Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 1/2011

01-10-2011

Surgical management of colorectal injuries: colostomy or primary repair?

Authors: V. N. Papadopoulos, A. Michalopoulos, S. Apostolidis, D. Paramythiotis, A. Ioannidis, A. Mekras, S. Panidis, G. Stavrou, G. Basdanis

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Special Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Several factors have been considered important for the decision between diversion and primary repair in the surgical management of colorectal injuries. The aim of this study is to clarify whether patients with colorectal injuries need diversion or not.

Methods

From 2008 to 2010, ten patients with colorectal injuries were surgically treated by primary repair or by a staged repair.

Results

The patients were five men and five women, with median age 40 years (20–55). Two men and two women had rectal injuries, while 6 patients had colon injuries. The mechanism of trauma in two patients was firearm injuries, in two patients was a stab injury, in four patients was a motor vehicle accident, in one woman was iatrogenic injury during vaginal delivery, and one case was the transanal foreign body insertion. Primary repair was possible in six patients, while diversion was necessary in four patients.

Conclusions

Primary repair should be attempted in the initial surgical management of all penetrating colon and intraperitoneal rectal injuries. Diversion of colonic injuries should only be considered if the colon tissue itself is inappropriate for repair due to severe edema or ischemia. The role of diversion in the management of unrepaired extraperitoneal rectal injuries and in cases with anal sphincter injuries is mandatory.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Papadopoulos VN (2010) Surgical management of colon and rectum injury. Surg Chron 15:92–104 Papadopoulos VN (2010) Surgical management of colon and rectum injury. Surg Chron 15:92–104
2.
go back to reference Brasel KJ, Borgstrom DC, Weiglet JA et al (1999) Management of penetrating colon trauma: a cost utility analysis. Surgery 125:471–479PubMedCrossRef Brasel KJ, Borgstrom DC, Weiglet JA et al (1999) Management of penetrating colon trauma: a cost utility analysis. Surgery 125:471–479PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Conrad JK, Ferry KM, Foreman ML et al (2000) Changing management trends in penetrating colon trauma. Dis Colon Rectum 43:466–471PubMedCrossRef Conrad JK, Ferry KM, Foreman ML et al (2000) Changing management trends in penetrating colon trauma. Dis Colon Rectum 43:466–471PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thomson SR, Baker A, Baker LW et al (1996) Prospective audit of multiple penetrating injuries to the colon further support for primary repair. J R Coll Surg Ed 41:20–24 Thomson SR, Baker A, Baker LW et al (1996) Prospective audit of multiple penetrating injuries to the colon further support for primary repair. J R Coll Surg Ed 41:20–24
5.
go back to reference Nelken N, Lewis F (1989) The influence of injury severity on complication rates after primary closure or colostomy for penetrating colon trauma. Ann Surg 209:439–447PubMedCrossRef Nelken N, Lewis F (1989) The influence of injury severity on complication rates after primary closure or colostomy for penetrating colon trauma. Ann Surg 209:439–447PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sasaki LS, Mittal V, Allaben RD (1994) Primary repair of colon injuries: a retrospective analysis. Am Surg 60:522–527PubMed Sasaki LS, Mittal V, Allaben RD (1994) Primary repair of colon injuries: a retrospective analysis. Am Surg 60:522–527PubMed
7.
go back to reference Ivatury RR, Guadino J, Nallathambi MN et al (1993) Definitive treatment of colon injuries: a prospective study. Am Surg 59:43–49PubMed Ivatury RR, Guadino J, Nallathambi MN et al (1993) Definitive treatment of colon injuries: a prospective study. Am Surg 59:43–49PubMed
8.
go back to reference Sasaki LS, Allaben RD, Golwala R, Mittal V (1995) Primary repair of colon injuries: a prospective randomized study. J Trauma 39:895–901PubMedCrossRef Sasaki LS, Allaben RD, Golwala R, Mittal V (1995) Primary repair of colon injuries: a prospective randomized study. J Trauma 39:895–901PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gonzalez RP, Holevar MR, Falimirski ME, Merlotti GJ (1997) A method for management of extraperitoneal pelvic bleeding secondary to penetrating trauma. J Trauma 43:338–341PubMedCrossRef Gonzalez RP, Holevar MR, Falimirski ME, Merlotti GJ (1997) A method for management of extraperitoneal pelvic bleeding secondary to penetrating trauma. J Trauma 43:338–341PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Joe D (2009) Colonic trauma: indications for diversion vs repair. J Gastrointest Surg 13:403–404CrossRef Joe D (2009) Colonic trauma: indications for diversion vs repair. J Gastrointest Surg 13:403–404CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chappuis CW, Frey DJ, Dietzen CD et al (1991) Management of penetrating colon injuries: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 213:492–498PubMedCrossRef Chappuis CW, Frey DJ, Dietzen CD et al (1991) Management of penetrating colon injuries: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 213:492–498PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gonzalez RP, Turk B (2002) Surgical options in colorectal injuries. Scand J Surg 91:87–91PubMed Gonzalez RP, Turk B (2002) Surgical options in colorectal injuries. Scand J Surg 91:87–91PubMed
Metadata
Title
Surgical management of colorectal injuries: colostomy or primary repair?
Authors
V. N. Papadopoulos
A. Michalopoulos
S. Apostolidis
D. Paramythiotis
A. Ioannidis
A. Mekras
S. Panidis
G. Stavrou
G. Basdanis
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue Special Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0734-0

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2011

Techniques in Coloproctology 1/2011 Go to the issue