Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hernia 4/2013

01-08-2013 | Original Article

Suture repair of umbilical hernia during caesarean section: a case–control study

Authors: D. C. Steinemann, P. Limani, N. Ochsenbein, F. Krähenmann, P.-A. Clavien, R. Zimmermann, D. Hahnloser

Published in: Hernia | Issue 4/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to investigate the additional burdens in terms of pain, prolongation of surgery and morbidity which is added to elective caesarean section if umbilical hernia suture repair is performed simultaneously. Secondly, patient’s satisfaction and hernia recurrence rate were assessed.

Methods

Consecutive women with symptomatic umbilical hernia undergoing internal or external suture repair during elective caesarean were included in this retrospective cohort–control study. Data on post-operative pain, duration of surgery and morbidity of a combined procedure were collected. These patients were matched 1:10 to women undergoing caesarean section only. Additionally, two subgroups were assessed separately: external and internal suture hernia repair. These subgroups were compared for patient’s satisfaction, cosmesis, body image and recurrence rate.

Results

Fourteen patients with a mean age of 37 years were analysed. Internal suture repair (n = 7) prolonged caesarean section by 20 min (p = 0.001) and external suture repair (n = 7) by 34 min (p < 0.0001). Suture repair did not increase morphine use (0.38 ± 0.2 vs. 0.4 ± 02 mg/kg body weight), had no procedure-related morbidity and prolonged hospitalization by 0.5 days (p = 0.01). At a median follow-up of 37 (5–125) months, two recurrences in each surgical technique, internal and external suture repair, occurred (28 %). Body image and cosmesis score showed a higher level of functioning in internal suture repair (p = 0.02; p = 0.04).

Discussion

Despite a high recurrence rate, internal suture repair of a symptomatic umbilical hernia during elective caesarean section should be offered to women if requested. No additional morbidity or scar is added to caesarean section. Internal repair is faster, and cosmetic results are better, additional skin or fascia dissection is avoided, and it seems to be as effective as an external approach. Yet, women must be informed on the high recurrence rate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dabbas N, Adams K, Pearson K, Royle G (2011) Frequency of abdominal wall hernias: is classical teaching out of date? JRSM Short Rep 2(1):5PubMedCrossRef Dabbas N, Adams K, Pearson K, Royle G (2011) Frequency of abdominal wall hernias: is classical teaching out of date? JRSM Short Rep 2(1):5PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Buch KE, Tabrizian P, Divino CM (2008) Management of hernias in pregnancy. J Am Coll Surg 207(4):539–542PubMedCrossRef Buch KE, Tabrizian P, Divino CM (2008) Management of hernias in pregnancy. J Am Coll Surg 207(4):539–542PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Boissonnault JS, Blaschak MJ (1988) Incidence of diastasis recti abdominis during the childbearing year. Phys Ther 68(7):1082–1086PubMed Boissonnault JS, Blaschak MJ (1988) Incidence of diastasis recti abdominis during the childbearing year. Phys Ther 68(7):1082–1086PubMed
4.
go back to reference Oh CS, Won HS, Kwon CH, Chung IH (2008) Morphologic variations of the umbilical ring, umbilical ligaments and ligamentum teres hepatis. Yonsei Med J 49(6):1004–1007PubMedCrossRef Oh CS, Won HS, Kwon CH, Chung IH (2008) Morphologic variations of the umbilical ring, umbilical ligaments and ligamentum teres hepatis. Yonsei Med J 49(6):1004–1007PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Beischer NA, Wein P (1996) Linea alba pigmentation and umbilical deviation in nulliparous pregnancy: the ligamentum teres sign. Obstet Gynecol 87(2):254–256PubMedCrossRef Beischer NA, Wein P (1996) Linea alba pigmentation and umbilical deviation in nulliparous pregnancy: the ligamentum teres sign. Obstet Gynecol 87(2):254–256PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Perry Z, Netz U, Yitzhak A, Mizrahi S (2011) Pros and cons in the approach to an incarcerated umbilical hernia in the pregnant woman. Am Surg 77(3):E43–E44PubMed Perry Z, Netz U, Yitzhak A, Mizrahi S (2011) Pros and cons in the approach to an incarcerated umbilical hernia in the pregnant woman. Am Surg 77(3):E43–E44PubMed
7.
go back to reference Ghnnam WM, Helal AS, Fawzy M, Ragab A, Shalaby H, Elrefaay E (2009) Paraumbilical hernia repair during cesarean delivery. Ann Saudi Med 29(2):115–118PubMedCrossRef Ghnnam WM, Helal AS, Fawzy M, Ragab A, Shalaby H, Elrefaay E (2009) Paraumbilical hernia repair during cesarean delivery. Ann Saudi Med 29(2):115–118PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gabriele R, Conte M, Izzo L, Basso L (2010) Cesarean section and hernia repair: simultaneous approach. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 36(5):944–949PubMedCrossRef Gabriele R, Conte M, Izzo L, Basso L (2010) Cesarean section and hernia repair: simultaneous approach. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 36(5):944–949PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ochsenbein-Kolble N, Demartines N, Ochsenbein-Imhof N, Zimmermann R (2004) Cesarean section and simultaneous hernia repair. Arch Surg 139(8):893–895PubMedCrossRef Ochsenbein-Kolble N, Demartines N, Ochsenbein-Imhof N, Zimmermann R (2004) Cesarean section and simultaneous hernia repair. Arch Surg 139(8):893–895PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dunker MS, Stiggelbout AM, van Hogezand RA, Ringers J, Griffioen G, Bemelman WA (1998) Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc 12(11):1334–1340PubMedCrossRef Dunker MS, Stiggelbout AM, van Hogezand RA, Ringers J, Griffioen G, Bemelman WA (1998) Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease. Surg Endosc 12(11):1334–1340PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nolan A, Lawrence C (2009) A pilot study of a nursing intervention protocol to minimize maternal-infant separation after Cesarean birth. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 38(4):430–442PubMedCrossRef Nolan A, Lawrence C (2009) A pilot study of a nursing intervention protocol to minimize maternal-infant separation after Cesarean birth. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 38(4):430–442PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M, Iversen MG, Rosenberg J, Jorgensen LN (2011) A nationwide study on readmission, morbidity, and mortality after umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. Hernia 15(5):541–546PubMedCrossRef Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M, Iversen MG, Rosenberg J, Jorgensen LN (2011) A nationwide study on readmission, morbidity, and mortality after umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. Hernia 15(5):541–546PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Arroyo A, Garcia P, Perez F, Andreu J, Candela F, Calpena R (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg 88(10):1321–1323PubMedCrossRef Arroyo A, Garcia P, Perez F, Andreu J, Candela F, Calpena R (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg 88(10):1321–1323PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stabilini C, Stella M, Frascio M, De Salvo L, Fornaro R, Larghero G, Mandolfino F, Lazzara F, Gianetta E (2009) Mesh versus direct suture for the repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias. Ten-year experience. Ann Ital Chir 80(3):183–187PubMed Stabilini C, Stella M, Frascio M, De Salvo L, Fornaro R, Larghero G, Mandolfino F, Lazzara F, Gianetta E (2009) Mesh versus direct suture for the repair of umbilical and epigastric hernias. Ten-year experience. Ann Ital Chir 80(3):183–187PubMed
16.
go back to reference Aslani N, Brown CJ (2010) Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 14(5):455–462PubMedCrossRef Aslani N, Brown CJ (2010) Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 14(5):455–462PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Halm JA, Heisterkamp J, Veen HF, Weidema WF (2005) Long-term follow-up after umbilical hernia repair: are there risk factors for recurrence after simple and mesh repair? Hernia 9(4):334–337PubMedCrossRef Halm JA, Heisterkamp J, Veen HF, Weidema WF (2005) Long-term follow-up after umbilical hernia repair: are there risk factors for recurrence after simple and mesh repair? Hernia 9(4):334–337PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Israelsson LA, Smedberg S, Montgomery A, Nordin P, Spangen L (2006) Incisional hernia repair in Sweden 2002. Hernia 10(3):258–261PubMedCrossRef Israelsson LA, Smedberg S, Montgomery A, Nordin P, Spangen L (2006) Incisional hernia repair in Sweden 2002. Hernia 10(3):258–261PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Suture repair of umbilical hernia during caesarean section: a case–control study
Authors
D. C. Steinemann
P. Limani
N. Ochsenbein
F. Krähenmann
P.-A. Clavien
R. Zimmermann
D. Hahnloser
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
Hernia / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1265-4906
Electronic ISSN: 1248-9204
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1087-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Hernia 4/2013 Go to the issue