Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Review

Sustainable rare diseases business and drug access: no time for misconceptions

Authors: Pierrick Rollet, Adrien Lemoine, Marc Dunoyer

Published in: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Legislative incentives enacted in Europe through the Regulation (EC) No. 141/2000 to incentivize orphan drug development have over the last 12 years constituted a powerful impetus toward R&D directed at the rare diseases population.
However, despite therapeutic promises contained in these projects and significant economic impact linked to burgeoning R&D expenditures, the affordability and value of OMPs has become a topic of health policy debate in Europe fueled by the perception that OMPs have high acquisition costs, and by misconceptions around pricing dynamics and rare-diseases business models. In order to maintain sustainable patient access to new and innovative therapies, it is essential to address these misconceptions, and to ensure the successful continuation of a dynamic OMPs R&D within rare-diseases public health policy.
Misconceptions abound regarding the pricing of rare diseases drugs and reflect a poor appreciation of the R&D model and the affordability and value of OMPs.
Simulation of potential financial returns of small medium sized rare diseases companies focusing on high priced drugs show that their economic returns are likely to be close to their cost of capital. Research in rare diseases is a challenging endeavour characterised by high fixed costs in which companies accrue substantial costs for several years before potentially generating returns from the fruits of their investments. Although heavily dependent upon R&D capabilities of each individual company or R&D organization, continuous flow of R&D financial investment should allow industry to increasingly include efficiencies in research and development in cost considerations to its customers. Industry should also pro-actively work on facilitating development of a specific value based pricing approach to help understanding what constitute value in rare diseases. Policy makers must reward innovation based upon unmet need and patient outcome. Broader understanding by clinicians, the public, and policy makers of the complexity of clinical programs to deliver OMPs to market is required to better comprehend the decisions needed and made by industry. In parallel, an overt effort to consider the impact of public policies on R&D investments is key to enable policy makers to better reconcile the incentives provided by public policy decisions and companies investments decisions in a more positive manner.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schieppati A, Henter JI, Daina E, et al.: Why rare diseases are an important medical and social issue. Lancet. 2008, 371: 2039-2041. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60872-7.PubMedCrossRef Schieppati A, Henter JI, Daina E, et al.: Why rare diseases are an important medical and social issue. Lancet. 2008, 371: 2039-2041. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60872-7.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Eurordiscare report: “the voice of 12 000 patients, Experiences and Expectations of Rare Disease Patients on Diagnosis and Care in Europe. Eurordiscare report: “the voice of 12 000 patients, Experiences and Expectations of Rare Disease Patients on Diagnosis and Care in Europe.
3.
go back to reference Experiences of Rare Diseases: Genetic alliance UK, Rare diseases UK report. An Insight from Patients and Families. 2010 Experiences of Rare Diseases: Genetic alliance UK, Rare diseases UK report. An Insight from Patients and Families. 2010
4.
go back to reference The cost of Muscular Dystrophy”, Report by Access Economics Pty Limited for the Muscular Dystrophy Association. 2007 The cost of Muscular Dystrophy”, Report by Access Economics Pty Limited for the Muscular Dystrophy Association. 2007
5.
go back to reference OHE Consulting: Assessment of the Impact of Orphan Medicinal Products (OMPs) on the European Economy and Society. 2010 OHE Consulting: Assessment of the Impact of Orphan Medicinal Products (OMPs) on the European Economy and Society. 2010
6.
7.
go back to reference Tambuyzer E: Nature Reviews Drug Discovery | AOP. “Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions”. 2010 Tambuyzer E: Nature Reviews Drug Discovery | AOP. “Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions”. 2010
8.
go back to reference Wills Hughes W: Paying for the Orphan Drug System: break or bend? Is it time for a new evaluation system for payers in Europe to take account of new rare disease treatments. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012, 7: 74-10.1186/1750-1172-7-74.CrossRef Wills Hughes W: Paying for the Orphan Drug System: break or bend? Is it time for a new evaluation system for payers in Europe to take account of new rare disease treatments. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012, 7: 74-10.1186/1750-1172-7-74.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Country drug public list prices from: France: UK- National Health Service (NHS) via Drug Tariff; Chemist & Druggist. Official Journal of the French Republic (JORF), Germany- Informationsstelle für Arzneispezialitäten (IFA) via ABDATA, Italy- Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) via Farmadati, Spain- Spanish Pharmaceutical Association (BOT). UK- National Health Service (NHS) via Drug Tariff; Chemist & Druggist Country drug public list prices from: France: UK- National Health Service (NHS) via Drug Tariff; Chemist & Druggist. Official Journal of the French Republic (JORF), Germany- Informationsstelle für Arzneispezialitäten (IFA) via ABDATA, Italy- Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) via Farmadati, Spain- Spanish Pharmaceutical Association (BOT). UK- National Health Service (NHS) via Drug Tariff; Chemist & Druggist
12.
13.
go back to reference Coté A: what is wrong with orphan drug policies. Value Health. 2012, 15: 1185-1191. 10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.004.PubMedCrossRef Coté A: what is wrong with orphan drug policies. Value Health. 2012, 15: 1185-1191. 10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.004.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference The tiger in the fiscal room: Beware the increasing cost and number of orphan drugs. The tiger in the fiscal room: Beware the increasing cost and number of orphan drugs.
15.
go back to reference Schey C: Estimating the budget impact of orphan medicines in Europe. 2010, 2020 Schey C: Estimating the budget impact of orphan medicines in Europe. 2010, 2020
16.
go back to reference AFM report: médicaments orphelins, un dispositif à renforcer. Février. 2011 AFM report: médicaments orphelins, un dispositif à renforcer. Février. 2011
17.
go back to reference Orofino J: Global Spending on Orphan Drugs in France, Germany, the UK, Italy and Spain during 2007. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010, 8 (5): 301-315. 10.2165/11531880-000000000-00000.PubMedCrossRef Orofino J: Global Spending on Orphan Drugs in France, Germany, the UK, Italy and Spain during 2007. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010, 8 (5): 301-315. 10.2165/11531880-000000000-00000.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, Cleemput I, Simoens S: A comparative study of European rare disease and orphan drug markets. Health Policy. 2010, 97: 173-179. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.017.PubMedCrossRef Denis A, Mergaert L, Fostier C, Cleemput I, Simoens S: A comparative study of European rare disease and orphan drug markets. Health Policy. 2010, 97: 173-179. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.05.017.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Carlson JJ: Linking payment to health outcomes: A taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers. Health Policy. 2010, 96: 179-190. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.02.005.PubMedCrossRef Carlson JJ: Linking payment to health outcomes: A taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers. Health Policy. 2010, 96: 179-190. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.02.005.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Klemp M: What principles should govern the use of managed entry agreements?. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011, 27 (1): 77-83. 10.1017/S0266462310001297.PubMedCrossRef Klemp M: What principles should govern the use of managed entry agreements?. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011, 27 (1): 77-83. 10.1017/S0266462310001297.PubMedCrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Kiran N, Meekings : Orphan drug development: an economically viable strategy for biopharma R&D”, Drug Discovery Today. 2012 Kiran N, Meekings : Orphan drug development: an economically viable strategy for biopharma R&D”, Drug Discovery Today. 2012
24.
go back to reference Jorge Mestre F: OHE report. The R&D cost of a new medicine. 2012 Jorge Mestre F: OHE report. The R&D cost of a new medicine. 2012
25.
go back to reference Paul S: How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry’s grand challenge. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010, 9: 203-214.PubMed Paul S: How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry’s grand challenge. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010, 9: 203-214.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Regnstrom J: factors associated with success of market authorization applications for pharmaceutical drugs submitted to the European Medicines agency. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010, 66: 39-48. 10.1007/s00228-009-0756-y.PubMedCrossRef Regnstrom J: factors associated with success of market authorization applications for pharmaceutical drugs submitted to the European Medicines agency. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010, 66: 39-48. 10.1007/s00228-009-0756-y.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Danzon P: productivity in pharmaceutical-biotechnology R&D: the role of expererience and alliances. J Health Econ. 2005, 24: 317-339. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.006.PubMedCrossRef Danzon P: productivity in pharmaceutical-biotechnology R&D: the role of expererience and alliances. J Health Econ. 2005, 24: 317-339. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.006.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Orfali M: Clinical pharmacology & Therapeutics. Raising Orphans: How Clinical Development Programs of Drugs for Rare and Common Diseases Are Different. 2012 Orfali M: Clinical pharmacology & Therapeutics. Raising Orphans: How Clinical Development Programs of Drugs for Rare and Common Diseases Are Different. 2012
29.
go back to reference financial reports of Actelion (2012), Alexion (2012) , Bio Marin (2012), Dyax (2012), Enzon (2009),Genzyme (2010), Shire (2012), Sobi (2012), Viropharma (2012), United Therapeutics. 2012 financial reports of Actelion (2012), Alexion (2012) , Bio Marin (2012), Dyax (2012), Enzon (2009),Genzyme (2010), Shire (2012), Sobi (2012), Viropharma (2012), United Therapeutics. 2012
30.
go back to reference Di JA, Masi HG, Grabowski : “the cost of biopharmaceutical R&D, is Biotech different. manage decision economics. 2007, 28: 469-479. 10.1002/mde.1360.CrossRef Di JA, Masi HG, Grabowski : “the cost of biopharmaceutical R&D, is Biotech different. manage decision economics. 2007, 28: 469-479. 10.1002/mde.1360.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Light DW: Estimated research and development costs of rotavirus vaccines. Vaccine. 2009 Nov 5, 27 (47): 6627-6633. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.077.PubMedCrossRef Light DW: Estimated research and development costs of rotavirus vaccines. Vaccine. 2009 Nov 5, 27 (47): 6627-6633. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.077.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Jack A: healthcare uncommon complaints. Financial times. 2012 Jack A: healthcare uncommon complaints. Financial times. 2012
33.
go back to reference Official Journal of the European Communities: (EC) No 141/2000 of the European parliament and of the council of 16 December 1999 on Orphan Medicinal products. Regulation. 2000, 1: 22. Official Journal of the European Communities: (EC) No 141/2000 of the European parliament and of the council of 16 December 1999 on Orphan Medicinal products. Regulation. 2000, 1: 22.
Metadata
Title
Sustainable rare diseases business and drug access: no time for misconceptions
Authors
Pierrick Rollet
Adrien Lemoine
Marc Dunoyer
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1750-1172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-8-109

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1/2013 Go to the issue