Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 5/2015

01-05-2015 | Original Article

Surgical stress response after colorectal resection: a comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery

Authors: J. Shibata, S. Ishihara, N. Tada, K. Kawai, N. H. Tsuno, H. Yamaguchi, E. Sunami, J. Kitayama, T. Watanabe

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The perioperative immune status of colorectal robotic surgery (RS), laparoscopic surgery (LS), and open surgery (OS) patients has not been compared. Our aim was to evaluate perioperative stress and immune response after RS, LS and OS.

Methods

This prospective study included 46 colorectal surgery patients from the Department of Surgical Oncology of the University of Tokyo Hospital. Peripheral venous blood samples were obtained preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 3, and 6. We evaluated expression of HLA-DR (marker of immune competence), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and lymphocyte subset counts (natural killers, cytotoxic T cells and helper T cells).

Results

Fifteen, 23, and 8 patients underwent RS, LS and OS, respectively. HLA-DR expression was the lowest on day 1 and gradually increased on days 3 and 6 in all the groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative HLA-DR expression between the RS and LS group. However, on day 3, HLA-DR expression in the RS group was significantly higher than in the OS group (p = 0.04). On day 1, CRP levels in the LS group were significantly lower than in the RS group (p = 0.038). There were no significant perioperative changes in the lymphocyte subset cell count between the three groups.

Conclusions

Perioperative surgical stress, as evaluated by immunological parameters, was comparable between robotic and laparoscopic surgery and higher with open surgery. Robotic surgery may be an alternative to laparoscopic surgery, as a minimally invasive surgery option for colorectal cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Group COoSTS (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 13:2050–2059 Group COoSTS (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 13:2050–2059
2.
go back to reference Biondi A, Grosso G, Mistretta A et al (2013) Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery. BMC Surg 13(Suppl 2):S12CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Biondi A, Grosso G, Mistretta A et al (2013) Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery. BMC Surg 13(Suppl 2):S12CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163–1185CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163–1185CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25:3061–3068CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662 discussion 662–654CrossRefPubMed Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662 discussion 662–654CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W et al (2002) Metabolic and functional results after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1070–1077CrossRefPubMed Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W et al (2002) Metabolic and functional results after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1070–1077CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Han SA, Lee WY, Park CM, Yun SH, Chun HK (2010) Comparison of immunologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open approaches in clinical stage III colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:631–638CrossRefPubMed Han SA, Lee WY, Park CM, Yun SH, Chun HK (2010) Comparison of immunologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open approaches in clinical stage III colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:631–638CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Veenhof AA, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM et al (2011) The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:53–59CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Veenhof AA, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM et al (2011) The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:53–59CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Karanika S, Karantanos T, Theodoropoulos GE (2013) Immune response after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: a review. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 1:85–94CrossRef Karanika S, Karantanos T, Theodoropoulos GE (2013) Immune response after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: a review. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 1:85–94CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20:1521–1525CrossRefPubMed Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH, Paz IB (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20:1521–1525CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Keller DS, Senagore AJ, Lawrence JK, Champagne BJ, Delaney CP (2013) Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 28:212–221CrossRefPubMed Keller DS, Senagore AJ, Lawrence JK, Champagne BJ, Delaney CP (2013) Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 28:212–221CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Saklani AP, Lim DR, Hur H et al (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1689–1698CrossRefPubMed Saklani AP, Lim DR, Hur H et al (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1689–1698CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V (2013) Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am Surg 79:553–560PubMed Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V (2013) Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am Surg 79:553–560PubMed
17.
go back to reference Kerr SF, Klonizakis M, Glynne-Jones R (2010) Suppression of the postoperative neutrophil leucocytosis following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer and implications for surgical morbidity. Colorectal Dis 12:549–554CrossRefPubMed Kerr SF, Klonizakis M, Glynne-Jones R (2010) Suppression of the postoperative neutrophil leucocytosis following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer and implications for surgical morbidity. Colorectal Dis 12:549–554CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wichmann MW, Meyer G, Adam M et al (2003) Detrimental immunologic effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in advanced rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 46:875–887CrossRefPubMed Wichmann MW, Meyer G, Adam M et al (2003) Detrimental immunologic effects of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in advanced rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 46:875–887CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hartley A, Giridharan S, Srihari N, McConkey C, Geh JI (2003) Impaired postoperative neutrophil leucocytosis and acute complications following short course preoperative radiotherapy for operable rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:155–157CrossRefPubMed Hartley A, Giridharan S, Srihari N, McConkey C, Geh JI (2003) Impaired postoperative neutrophil leucocytosis and acute complications following short course preoperative radiotherapy for operable rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:155–157CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kawai K, Tsuno NH, Kitayama J et al (2003) Epigallocatechian gallate, the main component of tea polyphenol, binds to CD4 and interferes with gp120 binding. J Allergy Clin Immunol 112:951–957CrossRefPubMed Kawai K, Tsuno NH, Kitayama J et al (2003) Epigallocatechian gallate, the main component of tea polyphenol, binds to CD4 and interferes with gp120 binding. J Allergy Clin Immunol 112:951–957CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD et al (2013) Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg 37:2782–2790CrossRefPubMed Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD et al (2013) Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg 37:2782–2790CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Scarpinata R, Aly EH (2013) Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum 56:253–262CrossRefPubMed Scarpinata R, Aly EH (2013) Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum 56:253–262CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kwon YJ et al (2013) Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1258–1265CrossRefPubMed Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kwon YJ et al (2013) Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1258–1265CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Park JY, Jo MJ, Nam BH et al (2012) Surgical stress after robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and its economic implications. Br J Surg 99:1554–1561CrossRefPubMed Park JY, Jo MJ, Nam BH et al (2012) Surgical stress after robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and its economic implications. Br J Surg 99:1554–1561CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kawasaki T, Ogata M, Kawasaki C, Tomihisa T, Okamoto K, Shigematsu A (2001) Surgical stress induces endotoxin hyporesponsiveness and an early decrease of monocyte mCD14 and HLA-DR expression during surgery. Anesth Analg 92:1322–1326CrossRefPubMed Kawasaki T, Ogata M, Kawasaki C, Tomihisa T, Okamoto K, Shigematsu A (2001) Surgical stress induces endotoxin hyporesponsiveness and an early decrease of monocyte mCD14 and HLA-DR expression during surgery. Anesth Analg 92:1322–1326CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Flohe S, Lendemans S, Schade FU, Kreuzfelder E, Waydhas C (2004) Influence of surgical intervention in the immune response of severely injured patients. Intensive Care Med 30:96–102CrossRefPubMed Flohe S, Lendemans S, Schade FU, Kreuzfelder E, Waydhas C (2004) Influence of surgical intervention in the immune response of severely injured patients. Intensive Care Med 30:96–102CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Mokart D, Textoris J, Chow-Chine L et al (2011) HLA-DR and B7-2 (CD86) monocyte expressions after major cancer surgery: profile in sepsis. Minerva Anestesiol 77:522–527PubMed Mokart D, Textoris J, Chow-Chine L et al (2011) HLA-DR and B7-2 (CD86) monocyte expressions after major cancer surgery: profile in sepsis. Minerva Anestesiol 77:522–527PubMed
28.
go back to reference Kono K, Sekikawa T, Matsumoto Y (1995) Influence of surgical stress on monocytes and complications of infection in patients with esophageal cancer–monocyte HLA-DR antigen expression and respiratory burst capacity. J Surg Res 58:275–280CrossRefPubMed Kono K, Sekikawa T, Matsumoto Y (1995) Influence of surgical stress on monocytes and complications of infection in patients with esophageal cancer–monocyte HLA-DR antigen expression and respiratory burst capacity. J Surg Res 58:275–280CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Veenhof AA, Vlug MS, van der Pas MH et al (2012) Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 255:216–221CrossRefPubMed Veenhof AA, Vlug MS, van der Pas MH et al (2012) Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 255:216–221CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Tsimogiannis KE, Tellis CC, Tselepis AD, Pappas-Gogos GK, Tsimoyiannis EC, Basdanis G (2012) Toll-like receptors in the inflammatory response during open and laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 26:330–336CrossRefPubMed Tsimogiannis KE, Tellis CC, Tselepis AD, Pappas-Gogos GK, Tsimoyiannis EC, Basdanis G (2012) Toll-like receptors in the inflammatory response during open and laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 26:330–336CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Baumgartner JM, Silliman CC, Moore EE, Banerjee A, McCarter MD (2009) Stored red blood cell transfusion induces regulatory T cells. J Am Coll Surg 208:110–119CrossRefPubMed Baumgartner JM, Silliman CC, Moore EE, Banerjee A, McCarter MD (2009) Stored red blood cell transfusion induces regulatory T cells. J Am Coll Surg 208:110–119CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Tyler JA, Fox JP, Desai MM, Perry WB, Glasgow SC (2013) Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Dis Colon Rectum 56:458–466CrossRefPubMed Tyler JA, Fox JP, Desai MM, Perry WB, Glasgow SC (2013) Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Dis Colon Rectum 56:458–466CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Park EJ, Cho MS, Baek SJ et al (2014) Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000000613 Park EJ, Cho MS, Baek SJ et al (2014) Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. doi:10.​1097/​sla.​0000000000000613​
34.
go back to reference Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH (2014) Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 18:816–830CrossRefPubMed Kim CW, Kim CH, Baik SH (2014) Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 18:816–830CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Surgical stress response after colorectal resection: a comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open surgery
Authors
J. Shibata
S. Ishihara
N. Tada
K. Kawai
N. H. Tsuno
H. Yamaguchi
E. Sunami
J. Kitayama
T. Watanabe
Publication date
01-05-2015
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1263-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Techniques in Coloproctology 5/2015 Go to the issue