Snowdon C, Barker K, Frost H, Fairbank J. Does it matter if clinicians recruiting for a trial don't understand what the trial is really about? Qualitative study of surgeons’ experiences of participation in a pragmatic multi-centre RCT. Trials. 2007;8:4.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Patterson S, Mairs H, Borschmann R. Successful recruitment to trials: a phased approach to opening gates and building bridges. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:73.CrossRef Patterson S, Mairs H, Borschmann R. Successful recruitment to trials: a phased approach to opening gates and building bridges. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:73.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, et al. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006;7:9.CrossRef McDonald AM, Knight RC, Campbell MK, et al. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006;7:9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Holmes EG, Connolly A, Putnam KT, et al. Taking care of our own: A multispecialty study of resident and program director perspectives on contributors to burnout and potential interventions. Acad Psychiatry. 2017;41:159–66.CrossRef Holmes EG, Connolly A, Putnam KT, et al. Taking care of our own: A multispecialty study of resident and program director perspectives on contributors to burnout and potential interventions. Acad Psychiatry. 2017;41:159–66.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fletcher B, Gheorghe A, Moore D, Wilson S, Damery S. Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000496.CrossRef Fletcher B, Gheorghe A, Moore D, Wilson S, Damery S. Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000496.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Oehme F, Ruhle A, Muhlhausser J, et al. Are routine radiographs needed the day after open reduction and internal fixation surgery for distal radius and ankle fractures: Study protocol for a prospective, open label, randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6:e159.CrossRef Oehme F, Ruhle A, Muhlhausser J, et al. Are routine radiographs needed the day after open reduction and internal fixation surgery for distal radius and ankle fractures: Study protocol for a prospective, open label, randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6:e159.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ruhle A, Oehme F, Bornert K, et al. Simple wound irrigation in the postoperative treatment for surgically drained spontaneous soft tissue abscesses: Study protocol for a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6:e77.CrossRef Ruhle A, Oehme F, Bornert K, et al. Simple wound irrigation in the postoperative treatment for surgically drained spontaneous soft tissue abscesses: Study protocol for a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6:e77.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mergenthaler P, Lindauer U, Dienel GA, Meisel A. Sugar for the brain: the role of glucose in physiological and pathological brain function. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36:587–97.CrossRef Mergenthaler P, Lindauer U, Dienel GA, Meisel A. Sugar for the brain: the role of glucose in physiological and pathological brain function. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36:587–97.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Scholey A, Owen L. Effects of chocolate on cognitive function and mood: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2013;71:665–81.CrossRef Scholey A, Owen L. Effects of chocolate on cognitive function and mood: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2013;71:665–81.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:261–6.CrossRef Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:261–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. A systematic review of reasons for nonentry of eligible patients into surgical randomized controlled trials. Surgery. 2006;139:469–83.CrossRef Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. A systematic review of reasons for nonentry of eligible patients into surgical randomized controlled trials. Surgery. 2006;139:469–83.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Raftery J, Bryant J, Powell J, Kerr C, Hawker S. Payment to healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials: systematic review and qualitative study. Health Technol Assess. 2008;12:1–128 iii.CrossRef Raftery J, Bryant J, Powell J, Kerr C, Hawker S. Payment to healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials: systematic review and qualitative study. Health Technol Assess. 2008;12:1–128 iii.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Swiss chocolate and free beverages to increase the motivation for scientific work amongst residents: a prospective interventional study in a non-academic teaching hospital in Switzerland
Authors
Annika Rühle
Florian Oehme
Björn-Christian Link
Jürg Metzger
Henning Fischer
Michael Stickel
Dimitri E. Delagrammaticas
Reto Babst
Frank J. P. Beeres
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3956-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Trials 1/2020 Go to the issue