Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2/2019

01-11-2019 | Original Article

Sutureless Tragal Cartilage Island Tympanoplasty: Our Experience

Authors: George Mullonkal Varghese, P. Hafees Abdullah, Nelwin Jerald Sabu

Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Special Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

To evaluate graft take up and hearing improvement using the technique of tragal cartilage island in COM-mucosal type. Prospective study. A total of 258 type 1 tympanoplasty surgeries were done using tragal cartilage island graft from December 2013, to December 2015; in Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute with a follow up of 1 year. Inclusion criteria—all the patients undergoing type 1 tympanoplasty for chronic otitis media (mucosal type, inactive) with an intact ossicular chain by the senior author. The youngest patient was 6 years old and the oldest was 64 years. This pattern was selected for getting a uniform pattern even though cartilage tympanoplasty can be done in other forms of COM also. Graft take up in our study was found to be 96.12% in 1 year of follow up. Closure of tympanic membrane was achieved in 248 of 258 cases. None of the patients showed retraction pockets or cholesteatoma during follow up. The average pre-op AB gap was 21.62 dB which was lowered to 4.22 dB post op. The mean gain in hearing was 17.37 dB. It is worthwhile to consider tragal cartilage island graft as an alternative to temporalis fascia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference De Freitas MR, De Oliveira TC (2014) The role of different types of grafts in tympanoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 80:275–276CrossRef De Freitas MR, De Oliveira TC (2014) The role of different types of grafts in tympanoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 80:275–276CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dornhoffer J (2003) Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, techniques, and outcomes in A 1,000-patient series. Laryngoscope 113(11):1844–1856CrossRef Dornhoffer J (2003) Cartilage tympanoplasty: indications, techniques, and outcomes in A 1,000-patient series. Laryngoscope 113(11):1844–1856CrossRef
3.
go back to reference De Seta E et al (2010) Cartilage tympanoplasty: how to reduce surgery time. J Laryngol Otol 124(7):784–785CrossRef De Seta E et al (2010) Cartilage tympanoplasty: how to reduce surgery time. J Laryngol Otol 124(7):784–785CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kevin Ho K-H, Katzenmeyer K(1999) TITLE: Tympanoplasty SOURCE: grand rounds presentation. The University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Department of Otolaryngology DATE: June 9, 1999 Kevin Ho K-H, Katzenmeyer K(1999) TITLE: Tympanoplasty SOURCE: grand rounds presentation. The University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Department of Otolaryngology DATE: June 9, 1999
5.
go back to reference Cavaliere M et al (2009) Tragal cartilage in tympanoplasty: anatomic and functional results in 306 cases. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 29(1):27PubMedPubMedCentral Cavaliere M et al (2009) Tragal cartilage in tympanoplasty: anatomic and functional results in 306 cases. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 29(1):27PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Onal K et al (2012) Functional results of temporalis fascia versus cartilage tympanoplasty in patients with bilateral chronic otitis media. J Laryngol Otol 126(1):22–25CrossRef Onal K et al (2012) Functional results of temporalis fascia versus cartilage tympanoplasty in patients with bilateral chronic otitis media. J Laryngol Otol 126(1):22–25CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aidonis I, Robertson TC, Sismanis AS (2005) Cartilage shield tympanoplasty: a reliable technique. Otol Neurotol 26(5):838–841CrossRef Aidonis I, Robertson TC, Sismanis AS (2005) Cartilage shield tympanoplasty: a reliable technique. Otol Neurotol 26(5):838–841CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tek A et al (2012) Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 269(4):1117–1126CrossRef Tek A et al (2012) Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 269(4):1117–1126CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Coelho DH et al (2012) Cartilage tympanoplasty in smokers. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 121(10):657–663CrossRef Coelho DH et al (2012) Cartilage tympanoplasty in smokers. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 121(10):657–663CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ahmed S et al (2013) Chondroperichondrial clip myringoplasty: a new technique for closure of tympanic membrane perforations. J Laryngol Otol 127(6):562CrossRef Ahmed S et al (2013) Chondroperichondrial clip myringoplasty: a new technique for closure of tympanic membrane perforations. J Laryngol Otol 127(6):562CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Şahan M et al (2014) Factors affecting success and results of cartilage-perichondrium island graft in revision tympanoplasty. J Int Adv Otol 10(1):64CrossRef Şahan M et al (2014) Factors affecting success and results of cartilage-perichondrium island graft in revision tympanoplasty. J Int Adv Otol 10(1):64CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ferekidis EA et al (2003) Chondrotympanoplasty: a modified technique of cartilage graft tympanoplasty. Med Sci Monit 9(2):CR73–CR78PubMed Ferekidis EA et al (2003) Chondrotympanoplasty: a modified technique of cartilage graft tympanoplasty. Med Sci Monit 9(2):CR73–CR78PubMed
13.
go back to reference Mohamad SH, Khan I, Hussain SSH (2012) Is cartilage tympanoplasty more effective than fascia tympanoplasty? A systematic review. Otol Neurotol 33(5):699–705CrossRef Mohamad SH, Khan I, Hussain SSH (2012) Is cartilage tympanoplasty more effective than fascia tympanoplasty? A systematic review. Otol Neurotol 33(5):699–705CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Khan MM, Parab SR (2011) Primary cartilage tympanoplasty: our technique and results. Am J Otolaryngol 32(5):381–387CrossRef Khan MM, Parab SR (2011) Primary cartilage tympanoplasty: our technique and results. Am J Otolaryngol 32(5):381–387CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gün T et al (2017) A comparison of cartilage palisades and temporal fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty for bilateral tympanic membrane perforations in children. J Int Adv Otol 13(1):36–39CrossRef Gün T et al (2017) A comparison of cartilage palisades and temporal fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty for bilateral tympanic membrane perforations in children. J Int Adv Otol 13(1):36–39CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kalcioglu MT, Firat Y, Selimoglu E (2009) Cartilage tympanoplasty with island technique: a comparison with the temporalis muscle fascia technique. J Int Adv Otol 5(1):45–50 Kalcioglu MT, Firat Y, Selimoglu E (2009) Cartilage tympanoplasty with island technique: a comparison with the temporalis muscle fascia technique. J Int Adv Otol 5(1):45–50
17.
go back to reference Al Qahtani B et al (2015) Tympanometric patterns in patients undergoing cartilage tympanoplasty of 0.6 mm thickness. Indian J Otol 21(4):233CrossRef Al Qahtani B et al (2015) Tympanometric patterns in patients undergoing cartilage tympanoplasty of 0.6 mm thickness. Indian J Otol 21(4):233CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pradeep P et al (2017) Indian J Otolaryngol 29(2):63–68 Pradeep P et al (2017) Indian J Otolaryngol 29(2):63–68
19.
go back to reference Priya K et al (2012) Evaluation of eustachian tube function in chronic suppurative otitis media (tubotympanic type) with reference to its treatment outcome. Indian J Otol 18(4):179CrossRef Priya K et al (2012) Evaluation of eustachian tube function in chronic suppurative otitis media (tubotympanic type) with reference to its treatment outcome. Indian J Otol 18(4):179CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Anirban B (2002) Clinical audio-vestibulometry for otologists and neurologists, 3rd edn. Bhalani Publishing House, Mumbai, pp 56–60 Anirban B (2002) Clinical audio-vestibulometry for otologists and neurologists, 3rd edn. Bhalani Publishing House, Mumbai, pp 56–60
21.
go back to reference Salén B (1967) Tympanic membrane grafts of full-thickness skin, fascia and cartilage with its perichondrium. An experimental and clinical investigation. Acta oto-laryngol 85(Suppl-244):1173–1176 Salén B (1967) Tympanic membrane grafts of full-thickness skin, fascia and cartilage with its perichondrium. An experimental and clinical investigation. Acta oto-laryngol 85(Suppl-244):1173–1176
22.
go back to reference Jansen C (1963) Cartilage island tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 73:1288–1301CrossRef Jansen C (1963) Cartilage island tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 73:1288–1301CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Heermann Joachim, Heermann Hans, Kopstein Ernest (1970) Fascia and cartilage palisade mtympanoplasty: nine years’ experience. Arch Otolaryngol 91(3):228–241CrossRef Heermann Joachim, Heermann Hans, Kopstein Ernest (1970) Fascia and cartilage palisade mtympanoplasty: nine years’ experience. Arch Otolaryngol 91(3):228–241CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Goodhill V (1967) Tragal perichondrium and cartilage in tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol. 85(5):480–491CrossRef Goodhill V (1967) Tragal perichondrium and cartilage in tympanoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol. 85(5):480–491CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tos M (2008) Cartilage tympanoplasty methods: proposal of a classification. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139(6):747–758CrossRef Tos M (2008) Cartilage tympanoplasty methods: proposal of a classification. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139(6):747–758CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lee C-F et al (2007) Optimal graft thickness for different sizes of tympanic membrane perforation in cartilage myringoplasty: a finite element analysis. Laryngoscope 117(4):725–730CrossRef Lee C-F et al (2007) Optimal graft thickness for different sizes of tympanic membrane perforation in cartilage myringoplasty: a finite element analysis. Laryngoscope 117(4):725–730CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Mathur NN, Manimaran V, Deka A (2017) Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (abstract) Mathur NN, Manimaran V, Deka A (2017) Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (abstract)
28.
go back to reference Demirpehlivan IA, Onal K, Arslanoglu S et al (2011) Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(3):471–474 (abstract) CrossRef Demirpehlivan IA, Onal K, Arslanoglu S et al (2011) Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268(3):471–474 (abstract) CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Karaman E, Duman C, Isildak H (2010) Composite cartilage island grafts in type 1 tympanoplasty: audiological and otological outcomes. J Craniofac Surg 21(1):37–39 (abstract) CrossRef Karaman E, Duman C, Isildak H (2010) Composite cartilage island grafts in type 1 tympanoplasty: audiological and otological outcomes. J Craniofac Surg 21(1):37–39 (abstract) CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Onal K et al (2011) Perichondrium/cartilage island flap and temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 40(4):295–299 (abstract) PubMed Onal K et al (2011) Perichondrium/cartilage island flap and temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 40(4):295–299 (abstract) PubMed
Metadata
Title
Sutureless Tragal Cartilage Island Tympanoplasty: Our Experience
Authors
George Mullonkal Varghese
P. Hafees Abdullah
Nelwin Jerald Sabu
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Issue Special Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-018-1438-9

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2019

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2/2019 Go to the issue